ImageImageImage

The Boogie Watch

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

LV-Suns
Analyst
Posts: 3,492
And1: 2,099
Joined: Aug 11, 2009
Location: Las Vegas
   

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#121 » by LV-Suns » Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:40 pm

1UPZ wrote:Cousins will extend with the Suns... IF.... and this is a big IF..... they can prove to him that they are serious in contending.

By going for a 3rd superstar / All-Star.


Celtics will be the biggest obstacle though... they too are hunting for a star or two.




Hayward and Cousins would be perfect next to Booker OR Warren, Bledsoe.

To be honest, I think Warren is better than Booker... mainly because he can do it all and actually put good pressure defensively.
Booker can get hot from the 3pt line though so thats huge for him... but Warren can score anywhere. But the comparison is only valid because there might be a situation where the Suns must choose between the two.


Hayward and Watson played together for 3 years, he might be the most realistic star free agent we have. I would be completely fine if we unload all our assets for Boogie and and go all in on Hayward in the free agency.
I Dont wanna be here
User avatar
lilfishi22
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 36,229
And1: 24,587
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Australia

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#122 » by lilfishi22 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:29 pm

LV-Suns wrote:
1UPZ wrote:Cousins will extend with the Suns... IF.... and this is a big IF..... they can prove to him that they are serious in contending.

By going for a 3rd superstar / All-Star.


Celtics will be the biggest obstacle though... they too are hunting for a star or two.




Hayward and Cousins would be perfect next to Booker OR Warren, Bledsoe.

To be honest, I think Warren is better than Booker... mainly because he can do it all and actually put good pressure defensively.
Booker can get hot from the 3pt line though so thats huge for him... but Warren can score anywhere. But the comparison is only valid because there might be a situation where the Suns must choose between the two.


Hayward and Watson played together for 3 years, he might be the most realistic star free agent we have. I would be completely fine if we unload all our assets for Boogie and and go all in on Hayward in the free agency.

By unloading assets, you mean everyone but Bledsoe (who we need for Boogie to extend) and I'm assuming Booker?
User avatar
thamadkant
Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
Posts: 16,916
And1: 8,599
Joined: Jan 06, 2007
 

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#123 » by thamadkant » Thu Dec 1, 2016 1:49 am

lilfishi22 wrote:
LV-Suns wrote:
1UPZ wrote:Cousins will extend with the Suns... IF.... and this is a big IF..... they can prove to him that they are serious in contending.

By going for a 3rd superstar / All-Star.


Celtics will be the biggest obstacle though... they too are hunting for a star or two.




Hayward and Cousins would be perfect next to Booker OR Warren, Bledsoe.

To be honest, I think Warren is better than Booker... mainly because he can do it all and actually put good pressure defensively.
Booker can get hot from the 3pt line though so thats huge for him... but Warren can score anywhere. But the comparison is only valid because there might be a situation where the Suns must choose between the two.


Hayward and Watson played together for 3 years, he might be the most realistic star free agent we have. I would be completely fine if we unload all our assets for Boogie and and go all in on Hayward in the free agency.

By unloading assets, you mean everyone but Bledsoe (who we need for Boogie to extend) and I'm assuming Booker?




One of Booker or Warren... Its a toss up for me.

If you have Hayward... A catch and shoot high volume scorer would be vital.
Booker's current role of ball handler will be limited to when oone of Hayward or Bledsoe is resting.

Having more than 2 ball handling wingman leads to 2 of them ball watching.. Terrible to watch... And bad results as we all can
User avatar
LukasBMW
Suns Forum SlamDRUNK Contributor
Posts: 4,827
And1: 4,291
Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Location: Phoenix AZ & San Diego CA
 

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#124 » by LukasBMW » Thu Dec 1, 2016 5:48 am

I think getting Boogie fixes a lot of our offensive problems.

But we'd still be a bit weak on defense.
Image
Jkam31
Head Coach
Posts: 6,868
And1: 5,833
Joined: Feb 23, 2014

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#125 » by Jkam31 » Thu Dec 1, 2016 1:05 pm

Ya Boogie would resign with you guys if you prove you could build a winner. He is best friends with Wall/ Bledsoe so you guys having him is big.
Cousins/Booker/Bledsoe is a great start than add in Hayword or Gallonari add you guys are an easy playoff team.

The deal I'd ask for as a kings fan is

Chriss/Bender/Warren/ 2017 1st/ heat 1st

For

Cousins and WCS


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Barkley_34
Junior
Posts: 465
And1: 174
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
       

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#126 » by Barkley_34 » Thu Dec 1, 2016 5:40 pm

Jkam31 wrote:Ya Boogie would resign with you guys if you prove you could build a winner. He is best friends with Wall/ Bledsoe so you guys having him is big.
Cousins/Booker/Bledsoe is a great start than add in Hayword or Gallonari add you guys are an easy playoff team.

The deal I'd ask for as a kings fan is

Chriss/Bender/Warren/ 2017 1st/ heat 1st

For

Cousins and WCS


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app


Realistic. Possibly our GM would negotiate a term close to that. Most of the people here would not close this trade. Maybe take the cris or bender and put the 1st heat 2021? I find the natural request for the level of player that you are giving up. Good Job.
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,287
And1: 6,411
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#127 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Thu Dec 1, 2016 6:10 pm

Not interested in dealing Bender or Warren. We have enough assets to get Boogie without giving them up, IMO.
Barkley_34
Junior
Posts: 465
And1: 174
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
       

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#128 » by Barkley_34 » Thu Dec 1, 2016 6:17 pm

cosmofizzo wrote:Not interested in dealing Bender or Warren. We have enough assets to get Boogie without giving them up, IMO.


Which are they?
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,287
And1: 6,411
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#129 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Thu Dec 1, 2016 6:20 pm

Barkley_34 wrote:
cosmofizzo wrote:Not interested in dealing Bender or Warren. We have enough assets to get Boogie without giving them up, IMO.


Which are they?


Chriss, Knight, our 2017 or 2018 pick, and the MIA picks.

To beat that, Boston would have to surrender at least Brown and both Nets picks, which I doubt they're willing to do.|

I suppose Denver could get in on it, with a package of Nurkic, Hernangomez, Beasley, their pick and the MEM pick.
Barkley_34
Junior
Posts: 465
And1: 174
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
       

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#130 » by Barkley_34 » Thu Dec 1, 2016 6:29 pm

cosmofizzo wrote:
Barkley_34 wrote:
cosmofizzo wrote:Not interested in dealing Bender or Warren. We have enough assets to get Boogie without giving them up, IMO.


Which are they?


Chriss, Knight, our 2017 or 2018 pick, and the MIA picks.

To beat that, Boston would have to surrender at least Brown and both Nets picks, which I doubt they're willing to do.|

I suppose Denver could get in on it, with a package of Nurkic, Hernangomez, Beasley, their pick and the MEM pick.



I disagree with you, for me this offer is very low. But each one has his vision
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,287
And1: 6,411
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#131 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Thu Dec 1, 2016 7:23 pm

Barkley_34 wrote:
cosmofizzo wrote:
Barkley_34 wrote:
Which are they?


Chriss, Knight, our 2017 or 2018 pick, and the MIA picks.

To beat that, Boston would have to surrender at least Brown and both Nets picks, which I doubt they're willing to do.|

I suppose Denver could get in on it, with a package of Nurkic, Hernangomez, Beasley, their pick and the MEM pick.



I disagree with you, for me this offer is very low. But each one has his vision


What beats it?
Bogyo
Analyst
Posts: 3,357
And1: 2,478
Joined: Jul 29, 2013

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#132 » by Bogyo » Thu Dec 1, 2016 9:15 pm

Barkley_34 wrote:
Jkam31 wrote:Ya Boogie would resign with you guys if you prove you could build a winner. He is best friends with Wall/ Bledsoe so you guys having him is big.
Cousins/Booker/Bledsoe is a great start than add in Hayword or Gallonari add you guys are an easy playoff team.

The deal I'd ask for as a kings fan is

Chriss/Bender/Warren/ 2017 1st/ heat 1st

For

Cousins and WCS


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app


Realistic. Possibly our GM would negotiate a term close to that. Most of the people here would not close this trade. Maybe take the cris or bender and put the 1st heat 2021? I find the natural request for the level of player that you are giving up. Good Job.


Not really sure - thats 5 probable lottery picks for Boogie and WCS, and 4 of those could easily be top 10! :o Very steep price to pay for a possiple rental. I'd substitute Bender or Warren and one of the picks with Len, Knight and Tucker, which could still be an attractive package. Hard to see who would offer so much better without selling the farm that Boogie would reach significant results, and have a chance of a deep playoff run with such a guted team... Maaaaybeeee Boston with Brown and all the Nets picks and some other young players - if they are willing to give up that much.
# waiting for the next chapter
TeamTragic
General Manager
Posts: 9,000
And1: 7,028
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
 

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#133 » by TeamTragic » Thu Dec 1, 2016 10:03 pm

Jkam31 wrote:Ya Boogie would resign with you guys if you prove you could build a winner. He is best friends with Wall/ Bledsoe so you guys having him is big.
Cousins/Booker/Bledsoe is a great start than add in Hayword or Gallonari add you guys are an easy playoff team.

The deal I'd ask for as a kings fan is

Chriss/Bender/Warren/ 2017 1st/ heat 1st

For

Cousins and WCS


cosmofizzo wrote:Not interested in dealing Bender or Warren. We have enough assets to get Boogie without giving them up, IMO.


Agreed. You can choose from Knight/Len/Tucker. How do you guys feel about Skal?
Barkley_34
Junior
Posts: 465
And1: 174
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
       

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#134 » by Barkley_34 » Thu Dec 1, 2016 10:48 pm

cosmofizzo wrote:
Barkley_34 wrote:
cosmofizzo wrote:
Chriss, Knight, our 2017 or 2018 pick, and the MIA picks.

To beat that, Boston would have to surrender at least Brown and both Nets picks, which I doubt they're willing to do.|

I suppose Denver could get in on it, with a package of Nurkic, Hernangomez, Beasley, their pick and the MEM pick.



I disagree with you, for me this offer is very low. But each one has his vision


What beats it?



I honestly think Warren or booker has to be on the proposal. Are we talking about the best NBA Center (my opinion), relatively young yet (26 years?). And on offer comes the Cauley stein which was a top 10 pick, but it can bloom depending on how it will be developed. Knight, Alex today does not have much trade value, honestly. In my vision I would offer Warren, Chris, Knight 1st suns 2017 and the Miami pick (2018). In terms of value I find it quite interesting for them, mainly because they have 2 young centers and one sg still prospect and that can burst which is mclemore.
And on your question, I think Wizards Nuggets and Boston can offer things better than your offer.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,149
And1: 61,003
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#135 » by bwgood77 » Thu Dec 1, 2016 11:14 pm

Barkley_34 wrote:
cosmofizzo wrote:
Barkley_34 wrote:

I disagree with you, for me this offer is very low. But each one has his vision


What beats it?



I honestly think Warren or booker has to be on the proposal. Are we talking about the best NBA Center (my opinion), relatively young yet (26 years?). And on offer comes the Cauley stein which was a top 10 pick, but it can bloom depending on how it will be developed. Knight, Alex today does not have much trade value, honestly. In my vision I would offer Warren, Chris, Knight 1st suns 2017 and the Miami pick (2018). In terms of value I find it quite interesting for them, mainly because they have 2 young centers and one sg still prospect and that can burst which is mclemore.
And on your question, I think Wizards Nuggets and Boston can offer things better than your offer.


What about Booker instead of Warren then?
Barkley_34
Junior
Posts: 465
And1: 174
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
       

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#136 » by Barkley_34 » Thu Dec 1, 2016 11:24 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
Barkley_34 wrote:
cosmofizzo wrote:
What beats it?



I honestly think Warren or booker has to be on the proposal. Are we talking about the best NBA Center (my opinion), relatively young yet (26 years?). And on offer comes the Cauley stein which was a top 10 pick, but it can bloom depending on how it will be developed. Knight, Alex today does not have much trade value, honestly. In my vision I would offer Warren, Chris, Knight 1st suns 2017 and the Miami pick (2018). In terms of value I find it quite interesting for them, mainly because they have 2 young centers and one sg still prospect and that can burst which is mclemore.
And on your question, I think Wizards Nuggets and Boston can offer things better than your offer.


What about Booker instead of Warren then?


Booker and Cousins are friends, he said that after the game we lost to Kings and that they discussed. I think it's easier for Cousins to reassign us if Bledsoe and Booker are here.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,149
And1: 61,003
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#137 » by bwgood77 » Thu Dec 1, 2016 11:48 pm

Barkley_34 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
Barkley_34 wrote:

I honestly think Warren or booker has to be on the proposal. Are we talking about the best NBA Center (my opinion), relatively young yet (26 years?). And on offer comes the Cauley stein which was a top 10 pick, but it can bloom depending on how it will be developed. Knight, Alex today does not have much trade value, honestly. In my vision I would offer Warren, Chris, Knight 1st suns 2017 and the Miami pick (2018). In terms of value I find it quite interesting for them, mainly because they have 2 young centers and one sg still prospect and that can burst which is mclemore.
And on your question, I think Wizards Nuggets and Boston can offer things better than your offer.


What about Booker instead of Warren then?


Booker and Cousins are friends, he said that after the game we lost to Kings and that they discussed. I think it's easier for Cousins to reassign us if Bledsoe and Booker are here.


I guess the probably spent some time together when Booker played for the US Select team.
User avatar
Kerrsed
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,876
And1: 16,578
Joined: Mar 31, 2009
Location: Land of the Internet Memes
Contact:
     

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#138 » by Kerrsed » Fri Dec 2, 2016 12:26 am

Jkam31 wrote:Ya Boogie would resign with you guys if you prove you could build a winner. He is best friends with Wall/ Bledsoe so you guys having him is big.
Cousins/Booker/Bledsoe is a great start than add in Hayword or Gallonari add you guys are an easy playoff team.

The deal I'd ask for as a kings fan is

Chriss/Bender/Warren/ 2017 1st/ heat 1st

For

Cousins and WCS


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app


Thank you. This is pretty much around where i think a Cousins trade would be, and something that i have been trying to express to the board. For some reason people around here think that players like Knight/Tucker hold any value in a trade for a star player, and the fact that they hate them and see what they do to our team night after night, yet think they would all of a sudden be a great trade chip for a star player boggles my mind.

Now, with that being said, i would make a few alterations to your proposal. 1, with Cousins/WCS coming here, we would be overtly stacked at the C spot, leaving the Kings rather bare, so i would believe the Suns would counter offer by including Len and subtracting one of our young rookies (Bender/Chriss).

I also believe that there is another play that can be made to better the Kings return, while also having the Suns keep another asset (a draft pick or another youngster), and that would be by including Philly in this trade and doing the much talked about Knight to 76ers for Noel or Okafor (which ever one you guys would prefer). The desperately need some kind of PG this season, but the value in Knight would be increased next season when they get Simmons back. All the news out of Philly keeps reiterating that they plan on having Simmons run the team as a point-forward, so it makes sense to have more of a shooting PG in the starting 5 nest to him, and thats where i think Knight would excel.

Maybe something like: http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=gmwqeoy

Suns get Cousins/WCS
Kings get 2 (of Warren and/or Chriss and/or Bender)/Okafor/Len/(1 of either Miami's 2018 pick or Suns 2018 1st)
76ers get Knight/2017 Suns 2nd
Its #DUMPSTERFIRE SEASON! #TeamTRAINWRECK -KERRSED- The Mod, The Myth, The Legend
Image
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,149
And1: 61,003
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#139 » by bwgood77 » Fri Dec 2, 2016 1:31 am

Kerrsed wrote:
Jkam31 wrote:Ya Boogie would resign with you guys if you prove you could build a winner. He is best friends with Wall/ Bledsoe so you guys having him is big.
Cousins/Booker/Bledsoe is a great start than add in Hayword or Gallonari add you guys are an easy playoff team.

The deal I'd ask for as a kings fan is

Chriss/Bender/Warren/ 2017 1st/ heat 1st

For

Cousins and WCS


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app


Thank you. This is pretty much around where i think a Cousins trade would be, and something that i have been trying to express to the board. For some reason people around here think that players like Knight/Tucker hold any value in a trade for a star player, and the fact that they hate them and see what they do to our team night after night, yet think they would all of a sudden be a great trade chip for a star player boggles my mind.

Now, with that being said, i would make a few alterations to your proposal. 1, with Cousins/WCS coming here, we would be overtly stacked at the C spot, leaving the Kings rather bare, so i would believe the Suns would counter offer by including Len and subtracting one of our young rookies (Bender/Chriss).

I also believe that there is another play that can be made to better the Kings return, while also having the Suns keep another asset (a draft pick or another youngster), and that would be by including Philly in this trade and doing the much talked about Knight to 76ers for Noel or Okafor (which ever one you guys would prefer). The desperately need some kind of PG this season, but the value in Knight would be increased next season when they get Simmons back. All the news out of Philly keeps reiterating that they plan on having Simmons run the team as a point-forward, so it makes sense to have more of a shooting PG in the starting 5 nest to him, and thats where i think Knight would excel.

Maybe something like: http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=gmwqeoy

Suns get Cousins/WCS
Kings get 2 (of Warren and/or Chriss and/or Bender)/Okafor/Len/(1 of either Miami's 2018 pick or Suns 2018 1st)
76ers get Knight/2017 Suns 2nd


I definitely think it takes at least two of Warren/Bender/Chriss and maybe all three, though they'd probably demand Booker along with 1 or 2 of those guys. Personally, as I've mentioned many times, I've always been a fan of building through the draft, and want to continue building through the draft, and like all our young players (23 and under) and don't want to try to just destroy our future by trying to quickly make a splash trade to make the playoffs this year and for a few years, but build a good long term outlook...

Having said all that, I have zero idea what's going to happen. I thought Sarver had finally embraced the youth movement and all, but that goes against him always trying to make short sighted moves to try desperately to win now, and always has thought short term over long term, so perhaps that wins out in the end..

So...I put this edit in the first post of the thread- (lilfishi was/is going to add a poll later about whether or not people want to trade for Boogie, and if so, how much they are willing to give up, but I'm going to do a quick one now to see who people would rather keep IF we had to trade one of Bender or Warren. This is kind of a tough one for me because they are probably the two Suns for which I have the biggest interest, fandom, pull for, etc. I'm guessing the board will be fairly split on this but I don't know. I guess if we get Boogie it might make more sense to keep Warren if we could. And it might make more sense for Sac to take Bender if they were going rebuild route but I don't know).

Oh, and I want no part of Willie Cauley Stein.

The funny thing is I have never pulled against a team so much in college basketball than that team Wisconsin beat with Booker, Towns, Lyles, WCS, Harrison twins, Ulis, etc. But of course what could those guys do against a team with Frank the Tank and Sam Dekker? Can't beat a couple white boys from the mid west. Of course I hated them too because they BARELY knocked out AZ in the elite 8 two years in a row, and Kaminsky had the biggest game of his college tourney career in the first one and Dekker the second. Should have been AZ to take Kentucky out.
User avatar
lilfishi22
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 36,229
And1: 24,587
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Australia

Re: The Boogie Watch 

Post#140 » by lilfishi22 » Fri Dec 2, 2016 1:49 am

bwgood77 wrote:
Spoiler:
Kerrsed wrote:
Jkam31 wrote:Ya Boogie would resign with you guys if you prove you could build a winner. He is best friends with Wall/ Bledsoe so you guys having him is big.
Cousins/Booker/Bledsoe is a great start than add in Hayword or Gallonari add you guys are an easy playoff team.

The deal I'd ask for as a kings fan is

Chriss/Bender/Warren/ 2017 1st/ heat 1st

For

Cousins and WCS


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app


Thank you. This is pretty much around where i think a Cousins trade would be, and something that i have been trying to express to the board. For some reason people around here think that players like Knight/Tucker hold any value in a trade for a star player, and the fact that they hate them and see what they do to our team night after night, yet think they would all of a sudden be a great trade chip for a star player boggles my mind.

Now, with that being said, i would make a few alterations to your proposal. 1, with Cousins/WCS coming here, we would be overtly stacked at the C spot, leaving the Kings rather bare, so i would believe the Suns would counter offer by including Len and subtracting one of our young rookies (Bender/Chriss).

I also believe that there is another play that can be made to better the Kings return, while also having the Suns keep another asset (a draft pick or another youngster), and that would be by including Philly in this trade and doing the much talked about Knight to 76ers for Noel or Okafor (which ever one you guys would prefer). The desperately need some kind of PG this season, but the value in Knight would be increased next season when they get Simmons back. All the news out of Philly keeps reiterating that they plan on having Simmons run the team as a point-forward, so it makes sense to have more of a shooting PG in the starting 5 nest to him, and thats where i think Knight would excel.

Maybe something like: http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=gmwqeoy

Suns get Cousins/WCS
Kings get 2 (of Warren and/or Chriss and/or Bender)/Okafor/Len/(1 of either Miami's 2018 pick or Suns 2018 1st)
76ers get Knight/2017 Suns 2nd

I definitely think it takes at least two of Warren/Bender/Chriss and maybe all three, though they'd probably demand Booker along with 1 or 2 of those guys. Personally, as I've mentioned many times, I've always been a fan of building through the draft, and want to continue building through the draft, and like all our young players (23 and under) and don't want to try to just destroy our future by trying to quickly make a splash trade to make the playoffs this year and for a few years, but build a good long term outlook...

Having said all that, I have zero idea what's going to happen. I thought Sarver had finally embraced the youth movement and all, but that goes against him always trying to make short sighted moves to try desperately to win now, and always has thought short term over long term, so perhaps that wins out in the end..

So...I put this edit in the first post of the thread- (lilfishi was/is going to add a poll later about whether or not people want to trade for Boogie, and if so, how much they are willing to give up, but I'm going to do a quick one now to see who people would rather keep IF we had to trade one of Bender or Warren. This is kind of a tough one for me because they are probably the two Suns for which I have the biggest interest, fandom, pull for, etc. I'm guessing the board will be fairly split on this but I don't know. I guess if we get Boogie it might make more sense to keep Warren if we could. And it might make more sense for Sac to take Bender if they were going rebuild route but I don't know).

Oh, and I want no part of Willie Cauley Stein.

The funny thing is I have never pulled against a team so much in college basketball than that team Wisconsin beat with Booker, Towns, Lyles, WCS, Harrison twins, Ulis, etc. But of course what could those guys do against a team with Frank the Tank and Sam Dekker? Can't beat a couple white boys from the mid west. Of course I hated them too because they BARELY knocked out AZ in the elite 8 two years in a row, and Kaminsky had the biggest game of his college tourney career in the first one and Dekker the second. Should have been AZ to take Kentucky out.

I'm not against building through the draft and in many cases it is an exciting way to build a winning team because you get to follow the development of young players you drafted. That being said, a trade for Boogie wouldn't be a a short-sighted win-now move that we've seen in the past. I would consider trading for someone like a Dwight Howard, LMA, Melo or a Chris Paul for example, as a short-sighted win-now move. All of these guys have a short competitive window where they could still be the best 1-3 player on the team. Cousins would likely be the best player on our team for at least another 5 so we're essentially fast tracking the build of a potential contender. It will not be a win it all in 1 or 2 seasons but be a perennial contender for 4-5.

Return to Phoenix Suns