Lonzo Ball
Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831
Re: Lonzo Ball
-
No-Man
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,879
- And1: 3,480
- Joined: Feb 11, 2012
Re: Lonzo Ball
Seriously I get the, spectacular passer, big Guard out of Cal,but whoever that really thinks that the Kidd comp makes sense outside of that surface needs to check their way of thinking
Re: Lonzo Ball
-
Supreme-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 121
- And1: 36
- Joined: Dec 13, 2015
-
Re: Lonzo Ball
Kolkmania wrote:Supreme- wrote:did someone just compare him to a poormans rajon rondo?? LOL
he has steph curry range, can play defense, B+ athleticism, and his bb iq is off the charts.
yes, his numbers didnt look great against kentucky, but he outplayed fox down the stretch. huge steal followed by a dagger three.
havent seen him really attack the basket, but i have no qualms that he will be able to at the next level
So we should ignore the entire game and state that Ball outplayed Fox down the stretch because Malik Monk threw a ball at his leg and he hit a three? I'm not saying that De'Aaron Fox is better than Lonzo Ball, but Hamilton and Leaf won that game for UCLA.
where did i state that we should ignore the entire game? and monk threw the ball at his leg? go re-watch the play, he read monk like a book. paint whatever narrative you want, he made the big plays that contributed to uclas win
Re: Lonzo Ball
-
ItsThatEasy
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,189
- And1: 5,033
- Joined: Nov 04, 2014
-
Re: Lonzo Ball
E-Balla wrote:Kolkmania wrote:E-Balla wrote:One major thing I have noticed about Ball is the offense doesn't play to his strengths much. How often do you see them run the PNR? Not much. Its mostly dribble handoffs. I think his biggest stretch will come late season when defenses crack down on them and they're forced to run more PNRs because he's the perfect player to run them.
Why do you think that more P&R's will benefit Ball? The few occasions I've seen him do it he nearly lost his handle and his lack of a pull-up jumper makes him easier to defend. Don't think that UCLA will change their playstyle this season, they will continue to outrun their opponents and use off-ball screens to score in the half court.
Lack of a pull up jumper? Maybe from midrange but he's money from deep. And I think the PNR will benefit him because his biggest positive is the angles he sees on his passes. Here's the closest I can find to stats about his PNR possessions:Paired with Leaf, UCLA can either pick and pop (50 percent on 18 attempts), or let Leaf roll to the rim (1.18 points per roll, according to Synergy Sports).
I'm not sure exactly what his overall numbers are but it fit what I've seen - mainly that the Ball-Leaf PNR is nasty even though it's not ran often.
Without a decent pull up he won't be a PnR stud, no matter how good his 3 ball is.
Re: Lonzo Ball
-
gaspar
- Suns Forum Stat Stuffer
- Posts: 6,761
- And1: 5,479
- Joined: Jun 21, 2009
Re: Lonzo Ball
Kolkmania wrote:E-Balla wrote:One major thing I have noticed about Ball is the offense doesn't play to his strengths much. How often do you see them run the PNR? Not much. Its mostly dribble handoffs. I think his biggest stretch will come late season when defenses crack down on them and they're forced to run more PNRs because he's the perfect player to run them.
Why do you think that more P&R's will benefit Ball? The few occasions I've seen him do it he nearly lost his handle and his lack of a pull-up jumper makes him easier to defend. Don't think that UCLA will change their playstyle this season, they will continue to outrun their opponents and use off-ball screens to score in the half court.
+1
I highly doubt that a guy who doesn't (can't?) penetrate and can't shoot off the dribble will be a great PNR guard in the NBA.
Re: Lonzo Ball
- E-Balla
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,865
- And1: 25,163
- Joined: Dec 19, 2012
- Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
-
Re: Lonzo Ball
ItsThatEasy wrote:E-Balla wrote:Kolkmania wrote:
Why do you think that more P&R's will benefit Ball? The few occasions I've seen him do it he nearly lost his handle and his lack of a pull-up jumper makes him easier to defend. Don't think that UCLA will change their playstyle this season, they will continue to outrun their opponents and use off-ball screens to score in the half court.
Lack of a pull up jumper? Maybe from midrange but he's money from deep. And I think the PNR will benefit him because his biggest positive is the angles he sees on his passes. Here's the closest I can find to stats about his PNR possessions:Paired with Leaf, UCLA can either pick and pop (50 percent on 18 attempts), or let Leaf roll to the rim (1.18 points per roll, according to Synergy Sports).
I'm not sure exactly what his overall numbers are but it fit what I've seen - mainly that the Ball-Leaf PNR is nasty even though it's not ran often.
Without a decent pull up he won't be a PnR stud, no matter how good his 3 ball is.
He has a decent pull up jumper from 3. That stepback 3 has gone in regularly and it's not wise to go under on his screens. I think y'all need to watch him more because he's looked great on PNRs when they do run them.
Re: Lonzo Ball
-
ItsThatEasy
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,189
- And1: 5,033
- Joined: Nov 04, 2014
-
Re: Lonzo Ball
E-Balla wrote:ItsThatEasy wrote:E-Balla wrote:Lack of a pull up jumper? Maybe from midrange but he's money from deep. And I think the PNR will benefit him because his biggest positive is the angles he sees on his passes. Here's the closest I can find to stats about his PNR possessions:
I'm not sure exactly what his overall numbers are but it fit what I've seen - mainly that the Ball-Leaf PNR is nasty even though it's not ran often.
Without a decent pull up he won't be a PnR stud, no matter how good his 3 ball is.
He has a decent pull up jumper from 3. That stepback 3 has gone in regularly and it's not wise to go under on his screens. I think y'all need to watch him more because he's looked great on PNRs when they do run them.
Even Steph is forced into the mid-range pull up every now and then. His step back 3 should not be the strong suit of his scoring PnR game. He hasn't shown the ability to hit the floater or mid-range jumper consistently and his finishing in traffic isn't all that great either. As of now he's either hitting a deep 3, cutting or scoring in transition. Scoring wise half court game is simply not NBA ready. People had the same complaints about Simmons in the half court, though he was much better finishing through contact and showed flashes of a post game.
Re: Lonzo Ball
- E-Balla
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,865
- And1: 25,163
- Joined: Dec 19, 2012
- Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
-
Re: Lonzo Ball
ItsThatEasy wrote:E-Balla wrote:ItsThatEasy wrote:
Without a decent pull up he won't be a PnR stud, no matter how good his 3 ball is.
He has a decent pull up jumper from 3. That stepback 3 has gone in regularly and it's not wise to go under on his screens. I think y'all need to watch him more because he's looked great on PNRs when they do run them.
Even Steph is forced into the mid-range pull up every now and then. His step back 3 should not be the strong suit of his scoring PnR game. He hasn't shown the ability to hit the floater or mid-range jumper consistently and his finishing in traffic isn't all that great either. As of now he's either hitting a deep 3, cutting or scoring in transition. Scoring wise half court game is simply not NBA ready. People had the same complaints about Simmons in the half court, though he was much better finishing through contact and showed flashes of a post game.
Steph isn't really forced into midrange 2s often he takes them when open because he makes them. That said I get what you mean but as deep as he shoots you have to blanket him and that's blow by layup central unless the D collapses and he's a great drive and kick guy. If his stepback 3 is legit everything else opens up scoring wise. If not he needs to learn how to get creative with his handles or get his shot off. One major positive is that he knows how to draw fouls when in the crowded paint (just like Simmons did).
Re: Lonzo Ball
-
Duke4life831
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 37,098
- And1: 67,966
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
-
Re: Lonzo Ball
Ball definitely needs a floater. That to me is the glaring hole in his offense right now. Its definitely a shot that I dont have to big of doubts that he can add to his arsenal. The only guy in this draft I think is going to be a better PnR PG is going to be DSJ, hes an elite PnR player.
Re: Lonzo Ball
-
EMG518
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,843
- And1: 944
- Joined: Mar 11, 2012
Re: Lonzo Ball
Fischella wrote:EMG518 wrote:Starting to think he may wind up going #1.
There is literally no way he goes ahead of Fultz.
I don't know, he looks like he could be a game changer. I would never say never.
Re: Lonzo Ball
-
Kolkmania
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,472
- And1: 1,750
- Joined: Feb 11, 2015
Re: Lonzo Ball
Supreme- wrote:Kolkmania wrote:Supreme- wrote:did someone just compare him to a poormans rajon rondo?? LOL
he has steph curry range, can play defense, B+ athleticism, and his bb iq is off the charts.
yes, his numbers didnt look great against kentucky, but he outplayed fox down the stretch. huge steal followed by a dagger three.
havent seen him really attack the basket, but i have no qualms that he will be able to at the next level
So we should ignore the entire game and state that Ball outplayed Fox down the stretch because Malik Monk threw a ball at his leg and he hit a three? I'm not saying that De'Aaron Fox is better than Lonzo Ball, but Hamilton and Leaf won that game for UCLA.
where did i state that we should ignore the entire game? and monk threw the ball at his leg? go re-watch the play, he read monk like a book. paint whatever narrative you want, he made the big plays that contributed to uclas win
Oh sure Lonzo Ball did the right thing, but to me it was more a display of Monk's flaws as a playmaker than a great read from Ball. Everybody saw that Monk was going to bounce pass that ball three seconds before he actually did that.
Well, because two good plays from Ball don't negate the concerning signs he showed during that entire game. The only times he drived to the rim, he was defended by Derek Willis or Bam Adebayo and even then he was very hesitant. I'm not sure why two/three good plays in the last 8 minutes is outplaying someone and worth mentioning when he had a disappointing game.
I'm coming off a as a huge "hater", but I'm not. I love Lonzo Ball. He's the kind of player that makes everybody better with his BB IQ and an absolute winner. Although, so far he's not showing me he's close to first pick worthy like some guys here mention. To me he's a complementary player instead of player you build around.
Re: Lonzo Ball
- SelfishPlayer
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,550
- And1: 3,369
- Joined: May 23, 2014
Re: Lonzo Ball
That Kentucky game was very telling. When he went up against NBA level athletes they were capable of crowding him preventing his unorthodox pull up and step back 3's. But it also revealed that he is unwilling to be a diva by forcing the issue, instead allowing the game to come to him. As for the Jason Kidd comparisons, I haven't seen Ball throw one handed passes off of the dribble with his non shooting hand like Kidd. From what I have witnessed Ball pretty much passes with his shooting hand or both. The ability to pass with either hand made Kidd a threat for the assist at all times from all angles without the need to first put the ball in his dominant hand or both.
SelfishPlayer wrote:The Mavs won playoff games without Luka
The Mavs missed the playoffs without Brunson.
Re: Lonzo Ball
- madmaxmedia
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,604
- And1: 7,530
- Joined: Jun 22, 2001
- Location: SoCal
-
Re: Lonzo Ball
Funny there have been a lot of articles blowing him up the last week or so, but he has not shown a lot the last couple of games.
Re: Lonzo Ball
-
peachbucket
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,613
- And1: 663
- Joined: Feb 02, 2005
Re: Lonzo Ball
SelfishPlayer wrote:That Kentucky game was very telling. When he went up against NBA level athletes they were capable of crowding him preventing his unorthodox pull up and step back 3's. But it also revealed that he is unwilling to be a diva by forcing the issue, instead allowing the game to come to him. As for the Jason Kidd comparisons, I haven't seen Ball throw one handed passes off of the dribble with his non shooting hand like Kidd. From what I have witnessed Ball pretty much passes with his shooting hand or both. The ability to pass with either hand made Kidd a threat for the assist at all times from all angles without the need to first put the ball in his dominant hand or both.
This is a really great point about the J Kidd comp. I will have to watch Ball more closely. Could Magic or Nash make the pass off the dribble with their off hand?
Re: Lonzo Ball
-
Bakomagic
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,706
- And1: 1,041
- Joined: Feb 24, 2009
Re: Lonzo Ball
SelfishPlayer wrote:That Kentucky game was very telling. When he went up against NBA level athletes they were capable of crowding him preventing his unorthodox pull up and step back 3's. But it also revealed that he is unwilling to be a diva by forcing the issue, instead allowing the game to come to him. As for the Jason Kidd comparisons, I haven't seen Ball throw one handed passes off of the dribble with his non shooting hand like Kidd. From what I have witnessed Ball pretty much passes with his shooting hand or both. The ability to pass with either hand made Kidd a threat for the assist at all times from all angles without the need to first put the ball in his dominant hand or both.
He's made those passes in three of the seven games I've seen this year. Off the dribble left hand pass across the court to shooters in the corner.
Watch the Lonzo Ball Highlights from the Portland, Cal State Northridge, and Kentucky games.
He can make any pass you need him to make he is a generational talent when it comes to passing. There are limiys to his game but passing is not one of them.
Re: Lonzo Ball
-
Bakomagic
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,706
- And1: 1,041
- Joined: Feb 24, 2009
Re: Lonzo Ball
madmaxmedia wrote:Funny there have been a lot of articles blowing him up the last week or so, but he has not shown a lot the last couple of games.
He had 19,7,and 4 in a blowout win against mich
And 13, 10, and 7 in a even bigger blow out game against UCSB
Shooting 4-7 from three then 3-6 from three. He's been pretty consistent all year doesn't put up huge scoring numbers but anytime UCLA needs a big bucket he gets a layup or hits a step back jumper from deep.
But I do agree The Hype for him lately has been crazy.
Re: Lonzo Ball
-
bigboi
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,762
- And1: 1,422
- Joined: Nov 05, 2010
Re: Lonzo Ball
Bakomagic wrote:SelfishPlayer wrote:That Kentucky game was very telling. When he went up against NBA level athletes they were capable of crowding him preventing his unorthodox pull up and step back 3's. But it also revealed that he is unwilling to be a diva by forcing the issue, instead allowing the game to come to him. As for the Jason Kidd comparisons, I haven't seen Ball throw one handed passes off of the dribble with his non shooting hand like Kidd. From what I have witnessed Ball pretty much passes with his shooting hand or both. The ability to pass with either hand made Kidd a threat for the assist at all times from all angles without the need to first put the ball in his dominant hand or both.
He's made those passes in three of the seven games I've seen this year. Off the dribble left hand pass across the court to shooters in the corner.
Watch the Lonzo Ball Highlights from the Portland, Cal State Northridge, and Kentucky games.
He can make any pass you need him to make he is a generational talent when it comes to passing. There are limiys to his game but passing is not one of them.
Generational? Exaggerating. D'angelo Russell was once a generational passer on this board too smh
tlee324 wrote:
Lebron made it to the finals with that cleveland team.
Bird would have won 4 rings with that team, in this weak ass era of basketball.
Re: Lonzo Ball
-
Bakomagic
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,706
- And1: 1,041
- Joined: Feb 24, 2009
Re: Lonzo Ball
bigboi wrote:Bakomagic wrote:SelfishPlayer wrote:That Kentucky game was very telling. When he went up against NBA level athletes they were capable of crowding him preventing his unorthodox pull up and step back 3's. But it also revealed that he is unwilling to be a diva by forcing the issue, instead allowing the game to come to him. As for the Jason Kidd comparisons, I haven't seen Ball throw one handed passes off of the dribble with his non shooting hand like Kidd. From what I have witnessed Ball pretty much passes with his shooting hand or both. The ability to pass with either hand made Kidd a threat for the assist at all times from all angles without the need to first put the ball in his dominant hand or both.
He's made those passes in three of the seven games I've seen this year. Off the dribble left hand pass across the court to shooters in the corner.
Watch the Lonzo Ball Highlights from the Portland, Cal State Northridge, and Kentucky games.
He can make any pass you need him to make he is a generational talent when it comes to passing. There are limiys to his game but passing is not one of them.
Generational? Exaggerating. D'angelo Russell was once a generational passer on this board too smh
It less of an exaggeration and more of a prediction. We won't be able to determine if a player is/was a generational talent until well into his professional career. You can't exaggerate something that can't be proven right or wrong.
do you feel that D. Russell passing ability compares with Lonzo Ball's ? I don't think it's close.
Re: Lonzo Ball
-
TKainZero
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,056
- And1: 3,275
- Joined: Jul 31, 2014
-
Re: Lonzo Ball
Ucla has some really exciting players
Ball of course
TJ leaf has been playing fantastic as well
Hamilton I fell in love with last season
Even holiday will probably be drafted
Ucla all the way
Ball of course
TJ leaf has been playing fantastic as well
Hamilton I fell in love with last season
Even holiday will probably be drafted
Ucla all the way
USA Celtics in full effect. Amazing chemistry building experience right there for the main core of the team
Proceeds to finish 7th and shames the entire nation!
Re: Lonzo Ball
- Jaisy
- Sophomore
- Posts: 217
- And1: 88
- Joined: Mar 25, 2016
-
Re: Lonzo Ball
Lonzo is a type of player that team will be build around him. Mavs should draft him. He is a game changer and he is showing up a leadership since hes been in high school.
"I don't want to fight Goliath's homeboy or little brother. I want to fight Goliath."
Re: Lonzo Ball
-
jonjames
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,687
- And1: 1,758
- Joined: Apr 02, 2016
Re: Lonzo Ball
Bakomagic wrote:bigboi wrote:Bakomagic wrote:
He's made those passes in three of the seven games I've seen this year. Off the dribble left hand pass across the court to shooters in the corner.
Watch the Lonzo Ball Highlights from the Portland, Cal State Northridge, and Kentucky games.
He can make any pass you need him to make he is a generational talent when it comes to passing. There are limiys to his game but passing is not one of them.
Generational? Exaggerating. D'angelo Russell was once a generational passer on this board too smh
It less of an exaggeration and more of a prediction. We won't be able to determine if a player is/was a generational talent until well into his professional career. You can't exaggerate something that can't be proven right or wrong.
do you feel that D. Russell passing ability compares with Lonzo Ball's ? I don't think it's close.
I think they are pretty much on the same level. Russell has impeccable timing on his passes and can really thread the needle between defenders. lonzo ball has a more pass first mentality and makes the game look easy. He looks like he's a couple of plays ahead of defense always looking ahead for the easy baskets for his teammates.



