CeltsfanSinceBirth wrote:Nets fans - this year's pick could end up being 10th, and next year's pick could end up being 15th.....and if you want to celebrate that as a victory, feel free to do so. It's like entering the 4th quarter down by 35 points, and then making a rally at the end and losing the game by 15 points.
Bottom line: you guys still lost this trade.
I completely disagree. The Nets organization was in dire to make this type of move in order for them to realize that their philosophies in making a successful team is flawed. That's just the reality of human beings. We need to make the mistakes in order for us to stop making lateral moves. I also think you need to tip your hats off towards what the Nets are trying to accomplish to be one of the most dominant team in the league by risking everything. I think it's a much more respectful move than half of the league just trying to be pretenders with their franchise for years. Yet, when they went unsuccessful they completely swallowed their pride and went to a complete 180 in just of a span of a year. So in truth Sean Marks is a franchise changer that the Nets were hoping for and it was a snowball effect of Celtics/Nets trade.
The fact that this team is projected to be horrible for at least a decade and showing life just after one year lost is a complete win for the franchise itself. I mean look at the Sixers and Sac they are both "trusting the process." Yet, their team is just stuck in limbo thinking that they are just a talent away from being great years and no signs of life being successful.
So for me, the trade was actually KG, Pierce, Terry, and
Sean Marks(Franchise changer) for Humphries, Wallace, James Young, Jaylen Brown, 2017 and 2018 first rounders (that looks to be around 6th-15th pick). You guys might've won on paper but you gave us gem with Sean Marks that took a huge dent on those "valued" picks.