So how about Joel Embiid

Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Dirk, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27

phifans
Veteran
Posts: 2,903
And1: 661
Joined: Feb 10, 2009
         

Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1061 » by phifans » Tue Nov 22, 2016 4:18 am

I can get some of you dont like OK4 and bash him everyday in our own board but pls dont do this in GB. Its just a shame how some of you treated to your own players.
the7boss
Pro Prospect
Posts: 836
And1: 553
Joined: Apr 02, 2007
Location: Spain
   

Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1062 » by the7boss » Tue Nov 22, 2016 4:34 am

My favourite player already outside the Lakers, generational talent and seems to be a funny good dude. And he is a Real Madrid fan, greatness recognizes greatness.
spursscott
Freshman
Posts: 63
And1: 46
Joined: Dec 31, 2015

Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1063 » by spursscott » Tue Nov 22, 2016 6:44 am

phifans wrote:I can get some of you dont like OK4 and bash him everyday in our own board but pls dont do this in GB. Its just a shame how some of you treated to your own players.

For real guys its sad that you go that far to hold on to your crazy opinions. Listen to the sane member of your fanbase.

edit- the hilarity of "im a sixers fan" giving your opinion any more weight in the conversation is hilarious. Not directed at your @phifans but at the others in this thread.
nikster
RealGM
Posts: 14,654
And1: 13,140
Joined: Sep 08, 2013

Re: RE: Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1064 » by nikster » Tue Nov 22, 2016 7:25 am

spursscott wrote:
The_Hater wrote:
spursscott wrote:I dont have to tell you, you just told me. Im pointing out the hilarity of you saying "basically just Jrue Holiday and no assets" when that clearly wasnt the case especially when you reach so hard to throw Noel and Saric in to the same group as the other actually talented guys on your roster.


It's more hilarious to claim that Noel and Saric aren't talented young NBA players.

You keep fighting for your initial one-sided argument about Hinkie and the Sixers and have still failed to present a single good counter argument. You just toss out these throwaway statements and try to pass them off as facts.

In the context of putting them in the same group as Embiid, Simmons, and Okafor ,which you obviously would know is the context I am referring to if you would ever read, they are clearly not at the same level. They are a lot closer to the type of talent the sixers had when Hinkie took over.

Please try reading before you respond to another one of my posts. Explaining very simple things to you is tiresome.

so the same guy who insists I mention Evan Turner and Spencer Hawes as assets for Hinkie is offended that Saric and Noel were labeled as young talent.
User avatar
Dynamix
Starter
Posts: 2,076
And1: 2,343
Joined: Dec 26, 2011
Location: Romania
 

Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1065 » by Dynamix » Tue Nov 22, 2016 7:36 am

the7boss wrote:My favourite player already outside the Lakers, generational talent and seems to be a funny good dude. And he is a Real Madrid fan, greatness recognizes greatness.


I knew there had to be a Lakers/Real fan somewhere around here. Greetings! :)

Injuries have been an issue for the Clippers in recent years, so I've gotten used to wishing for players being healthy above all else. Now I am extending these positive thoughts to Embiid, who I've been checking out more and more lately.
It really blew me away that he could be so consistent so soon after missing so much time. It can't be easy to be out there as a rookie and top player on your team, having to produce the numbers that many were expecting from a top pick, while also trying to block out any worries of getting hurt again. His mental toughness, above all else, is to be commended.
spursscott
Freshman
Posts: 63
And1: 46
Joined: Dec 31, 2015

Re: RE: Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1066 » by spursscott » Tue Nov 22, 2016 8:03 am

nikster wrote:
spursscott wrote:
The_Hater wrote:
It's more hilarious to claim that Noel and Saric aren't talented young NBA players.

You keep fighting for your initial one-sided argument about Hinkie and the Sixers and have still failed to present a single good counter argument. You just toss out these throwaway statements and try to pass them off as facts.

In the context of putting them in the same group as Embiid, Simmons, and Okafor ,which you obviously would know is the context I am referring to if you would ever read, they are clearly not at the same level. They are a lot closer to the type of talent the sixers had when Hinkie took over.

Please try reading before you respond to another one of my posts. Explaining very simple things to you is tiresome.

so the same guy who insists I mention Evan Turner and Spencer Hawes as assets for Hinkie is offended that Saric and Noel were labeled as young talent.

You know very well you are mentioning Saric and Noel as assets while saying that when Hinkie got the sixers they had no assets other than Jrue Holiday. This very obviously isnt true if you are willing to think so highly of players the level of Saric and Noel.
Snotbubbles
Starter
Posts: 2,189
And1: 1,773
Joined: Feb 26, 2014
       

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1067 » by Snotbubbles » Tue Nov 22, 2016 12:27 pm

Misteclipse wrote:
sixerhp3 wrote:
Misteclipse wrote:Just stop. You're a non-sixers fan trying to tell 76ers fans that watch games, that Okafor was better. He wasn't. The eyes prove that. The stats prove that.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk


You also can't speak for all the sixer fans. I actually thought Jahlil overall had a better season. Noel was disappointing IMO because he didn't improve. Okafor was a rookie and I was expecting some struggles.

It's pretty much unanimous on our board. Noel hasn't improved. I agree. But he was still a more productive player on the court than Okafor. Just because Okafor was a rookie, and struggles were expected, doesn't change what was happening on the court. We're not debating potential, we're debating what actually happened.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk


Not a unanimous opinion on the Sixers board.
Madhouse
RealGM
Posts: 12,326
And1: 9,902
Joined: Dec 23, 2014
 

Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1068 » by Madhouse » Tue Nov 22, 2016 1:26 pm

PER of 25 and averaging 30/12 per 36 after not playing basketball for 2 years and never playing an NBA game before?

Sixers will be a damn force in 2 or 3 years.
lorak
Head Coach
Posts: 6,317
And1: 2,237
Joined: Nov 23, 2009

Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1069 » by lorak » Tue Nov 22, 2016 2:38 pm

LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,840
And1: 11,659
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1070 » by LloydFree » Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:06 pm

sixerhp3 wrote:
Misteclipse wrote:
spursscott wrote:
This would be like explaining why Lebron James is better than Tobias Harris. It really isnt necessary and only a very obvious troll would try to argue against it.

Just stop. You're a non-sixers fan trying to tell 76ers fans that watch games, that Okafor was better. He wasn't. The eyes prove that. The stats prove that.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk


You also can't speak for all the sixer fans. I actually thought Jahlil overall had a better season. Noel was disappointing IMO because he didn't improve. Okafor was a rookie and I was expecting some struggles.

Which proves that some 76ers' fans have no idea what they're watching either.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
trickshot
Head Coach
Posts: 6,840
And1: 7,542
Joined: Feb 27, 2012

Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1071 » by trickshot » Tue Nov 22, 2016 4:06 pm

lorak wrote:

His game is incredibly physical. Guys like KAT are great with incredible finesse type scoring. Embiid is looking the whole package. It's reassuring to know your big can brute bully his way to the rim when no one is biting on those pumpfakes and spins. And his rim protection looks legit for a rookie
Unbreakable99
General Manager
Posts: 8,752
And1: 3,993
Joined: Jul 04, 2014

Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1072 » by Unbreakable99 » Tue Nov 22, 2016 8:30 pm

I expected Embiid to be dominant. This is how I envisioned he would play.
User avatar
Zombiesonics
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,518
And1: 4,220
Joined: Mar 27, 2011

Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1073 » by Zombiesonics » Tue Nov 22, 2016 9:49 pm

i'm utterly shocked how strong embiid is, he tossed whiteside around like a rag doll a few times in that video. I also like his body language, exudes leadership and high basketball iq, always yelling at his dumb teammates to cut. I wonder if he can get fully athletic again, like he sometimes crumbles and falls still. but imagine him with simmons son :o :o :o
User avatar
Hipster Doofus
Head Coach
Posts: 6,451
And1: 6,958
Joined: Jun 24, 2008
         

Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1074 » by Hipster Doofus » Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:42 pm

He's just a force of nature. I've had the pleasure, as many others across RealGM, to be a Philadelphia 76ers fan for a long, loooong time, and I personally haven't been this excited since the A.I. days. Embiid is truly incredible, what a specimen.

Stay healthy big man, and you'll be a special one in the history of the NBA.
Truth is on the side of the oppressed.
User avatar
wadekim7
Sophomore
Posts: 136
And1: 81
Joined: Apr 28, 2015
 

Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1075 » by wadekim7 » Tue Nov 22, 2016 11:50 pm

This guy is just amazing. He's pretty much the whole package you'd want in your Center. Strength, agility, high IQ, etc. Most important feature that I see from him is his leadership skills. He just eludes it on and off the court. Very likeable guy to top it off. Hoping for a long, healthy career.
nikster
RealGM
Posts: 14,654
And1: 13,140
Joined: Sep 08, 2013

Re: RE: Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1076 » by nikster » Wed Nov 23, 2016 12:04 am

spursscott wrote:
nikster wrote:
spursscott wrote:In the context of putting them in the same group as Embiid, Simmons, and Okafor ,which you obviously would know is the context I am referring to if you would ever read, they are clearly not at the same level. They are a lot closer to the type of talent the sixers had when Hinkie took over.

Please try reading before you respond to another one of my posts. Explaining very simple things to you is tiresome.

so the same guy who insists I mention Evan Turner and Spencer Hawes as assets for Hinkie is offended that Saric and Noel were labeled as young talent.

You know very well you are mentioning Saric and Noel as assets while saying that when Hinkie got the sixers they had no assets other than Jrue Holiday. This very obviously isnt true if you are willing to think so highly of players the level of Saric and Noel.

Noel is far more valuable than any of those other holdovers from the pre-Hinkie era. You can get something of value for him. All those other assests werent worth much more than a couple 2nd round picks.
sixerhp3
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,283
And1: 570
Joined: Dec 17, 2011

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1077 » by sixerhp3 » Wed Nov 23, 2016 12:44 am

LloydFree wrote:
sixerhp3 wrote:
Misteclipse wrote:Just stop. You're a non-sixers fan trying to tell 76ers fans that watch games, that Okafor was better. He wasn't. The eyes prove that. The stats prove that.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk


You also can't speak for all the sixer fans. I actually thought Jahlil overall had a better season. Noel was disappointing IMO because he didn't improve. Okafor was a rookie and I was expecting some struggles.

Which proves that some 76ers' fans have no idea what they're watching either.


You acting like it is sooooo obvious that Noel had a better season is more of a joke than me stating my own opinion. I absolutely do know what I am watching. You have to expect Okafor to struggle as a rookie on such a terrible team. Noel didn't show any progress. Simply stating that.
User avatar
Misteclipse
Junior
Posts: 478
And1: 375
Joined: Oct 07, 2009

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1078 » by Misteclipse » Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:48 am

sixerhp3 wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
sixerhp3 wrote:
You also can't speak for all the sixer fans. I actually thought Jahlil overall had a better season. Noel was disappointing IMO because he didn't improve. Okafor was a rookie and I was expecting some struggles.

Which proves that some 76ers' fans have no idea what they're watching either.


You acting like it is sooooo obvious that Noel had a better season is more of a joke than me stating my own opinion. I absolutely do know what I am watching. You have to expect Okafor to struggle as a rookie on such a terrible team. Noel didn't show any progress. Simply stating that.

Which once again has nothing to do with the point being made that Noel was better than Okafor last year. Every advanced stat and eye test proves that. Hell you just said it yourself, Okafor struggled, because he was a rookie. So what point are you trying to make again?

I would keep Okafor over Noel for several reasons, but that's not the point of the original statement. And certainly not relevant to a thread discussing Joel Embiid. So back on topic I go.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
mg
General Manager
Posts: 8,888
And1: 4,705
Joined: Jun 12, 2003

Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1079 » by mg » Wed Nov 23, 2016 4:15 am

Sixers have a stud in Embiid.
Knicks have a stud in Porzingis.
It should get very interesting for the Atlantic Division in coming years.
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,950
And1: 9,540
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: RE: Re: So how about Joel Embiid 

Post#1080 » by Braggins » Wed Nov 23, 2016 4:23 am

spursscott wrote:
nikster wrote:
spursscott wrote:In the context of putting them in the same group as Embiid, Simmons, and Okafor ,which you obviously would know is the context I am referring to if you would ever read, they are clearly not at the same level. They are a lot closer to the type of talent the sixers had when Hinkie took over.

Please try reading before you respond to another one of my posts. Explaining very simple things to you is tiresome.

so the same guy who insists I mention Evan Turner and Spencer Hawes as assets for Hinkie is offended that Saric and Noel were labeled as young talent.

You know very well you are mentioning Saric and Noel as assets while saying that when Hinkie got the sixers they had no assets other than Jrue Holiday. This very obviously isnt true if you are willing to think so highly of players the level of Saric and Noel.

Um, I hate to butt in here, but you can't seriously be suggesting that Spencer Hawes is anywhere near as valuable an asset as Saric or Noel...

Return to The General Board