ImageImageImageImageImage

Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
WesleyExChiFan
Starter
Posts: 2,483
And1: 1,014
Joined: Jul 05, 2013
       

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#101 » by WesleyExChiFan » Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:12 pm

Knick4Real wrote:
moocow007 wrote:What's interesting is that the vast, vast majority of the responses to an extension seems to be "NO". And yet Rose was the preference to be the PG over every other potential free agent PG except Chris Paul (that includes Kyle Lowry, Jrue Holiday, George Hill or basically the best starting PG options). So that tells me:

1. Folks believe Chris Paul is a real option via free agency
2. Folks think the Knicks can actually get a better PG outside of free agency (by trading Lance Thomas and Kyle O'Quinn)
3. Folks aren't really thinking out their responses (either in this thread or the other thread) clearly
4. Folks that like to vote in polls don't like to post their opinions
5. All (or some combination) of the above


You took the words right out of my mouth!! :clap: :clap: :clap:

KNICK fans are hilarious in thinking we can magically walk into a "player store" and just pick whoever we want. Does anybody recognize how unrealistic and ridiculous that is???

Please Please wake up and stop the lofty dreams that we can have whoever we want. If that were true, LeBron, Steph and Durant would all be in a KNICK uniform today....but they're not.

If we don't extend Rose, then REALISTICALLY who else is available to us...AND wants to be here??? That is the true question. Some of us need to stop playing fantasy basketball and float back down to reality.

I doubt Derrick Rose wants to sit out the rest of his career injured and on the bench. He recognizes his best years are behind him and that the KNICKS are probably his last stop in his career. So a SMART deal that's less and shorter than his current one is not a bad idea. Rose is better than any PG we had in more than a decade... or do I need to post reminder videos of Jose Calderon and Toney Douglas at the point???

It's time for us to wake up and stop dreaming!! :noway:

Here's another way of looking at it: A newly extended Rose on a somewhat palatable deal in this market could be sign and trade bait for Chris Paul. I'd be surprised if an extension happened tbh. I mean, maintain a winning record first before you start paying people.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,252
And1: 25,712
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extention later in the season 

Post#102 » by moocow007 » Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:43 pm

BadNewsBarnes wrote:
moocow007 wrote:
BeagleBoss wrote:You just KNOW he's going down the minute he signs that extension.


He's going to trip on the tiny table.

Image

Image
PS: Kyle O'Quinn brought his mom to his contract signing. :lol:

It could be worse...it could have been the table in Men In Black when J moved the table during the test...



:lol:
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,788
And1: 48,762
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#103 » by dakomish23 » Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:46 pm

November hasn't ended and there's articles of an extension talk.

Welcome to NY
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,252
And1: 25,712
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#104 » by moocow007 » Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:47 pm

magnumt wrote:Quick, someone check on Knickstape!

--Mags


KT's reaction now...

Image

KT's reaction if it happens...

Image
kane2021
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,005
And1: 6,067
Joined: Oct 03, 2008
Location: It's OK to feel that way. Just sick of hearing about it all the time.

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#105 » by kane2021 » Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:51 pm

The only guy I see Paul getting traded for is Irving. In fact I think that's the only place Paul ends up if he wants out of la.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Image

Never underestimate the strength of knowledge.

Bring back the physical game and send the softies home.
User avatar
vallen
RealGM
Posts: 10,927
And1: 3,180
Joined: Jan 31, 2005
       

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#106 » by vallen » Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:12 pm

just doin what this franchise does.
There's something about an underdog that really inspires the unexceptional.
CJackson
General Manager
Posts: 9,584
And1: 5,221
Joined: Mar 05, 2016

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#107 » by CJackson » Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:15 pm

If there is a God then Supertramp has an unreleased song in their vaults called "Tiny Tables"
User avatar
Zombiesonics
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,518
And1: 4,220
Joined: Mar 27, 2011

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#108 » by Zombiesonics » Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:33 pm

Deeeez Knicks wrote:We should have just locked up Tim Frazier for cheap like I was begging for

wouldn't be hard to find a more effective pg fit with melo + KP. Tim frazier is playing better than rose has since 2012. Thing is, there is no way in hell melo is ok with letting rose walk. they are all lovey dovey now. cut from the same cloth.
User avatar
Lockdown
RealGM
Posts: 10,459
And1: 1,499
Joined: Dec 17, 2004
Location: Toronto
   

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#109 » by Lockdown » Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:40 pm

whocares1 wrote:
Lockdown wrote:Unless he flamed out, the plan was always to re-sign him, there were pretty much no other moves. There's no cap space, no redundant players to trade, and moving more picks would be a mistake. Pretty much all you can do is hope luck holds out with him.


Derrick Rose's contract IS the cap space.


Okay, so let's say the Knicks give him up for nothing. With cap holds the Knicks have -11,263,263 in cap space for next year. So renouncing Rose outright gets them around $15 million under the cap with 3 positions to fill, assuming NY keeps their pick and drafts in the middle of the draft.

Next, look at the list of free agents and think about who you can get for $12 million, assuming you sign two minimum salary guys to fill out the other roster spots. Then consider that Courtney Lee got $12 million last summer, and the cap is going up so average salaries offered will too.

Really, cap space is not a realistic option for signing a starter.
User avatar
CrazyKnicks
General Manager
Posts: 8,488
And1: 1,477
Joined: Aug 04, 2009

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#110 » by CrazyKnicks » Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:46 pm

A two year reasonable extension if he stays somewhat healthy and team does ok. That way him and Melo would come off the books at the same time and we can build with KP and capspace (with Noah, Lee and Thomas coming off the books the year after).
User avatar
FemaleDogPlease
Veteran
Posts: 2,858
And1: 1,473
Joined: Jun 30, 2010

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#111 » by FemaleDogPlease » Wed Nov 30, 2016 12:10 am

I'm cool with extending Derrick Rose.
User avatar
malik959
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,297
And1: 1,832
Joined: Apr 10, 2001
Location: Alabama (from L.I)
     

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#112 » by malik959 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 12:20 am

Knick4Real wrote:
moocow007 wrote:What's interesting is that the vast, vast majority of the responses to an extension seems to be "NO". And yet Rose was the preference to be the PG over every other potential free agent PG except Chris Paul (that includes Kyle Lowry, Jrue Holiday, George Hill or basically the best starting PG options). So that tells me:

1. Folks believe Chris Paul is a real option via free agency
2. Folks think the Knicks can actually get a better PG outside of free agency (by trading Lance Thomas and Kyle O'Quinn)
3. Folks aren't really thinking out their responses (either in this thread or the other thread) clearly
4. Folks that like to vote in polls don't like to post their opinions
5. All (or some combination) of the above


You took the words right out of my mouth!! :clap: :clap: :clap:

KNICK fans are hilarious in thinking we can magically walk into a "player store" and just pick whoever we want. Does anybody recognize how unrealistic and ridiculous that is???

Please Please wake up and stop the lofty dreams that we can have whoever we want. If that were true, LeBron, Steph and Durant would all be in a KNICK uniform today....but they're not.

If we don't extend Rose, then REALISTICALLY who else is available to us...AND wants to be here??? That is the true question. Some of us need to stop playing fantasy basketball and float back down to reality.

I doubt Derrick Rose wants to sit out the rest of his career injured and on the bench. He recognizes his best years are behind him and that the KNICKS are probably his last stop in his career. So a SMART deal that's less and shorter than his current one is not a bad idea. Rose is better than any PG we had in more than a decade... or do I need to post reminder videos of Jose Calderon and Toney Douglas at the point???

It's time for us to wake up and stop dreaming!! :noway:


A lot of fans just fail to realize that Players aren't kicking down the Knicks door to be with us. From players like G. Hill, C.Web, LBJ, and now C. Paul, these players were all linked to be coming to the Knicks in some way, but we still ended up with the 3rd string superstar signings like C. Weatherspoon, S. Anderson, Z. Randolph, Harrington. Hell the best we could get was a broke Amare and an aging Chandler.

I'd prefer to sign Rose early, possibly to a 2-3 year deal and use the rest to replace Thomas.
User avatar
NoLayupRule
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 48,099
And1: 11,028
Joined: Dec 06, 2002
Location: Playoffs Fool!
Contact:

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#113 » by NoLayupRule » Wed Nov 30, 2016 12:32 am

Not rule something out isn't unite the same as saying you want to do it or will do it

Rose has been impressive it still needs a long way to go

And he needs to be reasonable with his extension in both amount and length

Ifs far too early to start this conversation for real
User avatar
Jeff Van Gully
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 30,607
And1: 30,808
Joined: Jul 31, 2010
     

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extention later in the season 

Post#114 » by Jeff Van Gully » Wed Nov 30, 2016 12:32 am

E-Balla wrote:
Jeff Van Gully wrote:
E-Balla wrote:I just keep thinking... If we didn't get him off Chicago we could've signed Wade and Chicago couldn't have.


how? the trade did not clear cap space for chicago. the salaries nearly matched.

signing noah and lee precluded the knicks having any available money for wade. and i don't know why if he left miami it wouldn't have been for chicago anyway.

lee was smart money. but getting noah was a major tipping point in landing lee. it was noah's phone call that sold lee. we might have been hard pressed to get him at all, let alone at the price we did, if noah wasn't working the phones.

but, in the no rose dream scenario, d-wade joins the knicks to create a starting five of:

calderon
wade
melo
KP
lopez

?

They matched up but remember Chicago could only sign Wade because they traded Jose with 2 2nds to the Lakers. Noah was only signed because we didn't have a C in this situation we couldn't have signed Lee but Wade would've been open to come here. Remember there were reports that he was thinking of NY when signing.

That dream scenario is what I had in mind though. Maybe even starting Ennings. We wouldn't have Holiday and Lee but I remember when reports first started coming out about Wade not signing in Miami they said his top choices were NY, Denver, and Chicago. If we had RoLo already it could've been an easy signing.


that's a lot of monday morning quarterbacking.

so we were to just know that miami and d-wade wasn't going to work out...

then, sit on the same team during the offseason and hope wade wanted to sign, under that crazy circumstance deep into free agency that no one really knew was going to happen until it did?

and then... when wade signs with chicago anyway... we trot out the exact same team as before with no significant changes?

maybe a maxed-out unworthy SG?
RIP magnumt

thanks for everything, thibs.

Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
User avatar
E-Balla
RealGM
Posts: 35,841
And1: 25,136
Joined: Dec 19, 2012
Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
   

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extention later in the season 

Post#115 » by E-Balla » Wed Nov 30, 2016 12:51 am

HarthorneWingo wrote:
E-Balla wrote:I just keep thinking... If we didn't get him off Chicago we could've signed Wade and Chicago couldn't have.



Wade? LOL. Wade was never coming here.

You guys are piping in this thread. I'm cool extending Rose. Just extend Jennings too.

Only other team in it was Denver. And anyone good extending Rose that complained about Jose doesn't know basketball. Plain and simple. They're equally terrible in opposite ways.
User avatar
E-Balla
RealGM
Posts: 35,841
And1: 25,136
Joined: Dec 19, 2012
Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
   

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extention later in the season 

Post#116 » by E-Balla » Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:00 am

Jeff Van Gully wrote:
E-Balla wrote:
Jeff Van Gully wrote:
how? the trade did not clear cap space for chicago. the salaries nearly matched.

signing noah and lee precluded the knicks having any available money for wade. and i don't know why if he left miami it wouldn't have been for chicago anyway.

lee was smart money. but getting noah was a major tipping point in landing lee. it was noah's phone call that sold lee. we might have been hard pressed to get him at all, let alone at the price we did, if noah wasn't working the phones.

but, in the no rose dream scenario, d-wade joins the knicks to create a starting five of:

calderon
wade
melo
KP
lopez

?

They matched up but remember Chicago could only sign Wade because they traded Jose with 2 2nds to the Lakers. Noah was only signed because we didn't have a C in this situation we couldn't have signed Lee but Wade would've been open to come here. Remember there were reports that he was thinking of NY when signing.

That dream scenario is what I had in mind though. Maybe even starting Ennings. We wouldn't have Holiday and Lee but I remember when reports first started coming out about Wade not signing in Miami they said his top choices were NY, Denver, and Chicago. If we had RoLo already it could've been an easy signing.


that's a lot of monday morning quarterbacking.

so we were to just know that miami and d-wade wasn't going to work out...

then, sit on the same team during the offseason and hope wade wanted to sign, under that crazy circumstance deep into free agency that no one really knew was going to happen until it did?

and then... when wade signs with chicago anyway... we trot out the exact same team as before with no significant changes?

maybe a maxed-out unworthy SG?

1. Chicago couldn't sign Wade with Rose on the books. They had to trade Jose to fit him.

2. Yeah this is in hindsight. What's not hindsight? Noah and Rose were terrible acquisitions and we gave up a B+ deal to get 2 scrubs that made us worse and destroyed flexibility. Flexibility that could've had us in the running for Wade.
User avatar
Mike Breen
Analyst
Posts: 3,555
And1: 2,093
Joined: Nov 06, 2013
Location: In your glazed donut face ass
 

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#117 » by Mike Breen » Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:04 am

No. There's no market for Derrick Rose. Just wait until the offseason
And just like that, the lead has been cut to 8!

-Mike Breen
Adelheid
RealGM
Posts: 11,746
And1: 7,965
Joined: Jul 10, 2014
 

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#118 » by Adelheid » Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:09 am

You really cant say that Wade wasn't re-signing in CHI

I have no confidence in Phil making the savvy choices in contract negotiations. Expect the extension to be like 4yr just like Noah's.
Old man is desperate for FAs, he ended up overpaying for Noah even if he had known that he cannot play Noah for 30mins+.
User avatar
magnumt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 49,372
And1: 15,048
Joined: Jan 27, 2004
Location: Gott'a Stick To My Girls Like Glue, Ain't No No. 2 Here...Sean Paul Style, Baby Gyrl!!!
Contact:
         

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#119 » by magnumt » Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:17 am

moocow007 wrote:
magnumt wrote:Quick, someone check on Knickstape!

--Mags


KT's reaction now...

Image

KT's reaction if it happens...

Image


:rofl:

--Mags
BAF 1.0 - Wizards: Year 2
PG: Kemba Walker (32) / Rivers (16) / Felton
SG: Evan Fournier (28) / Evans (20) / Dotson
SF: Gordon Hayward (36)/ Delly (12) / Dudley
PF: Kevin Love (36) / Frye (12) / Ellenson
C: Pau Gasol (32) / Noah (16) / Felicio


magnumt6
User avatar
AmazingJason
RealGM
Posts: 15,179
And1: 6,142
Joined: Aug 07, 2006
Location: NYC
   

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#120 » by AmazingJason » Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:23 am

Adelheid wrote:You really cant say that Wade wasn't re-signing in CHI

I have no confidence in Phil making the savvy choices in contract negotiations. Expect the extension to be like 4yr just like Noah's.
Old man is desperate for FAs, he ended up overpaying for Noah even if he had known that he cannot play Noah for 30mins+.


Phil is like Isiah.

Except instead of trading draft picks for other team's unwanted players, Phil just signs them in FA to long term deals :D
BAT 18.0 - MINNESOTA TIMBERWOLVES

El Poochio - POBO
Amazing Jason - Assistant to the VPOBO

PG: Lonzo Ball/Dennis Smith Jr.
SG: Donovan Mitchell/R. McGruder
SF: Jaylen Brown/Josh Jackson
PF: Jayson Tatum/T. Booker
C: Joel Embiid/McGee

Return to New York Knicks