Dat2U wrote:queridiculo wrote:Three way deal.
WAS out: Wall, Mahinmi, Burke, Smith, Oubre
WAS in: Cauley-Stein, Collison, Deng, Temple, Clarkson
SAC out: Cauley-Stein, Temple, Collison, Gay
SAC in: Wall, Mahinmi, Burke
LAL out: Clarkson, Deng
LAL in: Gay, Smith, Oubre
Washington adds a prospect in WCS and builds around Porter and Beal. Deng's deal is terrible, but in a swap for Mahinmi he might actually be a better fit in Washington spelling Porter and backing up Morris.
Collision is more than serviceable and Clarkson is the x-man playing both guard positions either as starter at PG or coming for the bench backing up both Beal and Collison.
Sacramento takes another shot at making it work with Wall, while adding salary cap flexibility.
Lakers give up Clarkson to shed Dengs deal and gain a prospect, as well as a more productive option at Small Forward to keep things interesting for this season.
Wow, I would expect better from you. You didn't acquire ONE sure-fire starter in that deal. Not one. It's just a collection of guys who ideally would make up your bench. More than $150 million in salaries too; and what's the point of having a bench if you just traded your best player?
Agree with DAT. Assuming you dont do a complete rebuild in trading Wall (Which could conceivably be done if we're bad enough to get a top 5 pick and combine that with the Wall return) then you have to get back one significant piece (I.e. Top 3 pick or elite young player)
Wall/Smith to Philly for Simmons/Holmes is a good starting place.
We suck the rest of the year and get a top 5-8 pick to take one of the PG's. Get 16-17M trade exception and use it for a Alec Burks/Faried type.
Dennis Smith / Sato
Beal / Burks
Otto / Oubre
Simmons / Morris / Holmes
Mahinmi / Gortat / Holmes





















