ImageImageImage

College basketball and 2017 draft - One more poll after last game

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

If we have the 1st or 2nd pick, and take Ball, how will you feel

Feel VERY good about the pick
7
17%
OK with the pick
14
34%
Not particularly happy with it
8
20%
Pissed
9
22%
OK at 2, but at one 1 am not happy and will explain this pick in thread
3
7%
 
Total votes: 41

Phoenix-Sons
Sophomore
Posts: 198
And1: 105
Joined: Dec 27, 2016
       

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#321 » by Phoenix-Sons » Thu Dec 29, 2016 10:19 pm

I like Smith a lot, but don't know If I want to pair another minus defender with Booker...
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,149
And1: 61,003
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#322 » by bwgood77 » Thu Dec 29, 2016 11:46 pm

Phoenix-Sons wrote:I like Smith a lot, but don't know If I want to pair another minus defender with Booker...


It doesn't look like he's terrible. Not like this anyway.

Read on Twitter
Phoenix-Sons
Sophomore
Posts: 198
And1: 105
Joined: Dec 27, 2016
       

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#323 » by Phoenix-Sons » Thu Dec 29, 2016 11:49 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
Phoenix-Sons wrote:I like Smith a lot, but don't know If I want to pair another minus defender with Booker...


It doesn't look like he's terrible. Not like this anyway.

Read on Twitter

Lord have mercy :lol:

I wouldn't be completely opposed to taking Smith, but we have to make sure that we have good defenders, especially rim protection to make up for Smith's and Bookers lack of defense.
PackSuns
Senior
Posts: 538
And1: 251
Joined: Jul 18, 2014
       

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#324 » by PackSuns » Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:20 am

Phoenix-Sons wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
Phoenix-Sons wrote:I like Smith a lot, but don't know If I want to pair another minus defender with Booker...


It doesn't look like he's terrible. Not like this anyway.

Read on Twitter

Lord have mercy :lol:

I wouldn't be completely opposed to taking Smith, but we have to make sure that we have good defenders, especially rim protection to make up for Smith's and Bookers lack of defense.


I have been more critical of DSJ than almost anyone I know. I have seen him play almost more than anyone I know. NC State was missing 2 starters for the first 10 games or so of the year but since then DSJ has been very good to great. He was ask to do a lot the first 10 games. Plus he was coming off an ACL injury and he didn't play his senior year of high school. He was a great defender in HS and AAU. Dominated all the PG camps on both ends of the court. (See video of him and Oladipo). He will be be fine on the defensive end. His shooting has looked great lately(hit his last 12 of 18 threes I believe). I went from warm to hot on DSJ.
Phoenix-Sons
Sophomore
Posts: 198
And1: 105
Joined: Dec 27, 2016
       

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#325 » by Phoenix-Sons » Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:34 am

PackSuns wrote:
Phoenix-Sons wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
It doesn't look like he's terrible. Not like this anyway.

Read on Twitter

Lord have mercy :lol:

I wouldn't be completely opposed to taking Smith, but we have to make sure that we have good defenders, especially rim protection to make up for Smith's and Bookers lack of defense.


I have been more critical of DSJ than almost anyone I know. I have seen him play almost more than anyone I know. NC State was missing 2 starters for the first 10 games or so of the year but since then DSJ has been very good to great. He was ask to do a lot the first 10 games. Plus he was coming off an ACL injury and he didn't play his senior year of high school. He was a great defender in HS and AAU. Dominated all the PG camps on both ends of the court. (See video of him and Oladipo). He will be be fine on the defensive end. His shooting has looked great lately(hit his last 12 of 18 threes I believe). I went from warm to hot on DSJ.

I haven't watched much of Smith myself so I don't know too much about him. I've mostly focused on Fultz and Ball, but I'll start watching some stuff on Smith. It seems like he's still really athletic even though injuring his knee and he can pass the rock when needed which is a plus.
Damkac
Analyst
Posts: 3,143
And1: 3,062
Joined: Apr 18, 2011
Location: Poland

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#326 » by Damkac » Fri Dec 30, 2016 8:52 am

Would Smith be upgrade as a playmaker over Bledsoe or is he more of a scorer too?
User avatar
thamadkant
Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
Posts: 16,916
And1: 8,599
Joined: Jan 06, 2007
 

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#327 » by thamadkant » Fri Dec 30, 2016 10:38 am

Thomas being a poor defender is well known...being 5'7 and a buck fifty in weight.

But 27ppg and 7apg are All Star numbers no matter what.
The guy is paid 7 million and putting up great offensive numbers. Kudos.
Damkac
Analyst
Posts: 3,143
And1: 3,062
Joined: Apr 18, 2011
Location: Poland

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#328 » by Damkac » Fri Dec 30, 2016 10:46 am

And everybody hated him so hard when he played for Suns.
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,748
And1: 67,427
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#329 » by Duke4life831 » Fri Dec 30, 2016 10:49 pm

Damkac wrote:Would Smith be upgrade as a playmaker over Bledsoe or is he more of a scorer too?


Hes a pretty underrated passer for sure. He gets most of his assists out of the PnR. Id say this think of his facilitating more along the lines of a Westbrook. Hyper aggressive, always attacking and attacking, but I think Smith is a more willing passer and has better vision. If you want the biggest upgrade for playmaking its easily Ball. He runs an offense better than any other PG I've seen in college in a pretty long time. He also isn't one that needs to have the ball and pound it. Hes going to make sure it keeps moving when it needs to.

Smith is the ultimate PnR point guard, Ball is the ultimate free flowing offense type PG while Fultz to me is a better version Dangelo Russell. I think in the end he is going to be a very good SG that can also pass it very well. I personally still think Ball fits your team better
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,149
And1: 61,003
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#330 » by bwgood77 » Fri Dec 30, 2016 11:54 pm

Duke4life831 wrote:
Damkac wrote:Would Smith be upgrade as a playmaker over Bledsoe or is he more of a scorer too?


Hes a pretty underrated passer for sure. He gets most of his assists out of the PnR. Id say this think of his facilitating more along the lines of a Westbrook. Hyper aggressive, always attacking and attacking, but I think Smith is a more willing passer and has better vision. If you want the biggest upgrade for playmaking its easily Ball. He runs an offense better than any other PG I've seen in college in a pretty long time. He also isn't one that needs to have the ball and pound it. Hes going to make sure it keeps moving when it needs to.

Smith is the ultimate PnR point guard, Ball is the ultimate free flowing offense type PG while Fultz to me is a better version Dangelo Russell. I think in the end he is going to be a very good SG that can also pass it very well. I personally still think Ball fits your team better


Who do you think wins the Rabb/Markaanen matchup tonight?
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,748
And1: 67,427
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#331 » by Duke4life831 » Fri Dec 30, 2016 11:57 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
Duke4life831 wrote:
Damkac wrote:Would Smith be upgrade as a playmaker over Bledsoe or is he more of a scorer too?


Hes a pretty underrated passer for sure. He gets most of his assists out of the PnR. Id say this think of his facilitating more along the lines of a Westbrook. Hyper aggressive, always attacking and attacking, but I think Smith is a more willing passer and has better vision. If you want the biggest upgrade for playmaking its easily Ball. He runs an offense better than any other PG I've seen in college in a pretty long time. He also isn't one that needs to have the ball and pound it. Hes going to make sure it keeps moving when it needs to.

Smith is the ultimate PnR point guard, Ball is the ultimate free flowing offense type PG while Fultz to me is a better version Dangelo Russell. I think in the end he is going to be a very good SG that can also pass it very well. I personally still think Ball fits your team better


Who do you think wins the Rabb/Markaanen matchup tonight?


Zona wins. Markkanen puts up more points while Rabb has the more complete game.
DirtyDez
Suns Forum College Scout
Posts: 17,177
And1: 6,908
Joined: Jun 25, 2009
Location: the Arizona desert

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#332 » by DirtyDez » Sat Dec 31, 2016 6:41 am

Markk could use another year... Almost ready to stop doubting Lonzo's 3-ball. Beyond the box score, how'd he look inside the arc?
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
Zelaznyrules
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,776
And1: 995
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#333 » by Zelaznyrules » Sat Dec 31, 2016 6:51 am

Damkac wrote:And everybody hated him so hard when he played for Suns.


Many of the internet posters (here and elsewhere) did but "everybody" doesn't work. It was obvious to many of us that we played our best when Thomas was on the court and I know I wasn't alone in supporting him. Unfortunately, there was a lot of loud pro-Goran support which made it look a little more one-sided than it was.
Blackification
Head Coach
Posts: 6,473
And1: 2,229
Joined: Feb 13, 2009

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#334 » by Blackification » Sat Dec 31, 2016 7:57 am

Zelaznyrules wrote:
Damkac wrote:And everybody hated him so hard when he played for Suns.


Many of the internet posters (here and elsewhere) did but "everybody" doesn't work. It was obvious to many of us that we played our best when Thomas was on the court and I know I wasn't alone in supporting him. Unfortunately, there was a lot of loud pro-Goran support which made it look a little more one-sided than it was.

I was always a fan of his but didn't think he was right for the team or a particularly good signing. I think many people knew he was a good player but not the right fit when we had two point guards already.

I want us to draft Lonzo but I have already accepted that we will end up drafting Malik
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,149
And1: 61,003
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#335 » by bwgood77 » Sat Dec 31, 2016 8:38 am

Blackification wrote:
Zelaznyrules wrote:
Damkac wrote:And everybody hated him so hard when he played for Suns.


Many of the internet posters (here and elsewhere) did but "everybody" doesn't work. It was obvious to many of us that we played our best when Thomas was on the court and I know I wasn't alone in supporting him. Unfortunately, there was a lot of loud pro-Goran support which made it look a little more one-sided than it was.

I was always a fan of his but didn't think he was right for the team or a particularly good signing. I think many people knew he was a good player but not the right fit when we had two point guards already.

I want us to draft Lonzo but I have already accepted that we will end up drafting Malik


Yes, Thomas is a great scorer, but I have never been a fan of guys who dribbled the whole shot clock and dumped it for a potential assist a the end only when they couldn't get their own. I want team ball.

I don't like freelance basketball from individuals on a consistent basis. It's not a recipe for success in the playoffs. I could argue that Barkley cost the team in the playoffs because of it.
Blackification
Head Coach
Posts: 6,473
And1: 2,229
Joined: Feb 13, 2009

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#336 » by Blackification » Sat Dec 31, 2016 8:43 am

bwgood77 wrote:
Blackification wrote:
Zelaznyrules wrote:
Many of the internet posters (here and elsewhere) did but "everybody" doesn't work. It was obvious to many of us that we played our best when Thomas was on the court and I know I wasn't alone in supporting him. Unfortunately, there was a lot of loud pro-Goran support which made it look a little more one-sided than it was.

I was always a fan of his but didn't think he was right for the team or a particularly good signing. I think many people knew he was a good player but not the right fit when we had two point guards already.

I want us to draft Lonzo but I have already accepted that we will end up drafting Malik


Yes, Thomas is a great scorer, but I have never been a fan of guys who dribbled the whole shot clock and dumped it for a potential assist a the end only when they couldn't get their own. I want team ball.

I don't like freelance basketball from individuals on a consistent basis. It's not a recipe for success in the playoffs. I could argue that Barkley cost the team in the playoffs because of it.

Well said. My biggest reason for wanting Lonzo is his passing (haven't seen much Fultz I will admit but I don't think we get 1st pick anyway because its the Suns). Tired of watching Bledsoe, Knight, and Booker do this very same thing.

I'm imagining the passing game between Lonzo Booker and Bender in 2 or three years. :droop:
gaspar
Suns Forum Stat Stuffer
Posts: 6,761
And1: 5,479
Joined: Jun 21, 2009

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#337 » by gaspar » Sat Dec 31, 2016 9:10 am

DirtyDez wrote:Almost ready to stop doubting Lonzo's 3-ball. Beyond the box score, how'd he look inside the arc?

He has no mid-range game whatsoever and he doesn't have the explosiveness to beat his defender off the dribble and attack the rim. In the half-court offense he operates strictly behind the 3-point line and is basically limited to a spot-up shooter role, almost like Kendall Marshall.

His efficiency and assist numbers are inflated by transition stats. Here's a good breakdown how elite guards in this class fare at getting to the basket off the dribble: LINK.

Image

I think Ball should go in the 5-10 range in the draft rather than the top-3.
Marcus
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,315
And1: 5,173
Joined: Mar 03, 2014

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#338 » by Marcus » Sat Dec 31, 2016 4:53 pm

gaspar wrote:
DirtyDez wrote:Almost ready to stop doubting Lonzo's 3-ball. Beyond the box score, how'd he look inside the arc?

He has no mid-range game whatsoever and he doesn't have the explosiveness to beat his defender off the dribble and attack the rim. In the half-court offense he operates strictly behind the 3-point line and is basically limited to a spot-up shooter role, almost like Kendall Marshall.

His efficiency and assist numbers are inflated by transition stats. Here's a good breakdown how elite guards in this class fare at getting to the basket off the dribble: LINK.

Image

I think Ball should go in the 5-10 range in the draft rather than the top-3.


If you're looking for numbers to evaluate Lonzo's worth then you're going about it wrong.
Watch More Basketball

Sometimes silence is the best thing you can contribute to a conversation

after what he did to Moses Moody's name, I got DJ K. Perk in a Verzuz battle against ANYBODY
Zelaznyrules
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,776
And1: 995
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#339 » by Zelaznyrules » Sun Jan 1, 2017 6:23 am

Marcus wrote:
gaspar wrote:
DirtyDez wrote:Almost ready to stop doubting Lonzo's 3-ball. Beyond the box score, how'd he look inside the arc?

He has no mid-range game whatsoever and he doesn't have the explosiveness to beat his defender off the dribble and attack the rim. In the half-court offense he operates strictly behind the 3-point line and is basically limited to a spot-up shooter role, almost like Kendall Marshall.

His efficiency and assist numbers are inflated by transition stats. Here's a good breakdown how elite guards in this class fare at getting to the basket off the dribble: LINK.

Image

I think Ball should go in the 5-10 range in the draft rather than the top-3.


If you're looking for numbers to evaluate Lonzo's worth then you're going about it wrong.


If you're evaluating him as a college player, you're probably right. But if you're trying to project him to the next level, I think the numbers are very revealing. I love watching him play and AFAIC he's one of the best college players in the past few decades but I'm not convinced he's an impact player at the next level. I just can't see him playing point in the NBA despite his incredible court awareness and floor leadership. His lack of a mid-range game along with below average PG foot speed will do him in unless he can make the move to SF or SG.
Mulhollanddrive
RealGM
Posts: 12,555
And1: 8,337
Joined: Jan 19, 2013

Re: Early look at 2017 draft & college basketball 

Post#340 » by Mulhollanddrive » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:44 am

Since 2006 only 1 draft has had 4 All-Stars in the top 10 picks (2007 - Picks 1, 4, 5,10)

If this is a strong draft, that's probably about what we're looking at this year.

Return to Phoenix Suns