DarkHawk wrote:Do you see Jonas as a guy who will become an elite center? Adding him would likely eliminate re-signing Len since we're not going to pay 15-20+ mil, per year, for a backup. Our C depth now would take a hit.
Is he a good defender or can he turn it on and become a great defensive center in the next few years?
If I were going to trade Chandler for a prospect, I'd rather get one that gives similar production like Noel. He can defend, can't score (we've got enough of that), and is young.
If Toronto was willing to trade JV, then they don't believe he's going to improve.
I see JV as potentially being a productive offensive C with capable defense. I'll also freely admit he may never be an elite C but I don't feel like Len would be elite either. He's a capable defender but he's a little slow which hurts him in the PnR and he likely will never be an elite defensive C. Len is a better defender on the PnR than JV for sure. But similarly, do you see Len as a great offensive C in the next few years? Highly, highly doubt it.
My issue with trading Chandler for a guy like Noel, is that he essentially does the same thing as Len. Can defend, can't score and is young. I don't see the point of that. If we're trading Chandler, I'd rather have a C who's good on offense, still young and also a capable defender. He gives us the big man that can score at a high percentage.
Also just because Raptors want to trade him doesn't mean he's a bad player or isn't going to improve either. Raptors are a contending team or they want to be and JV may not be ready to be their C during their run, which is now. And that's not necessarily a knock on JV. JV is still only 25, likely hasn't hit his prime yet and right now Raptor might be looking for a guy with playoff/championship experience. If you're a legit contending team, do you want Chandler on your team who has experience or do you want an inconsistent and inexperienced C like Len or JV? JV's developmental timeline may match up with ours better than the Raptors.
In my opinion, I'm OK with eliminating having to resign Len and I have grown to like Len's production when he is ....productive. For me, it all depends on what kind of deal Len is likely to get. I'd rather Len at $10-12m over JV at $16m but I'd rather JV at 16m over Len at $15-20m.
Just because he's young doesn't make it the right move IMO.
I'll still take Chandler's vet presence over a guy who, while young, is likely close to peaking if he hasn't already.
My belief is, if we traded for Valencuinas, it would do a couple of things.
1. Our offensive flow would be better because now we have a scoring big.
2. Our defense would be much worse, forcing us to find a defensive big man (Maybe a max offer to Noel as that's what it'd take to have any chance of Philly not matching)
So we'd be switching our need from a scoring big man to a defensive big man. I guess from an asset perspective, it would be better to have the younger player, but I would worry how it'd affect our chemistry and development if we are back to where we were 2 years ago with a bunch of kids and nobody to guide them. Dudley helps but Barbosa won't be here long (I'd be surprised if we don't trade him at the deadline.)
I don't think he's close to peaking yet but that's a matter of opinion.
Also my opinion but I think Bender has potential to be a better defender than he is as a scorer (not saying he's going to be crap offensively either). I think Bender is exactly the type of big that can cover JV on the PnR and weakside defense. So for me, I think a future front line of Bender/JV is more versatile and provides a better balance offensively/defensively over Bender/Len or Noel.
Chandler shouldn't really play any part in our future plans. I recognise his contribution on and off the court for us but like LB, I don't think he's here for the long term. He's a C with championship experience who is still a solid defender and elite rebounder; he's ripe for a trade.