Image ImageImage Image

Butler trade rumor - KC Johnson update: pg 63

Moderators: HomoSapien, Payt10, Ice Man, AshyLarrysDiaper, Tommy Udo 6 , coldfish, kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Michael Jackson, RedBulls23

User avatar
DaBulls82
Head Coach
Posts: 7,248
And1: 868
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
Location: SF

Re: Butler trade rumor - Ric Bucher 

Post#201 » by DaBulls82 » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:37 pm

The only way we can rid ourselves of GarPax is to miss the playoffs this our current roster. Even then it would be a stretch.

Do we want to start over with GarPax in charge? Or do we want to continue down this path of being a middle of the road NBA team with GarPax? Neither sound like much fun tbh.

A new GM, with the ability to use any of the roster as chips to build a team, along with their choice of coach would be ideal - and also happens to be the least likely to happen. :)
14 years is a nice run but it's time to end the Paxson era.

ImageImageImage
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 70,297
And1: 37,520
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Butler trade rumor - Ric Bucher 

Post#202 » by fleet » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:38 pm

RedBulls83 wrote:
GetBuLLish wrote:
RedBulls83 wrote:I'm questioning why anyone wants this current FO to go down any path.

If you hate Gar/Pax and think they have and are doing a terrible job, why trust their judgment on trading Jimmy for false hopes and dreams?


First, I am probably one of the earliest posters here calling for GarPax to be fired (if the not earliest since I've been advocating it for at least three years).

Second, your point is a non-sequitur. I don't trust the FO to do anything, whether it be start a team from scratch or build around Jimmy. The Bulls aren't winning anything with this FO intact. This entire conversation is academic if GarPax remain in charge.

Except my 2nd point does, because you're seeing many posters here who have wanted Gar and Pax fired advocating trading Jimmy to go for the tank.

Answer is, nobody can fix this current situation. Nobody. Have to hope for the best with a new direction.
User avatar
Leslie Forman
RealGM
Posts: 10,119
And1: 6,304
Joined: Apr 21, 2006
Location: 1700 Center Dr, Ames, IA 50011

Re: Butler on the move - Ric Bucher rumor 

Post#203 » by Leslie Forman » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:39 pm

Poohdini1 wrote:Don't think any team in the last few years has won the trade after giving up the all star. Jazz did pretty well getting Favors for D Will but that's about it. Magic lost the Howard trade, Denver lost the Melo trade, OKC lost the Harden trade.

Boston sure won that Rondo trade!
AirP.
RealGM
Posts: 37,601
And1: 32,275
Joined: Nov 21, 2007

Re: Butler trade rumor - Ric Bucher 

Post#204 » by AirP. » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:40 pm

GetBuLLish wrote:
RedBulls83 wrote:I'm questioning why anyone wants this current FO to go down any path.

If you hate Gar/Pax and think they have and are doing a terrible job, why trust their judgment on trading Jimmy for false hopes and dreams?


First, I am probably one of the earliest posters here calling for GarPax to be fired (if the not earliest since I've been advocating it for at least three years).

Second, your point is a non-sequitur. I don't trust the FO to do anything, whether it be start a team from scratch or build around Jimmy. The Bulls aren't winning anything with this FO intact. This entire conversation is academic if GarPax remain in charge.


Only 3 years? That was just a little longer ago then when the Bulls were trying to trade Thibs. I think there were people calling for their heads a few years before that, somewhere between refusing to trade for a SG and the FO siding with Rose on coming back on his own timetable instead of what the medical staff advocated.
User avatar
Mech Engineer
RealGM
Posts: 16,802
And1: 4,804
Joined: Apr 10, 2012
Location: NW Suburbs

Re: Butler trade rumor - Ric Bucher 

Post#205 » by Mech Engineer » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:41 pm

fleet wrote:
Mech Engineer wrote:
RedBulls83 wrote:I'm questioning why anyone wants this current FO to go down any path.

If you hate Gar/Pax and think they have and are doing a terrible job, why trust their judgment on trading Jimmy for false hopes and dreams?


If someone hates the FO, it is better for them to build around Jimmy. If they do well, at-least you get to enjoy the team. If they do badly, they will get fired.

If they trade Jimmy for picks and tank for the next 5 years....it gives them time to claim they are rebuilding and honestly Reinsdorf can't fire them because there are no expectations for wins. You usually don't fire a FO when you authorize a rebuild especially with Reinsdorf.

Whatever Reinsdorf decides he wants is not known. But they arent building jack cheese around Butler. That much I do know. Its impossible. I'll roll the dice on a total rebuild from scratch. That has better championship odds.


That means you trust GarPax have the ability to make great picks in the next 4/5 drafts and build a championship team. Or, you believe a robot in that GMs seat will succeed in building a championship team if they get top picks in the next half-decade.

Remember the Krause tanking era was not by design except for the first year maybe. They tried to sign free agents like McGrady, Eddie Jones and then tanked because they were incompetent.
User avatar
JohnnyKILLroy
RealGM
Posts: 12,492
And1: 4,670
Joined: Jun 18, 2008
Location: Fountain Valley- A nice place to live
       

Re: Butler trade rumor - Ric Bucher 

Post#206 » by JohnnyKILLroy » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:42 pm

Me personally I feel like Gar is the slime-ball that can't be trusted or respected or liked. I wonder how responsible he is for the mess we're in.

I might be ok with him getting the boot and putting it in Pax's hands which might be the outcome considering the Jerry-Job-Security-Factor.
What is happiness? It's a moment before you need more happiness.” — Don Draper
User avatar
RedBulls23
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 38,338
And1: 21,318
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Location: Waiting in Grant Park
       

Re: Butler trade rumor - Ric Bucher 

Post#207 » by RedBulls23 » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:42 pm

GetBuLLish wrote:
RedBulls83 wrote:Except my 2nd point does, because you're seeing many posters here who have wanted Gar and Pax fired advocating trading Jimmy to go for the tank.


Why is advocating a tank mutually exclusive with wanting GarPax fired? I don't understand.

The point is advocating for a tank with Gar/Pax pulling the trigger gets this org no where.

If anything, it just buys them more time.
My Tweets:@Salim_BGhoops
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 70,297
And1: 37,520
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Butler trade rumor - Ric Bucher 

Post#208 » by fleet » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:44 pm

Rerisen wrote:If GarPax are allowed to trade Butler, have to figure they just bought themselves 3 years at least.

If they aren't we don't know how long they have, but they could potentially be out (or one of them) as soon as the summer if the team fails to make the playoffs, while Jerry is expecting them to be competitive.

I don't think they buy anything. If Reinsdorf wants to fire them, he will. Or not. What he probably wants is to keep treadmilling. Maybe trading Butler will piss him off.

All depends on what the Bulls get, NBA players, or prospects. He can keep the treadmill going with a talent trade.
User avatar
Dominator83
RealGM
Posts: 21,292
And1: 32,607
Joined: Jan 16, 2005
Location: NBA Hell

Re: Butler on the move? 

Post#209 » by Dominator83 » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:45 pm

TheStig wrote:
jnrjr79 wrote:
TheStig wrote:This is also the same organization who signed a past prime Ben Wallce to a huge deal and then dealt a prime Tyson Chandler on a much smaller deal for an old broken down PJ Brown and Jr Smith, who they flipped for a 2nd rounder.

So a DPOY and 3 time all defensive player for a old rental and a 2nd.

It's a crap shoot.


That's a pretty slanted portrait of those deals. Chandler became DPOY six years after the Bulls dealt him.

Wallace, who you call "past prime," was the reigning DPOY the very year the Bulls signed him.

I get that you might not do those deals in retrospect, but GMs don't have time machines.

I'm not sure what time machine that you need to project that a 24 year old is going to have a brighter trajectory than a 32 year old. There was a reason a Piston's team that won 64 games and went to the ECF didn't want him back.

And they could have afforded to keep them both!

Yea not much hindsight needed on that one. In fact I remember I started a thread (im sure its still in the archives somewhere!) after that move questioning the logic behind taking Tyrus over Aldridge and dumping Tyson to sign Wallace.

My points were the obvious age difference, but most importantly the fact that Wallace's rebound and block #'s had declined each of the past 3 years PRIOR to signing him. Tyson was coming off a bad season no doubt, but I thought he actually had a solid series against the Heat (he kept finding ways to get Shaq into foul trouble)

Also our biggest hole going into that off season was scoring in the post. Neither Wallace/Tyrus or Tyson was going to help that, but Aldridge would have.

So if a poster on RealGM that couldn't even spell his username right knew these moves were bad, how does Gar/pax, who does this for a living, not see it??
Fantasy Hoops/Football/Baseball fans..

For info on a forum that actually talks Fantasy sports and not spammed with soliciting leagues, PM me. The more the merrier !
stl705
Senior
Posts: 526
And1: 152
Joined: May 29, 2010

Re: Butler trade rumor - Ric Bucher 

Post#210 » by stl705 » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:45 pm

Regardless of whether we "believe" Ric Bucher or not, this is not the first time there has been Jimmy trade rumors which scares the absolute hell out of me. Right now, a move makes zero sense. Unless the Bulls are confident they are getting 2x top 5-6 picks, I don't see why or how they could trade Butler before the lottery as another posted mentioned. Could be Jerry putting it out to feel out the fan base if Butler does get traded after the season.

I'm vehemently against trading Butler. No guarantee we get another player as good as him for the next 20 years. I don't care how many top 5 picks we get. Didn't help us after MJ left.
User avatar
RedBulls23
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 38,338
And1: 21,318
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Location: Waiting in Grant Park
       

Re: Butler trade rumor - Ric Bucher 

Post#211 » by RedBulls23 » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:46 pm

fleet wrote:
RedBulls83 wrote:
GetBuLLish wrote:
First, I am probably one of the earliest posters here calling for GarPax to be fired (if the not earliest since I've been advocating it for at least three years).

Second, your point is a non-sequitur. I don't trust the FO to do anything, whether it be start a team from scratch or build around Jimmy. The Bulls aren't winning anything with this FO intact. This entire conversation is academic if GarPax remain in charge.

Except my 2nd point does, because you're seeing many posters here who have wanted Gar and Pax fired advocating trading Jimmy to go for the tank.

Answer is, nobody can fix this current situation. Nobody. Have to hope for the best with a new direction.

I disagree. Imo, you get someone from the Spurs or Warriors org, and let them decide which path is best.

Simply letting gar or pax roll the dice again isn't going to make a difference. They will just keep digging a hole or we will more likely be back to being the Skiles era Bulls, without a player even remotely as good as Jimmy.
My Tweets:@Salim_BGhoops
GetBuLLish
General Manager
Posts: 9,046
And1: 2,644
Joined: Jan 14, 2009

Re: Butler trade rumor - Ric Bucher 

Post#212 » by GetBuLLish » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:46 pm

RedBulls83 wrote:The point is advocating for a tank with Gar/Pax pulling the trigger gets this org no where.

If anything, it just buys them more time.


That's just conjecture. I could just as easily theorize that if the Bulls went nuclear this year, that might finally convince Jerry to go full bore and completely clear house. I could also theorize that by allowing this team to remain first-round exit fodder, that might allow GarPax to remain in charge in perpetuity.

Truth is, we don't know. We're just making things harder by not only trying to build a good team but also in such a way that gets GarPax fired. :lol: Says a lot about the type of ownership we are dealing with.
User avatar
rtblues
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,802
And1: 2,577
Joined: Jul 12, 2008

Re: Butler trade rumor - Ric Bucher 

Post#213 » by rtblues » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:48 pm

My sources tell me Ric Butcher is an idiot who's never been right or had a scoop ever.
"I wouldn’t call it a rebuild; more of a retool.” - Gar Forman, June 2016
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 70,297
And1: 37,520
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Butler trade rumor - Ric Bucher 

Post#214 » by fleet » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:49 pm

Mech Engineer wrote:
fleet wrote:
Mech Engineer wrote:
If someone hates the FO, it is better for them to build around Jimmy. If they do well, at-least you get to enjoy the team. If they do badly, they will get fired.

If they trade Jimmy for picks and tank for the next 5 years....it gives them time to claim they are rebuilding and honestly Reinsdorf can't fire them because there are no expectations for wins. You usually don't fire a FO when you authorize a rebuild especially with Reinsdorf.

Whatever Reinsdorf decides he wants is not known. But they arent building jack cheese around Butler. That much I do know. Its impossible. I'll roll the dice on a total rebuild from scratch. That has better championship odds.


That means you trust GarPax have the ability to make great picks in the next 4/5 drafts and build a championship team. Or, you believe a robot in that GMs seat will succeed in building a championship team if they get top picks in the next half-decade.

Remember the Krause tanking era was not by design except for the first year maybe. They tried to sign free agents like McGrady, Eddie Jones and then tanked because they were incompetent.

I didnt say anything about trusting them. I dont trust them. I accept the burden that Ownership has placed on my fandom and work from there.
nitetrain8603
RealGM
Posts: 24,136
And1: 1,832
Joined: May 30, 2003
         

Re: Butler trade rumor - Ric Bucher 

Post#215 » by nitetrain8603 » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:49 pm

I would actually talk it out with Wade and Butler to be honest if the Bulls are really thinking about this. Because half of the return from those players (especially Wade) is that Chicago is a place you can trust. Ask both what they want to do, have plans layed out and then go from there.
User avatar
RedBulls23
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 38,338
And1: 21,318
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Location: Waiting in Grant Park
       

Re: Butler trade rumor - Ric Bucher 

Post#216 » by RedBulls23 » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:49 pm

JohnnyKILLroy wrote:Me personally I feel like Gar is the slime-ball that can't be trusted or respected or liked. I wonder how responsible he is for the mess we're in.

I might be ok with him getting the boot and putting it in Pax's hands which might be the outcome considering the Jerry-Job-Security-Factor.

I love pax for what he did during his playing days with the team, and thank him for dragging the team out of the post dynasty mess they were in, but (but if he's truly been hands off) his negligence has been as much of an issue in allowing Gar to run this franchise and roster into the ground.
My Tweets:@Salim_BGhoops
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 70,297
And1: 37,520
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Butler trade rumor - Ric Bucher 

Post#217 » by fleet » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:50 pm

RedBulls83 wrote:
fleet wrote:
RedBulls83 wrote:Except my 2nd point does, because you're seeing many posters here who have wanted Gar and Pax fired advocating trading Jimmy to go for the tank.

Answer is, nobody can fix this current situation. Nobody. Have to hope for the best with a new direction.

I disagree. Imo, you get someone from the Spurs or Warriors org, and let them decide which path is best.

Simply letting gar or pax roll the dice again isn't going to make a difference. They will just keep digging a hole or we will more likely be back to being the Skiles era Bulls, without a player even remotely as good as Jimmy.

All I have to work with is GarPax.
And so I will.
User avatar
Mech Engineer
RealGM
Posts: 16,802
And1: 4,804
Joined: Apr 10, 2012
Location: NW Suburbs

Re: Butler trade rumor - Ric Bucher 

Post#218 » by Mech Engineer » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:50 pm

fleet wrote:
Rerisen wrote:If GarPax are allowed to trade Butler, have to figure they just bought themselves 3 years at least.

If they aren't we don't know how long they have, but they could potentially be out (or one of them) as soon as the summer if the team fails to make the playoffs, while Jerry is expecting them to be competitive.

I don't think they buy anything. If Reinsdorf wants to fire them, he will. Or not. What he probably wants is to keep treadmilling. Maybe trading Butler will piss him off.

All depends on what the Bulls get, NBA players, or prospects. He can keep the treadmill going with a talent trade.


As much as I think GarPax are incompetent or Jerry is looking at seat-filling, I doubt even they are so selfish to trade Jimmy for a mediocre set of NBA players to get a treadmill going. If they trade Jimmy, they are getting the best sure-fire picks possible and a semi-proven young player back plus obviously salary fillers. They are not going to do a Crowder, Bradley and a pick type deal.

Or, in the best case, they are getting a Cousins back for Jimmy.
the ultimates
Analyst
Posts: 3,673
And1: 1,618
Joined: Jul 06, 2012

Re: Butler trade rumor - Ric Bucher 

Post#219 » by the ultimates » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:55 pm

GetBuLLish wrote:
fleet wrote: Motivation is that the team has turned down a dead end street no outlet.


Exactly. The people that criticize the so-called tanking method constantly fail to demonstrate how the Bulls can become a contender simply going down the path they are on now.


The plan was to be competitive and make the playoffs, possibly get to the second round and look more enticing to a high level free agent. People will say that will never work but I find it better than trading Butler for the trash offers that were on the table.
Losing to get high draft picks and hoping they turn into franchise players is not some next level, genius move. That's what teams want to happen in any rebuild/tank or whatever you want to market it as.
User avatar
Red Larrivee
RealGM
Posts: 42,503
And1: 19,444
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: Hogging Microphone Time From Tom Dore

Re: Butler trade rumor - Ric Bucher 

Post#220 » by Red Larrivee » Thu Jan 5, 2017 11:55 pm

Mech Engineer wrote:That means you trust GarPax have the ability to make great picks in the next 4/5 drafts and build a championship team. Or, you believe a robot in that GMs seat will succeed in building a championship team if they get top picks in the next half-decade.

Remember the Krause tanking era was not by design except for the first year maybe. They tried to sign free agents like McGrady, Eddie Jones and then tanked because they were incompetent.


Which is why you pigeon hole yourself when you rebuild. If the rebuild fails, then what? It's not like you can just trade all your pieces for superstars and become good again. You're more likely to do something desperate like trade for Jalen Rose. Orlando is going through the same thing. Their draft picks are not as good as they thought they would be and ownership is tired of watching a perennial loser. To move the needle, they trade Victor Oladipo and a first for Serge Ibaka. Yet, they're still in the same place as before.

Return to Chicago Bulls