ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

deneem4
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,917
And1: 1,263
Joined: Dec 26, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#941 » by deneem4 » Wed Dec 7, 2016 3:30 am

Can we trade gortat now...
Do you guys not see the decline??
Or should we wait for his value to keep decreasing?
Pay your beals....or its lights out!!!
Bron, Bosh, Wade is like Mike, Hakeem, barkley...3 top 5 picks from same draft
mike, hakeem and Barkley on the same team!!!!
User avatar
dangermouse
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,628
And1: 814
Joined: Dec 08, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#942 » by dangermouse » Wed Dec 7, 2016 8:21 am

Not a trade idea, but how about taking a flier on Lance Stephenson? He's recovering from a groin injury but should be ready about when Mahinmi is ready. If he can replicate his play with the Pacers he will be a welcome addition as a guard who can handle the rock and score off the bench. How was his relationship with Mahinmi, anyway? Anyone have any inside scoop? If it was positive perhaps he takes a chance on reuniting with a buddy and gives it his all.

If it doesnt work out, so what? We literally have nothing to lose but Ted's money (again, so what) and whoever we waive to bring him in (I vote Ochefu since he won't ever see court time).
Image
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
NatP4 wrote:but why would the pacers want Mahinmi's contract


Well, in fairness, we took Mike Pence off their hands. Taking back Mahinmi is the least they can do.
User avatar
Meliorus
Analyst
Posts: 3,646
And1: 1,185
Joined: Apr 16, 2015
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#943 » by Meliorus » Wed Dec 7, 2016 2:31 pm

Seems like there could be a Otto Porter hype-train leaving the station, with advanced stat nerds in NBA front offices creaming themselves over him, should we at least be fielding offers for him? I read some Minnesota Fans were willing to trade Wiggins for him, I don't know if I would make that deal.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,542
And1: 2,173
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#944 » by Dark Faze » Wed Dec 7, 2016 2:48 pm

payitforward wrote:Now that Paul Millsap is about to turn 32, now that he's entering the last phase of a terrific career, now that he's played almost 27,000 NBA minutes... now lets trade for him and give up one of the top picks in what all agree is a tremendous draft.

No thanks, not my cup of tea. We need to try to become a good team, which means not buying old guys for lots of $$.


This is admittedly a good point.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,542
And1: 2,173
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#945 » by Dark Faze » Wed Dec 7, 2016 2:49 pm

deneem4 wrote:Can we trade gortat now...
Do you guys not see the decline??
Or should we wait for his value to keep decreasing?


He'd have to be really bad to be bad value at 12 million in this big money era. That's a fantastic contract, and right now he's vastly outplaying it.

I think Gortat is good. I don't want to move him unless we acquire someone like Cousins that disrupts the balance on the roster.
User avatar
Meliorus
Analyst
Posts: 3,646
And1: 1,185
Joined: Apr 16, 2015
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#946 » by Meliorus » Wed Dec 7, 2016 2:52 pm

Dark Faze wrote:
deneem4 wrote:Can we trade gortat now...
Do you guys not see the decline??
Or should we wait for his value to keep decreasing?


He'd have to be really bad to be bad value at 12 million in this big money era. That's a fantastic contract, and right now he's vastly outplaying it.

I think Gortat is good. I don't want to move him unless we acquire someone like Cousins that disrupts the balance on the roster.


Gortat is not the problem for our perimeter defense woes, but no-one is really scared to go into the paint with Gortat. Also, I think we're underestimating the need for a big man Wall can throw alley-oops to. He's 32 with a fantastic contract, which should be an even bigger incentive to move him.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,542
And1: 2,173
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#947 » by Dark Faze » Wed Dec 7, 2016 2:57 pm

Meliorus wrote:
Dark Faze wrote:
deneem4 wrote:Can we trade gortat now...
Do you guys not see the decline??
Or should we wait for his value to keep decreasing?


He'd have to be really bad to be bad value at 12 million in this big money era. That's a fantastic contract, and right now he's vastly outplaying it.

I think Gortat is good. I don't want to move him unless we acquire someone like Cousins that disrupts the balance on the roster.


Gortat is not the problem for our perimeter defense woes, but no-one is really scared to go into the paint with Gortat. Also, I think we're underestimating the need for a big man Wall can throw alley-oops to. He's 32 with a fantastic contract, which should be an even bigger incentive to move him.


the problem is that the center position became really good in the last few seasons--so almost everyone has one. I don't see many places he'd go to and be a starter right away. The Warriors would be fantastic with him--but you'd get Looney and a really late 1st at best, which would hurt us a lot.
User avatar
Meliorus
Analyst
Posts: 3,646
And1: 1,185
Joined: Apr 16, 2015
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#948 » by Meliorus » Wed Dec 7, 2016 3:08 pm

Dark Faze wrote:
Meliorus wrote:
Dark Faze wrote:
He'd have to be really bad to be bad value at 12 million in this big money era. That's a fantastic contract, and right now he's vastly outplaying it.

I think Gortat is good. I don't want to move him unless we acquire someone like Cousins that disrupts the balance on the roster.


Gortat is not the problem for our perimeter defense woes, but no-one is really scared to go into the paint with Gortat. Also, I think we're underestimating the need for a big man Wall can throw alley-oops to. He's 32 with a fantastic contract, which should be an even bigger incentive to move him.


the problem is that the center position became really good in the last few seasons--so almost everyone has one. I don't see many places he'd go to and be a starter right away. The Warriors would be fantastic with him--but you'd get Looney and a really late 1st at best, which would hurt us a lot.


By the time Gortat's contract finishes, Wall will be 30 years old. I just can't accept the idea that the best center Wall ever played with was Marcin Gortat, and Javale McGee was the the only above the rim center he ever got.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,542
And1: 2,173
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#949 » by Dark Faze » Wed Dec 7, 2016 3:48 pm

i'd do dwight for mahinmi, smith, and a 2nd if we had a 2nd, but we dont
User avatar
Meliorus
Analyst
Posts: 3,646
And1: 1,185
Joined: Apr 16, 2015
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#950 » by Meliorus » Wed Dec 7, 2016 3:53 pm

Dark Faze wrote:i'd do dwight for mahinmi, smith, and a 2nd if we had a 2nd, but we dont


Are we really implying that a 2nd round pick is the missing piece to getting that deal done?
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,542
And1: 2,173
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#951 » by Dark Faze » Wed Dec 7, 2016 4:36 pm

I like Dwight but I'm not giving up a first to make that deal happen at this point, and I doubt many other teams would include one for him.
BealsLegs
Freshman
Posts: 51
And1: 7
Joined: Nov 17, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#952 » by BealsLegs » Wed Dec 7, 2016 5:18 pm

Im not against trading Otto I just dont get the nerlens noel hype, he'd be an upgrade athletically and defensively but hes had alot of serious injuries/we'd have to pay him big money cause of RFA/and he sucks at hitting FTs.

I just think if we give up on otto it should be for someone better but noel does seem like the most realistic trade
User avatar
Induveca
Head Coach
Posts: 7,379
And1: 724
Joined: Dec 02, 2004
   

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#953 » by Induveca » Wed Dec 7, 2016 5:29 pm

BealsLegs wrote:Im not against trading Otto I just dont get the nerlens noel hype, he'd be an upgrade athletically and defensively but hes had alot of serious injuries/we'd have to pay him big money cause of RFA/and he sucks at hitting FTs.

I just think if we give up on otto it should be for someone better but noel does seem like the most realistic trade


Beal/Gortat for Cousins/McLemore anyone?
BealsLegs
Freshman
Posts: 51
And1: 7
Joined: Nov 17, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#954 » by BealsLegs » Wed Dec 7, 2016 5:32 pm

Induveca wrote:
BealsLegs wrote:Im not against trading Otto I just dont get the nerlens noel hype, he'd be an upgrade athletically and defensively but hes had alot of serious injuries/we'd have to pay him big money cause of RFA/and he sucks at hitting FTs.

I just think if we give up on otto it should be for someone better but noel does seem like the most realistic trade


Beal/Gortat for Cousins/McLemore anyone?

id be all over any situation were (beal or otto) + gortat can get us Cousins + filler
User avatar
Induveca
Head Coach
Posts: 7,379
And1: 724
Joined: Dec 02, 2004
   

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#955 » by Induveca » Wed Dec 7, 2016 5:36 pm

BealsLegs wrote:
Induveca wrote:
BealsLegs wrote:Im not against trading Otto I just dont get the nerlens noel hype, he'd be an upgrade athletically and defensively but hes had alot of serious injuries/we'd have to pay him big money cause of RFA/and he sucks at hitting FTs.

I just think if we give up on otto it should be for someone better but noel does seem like the most realistic trade


Beal/Gortat for Cousins/McLemore anyone?

id be all over any situation were (beal or otto) + gortat can get us Cousins + filler


Just a hunch, but I think a Porter/Wall/Cousins trio meshes a bit better. Porter seems happy to not compete for an alpha spot, not so much Beal.

Beal immediately assumes the alpha role in Sacramento.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,542
And1: 2,173
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#956 » by Dark Faze » Wed Dec 7, 2016 8:01 pm

I really think an unprotected first in a draft of this caliber should be enough for a guy like Cousins. I doubt the Celtics would include any players with the Brooklyn pick if something got done. We should be able to just include a pick and filler for Cousins.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#957 » by Ruzious » Wed Dec 7, 2016 8:59 pm

BealsLegs wrote:
Induveca wrote:
BealsLegs wrote:Im not against trading Otto I just dont get the nerlens noel hype, he'd be an upgrade athletically and defensively but hes had alot of serious injuries/we'd have to pay him big money cause of RFA/and he sucks at hitting FTs.

I just think if we give up on otto it should be for someone better but noel does seem like the most realistic trade


Beal/Gortat for Cousins/McLemore anyone?

id be all over any situation were (beal or otto) + gortat can get us Cousins + filler

Yup - just find a 3rd team to include that can use Gortat (Boston?), because he is not a fit for Sac.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
Meliorus
Analyst
Posts: 3,646
And1: 1,185
Joined: Apr 16, 2015
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#958 » by Meliorus » Wed Dec 7, 2016 11:17 pm

Dark Faze wrote:I really think an unprotected first in a draft of this caliber should be enough for a guy like Cousins. I doubt the Celtics would include any players with the Brooklyn pick if something got done. We should be able to just include a pick and filler for Cousins.


The value of picks is being overstated. We'd be LUCKY to get Cousins for our 2017 + 2018 + 2019 1st round picks. Brooklyn's pick has more value since that team will stay bad.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 25,309
And1: 9,514
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#959 » by payitforward » Thu Dec 8, 2016 12:33 am

Meliorus wrote:
Dark Faze wrote:I really think an unprotected first in a draft of this caliber should be enough for a guy like Cousins. I doubt the Celtics would include any players with the Brooklyn pick if something got done. We should be able to just include a pick and filler for Cousins.

The value of picks is being overstated. We'd be LUCKY to get Cousins for our 2017 + 2018 + 2019 1st round picks. Brooklyn's pick has more value since that team will stay bad.

Well, that's BS, but those who worship Cousins will admit of no evidence to the contrary.

If he does get traded, you will be shocked that he doesn't bring anything like that kind of return.
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,894
And1: 9,183
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#960 » by AFM » Thu Dec 8, 2016 12:36 am

He's not getting 3 first round picks.

A first, and a decent player in return, sure.

Return to Washington Wizards