Otto Porter Part 2
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
- Dark Faze
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,488
- And1: 2,140
- Joined: Dec 27, 2008
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
I'm more impressed with his defensive improvement--that's what makes those other numbers matter more.
With that said hard to get excited about locking into this core of players.
With that said hard to get excited about locking into this core of players.
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
-
dckingsfan
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,138
- And1: 20,590
- Joined: May 28, 2010
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
Dark Faze wrote:I'm more impressed with his defensive improvement--that's what makes those other numbers matter more.
With that said hard to get excited about locking into this core of players.
It seems like, if we had locked into Wall, Porter, Gortat in the off-season we would have been fine. Built around that and let Beal go.
We would have had to acknowledge that we are in transition (not necessarily rebuild). And we would have used our cap to bring in assets - but that would require patience.
Wall, Satoransky
Satoransky
Porter, Oubre
Morris
Gortat
McClellan was a good pickup. Thorton doesn't belong as at all. RJ Hunter would have been a good gamble. We are trying not to give up assets so Burke would have been a no-go. The problem was there weren't very many solid PG free agents. Hold tight and see who broke through in the D league.
Wall, Satoransky, D League
Satoransky, McClellan, Hunter
Porter, Oubre
Morris, Nene, ??
Gortat, Nene, Ochefu
We are fine at SF so onto the FC. We are in transition, so no big splashes. Ian Mahinmi is out. There were several good options at backup C including Nene Hilario @ $2.9M. Smith - really? Daniel Ochefu fits this mold @ $.5M.
We probably could have taken on players and picked up draft picks like the Sixers have done.
But alas, this board had so many better ideas that EG - guess this beating a dead horse.
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
- Dark Faze
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,488
- And1: 2,140
- Joined: Dec 27, 2008
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
The FO is completely incompetent--that's obvious. Strong execs don't leave stuff like the KD situation to chance--you're never going to know if a player will choose your team, but to have no idea that you're not getting an effing meeting after being a GM in this league and fostering relationships across dozens of agents for nearly 20 years between his time in NY and Milwaukee...he should have been fired on the bat for not seeing that coming.
If he had managed to be competent and get that intel, then he could have had a leg up on the entire league by working to get low budget high value contracts.
Porter is a nice player but he's the worst kind of player to pay before you've gotten a second star. You want to pay your elite roleplayers after the cap is reached after having already gotten your studs. When you each the cap by paying elite roleplayers and busts (Brad is a bust at this point), then you can only get another core piece through scouting and development of draft picks or trades.
If he had managed to be competent and get that intel, then he could have had a leg up on the entire league by working to get low budget high value contracts.
Porter is a nice player but he's the worst kind of player to pay before you've gotten a second star. You want to pay your elite roleplayers after the cap is reached after having already gotten your studs. When you each the cap by paying elite roleplayers and busts (Brad is a bust at this point), then you can only get another core piece through scouting and development of draft picks or trades.
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
- tontoz
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,674
- And1: 5,263
- Joined: Apr 11, 2005
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
Dark Faze wrote:The FO is completely incompetent--that's obvious. Strong execs don't leave stuff like the KD situation to chance--you're never going to know if a player will choose your team, but to have no idea that you're not getting an effing meeting after being a GM in this league and fostering relationships across dozens of agents for nearly 20 years between his time in NY and Milwaukee...he should have been fired on the bat for not seeing that coming.
If he had managed to be competent and get that intel, then he could have had a leg up on the entire league by working to get low budget high value contracts.
Porter is a nice player but he's the worst kind of player to pay before you've gotten a second star. You want to pay your elite roleplayers after the cap is reached after having already gotten your studs. When you each the cap by paying elite roleplayers and busts (Brad is a bust at this point), then you can only get another core piece through scouting and development of draft picks or trades.
Actually the worst players to pay are mediocre, injury prone players who have shown little improvement over 4 seasons. Paying Porter wouldn't be a mistake. Paying Beal was the mistake that killed this teams chances of being good any time in the near future.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
-
AFM
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,611
- And1: 8,843
- Joined: May 25, 2012
-
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
I wish we could trade Beal for W. Barton and change. I wouldn't mind a slight decrease in talent, if it meant shedding his contract. I'd take an expiring back.
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
-
payitforward
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,824
- And1: 9,212
- Joined: May 02, 2012
- Location: On the Atlantic
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
I'd trade Smith, Nicholson, Burke & House for Otto Porter.
I know this is impractical inasmuch as we already have Otto Porter. But, we need at least two of him, and I don't know how else to get the other one!
I know... we could trade for Rudy Gay, insisting on a name change for him.
I know this is impractical inasmuch as we already have Otto Porter. But, we need at least two of him, and I don't know how else to get the other one!
I know... we could trade for Rudy Gay, insisting on a name change for him.
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
- tontoz
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,674
- And1: 5,263
- Joined: Apr 11, 2005
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
Nerlens Noel....... just thought i would mention his name for old times sake.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
-
Dat2U
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,184
- And1: 7,977
- Joined: Jun 23, 2001
- Location: Columbus, OH
-
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
tontoz wrote:Nerlens Noel....... just thought i would mention his name for old times sake.
Yeah I would have picked Noel but to be honest, I suspect Noel would have been better off playing C for a team that needed one. Playing Noel at PF was a completely disservice to him. Especially with a guy like Okafor. Noel still has elite defensive tools and his value has cratered a bit. Apparently he's close to playing too. If we move Gortat, I would be interested in acquiring him on the cheap.
Re: RE: Re: Otto Porter Part 2
- Chocolate City Jordanaire
- RealGM
- Posts: 54,873
- And1: 10,475
- Joined: Aug 05, 2001
-
Re: RE: Re: Otto Porter Part 2
AFM wrote:Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:queridiculo wrote:
I'd throw in a second rounder to make this happen, unprotected.
Also, I'd throw in Jason Smith.
Sent from my LG-H345 using RealGM mobile app
Way to sweeten the pot for them.
It's the least I can do. Throw some lighter fluid and a match in with the lumps of coal.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
- tontoz
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,674
- And1: 5,263
- Joined: Apr 11, 2005
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
Porter's 3 pt percentage is up to 39.5% after missing his first 10 of the season.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
-
queridiculo
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,937
- And1: 9,319
- Joined: Mar 29, 2005
- Location: So long Wizturdz.
-
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
payitforward wrote:I know... we could trade for Rudy Gay, insisting on a name change for him.
I know just the guy to make this happen.

Re: Otto Porter Part 2
-
WizarDynasty
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,602
- And1: 275
- Joined: Oct 23, 2003
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
Dark Faze wrote:The FO is completely incompetent--that's obvious. Strong execs don't leave stuff like the KD situation to chance--you're never going to know if a player will choose your team, but to have no idea that you're not getting an effing meeting after being a GM in this league and fostering relationships across dozens of agents for nearly 20 years between his time in NY and Milwaukee...he should have been fired on the bat for not seeing that coming.
If he had managed to be competent and get that intel, then he could have had a leg up on the entire league by working to get low budget high value contracts.
Porter is a nice player but he's the worst kind of player to pay before you've gotten a second star. You want to pay your elite roleplayers after the cap is reached after having already gotten your studs. When you each the cap by paying elite roleplayers and busts (Brad is a bust at this point), then you can only get another core piece through scouting and development of draft picks or trades.
And 1!!!!!!!
Build your team w/5 shooters using P. Pierce Form deeply bent hips and lower back arch at same time b4 rising into shot. Elbow never pointing to the ground! Good teams have an engine player that shoot volume (2000 full season) at 50 percent.Large Hands
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
-
WizarDynasty
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,602
- And1: 275
- Joined: Oct 23, 2003
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
tontoz wrote:Nerlens Noel....... just thought i would mention his name for old times sake.
you do realize he is injury prone and can't take contact to his knee yet he has the skill sets of a center?
He will get injured playing 280 plus pound centers, and he has way below average skills of a powerforward offensively. He is a energy big off the bench at best.
Build your team w/5 shooters using P. Pierce Form deeply bent hips and lower back arch at same time b4 rising into shot. Elbow never pointing to the ground! Good teams have an engine player that shoot volume (2000 full season) at 50 percent.Large Hands
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
- tontoz
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,674
- And1: 5,263
- Joined: Apr 11, 2005
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
WizarDynasty wrote:tontoz wrote:Nerlens Noel....... just thought i would mention his name for old times sake.
you do realize he is injury prone and can't take contact to his knee yet he has the skill sets of a center?
He will get injured playing 280 plus pound centers, and he has way below average skills of a powerforward offensively. He is a energy big off the bench at best.
I was being sarcastic about the way some people were pining for Noel during Porter's first two seasons.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
-
WizarDynasty
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,602
- And1: 275
- Joined: Oct 23, 2003
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
if i were washington, I would not let otto pile up garbage stats at the expense of the team. I would instruct wall not to give any easy assist to inflate otto porters value. I would give the ball to otto in iso situations and make him earn. His true value will show when he shows that he can't shoot a high percentage relying on his own athleticism. I hated the fact that he was always injured in his early years and now in contract year he isn't missing any games due to injury.
Beal is the same way, his body breaks down when he is required to actually earn his points -- rather than relying on wall to force his him man to leave him wide open for an easy clean jumpshot. I would offer otto a modest contract now and if he doesn't accept, trade him by the end of the season. He is a 3 and d player but worthless to a team that doesn't have at 1 superstar and one allstar . We have a broken superstar in wall because he can't shoot three pointers in volume at a high efficiency. Beal will never be an allstar because his injury is based on volume of basketball played. His body can't take pounding of 82 games and he stress related injuries. that is not an allstar i want to rely on as a foundation piece. Otto will never be an allstar, doesn't have athelicism, and his game is based on getting wide open looks after he is left wide open. He has no post game, he has no kyrie irving handles to get off clean shots, he doesn't quickness to blow by his man. He can play defense but he is not a lockdown defender or possess great lateral quickness. He is actually pretty horrible at lateral movement. He has decent length to contest shots but he is no max player and he isn't even close to harrison barnes, the guy we should have drafted with the beal pick. If we had competent gm and front office, we would be talking about the greek freak right now and how great our future is instead of what we are discussing now. Blame the bleak future outlook on the front office. Trade otto for klay and 2 unprotected 1st rounders and now we are getting somewhere.
Look what utah did, they draft burke 9th overall. Had utah management been EG, they would have played Burke tons of minutes and let him artificially inflate his value. Utah quickly figured out Burke was not starter material and was not a difference maker. They kept on the second unit and traded him for a second round pick instead of paying over inflated value. Otto has done nothing to help this team make the playoffs or even win a series. He can't take over games through his own play but relies on others to get his shots. If you can't get him to sign a bargain contract like charlotte did with MKG, then trade as quickly as possible because isn't a superstar or even an allstar and he can't take over a game in crunch time and get you a high percentage shot.
Beal is the same way, his body breaks down when he is required to actually earn his points -- rather than relying on wall to force his him man to leave him wide open for an easy clean jumpshot. I would offer otto a modest contract now and if he doesn't accept, trade him by the end of the season. He is a 3 and d player but worthless to a team that doesn't have at 1 superstar and one allstar . We have a broken superstar in wall because he can't shoot three pointers in volume at a high efficiency. Beal will never be an allstar because his injury is based on volume of basketball played. His body can't take pounding of 82 games and he stress related injuries. that is not an allstar i want to rely on as a foundation piece. Otto will never be an allstar, doesn't have athelicism, and his game is based on getting wide open looks after he is left wide open. He has no post game, he has no kyrie irving handles to get off clean shots, he doesn't quickness to blow by his man. He can play defense but he is not a lockdown defender or possess great lateral quickness. He is actually pretty horrible at lateral movement. He has decent length to contest shots but he is no max player and he isn't even close to harrison barnes, the guy we should have drafted with the beal pick. If we had competent gm and front office, we would be talking about the greek freak right now and how great our future is instead of what we are discussing now. Blame the bleak future outlook on the front office. Trade otto for klay and 2 unprotected 1st rounders and now we are getting somewhere.
Look what utah did, they draft burke 9th overall. Had utah management been EG, they would have played Burke tons of minutes and let him artificially inflate his value. Utah quickly figured out Burke was not starter material and was not a difference maker. They kept on the second unit and traded him for a second round pick instead of paying over inflated value. Otto has done nothing to help this team make the playoffs or even win a series. He can't take over games through his own play but relies on others to get his shots. If you can't get him to sign a bargain contract like charlotte did with MKG, then trade as quickly as possible because isn't a superstar or even an allstar and he can't take over a game in crunch time and get you a high percentage shot.
Build your team w/5 shooters using P. Pierce Form deeply bent hips and lower back arch at same time b4 rising into shot. Elbow never pointing to the ground! Good teams have an engine player that shoot volume (2000 full season) at 50 percent.Large Hands
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
-
payitforward
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,824
- And1: 9,212
- Joined: May 02, 2012
- Location: On the Atlantic
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
tontoz wrote:WizarDynasty wrote:tontoz wrote:Nerlens Noel....... just thought i would mention his name for old times sake.
you do realize he is injury prone and can't take contact to his knee yet he has the skill sets of a center?
He will get injured playing 280 plus pound centers, and he has way below average skills of a powerforward offensively. He is a energy big off the bench at best.
I was being sarcastic about the way some people were pining for Noel during Porter's first two seasons.
Good for you bringing this up!
I'd say a solid majority, maybe 2/3 of posters here, were bitching and moaning about us having picked Porter over Noel. I reckon most of you have forgotten that, right?
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
-
payitforward
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,824
- And1: 9,212
- Joined: May 02, 2012
- Location: On the Atlantic
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
WizarDynasty wrote:if i were washington, I would not let otto pile up garbage stats at the expense of the team....
Whoah.... I'd say this post is wrong point by point on every point. Without Otto Porter we lose last night. Likely we lose against Atlanta, and we might even lose vs. the Celtics! Those are our 3 wins so far.
WizarDynasty wrote:I would offer otto a modest contract now and if he doesn't accept, trade him by the end of the season. He is a 3 and d player ... ...he isn't even close to harrison barnes, the guy we should have drafted with the beal pick.
Wow.... Where to start? Otto is a zillion times better player than Harrison Barnes. And Barnes is not the guy we should have taken with the Beal pick, and that's kind of obvious: by far the best players in that draft from 3 down were Damion Lillard, Andre Drummond, Jae Crowder and Draymond Green.
WizarDynasty wrote: .. Trade otto for klay and 2 unprotected 1st rounders and now we are getting somewhere.
I'll say!! But I doubt they'd give us Klay and those 2 picks for Otto. And the way you really mean it (Otto and 2 picks for Klay) would be an awful trade.
WizarDynasty wrote:Look what utah did, they draft burke 9th overall. Had utah management been EG, they would have played Burke tons of minutes and let him artificially inflate his value.
But... but... they did play him tons of minutes. @2000 minutes a year.
WizarDynasty wrote:Utah quickly figured out Burke was not starter material and was not a difference maker... and traded him for a second round pick.
?? They picked a guy #9 in the draft, then 3 years later they traded him for a R2 pick another 3 years out. This is what you call good management?
WizarDynasty wrote:Otto has done nothing to help this team make the playoffs or even win a series. He can't take over games through his own play but relies on others to get his shots. If you can't get him to sign a bargain contract like charlotte did with MKG, then trade as quickly as possible because isn't a superstar or even an allstar and he can't take over a game in crunch time and get you a high percentage shot.
This is so off it's hard to know what to say. True, though, that Charlotte got MK-G long term for way under what he's worth in wins. It would have made great sense to extend Otto in that way when it was possible a couple of months ago. Ted/Ernie too dumb for that, however.
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
-
WizarDynasty
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,602
- And1: 275
- Joined: Oct 23, 2003
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
This is so off it's hard to know what to say. True, though, that Charlotte got MK-G long term for way under what he's worth in wins. It would have made great sense to extend Otto in that way when it was possible a couple of months ago. Ted/Ernie too dumb for that, however.
MKGo who was drafted one pick before beal was!!--was a severely limited player but he stayed committed the team that drafted him and invested in him. MKG could have gone out in the market and gambled but Charlotte was way to smart to let him inflate his stats on their dime when his stats weren't leading a his play wasn't directly or indirectly related to them getting a high playoff seed.
If washington was smart, they would know that we invested a number three overall pick in Otto and he absolutely has not provided us a return for that value since he has been here. He may have excuses for why it has happened but he has not lived up to an overall 3 pick which should be at least above average starter to all star.
So Otto tells management, guys haven't lived up to what you see in me but give me security and and time and I will live up to. So otto and washington sign a 4 year deal at average salary for a starting small forward in the league since Otto has provided negative value.
Instead, Washington allows their longtime rivals to sabotage the team boosting his stats artificially in contract year using the kobe bryant strategy.
http://www.opencourt-basketball.com/kobe-bryant-reveals-evil-strategy-he-used-to-destroy-opponents/
We see Otto getting garbage stats when the outcome of the game is meaningless. Then Otto takes these stats as his leverage to say, hey I did earn my draft status and I do deserve a max contract based on these garbage stats. He pulls the same Beal methodology BS of saying he believes he is a max contract player, yet he has never completed a full healthy season.
Beal has never has a 100 plus steals season, his assist to turnover ratio is horrible and not even close to 2:1 ratio, and in each of last 2 seasons, he hasn't scored more than 1000 points. In his contract year, it was only time he even came close to shooting .45Percent. all other years he shot below .43%. You aren't helping your team win if you don't shoot above .46 percent unless you are getting to line 10 times a game which beal was not. ON top of all of this, he has never shot more than 200 free throws in a season and HE HAD the never to make a public statement that he felt he was a max contract player.
I would have traded him in a heartbeat for pennies on the dollar once I heard him make this declaration.
The moment he approaches a full season of 1200 or more points, his body breaks down, yet front office strategy saw him as an allstar.
LMAO. tell me one consistent allstar shooting guard who doesn't average more than 100 steals a season? the keyword here is a consistent all star shooting guard. Getting steals is directly related to your athleticism and beal's steals totals are horrendous.
On top of that look at his total number of free throw attempt totals for each season. James Harden got to the line 837 times last season. Beal has never over 200 free throw attempts EVER. The organization using the same faulty logic with Otto. You let him inflate superficial stats and then allow him to demand a max contract based on superficial stats. The most important stat for determining max contract status is number of times you get to the line. Drawing a foul is almost always directly tied to elite ability. If Otto can't get to the line at an elite level, don't allow him boost his stats up as if he is an elite level player. Don't give a player superficial stats if he has not signed a longterm contract with your team. If he earns his stats by drawing fouls, then he deserves his money. If he is boosting his status off of another players hard work like Beal did, then management should have been fired. We can see from season two that Beal ability to get to line showed he would never be an allstar player.
Code: Select all
SEASON FGM-A FG% 3PM-A 3P% FTM-A FT% OR DR REB AST BLK STL PF TO PTS
'12-'13 282-0687 0.410 091-236 0.386 125-159 0.786 43 168 211 137 29 50 113 90 0780
'13-'14 481-1149 0.419 138-343 0.402 149-189 0.788 54 219 273 243 18 71 153 128 1249
'14-'15 363-0851 0.427 106-259 0.409 130-166 0.783 57 184 241 194 18 76 136 123 0962
'15-'16 359-0799 0.449 105-271 0.387 135-176 0.767 41 147 188 162 11 54 117 112 0958
'16-'17 042-0112 0.375 013-040 0.325 029-034 0.853 05 012 017 022 06 08 018 012 0126
now you compare a beal production to a top of line allstar shooting guard. Harden shot more free throws in his rookie year than beal has in his entire career and yet beal still demanded a max contract for his production publicly. This was the ultimate form of disrespect to organization.
Code: Select all
SEASON FGM-A FG% 3PM-A 3P% FTM-A FT% OR DR REB AST BLK STL PF TO PTS
'12-'13 585-1337 0.438 179-486 0.368 674-792 0.851 62 317 379 455 38 142 178 295 2023
'13-'14 549-1205 0.456 177-483 0.366 576-665 0.866 61 283 344 446 29 115 177 265 1851
'14-'15 647-1470 0.440 208-555 0.375 715-824 0.868 75 384 459 565 60 154 208 321 2217
'15-'16 710-1617 0.439 236-657 0.359 720-837 0.860 63 438 501 612 51 139 229 374 2376
'16-'17 106-0224 0.473 036-096 0.375 094-114 0.825 20 078 098 153 01 017 031 067 0342
Build your team w/5 shooters using P. Pierce Form deeply bent hips and lower back arch at same time b4 rising into shot. Elbow never pointing to the ground! Good teams have an engine player that shoot volume (2000 full season) at 50 percent.Large Hands
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
-
AFM
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,611
- And1: 8,843
- Joined: May 25, 2012
-
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
Agreed, WizD
Keep up the solid analysis.
Keep up the solid analysis.
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
- tontoz
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,674
- And1: 5,263
- Joined: Apr 11, 2005
Re: Otto Porter Part 2
This is where an unstoppable force meets an immovable object.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD







