ImageImageImageImageImage

GT: Bucks - Wizards 23.12.16 7 ET

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,253
And1: 5,029
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: GT: Bucks - Wizards 23.12.16 7 ET 

Post#221 » by tontoz » Sat Dec 24, 2016 2:58 pm

I bet Beal is missing JJ Redick right now.

Ugly beatdown. It happens. That is why it is best just to enjoy a win like the Clippers win without thinking it is some kind of turning point.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
TheBabyMaker
Starter
Posts: 2,130
And1: 852
Joined: Apr 01, 2009
Location: Truth or Consequences, NM
     

Re: GT: Bucks - Wizards 23.12.16 7 ET 

Post#222 » by TheBabyMaker » Sat Dec 24, 2016 5:28 pm

Bucks were due to give us a beatdown sooner or later. We have got to best of them (like Orlando) recently so it is what it is. They got smacked move on lets see what Wall and Beal will do Monday. IMO Giannis will be a top player when LeBron retires.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,554
And1: 9,076
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: GT: Bucks - Wizards 23.12.16 7 ET 

Post#223 » by payitforward » Sat Dec 24, 2016 8:48 pm

NatP4 wrote:I'm shocked at the amount of people that won't admit obvious coaching mistakes. BUT ERNIE DID THIS

Sheesh.... Is every loss Scott Brooks' fault?

We got thrashed in all 4 quarters. We've also been playing our starters an ungodly # of minutes. And this was our 3d game of a road trip. Brooks was right to recognize early on that the odds of our coming back to win the game were very long.

In fact, if you extend what the starters produced for another 100 minutes, we still lose the game by a lot. This was a good game for guys to rest and the bench to get 100 minutes.

IOW, it's an example of good coaching not bad coaching. As to who the players on the roster are, that and nothing else is the main factor in every win and every loss. We know who is responsible for our roster, and it isn't Scot Brooks.
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,336
And1: 6,705
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: GT: Bucks - Wizards 23.12.16 7 ET 

Post#224 » by TGW » Sat Dec 24, 2016 9:42 pm

miller31time wrote:Satoransky leading the league in the highly-coveted "assists to the crowd" statistic.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
User avatar
Meliorus
Analyst
Posts: 3,646
And1: 1,185
Joined: Apr 16, 2015
 

Re: GT: Bucks - Wizards 23.12.16 7 ET 

Post#225 » by Meliorus » Sat Dec 24, 2016 10:52 pm

payitforward wrote:
NatP4 wrote:I'm shocked at the amount of people that won't admit obvious coaching mistakes. BUT ERNIE DID THIS

Sheesh.... Is every loss Scott Brooks' fault?

We got thrashed in all 4 quarters. We've also been playing our starters an ungodly # of minutes. And this was our 3d game of a road trip. Brooks was right to recognize early on that the odds of our coming back to win the game were very long.

In fact, if you extend what the starters produced for another 100 minutes, we still lose the game by a lot. This was a good game for guys to rest and the bench to get 100 minutes.

IOW, it's an example of good coaching not bad coaching. As to who the players on the roster are, that and nothing else is the main factor in every win and every loss. We know who is responsible for our roster, and it isn't Scot Brooks.


Sometimes I forget that in the summer of 2015, Ernie refused to spend any money to leave cap space open for Durant. So coming off a season where we made it to the 2nd round and was a John Wall injury away from the ECF, Ernie decided to make no roster improvements. Our Front Office literally wasted our 2015-2016 season, basically told the players that it didn't matter, because we were going to get Durant. It's hilarious that Ernie planned for Durant so meticulously that a bunch of our players were on expiring deals (Nene, Temple, Sessions, Dudley). They actually believed we were going to land Durant.

Well, by the time Durant made it known that he hated playing in DC, it was too late. This summer, Ernie began dishing out max money to Horford and Batum, none of whom would sign with us.

In conclusion, we spent no money during the summer of 2015 just to sign Smith, Nicholson, Manhimi, and Thornton. This is not Scott Brooks fault.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,541
And1: 1,986
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: GT: Bucks - Wizards 23.12.16 7 ET 

Post#226 » by gambitx777 » Sun Dec 25, 2016 8:46 am

To be fair I think horford was pretty close to coming here. Horford would have been all 3 bigs we signed So replace ian (has not played) and smit/nicholson (sucked) with horfords production and move morris or gortat to a large bench roll. We would have been much better off, obviously. Now who would we have signed for cheap? IDK. But clearly if we got horford we would be signing a different tune, but I don't think it was EG fault we did not bag Horford.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,554
And1: 9,076
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: GT: Bucks - Wizards 23.12.16 7 ET 

Post#227 » by payitforward » Sun Dec 25, 2016 6:14 pm

Meliorus wrote:Sometimes I forget that in the summer of 2015, Ernie refused to spend any money to leave cap space open for Durant. So coming off a season where we made it to the 2nd round and was a John Wall injury away from the ECF, Ernie decided to make no roster improvements. Our Front Office literally wasted our 2015-2016 season, basically told the players that it didn't matter, because we were going to get Durant. It's hilarious that Ernie planned for Durant so meticulously that a bunch of our players were on expiring deals (Nene, Temple, Sessions, Dudley). They actually believed we were going to land Durant.

Well, by the time Durant made it known that he hated playing in DC, it was too late. This summer, Ernie began dishing out max money to Horford and Batum, none of whom would sign with us.

In conclusion, we spent no money during the summer of 2015 just to sign Smith, Nicholson, Manhimi, and Thornton. This is not Scott Brooks fault.

Not only "no roster improvements" that Summer -- we got worse. E.g. we weren't able to re-sign Paul Pierce. We had to play Temple 1900+ minutes instead of the 700+ of the previous season, and we gave a very raw rookie, Oubre, almost 700 minutes. The guys we brought in (on 1-year, rent-a-player contracts) -- Dudley, Neal, Anderson, et. al. -- either didn't play or were unproductive. In fairness, we made a good draft day move and pick. Then, things not working out, we traded a high R1 pick for a bad player... sigh.

We only had 5 players, overall, who produced at an above NBA average rate for their positions in 2015-16: Wall, Porter, Gortat, Sessions (who was only slightly above NBA average) and Hickson (who only played 155 minutes). They totaled @9100 minutes on the floor.

The previous year it had been 8 guys, and they played almost 12000 minutes. At the end of that season, I predicted that the team had peaked. I didn't see any practical way for us to get better given how Ernie puts teams together. But I didn't expect him to do as badly as he did!

Then, this year, he did even worse in the off-season! The result is that even with quick development from Oubre and a much better Bradley Beal than ever before, we are still worse than we were last year. No doubt Ted will reward Ernie with a new contract. :nonono: :crazy:
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,101
And1: 22,527
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: GT: Bucks - Wizards 23.12.16 7 ET 

Post#228 » by nate33 » Sun Dec 25, 2016 8:06 pm

gambitx777 wrote:To be fair I think horford was pretty close to coming here. Horford would have been all 3 bigs we signed So replace ian (has not played) and smit/nicholson (sucked) with horfords production and move morris or gortat to a large bench roll. We would have been much better off, obviously. Now who would we have signed for cheap? IDK. But clearly if we got horford we would be signing a different tune, but I don't think it was EG fault we did not bag Horford.

The reason we didn't get Horford is because our franchise has such a reputation for suckiness. That IS Ernie's fault.

Furthermore, once we failed to get Horford, I'd have gone after Biyombo instead of Mahinmi. Biyombo is only 24 and ended up costing just $1M more per year than Mahinmi. If that fell through, I would have abandoned the plan of acquiring a high price starting caliber player and instead would have sought 1-year stopgap deals with a plan to try again in 2017. Would Nene have remained on a 1-year, $6M deal? If he didn't stay, Hickson could certainly have been retained cheaply. Likewise, it was foolish to throw a big contract at a plodding PF like Nicholson. Those types of players are dinosaurs in today's game. Better to find a rangy combo forward if you can. If not, sign a stopgap vet like Brandon Bass on a cheap deal. We probably could have talked a backup PG like Galloway or Sessions into staying on a 1-year deal if we overpaid.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,443
And1: 4,440
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: GT: Bucks - Wizards 23.12.16 7 ET 

Post#229 » by closg00 » Sun Dec 25, 2016 8:27 pm

gambitx777 wrote:To be fair I think horford was pretty close to coming here. Horford would have been all 3 bigs we signed So replace ian (has not played) and smit/nicholson (sucked) with horfords production and move morris or gortat to a large bench roll. We would have been much better off, obviously. Now who would we have signed for cheap? IDK. But clearly if we got horford we would be signing a different tune, but I don't think it was EG fault we did not bag Horford.


This turned-out to be FALSE, Horford in a recent interview said the Houston, not Washington, was his 2nd choice. So to be clear, Ted & Ernie's Wizards, is an orginzation that Top-Tier NBA players do not wish to join outside of being traded here.
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,346
And1: 2,721
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: GT: Bucks - Wizards 23.12.16 7 ET 

Post#230 » by Kanyewest » Mon Dec 26, 2016 2:59 am

closg00 wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:To be fair I think horford was pretty close to coming here. Horford would have been all 3 bigs we signed So replace ian (has not played) and smit/nicholson (sucked) with horfords production and move morris or gortat to a large bench roll. We would have been much better off, obviously. Now who would we have signed for cheap? IDK. But clearly if we got horford we would be signing a different tune, but I don't think it was EG fault we did not bag Horford.


This turned-out to be FALSE, Horford in a recent interview said the Houston, not Washington, was his 2nd choice. So to be clear, Ted & Ernie's Wizards, is an orginzation that Top-Tier NBA players do not wish to join outside of being traded here.


Woj at the time said otherwise. Really not sure what to believe since Woj is pretty reputable but I was pretty surprised TBH when Washington was considered one of the final two teams.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,554
And1: 9,076
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: GT: Bucks - Wizards 23.12.16 7 ET 

Post#231 » by payitforward » Mon Dec 26, 2016 4:02 pm

Kanyewest wrote:
closg00 wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:To be fair I think horford was pretty close to coming here. Horford would have been all 3 bigs we signed So replace ian (has not played) and smit/nicholson (sucked) with horfords production and move morris or gortat to a large bench roll. We would have been much better off, obviously. Now who would we have signed for cheap? IDK. But clearly if we got horford we would be signing a different tune, but I don't think it was EG fault we did not bag Horford.

This turned-out to be FALSE, Horford in a recent interview said the Houston, not Washington, was his 2nd choice. So to be clear, Ted & Ernie's Wizards, is an orginzation that Top-Tier NBA players do not wish to join outside of being traded here.

Woj at the time said otherwise. Really not sure what to believe since Woj is pretty reputable but I was pretty surprised TBH when Washington was considered one of the final two teams.

He may be reputable, but if Horford says that it was between Boston & Houston in his mind then I think he probably has the best inside info! :)
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,119
And1: 4,969
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: GT: Bucks - Wizards 23.12.16 7 ET 

Post#232 » by DCZards » Mon Dec 26, 2016 6:24 pm

closg00 wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:To be fair I think horford was pretty close to coming here. Horford would have been all 3 bigs we signed So replace ian (has not played) and smit/nicholson (sucked) with horfords production and move morris or gortat to a large bench roll. We would have been much better off, obviously. Now who would we have signed for cheap? IDK. But clearly if we got horford we would be signing a different tune, but I don't think it was EG fault we did not bag Horford.



This turned-out to be FALSE, Horford in a recent interview said the Houston, not Washington, was his 2nd choice. So to be clear, Ted & Ernie's Wizards, is an orginzation that Top-Tier NBA players do not wish to join outside of being traded here.


I believe Horford said it came down to Boston, Houston and the Zards. I don't recall him saying whether the Zards or Houston was his 2nd choice.
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,346
And1: 2,721
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: GT: Bucks - Wizards 23.12.16 7 ET 

Post#233 » by Kanyewest » Mon Dec 26, 2016 7:18 pm

DCZards wrote:
closg00 wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:To be fair I think horford was pretty close to coming here. Horford would have been all 3 bigs we signed So replace ian (has not played) and smit/nicholson (sucked) with horfords production and move morris or gortat to a large bench roll. We would have been much better off, obviously. Now who would we have signed for cheap? IDK. But clearly if we got horford we would be signing a different tune, but I don't think it was EG fault we did not bag Horford.



This turned-out to be FALSE, Horford in a recent interview said the Houston, not Washington, was his 2nd choice. So to be clear, Ted & Ernie's Wizards, is an orginzation that Top-Tier NBA players do not wish to join outside of being traded here.


I believe Horford said it came down to Boston, Houston and the Zards. I don't recall him saying whether the Zards or Houston was his 2nd choice.


Well Horford said it here. http://www.csnne.com/boston-celtics/al-horford-recalls-offseason-free-agent-flirtation-with-houston-rockets

I just don't think Horford is that reliable because

1) Horford was visiting Houston when he made this statement. Obviously, probably had an impact on his answer. He said "probably the two teams he considered"; meaning he's leaving room for himself to back off the position.
2) Washington was terrible at this point in the season and he didn't want to look foolish. Conversely the Rockets were/are like the 4th best team in the Western Conference
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,798
And1: 7,924
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: GT: Bucks - Wizards 23.12.16 7 ET 

Post#234 » by montestewart » Mon Dec 26, 2016 8:58 pm

Kanyewest wrote:
DCZards wrote:
closg00 wrote:

This turned-out to be FALSE, Horford in a recent interview said the Houston, not Washington, was his 2nd choice. So to be clear, Ted & Ernie's Wizards, is an orginzation that Top-Tier NBA players do not wish to join outside of being traded here.


I believe Horford said it came down to Boston, Houston and the Zards. I don't recall him saying whether the Zards or Houston was his 2nd choice.


Well Horford said it here. http://www.csnne.com/boston-celtics/al-horford-recalls-offseason-free-agent-flirtation-with-houston-rockets

I just don't think Horford is that reliable because

1) Horford was visiting Houston when he made this statement. Obviously, probably had an impact on his answer. He said "probably the two teams he considered"; meaning he's leaving room for himself to back off the position.
2) Washington was terrible at this point in the season and he didn't want to look foolish. Conversely the Rockets were/are like the 4th best team in the Western Conference

Maybe Induveca could speak to this, but supposedly the Dominican community in and around Boston played into Horford's decision. Washington has a smaller but still present Dominican community, more in the suburbs. Is there a Dominican community of any size in Houston, and/or a prominent Dominican player who might have been speaking up for Houston, in the same way David Ortiz supposedly did for Boston?
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,346
And1: 2,721
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: GT: Bucks - Wizards 23.12.16 7 ET 

Post#235 » by Kanyewest » Mon Dec 26, 2016 10:32 pm

montestewart wrote:
Kanyewest wrote:
DCZards wrote:
I believe Horford said it came down to Boston, Houston and the Zards. I don't recall him saying whether the Zards or Houston was his 2nd choice.


Well Horford said it here. http://www.csnne.com/boston-celtics/al-horford-recalls-offseason-free-agent-flirtation-with-houston-rockets

I just don't think Horford is that reliable because

1) Horford was visiting Houston when he made this statement. Obviously, probably had an impact on his answer. He said "probably the two teams he considered"; meaning he's leaving room for himself to back off the position.
2) Washington was terrible at this point in the season and he didn't want to look foolish. Conversely the Rockets were/are like the 4th best team in the Western Conference

Maybe Induveca could speak to this, but supposedly the Dominican community in and around Boston played into Horford's decision. Washington has a smaller but still present Dominican community, more in the suburbs. Is there a Dominican community of any size in Houston, and/or a prominent Dominican player who might have been speaking up for Houston, in the same way David Ortiz supposedly did for Boston?


I'm not sure but Trevor Ariza ended up going to Houston.
ducler
Cold Hard Gameday Facts
Posts: 15,609
And1: 8,991
Joined: Jun 15, 2008
Location: France
 

Re: GT: Bucks - Wizards 23.12.16 7 ET 

Post#236 » by ducler » Mon Dec 26, 2016 11:11 pm

Image
Image
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,443
And1: 4,440
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

GT: Bucks - Wizards 23.12.16 7 ET 

Post#237 » by closg00 » Tue Dec 27, 2016 2:21 am

Oops

Return to Washington Wizards