EireannX wrote:LivingLegend wrote:Promezclan wrote:He's actually below average in opp FG% (there are more dots below him than above), and massively below average at blocks - he actually looks a bit better on that chart precisely BECAUSE his blocks are so low that he's on the good side of the trend line, even though all that means is that his FG defense isn't as bad as his awful blocks would predict, not that it's above average. Assuming that blocks have some independent value (and I think they do), he's definitely in the bottom 25%, although not the worst - by these metrics, he's pretty clearly better than Ryan Anderson and Blake Griffin, and he has solid arguments over Jokic, Gortat and M. Morris.
Does anybody know how to read graphs? The dotted line is the average and if you are below the line, that means he is holding people to a lower than average FG%. Which means he is actually above average in that department.
No, the dotted line isn't the average. If it were then why would the average be changing? It's a trend line which best maps both axes.
Mind you the average isn't 'more dots above than below', that would be more of a median calculation.
And even if you treat the line as some kind of metric for performance, all it might tell you is that Kevin Love's FG% is better than the trend for someone who so rarely blocks shots. It doesn't give any insight into how good his defence is against the average.
hmm that makes sense I guess, but then why even include the line?


































