ImageImageImage

Boogie time...

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

DBC10
General Manager
Posts: 9,963
And1: 2,829
Joined: Jun 01, 2013
 

Re: Boogie time... 

Post#41 » by DBC10 » Tue Nov 22, 2016 12:57 am

In SVG We Trust wrote:
Cowology wrote:
DBC10 wrote:Honestly, looking around the league, as a center, you better know how to stretch the floor or play elite level defense for a team to go anywhere.

When's the last time a team won it all with an center as their number 1 option? Shaq? Does KG (a PF/C) count as a number 1 option that wont it all? IMO the center position is one of the least important position in this day and age. These new era PFs that can do the rebounding and bang down low or those that stretch the floor have largely cannibalized the center position.
I don't think that proves you can't win with a C as your number one option so much as it illustrates how weak the position has become over all. There is a serious lack of talent at that positron. You put a player the caliber of Ewing in today's league and he'd be dominant.

It's not about talent, it's about to be effective in today's game, and if you're not an elite C on offense, you better let your offensive development and focus your training to be a defensive anchor, because it's what a C needs in these days.

Look a player like Brook Lopez. The guy is pure talent and he isn't in the elites C conversations because his game is not efficient for these days style of game.

I bet you the Warriors would choose DeAndre instead of Cousins for their team. Why? Because they have more efficient ways to score than what Cousins could offer, but rim protection is always required. Damn, have you notice how important a hustle guy like Andersen was to the LeBron's Heat?

It's absolutely false the C position is the less important nowadays. And you only have to look at the medium salary of the position to figure how false is that sentence (I know it was DBC10 who said this).


I think we largely agree, but I only meant that the C position is less important largely due to there being no true dominant centers anymore and has been that way for years now. I made that comment in concurrency of the recent trends. It's always been in recent memory, those defensive and hustle Cs that have largely won it all for other teams since the rise of the elite PGs and SFs of this new era along with a much more perimeter-oriented game.

Which is why I believe centers really aren't that important, UNLESS you're an absolute elite dominant big man which there is none of in today's game. There may be some in the next couple years like KAT, Davis, and Embiid, but its not now.
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: Boogie time... 

Post#42 » by Pharaoh » Tue Nov 22, 2016 1:36 am

Analytics has shown post ups are less effective which is another reason why teams have moved away from the traditional big man...

But analytics also shows that shots at the rim are what you wanna get...

So, how does a team get shots at the rim without using traditional post ups?

That's the question and I'd have to suffer through Pelicans & Wolves games to really break that down (no thank you!)

You see KAT & Davis (& BroLo) moving towards the perimeter more and more though so even guys that are quality in the post are stretching the floor.

IMO it comes back to more sophisticated team defenses, the elimination of illegal D, analytics showing the benefits of the 3 ball AND bigs being more multi-skilled due to Kevin Garnett (among others)

All these factors have changed the way teams look at and develop big men

Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

Re: Boogie time... 

Post#43 » by The Penguin » Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:57 pm

I was on board the Drummond train in regards to this argument for long time but I'm switching sides. Boogie (even with his warts) would be a massive upgrade over Drummond. Drummond is already unplayable late in close games, but if he's going to start putting postage stamps on regular season games I don't see Boogie's warts as being all that different. Andre isn't as effective a rim protector as many believe and Boogie has range out to 3 (shooting 33% on almost 4 attempts per game this year, 40% on 6 attempts per game over his last 5 games), something Andre will never possess. If we can trade Drummond for Boogie, we should take it and run.
DBC10
General Manager
Posts: 9,963
And1: 2,829
Joined: Jun 01, 2013
 

Re: Boogie time... 

Post#44 » by DBC10 » Tue Nov 22, 2016 4:04 pm

Pharaoh wrote:Analytics has shown post ups are less effective which is another reason why teams have moved away from the traditional big man...

But analytics also shows that shots at the rim are what you wanna get...

So, how does a team get shots at the rim without using traditional post ups?

That's the question and I'd have to suffer through Pelicans & Wolves games to really break that down (no thank you!)

You see KAT & Davis (& BroLo) moving towards the perimeter more and more though so even guys that are quality in the post are stretching the floor.

IMO it comes back to more sophisticated team defenses, the elimination of illegal D, analytics showing the benefits of the 3 ball AND bigs being more multi-skilled due to Kevin Garnett (among others)

All these factors have changed the way teams look at and develop big men

Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app


That's why a big that can stretch the floor also has a great dribble drive/face up game too nowadays. KAT, Boogie, Davis, and Embiid can all already do this at very respectable numbers.

Post play is simply too taxing on a player's bodies, especially you have physically push and shove your way to the rim and even then it results in a half assed look unless you're absolutely bigger than the opposition. Which is why the art is dying and why the percentages for post up ISOs (in overall frequency and conversions) are going down each season.

It's why Boogie would be really good for this team. He draws fouls at an absolute elite level and stretches the floor for our guards and forwards to have the driving lanes. RJ would be 20+ easily due to the floor being spaced thanks to Boogie, and I remember RJ playing better with someone like Serge Ibaka since he could run Pick and Pops with RJ all night long. Imagine that being Boogie with RJ.
Spider156
Head Coach
Posts: 6,613
And1: 1,421
Joined: Jul 25, 2010
       

Re: Boogie time... 

Post#45 » by Spider156 » Tue Nov 29, 2016 6:07 am

If I was SVG by the trade deadline if Jackson and Drummond don't start taking over, I would trade for Cousins and Wall and it will completely change our team
Defense wins championships
Spider156
Head Coach
Posts: 6,613
And1: 1,421
Joined: Jul 25, 2010
       

Re: Boogie time... 

Post#46 » by Spider156 » Tue Nov 29, 2016 6:08 am

I'm very sure John Wall would want to come here if we traded for Cousins
Defense wins championships
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: Boogie time... 

Post#47 » by Pharaoh » Tue Nov 29, 2016 7:07 am

Dre & SJ + our first for Cousins I could see happening.

Kings get a replacement for both Cousins & Gay in one move, plus the opportunity to add another young guy

Dre
WCS
Bunch O'Bigs
SJ
McLemore
Collison

Add a Lotto pick and ours to that, sell hope again...

We'd then have a season plus to convince Cousins he could actually win here

Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app
Notanoob
Analyst
Posts: 3,475
And1: 1,223
Joined: Jun 07, 2013

Re: Boogie time... 

Post#48 » by Notanoob » Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:24 am

I don't think that I've come out and said it much, but I've been in favor of swapping them for a while. Boogie has offensive skills that Andre will never have, it's practically instinctive. Andre's post skills are nothing special nor is his defense, and he cannot pass or hit free throws. He's elite at rebounding but that's all that he's elite at. I think that Boogie is simply a better player than Andre overall and if we could swing it without completely gutting the team I'd trade for Boogie in a heartbeat.
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: Boogie time... 

Post#49 » by Blkbrd671 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 4:14 am

Pharaoh wrote:Dre & SJ + our first for Cousins I could see happening.

Kings get a replacement for both Cousins & Gay in one move, plus the opportunity to add another young guy

Dre
WCS
Bunch O'Bigs
SJ
McLemore
Collison

Add a Lotto pick and ours to that, sell hope again...

We'd then have a season plus to convince Cousins he could actually win here

Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app


if we are trading for Cousins, considering contracts, we shouldn't have to add any assets to the deal. Dre for Boogie straight up would make sense. I would then take RJ+Mook and go get wall.
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: RE: Re: Boogie time... 

Post#50 » by Pharaoh » Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:31 am

Blkbrd671 wrote:
Pharaoh wrote:Dre & SJ + our first for Cousins I could see happening.

Kings get a replacement for both Cousins & Gay in one move, plus the opportunity to add another young guy

Dre
WCS
Bunch O'Bigs
SJ
McLemore
Collison

Add a Lotto pick and ours to that, sell hope again...

We'd then have a season plus to convince Cousins he could actually win here

Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app


if we are trading for Cousins, considering contracts, we shouldn't have to add any assets to the deal. Dre for Boogie straight up would make sense. I would then take RJ+Mook and go get wall.

Which gives us:

Cousins / Baynes / Bobo
Jon / KING
Harris / SJ
KCP / Hilly / Bull
Wall / Ish / Beno

Weaker bench until we develop our kids

Debatable if our starters make up the difference

Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app
theBigLip
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 16,857
And1: 3,449
Joined: May 22, 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
       

Re: Boogie time... 

Post#51 » by theBigLip » Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:35 am

It's nice to have Dre, but Cousins could be great for us. I think Sacramento should take a deal like this before they lose him for nothing.
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: RE: Re: Boogie time... 

Post#52 » by Blkbrd671 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:33 am

Pharaoh wrote:
Blkbrd671 wrote:
Pharaoh wrote:Dre & SJ + our first for Cousins I could see happening.

Kings get a replacement for both Cousins & Gay in one move, plus the opportunity to add another young guy

Dre
WCS
Bunch O'Bigs
SJ
McLemore
Collison

Add a Lotto pick and ours to that, sell hope again...

We'd then have a season plus to convince Cousins he could actually win here

Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app


if we are trading for Cousins, considering contracts, we shouldn't have to add any assets to the deal. Dre for Boogie straight up would make sense. I would then take RJ+Mook and go get wall.

Which gives us:

Cousins / Baynes / Bobo
Jon / KING
Harris / SJ
KCP / Hilly / Bull
Wall / Ish / Beno

Weaker bench until we develop our kids

Debatable if our starters make up the difference

Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app


swap Mook w SJ, and we essentially turn Dre into cousins and RJ into Wall and maintain our depth.
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,730
And1: 9,566
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: Boogie time... 

Post#53 » by bstein14 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:56 am

Wall and Beal have had issues... If we could trade Dre for Cousins, and Jackson + Johnson for Wall + Morris I think we could compete with the Cavs in the East, and be the clear #2 seed.

C:Cousins(34)/Baynes(14)
PF:Jon(24)/Morris(24)
SF:Harris(29)/Morris(19)
SG:KCP(36)/Wall(12)
PG:Wall(24)/Ish(24)
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 18,549
And1: 20,104
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: Boogie time... 

Post#54 » by MrBigShot » Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:01 am

What happens if we trade for Cousins and then he decides to bounce after next season? Dre is locked up for 3 more years after this one + a player option.

Need to get a deal that involves him extending immediately for this to be a feasible idea.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
Spider156
Head Coach
Posts: 6,613
And1: 1,421
Joined: Jul 25, 2010
       

Re: Boogie time... 

Post#55 » by Spider156 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:04 am

MrBigShot wrote:What happens if we trade for Cousins and then he decides to bounce after next season? Dre is locked up for 3 more years after this one + a player option.

Need to get a deal that involves him extending immediately for this to be a feasible idea.

Cousins would stay if Wall comes here and it's likely since all it would take is Jackson and someone else
Defense wins championships
mattao313
General Manager
Posts: 9,587
And1: 4,464
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
       

Re: Boogie time... 

Post#56 » by mattao313 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:26 am

Am I the only one who thinks Wall is fools gold? Plus he has knee problems. I'm not a big Cousins fan but I would take the risk and swap the two.
Championships
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: RE: Re: Boogie time... 

Post#57 » by Pharaoh » Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:45 pm

mattao313 wrote:Am I the only one who thinks Wall is fools gold? Plus he has knee problems. I'm not a big Cousins fan but I would take the risk and swap the two.

I'm not a fan of Wall.

Yeah yeah yeah he's more athletic than RJ, a better defender than RJ & probably a better shooter than RJ...

But he's a ****!

Any "leader" that whines about what other dudes get paid should STFU and be happy his team mates are making money!

You wanna trash an dude because of their money? Why? Did you not sign for the Max? If not you need to fire your agent!

Beal is a good player, a little too injury prone for my liking but still a good player. Be happy your running mate got paid!

As a leader your job is to pump him up and get him going so your team wins games! On the nights you don't have it get him going and vice versa

Instead Wall wants to be the #1 guy, undisputed! Pop talks about the need for players to get over themselves cause it makes them focus on the whole...Wall is too busy trying to show he's #1 IMO

Cousins I think has reached that point - he's put up great numbers for so long for nothing that now he'd kill someone if that meant he could play on a good team.

I honestly think the minute Cousins is traded he'll be so **** happy he'll do whatever the new team wants...while Wall will continue to worry about himself first cause he's not quite there yet.

2 more years of no playoffs for Wall and he'll be there...all players get there eventually

Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app

Return to Detroit Pistons