ImageImageImageImage

Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships

Moderators: UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior

User avatar
Blue_and_Whte
RealGM
Posts: 24,687
And1: 9,569
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
Location: Orlando, FL.
     

Re: RE: Re: Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1101 » by Blue_and_Whte » Sun Jan 8, 2017 4:26 am

MagicMatic wrote:
OrlandO wrote:
PennytoShaq wrote:
Uh no. Thats old school spread 4, inside out.

Have you watched Golden State and Houston? Do they dump it down to set up the offense?

It's 2017. Nothing bizarre about it.

You are too obsessed with trying to emulate teams with MVP level players carrying them.


Let's look at the top 5 in NBA power rankings shall we?

Cavs
GSW
Rockets
Spurs
Raptors

Which of these teams have a dominant scoring center that commands double teams?

The only team in the top 10 you can even remotely argue for is Memphis with gasol... and they aren't winning anything this year or next

They all have elite players, that's why they can have journey men centers that do one thing.

So unless you plan on **** an elite wing player out we have a center that can score.

Sent from my D6708 using RealGM mobile app
Faith, Family, & Orlando Magic
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
Bensational
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,611
And1: 13,874
Joined: Apr 10, 2001
     

Re: Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1102 » by Bensational » Sun Jan 8, 2017 5:22 am

PennytoShaq wrote:But we don't do we?

To me it's asinine to suggest we trade Fournier for a guy who is more "ready now". That makes no sense. I don't think Fournier is the problem on this offense. If we traded him plus Vuc and got a star guard, that would be fine though. I would not complain about it. It just doesn't seem likely that we can get a better player than Evan and not have to trade Ibaka as well.

Why are you always so defensive about AG not playing the 3? He can crossmatch and guard the wings and then get the better matchup on the other end if we have a wing who can create his shot. A PF simply would not be able to cover a player like that, and Gordon would be able to do serious damage on offense. I like Gallinari because at 6'10 he can guard PFs. If that sounds far fetched, keep in mind that Vogel had to put Vuc on Dekker last night because we stuck with the big lineup. Vuc got torched.

And that's what other teams are doing to us right now. They are abusing our big lineups with small ones. Hell, move Ibaka to 5 and keep him. I don't care. Let Biz back him up. Ibaka would get even more open 3s playing the 5 spot.


Yeah, we've got Ibaka who's one of the top 3pt shooting 4's in the league, and we've got Vuc who can hit the 3, and we still don't run an excess of 4 out 1 in plays. So why do you think moving AG to the 4 will make any kind of difference?

Why are you (and a lot of others) so insistent on AG playing the 4? AG works the mismatches now, as a 3, far better than he could as a 4. He's able to overpower a lot of 2's and 3's depending on who he gets on switches, and he can post them up and get himself closer to the rim. He can't post up 4's because he's not strong enough. He's likely not ready to be taking 4's off the dribble because he's still developing and only just getting that aspect of his game under control. Plus, if we play more teams that play more small-ball 4's, then they're likely to be faster 4's that will be able to keep up with him.

If you want a wing who can create his own shot, then do it at the expense of the wing who's currently supposed to be doing that but isn't achieving it. That's why I say trade Fournier if that's what you want to do. You don't put AG out of position (and by now I'd have thought it was becoming clearer that the 3 is the position that AG can truly thrive in) when he has so much more room for growth and development, in favour of... I don't even know what it's in favour of? Is it just following trends and keeping up with the Jones'? Why are you so attached to small ball? Because GSW and CLE do it, with teams with far superior players than ours? You think someone like Gallinari puts us anywhere near their level?

Again, Vogel seems like a guy who likes traditional lineups, so if we made moves how likely is he to even adopt more small ball?
Bensational
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,611
And1: 13,874
Joined: Apr 10, 2001
     

Re: Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1103 » by Bensational » Sun Jan 8, 2017 5:41 am

MagicMatic wrote:Just wondering Bensational, if you had to trade two players on this terrible squad who would they be? You seem pretty optimistic about this rosters future is why I ask.


I think AG and EP give us plenty of reason to be optimistic for the future.

I'm not sure who I would be rushing to trade at this point whilst we're still relying on the development of those two to really govern how to best shape this team.

Plus, why do we have to trade anyone? Who are we trading for? Are we just wanting a trade for the sake of a trade?

If you're telling me we could get Jimmy Butler for Vuc + Fournier + Hezonja, then that's probably the kind of assortment of players I'd be looking at. Ultimately, I'd keep Ibaka/AG/EP as untouchables and make everyone else available for any kind of star player, and this is the list of players I'd be looking at (almost all of them being unrealistic options for what we're offering).

ELITES
LeBron
Durant
Curry
Kawhi
Westbrook
Harden


SUPERSTARS
Davis
Giannis
P.George
Towns
Butler
Lillard
Wall
CP3

STARS/PLAYERS ON THE RISE
Klay
McCollum
Lavine
Porzingis


This is essentially the list of players I'd want to build a team around (although the jury is still out on whether or not you can build a team around LaVine/McCollum for me right now).

There are a bunch of names I've left on that list that most would probably want to trade for (Lowry/DeRozan/DMC/I.Thomas/Love/etc), but they're generally players I just wouldn't want to build a team around, personally.

We likely couldn't get any of them, especially for all I'm prepared to offer. But, with some good fortune, perhaps AG and/or EP will be amongst those names in a couple of seasons and instead of looking for someone to build around, we're looking for pieces to support the guys we're already building around?
PennytoShaq
Magic Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 7,381
And1: 5,218
Joined: Jan 24, 2016
 

Re: Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1104 » by PennytoShaq » Sun Jan 8, 2017 6:27 am

Bensational wrote:
PennytoShaq wrote:But we don't do we?

To me it's asinine to suggest we trade Fournier for a guy who is more "ready now". That makes no sense. I don't think Fournier is the problem on this offense. If we traded him plus Vuc and got a star guard, that would be fine though. I would not complain about it. It just doesn't seem likely that we can get a better player than Evan and not have to trade Ibaka as well.

Why are you always so defensive about AG not playing the 3? He can crossmatch and guard the wings and then get the better matchup on the other end if we have a wing who can create his shot. A PF simply would not be able to cover a player like that, and Gordon would be able to do serious damage on offense. I like Gallinari because at 6'10 he can guard PFs. If that sounds far fetched, keep in mind that Vogel had to put Vuc on Dekker last night because we stuck with the big lineup. Vuc got torched.

And that's what other teams are doing to us right now. They are abusing our big lineups with small ones. Hell, move Ibaka to 5 and keep him. I don't care. Let Biz back him up. Ibaka would get even more open 3s playing the 5 spot.


Yeah, we've got Ibaka who's one of the top 3pt shooting 4's in the league, and we've got Vuc who can hit the 3, and we still don't run an excess of 4 out 1 in plays. So why do you think moving AG to the 4 will make any kind of difference?

Why are you (and a lot of others) so insistent on AG playing the 4? AG works the mismatches now, as a 3, far better than he could as a 4. He's able to overpower a lot of 2's and 3's depending on who he gets on switches, and he can post them up and get himself closer to the rim. He can't post up 4's because he's not strong enough. He's likely not ready to be taking 4's off the dribble because he's still developing and only just getting that aspect of his game under control. Plus, if we play more teams that play more small-ball 4's, then they're likely to be faster 4's that will be able to keep up with him.

If you want a wing who can create his own shot, then do it at the expense of the wing who's currently supposed to be doing that but isn't achieving it. That's why I say trade Fournier if that's what you want to do. You don't put AG out of position (and by now I'd have thought it was becoming clearer that the 3 is the position that AG can truly thrive in) when he has so much more room for growth and development, in favour of... I don't even know what it's in favour of? Is it just following trends and keeping up with the Jones'? Why are you so attached to small ball? Because GSW and CLE do it, with teams with far superior players than ours? You think someone like Gallinari puts us anywhere near their level?

Again, Vogel seems like a guy who likes traditional lineups, so if we made moves how likely is he to even adopt more small ball?



You aware that Vogel himself said he would play Gordon at the 4 as well but he already has Ibaka, Vuc and Biz?

Vogel played PG at the 4 last year but PG complained about it and Vogel took care of him. That is why players like Vogel.

This is not keeping up with the Jones's. It is putting your talent at a schematic advantage to win. You know, kind of like Houston did to us?

The reason a lot of people want another wing is it makes the team a lot faster and more athletic. AG is developing quite well as a player, but I don't sit and pigeonhole him into a position like you are doing. Again, I stated if we had another wing across from him, it would only give him an advantage. You are the one focused on labeling his position, not me. Let him play the same way he is playing now, and put another wing out there who can score instead of a big , and our offense gets better.
PennytoShaq
Magic Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 7,381
And1: 5,218
Joined: Jan 24, 2016
 

Re: Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1105 » by PennytoShaq » Sun Jan 8, 2017 6:32 am

purpleswordfish wrote:
PennytoShaq wrote:
purpleswordfish wrote:
Bizarre theory, almost as bizarre as this desire to run a "spread 4" offense without the one thing necessary to do it - a center that commands double teams almost every time down the floor.


Uh no. Thats old school spread 4, inside out.

Have you watched Golden State and Houston? Do they dump it down to set up the offense?

It's 2017. Nothing bizarre about it.


Yeah, I have watched Houston and Golden State. They have shooters at every position. The Magic? Not so much.


Now we have come full circle, since that is what a spread 4 is now, and that is what I was saying the Magic need to work on.
User avatar
VFX
RealGM
Posts: 18,693
And1: 16,438
Joined: May 30, 2016

Re: Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1106 » by VFX » Sun Jan 8, 2017 8:01 am

Bensational wrote:
MagicMatic wrote:Just wondering Bensational, if you had to trade two players on this terrible squad who would they be? You seem pretty optimistic about this rosters future is why I ask.


I think AG and EP give us plenty of reason to be optimistic for the future.

I'm not sure who I would be rushing to trade at this point whilst we're still relying on the development of those two to really govern how to best shape this team.

Plus, why do we have to trade anyone? Who are we trading for? Are we just wanting a trade for the sake of a trade?

If you're telling me we could get Jimmy Butler for Vuc + Fournier + Hezonja, then that's probably the kind of assortment of players I'd be looking at. Ultimately, I'd keep Ibaka/AG/EP as untouchables and make everyone else available for any kind of star player, and this is the list of players I'd be looking at (almost all of them being unrealistic options for what we're offering).

ELITES
LeBron
Durant
Curry
Kawhi
Westbrook
Harden


SUPERSTARS
Davis
Giannis
P.George
Towns
Butler
Lillard
Wall
CP3

STARS/PLAYERS ON THE RISE
Klay
McCollum
Lavine
Porzingis


This is essentially the list of players I'd want to build a team around (although the jury is still out on whether or not you can build a team around LaVine/McCollum for me right now).

There are a bunch of names I've left on that list that most would probably want to trade for (Lowry/DeRozan/DMC/I.Thomas/Love/etc), but they're generally players I just wouldn't want to build a team around, personally.

We likely couldn't get any of them, especially for all I'm prepared to offer. But, with some good fortune, perhaps AG and/or EP will be amongst those names in a couple of seasons and instead of looking for someone to build around, we're looking for pieces to support the guys we're already building around?


I agree with most of your list / analysis. I don't necessarily think a trade player for player would benefit this roster as much as it would for picks at this point. Not calling you out, I just know you are higher on the development of our current roster than most.
User avatar
VFX
RealGM
Posts: 18,693
And1: 16,438
Joined: May 30, 2016

Re: RE: Re: Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1107 » by VFX » Sun Jan 8, 2017 8:06 am

Blue_and_Whte wrote:
MagicMatic wrote:
OrlandO wrote:You are too obsessed with trying to emulate teams with MVP level players carrying them.


Let's look at the top 5 in NBA power rankings shall we?

Cavs
GSW
Rockets
Spurs
Raptors

Which of these teams have a dominant scoring center that commands double teams?

The only team in the top 10 you can even remotely argue for is Memphis with gasol... and they aren't winning anything this year or next

They all have elite players, that's why they can have journey men centers that do one thing.

So unless you plan on **** an elite wing player out we have a center that can score.

Sent from my D6708 using RealGM mobile app


So essentially you are saying we HAVE to have an elite player, otherwise we subjected to playing in a system that isn't currently working in today's NBA.

If you rank the games best centers they are mostly on terrible teams.

Cousins- (19th)
Jordan- (17th)
KAT- (25th)
Drummond-(23rd)
Whiteside-(28th)
Gasol-(7th)
Gobert- (9th)
B.Lopez- (27th)

Some of these players have star players next to them like Gasol (Conley),Gobert (Hayward), and Jordan (Paul), but the majority are on terrible teams. If you had to ask me whether I wanted to build a team around a inside game big man or not- I would definitely say no. People might consider Biz a back up, and Vuc significantly better, but I'd argue Biz is more suited to a team that obviously doesn't rely on an inside out game.
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,420
And1: 19,519
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1108 » by pepe1991 » Sun Jan 8, 2017 10:38 am

Bensational wrote:
PennytoShaq wrote:But we don't do we?

To me it's asinine to suggest we trade Fournier for a guy who is more "ready now". That makes no sense. I don't think Fournier is the problem on this offense. If we traded him plus Vuc and got a star guard, that would be fine though. I would not complain about it. It just doesn't seem likely that we can get a better player than Evan and not have to trade Ibaka as well.

Why are you always so defensive about AG not playing the 3? He can crossmatch and guard the wings and then get the better matchup on the other end if we have a wing who can create his shot. A PF simply would not be able to cover a player like that, and Gordon would be able to do serious damage on offense. I like Gallinari because at 6'10 he can guard PFs. If that sounds far fetched, keep in mind that Vogel had to put Vuc on Dekker last night because we stuck with the big lineup. Vuc got torched.

And that's what other teams are doing to us right now. They are abusing our big lineups with small ones. Hell, move Ibaka to 5 and keep him. I don't care. Let Biz back him up. Ibaka would get even more open 3s playing the 5 spot.


Yeah, we've got Ibaka who's one of the top 3pt shooting 4's in the league, and we've got Vuc who can hit the 3, and we still don't run an excess of 4 out 1 in plays. So why do you think moving AG to the 4 will make any kind of difference?

Why are you (and a lot of others) so insistent on AG playing the 4? AG works the mismatches now, as a 3, far better than he could as a 4. He's able to overpower a lot of 2's and 3's depending on who he gets on switches, and he can post them up and get himself closer to the rim. He can't post up 4's because he's not strong enough. He's likely not ready to be taking 4's off the dribble because he's still developing and only just getting that aspect of his game under control. Plus, if we play more teams that play more small-ball 4's, then they're likely to be faster 4's that will be able to keep up with him.

If you want a wing who can create his own shot, then do it at the expense of the wing who's currently supposed to be doing that but isn't achieving it. That's why I say trade Fournier if that's what you want to do. You don't put AG out of position (and by now I'd have thought it was becoming clearer that the 3 is the position that AG can truly thrive in) when he has so much more room for growth and development, in favour of... I don't even know what it's in favour of? Is it just following trends and keeping up with the Jones'? Why are you so attached to small ball? Because GSW and CLE do it, with teams with far superior players than ours? You think someone like Gallinari puts us anywhere near their level?

Again, Vogel seems like a guy who likes traditional lineups, so if we made moves how likely is he to even adopt more small ball?



Wait ,what? Vučević CAN make a three?
Dude made 16 threes in 6 years. This year he is 9 of 29 from 3 point line. That's bearly reaching 30% mark. He can't even shoot free trows properly this year ( 59% ).
Just because he is swimming around 30% at 3 point line it doesn't mean he SHOULD shoot more because league average from 3 point line is freaking 35% so he isn't even close to that. Sure , not big sample size, but his cumulative sample size for whole career is 16-55 (29% )

Aaron at PF could rebound more than Ibaka ( based on rebounding ratio ), he also would save Magic from playing BIyombo and Vučević together who are awful pair together on the floor. Also Gordon at PF would finally push Green out of that position ,where he can't rebound, block, pass or do anything well enough.
Gordon at PF is MODERN basketball, 6'9 versatile big who can shoot ( hopeful ) , slash and pass. At PF ,with expended range he could attack rim even more because slower PFs now would have to contest his shots and leave paint, them leaving paint would open game not just for Gordon who could beat them off dribble for dunks and layups but it would also help other teammates to get at rim.
Biggest problem with this horrific offense is that nobody can't get to free trow line and attack rim in general because all 3 Magic offensive options ( Evan, Vuc, Ibaka ) just settle for long 2s most of the time (especially Ibaka who showed zero slashing skills and who is so awkward running with a ball ).

In perfect world Ibaka would take some of his playing time at C, Gordon would start at PF ,team would have somebody who can slash and shoot 3s at SF , Evan at PF and Payton ( or whoever ) at PG. Vučević from bench. However, because of Biyombo :banghead: and Green :banghead: who play only because of their salary team is forced to play 2 bigs together and push Gordon att SF.

In hottest games from Gordon what he did that he couldn't do at PF? Step back jumpers? Shooting 3s? Attacking the rim? All that things you can do at PF even better because your opponents are heavier, bigger and slower than at SF where wing players tend to be lean , more athletic and contest much more shots ( wing position is stuffed with great defenders, at PF most PFs are actually average defenders)
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
BudLightTwerk
Ballboy
Posts: 29
And1: 13
Joined: Jan 02, 2017

Re: Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1109 » by BudLightTwerk » Sun Jan 8, 2017 11:06 am

fendilim wrote:
BudLightTwerk wrote:I think Biyombo can be a starting center in the NBA today for a good team but you definitely need more offense at the other positions than we have.

The problem isn't that Biyombo is a bad offensive player. The problem is that 3/5 of our starting lineup are subpar offensively.

The two that aren't are Fournier and Serge and there are parts of Serge's offensive game that are way ahead of the other parts.

Agreed.

Last year, his offense wasn't looking as bad as here because the Raptors have magnets offensively which allows Biyombo to have better offensive space for him to be able to catch the ball without traffic.


I agree and I believe this is the concept that I meant to illustrate more fully rather than just shooting. The magic need more spacing offensively which has always been our problem. I would move Payton to the bench currently and reinsert DJ for the time being just because DJ commands more space with his jump shot which is more needed with our other starters.


Oh, and if you ask me, Ibaka is playing for a contract nothing more.
Instincts
Pro Prospect
Posts: 978
And1: 478
Joined: Jul 08, 2009

Re: Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1110 » by Instincts » Sun Jan 8, 2017 11:37 am

pepe1991 wrote:
Bensational wrote:
PennytoShaq wrote:But we don't do we?

To me it's asinine to suggest we trade Fournier for a guy who is more "ready now". That makes no sense. I don't think Fournier is the problem on this offense. If we traded him plus Vuc and got a star guard, that would be fine though. I would not complain about it. It just doesn't seem likely that we can get a better player than Evan and not have to trade Ibaka as well.

Why are you always so defensive about AG not playing the 3? He can crossmatch and guard the wings and then get the better matchup on the other end if we have a wing who can create his shot. A PF simply would not be able to cover a player like that, and Gordon would be able to do serious damage on offense. I like Gallinari because at 6'10 he can guard PFs. If that sounds far fetched, keep in mind that Vogel had to put Vuc on Dekker last night because we stuck with the big lineup. Vuc got torched.

And that's what other teams are doing to us right now. They are abusing our big lineups with small ones. Hell, move Ibaka to 5 and keep him. I don't care. Let Biz back him up. Ibaka would get even more open 3s playing the 5 spot.


Yeah, we've got Ibaka who's one of the top 3pt shooting 4's in the league, and we've got Vuc who can hit the 3, and we still don't run an excess of 4 out 1 in plays. So why do you think moving AG to the 4 will make any kind of difference?

Why are you (and a lot of others) so insistent on AG playing the 4? AG works the mismatches now, as a 3, far better than he could as a 4. He's able to overpower a lot of 2's and 3's depending on who he gets on switches, and he can post them up and get himself closer to the rim. He can't post up 4's because he's not strong enough. He's likely not ready to be taking 4's off the dribble because he's still developing and only just getting that aspect of his game under control. Plus, if we play more teams that play more small-ball 4's, then they're likely to be faster 4's that will be able to keep up with him.

If you want a wing who can create his own shot, then do it at the expense of the wing who's currently supposed to be doing that but isn't achieving it. That's why I say trade Fournier if that's what you want to do. You don't put AG out of position (and by now I'd have thought it was becoming clearer that the 3 is the position that AG can truly thrive in) when he has so much more room for growth and development, in favour of... I don't even know what it's in favour of? Is it just following trends and keeping up with the Jones'? Why are you so attached to small ball? Because GSW and CLE do it, with teams with far superior players than ours? You think someone like Gallinari puts us anywhere near their level?

Again, Vogel seems like a guy who likes traditional lineups, so if we made moves how likely is he to even adopt more small ball?



Wait ,what? Vučević CAN make a three?
Dude made 16 threes in 6 years. This year he is 9 of 29 from 3 point line. That's bearly reaching 30% mark. He can't even shoot free trows properly this year ( 59% ).
Just because he is swimming around 30% at 3 point line it doesn't mean he SHOULD shoot more because league average from 3 point line is freaking 35% so he isn't even close to that. Sure , not big sample size, but his cumulative sample size for whole career is 16-55 (29% )

Aaron at PF could rebound more than Ibaka ( based on rebounding ratio ), he also would save Magic from playing BIyombo and Vučević together who are awful pair together on the floor. Also Gordon at PF would finally push Green out of that position ,where he can't rebound, block, pass or do anything well enough.
Gordon at PF is MODERN basketball, 6'9 versatile big who can shoot ( hopeful ) , slash and pass. At PF ,with expended range he could attack rim even more because slower PFs now would have to contest his shots and leave paint, them leaving paint would open game not just for Gordon who could beat them off dribble for dunks and layups but it would also help other teammates to get at rim.
Biggest problem with this horrific offense is that nobody can't get to free trow line and attack rim in general because all 3 Magic offensive options ( Evan, Vuc, Ibaka ) just settle for long 2s most of the time (especially Ibaka who showed zero slashing skills and who is so awkward running with a ball ).

In perfect world Ibaka would take some of his playing time at C, Gordon would start at PF ,team would have somebody who can slash and shoot 3s at SF , Evan at PF and Payton ( or whoever ) at PG. Vučević from bench. However, because of Biyombo :banghead: and Green :banghead: who play only because of their salary team is forced to play 2 bigs together and push Gordon att SF.

In hottest games from Gordon what he did that he couldn't do at PF? Step back jumpers? Shooting 3s? Attacking the rim? All that things you can do at PF even better because your opponents are heavier, bigger and slower than at SF where wing players tend to be lean , more athletic and contest much more shots ( wing position is stuffed with great defenders, at PF most PFs are actually average defenders)


Zzzzz...this topic is getting sleepy. There are plenty of examples of players playing the 3 and 4 depending on lineup and matchups. i.e. Lebron James. Just leave it at that, AG will play both. There is a current benefit in him further developing his handles and passing abilities, but of course he will play pf in certain matchups/ lineups and as his career evolves and he gains more and more weight.
User avatar
Blue_and_Whte
RealGM
Posts: 24,687
And1: 9,569
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
Location: Orlando, FL.
     

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1111 » by Blue_and_Whte » Sun Jan 8, 2017 12:58 pm

MagicMatic wrote:
Blue_and_Whte wrote:
MagicMatic wrote:
Let's look at the top 5 in NBA power rankings shall we?

Cavs
GSW
Rockets
Spurs
Raptors

Which of these teams have a dominant scoring center that commands double teams?

The only team in the top 10 you can even remotely argue for is Memphis with gasol... and they aren't winning anything this year or next

They all have elite players, that's why they can have journey men centers that do one thing.

So unless you plan on **** an elite wing player out we have a center that can score.

Sent from my D6708 using RealGM mobile app


So essentially you are saying we HAVE to have an elite player, otherwise we subjected to playing in a system that isn't currently working in today's NBA.

If you rank the games best centers they are mostly on terrible teams.

Cousins- (19th)
Jordan- (17th)
KAT- (25th)
Drummond-(23rd)
Whiteside-(28th)
Gasol-(7th)
Gobert- (9th)
B.Lopez- (27th)



Some of these players have star players next to them like Gasol (Conley),Gobert (Hayward), and Jordan (Paul), but the majority are on terrible teams.

If you had to ask me whether I wanted to build a team around a inside game big man or not- I would definitely say no. People might consider Biz a back up, and Vuc significantly better, but I'd argue Biz is more suited to a team that obviously doesn't rely on an inside out game.

Imo kat and Embiid are still way to early in their careers to come to any conclusions.

Correct. I'm saying we need an elite player. I'm also saying teams have been successful with players comparable to biz starting because they have elite talent elsewhere. They've been successful despite their limitations, not because of them. Nobody in their right mind is picking biz over. Embiid, Kat, or DMC.

Furthermore, just as its happened over the 30+ years I've watched nba basketball, the game is changing to suit the type of talent that's coming in. We're now seeing stretch 5's with a post up game, who also rebound and defend. That's where I see the game headed.

I'm in no way comparing Nik to any of those guys. But the fact is that he's defending, rebounding, posting up and now shooting the three-ball. And to me more valuable than biz as this team is currently constructed and based on where I think the league is headed.





Sent from my D6708 using RealGM mobile app
Faith, Family, & Orlando Magic
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,420
And1: 19,519
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1112 » by pepe1991 » Sun Jan 8, 2017 1:15 pm

Blue_and_Whte wrote:
MagicMatic wrote:
Blue_and_Whte wrote:They all have elite players, that's why they can have journey men centers that do one thing.

So unless you plan on **** an elite wing player out we have a center that can score.

Sent from my D6708 using RealGM mobile app


So essentially you are saying we HAVE to have an elite player, otherwise we subjected to playing in a system that isn't currently working in today's NBA.

If you rank the games best centers they are mostly on terrible teams.

Cousins- (19th)
Jordan- (17th)
KAT- (25th)
Drummond-(23rd)
Whiteside-(28th)
Gasol-(7th)
Gobert- (9th)
B.Lopez- (27th)



Some of these players have star players next to them like Gasol (Conley),Gobert (Hayward), and Jordan (Paul), but the majority are on terrible teams.

If you had to ask me whether I wanted to build a team around a inside game big man or not- I would definitely say no. People might consider Biz a back up, and Vuc significantly better, but I'd argue Biz is more suited to a team that obviously doesn't rely on an inside out game.

Imo kat and Embiid are still way to early in their careers to come to any conclusions.

Correct. I'm saying we need an elite player. I'm also saying teams have been successful with players comparable to biz starting because they have elite talent elsewhere. They've been successful despite their limitations, not because of them. Nobody in their right mind is picking biz over. Embiid, Kat, or DMC.

Furthermore, just as its happened over the 30+ years I've watched nba basketball, the game is changing to suit the type of talent that's coming in. We're now seeing stretch 5's with a post up game, who also rebound and defend. That's where I see the game headed.

I'm in no way comparing Nik to any of those guys. But the fact is that he's defending, rebounding, posting up and now shooting the three-ball. And to me more valuable than biz as this team is currently constructed and based on where I think the league is headed.





Sent from my D6708 using RealGM mobile app



Whoever watches 76ers know, only reason why they won 9 games is Embiid . It's not even fair how good he is .However, when you projected starting PG ( Bayless) played zero games, your backup Rodrigez is missing games and your guard rotation is McConnell, Luwawu and Stauskas you simply can't compete. And along all that Simmons played ZERO games so far, and they have problems with Okafor/Noel situation. It's a miracle how they are 9-25
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
User avatar
j-ragg
RealGM
Posts: 18,332
And1: 11,680
Joined: Mar 31, 2005
Location: the don't re-sign Hedo bandwagon.
   

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1113 » by j-ragg » Sun Jan 8, 2017 2:10 pm

Blue_and_Whte wrote:
MagicMatic wrote:
Blue_and_Whte wrote:They all have elite players, that's why they can have journey men centers that do one thing.

So unless you plan on **** an elite wing player out we have a center that can score.

Sent from my D6708 using RealGM mobile app


So essentially you are saying we HAVE to have an elite player, otherwise we subjected to playing in a system that isn't currently working in today's NBA.

If you rank the games best centers they are mostly on terrible teams.

Cousins- (19th)
Jordan- (17th)
KAT- (25th)
Drummond-(23rd)
Whiteside-(28th)
Gasol-(7th)
Gobert- (9th)
B.Lopez- (27th)



Some of these players have star players next to them like Gasol (Conley),Gobert (Hayward), and Jordan (Paul), but the majority are on terrible teams.

If you had to ask me whether I wanted to build a team around a inside game big man or not- I would definitely say no. People might consider Biz a back up, and Vuc significantly better, but I'd argue Biz is more suited to a team that obviously doesn't rely on an inside out game.


I'm in no way comparing Nik to any of those guys. But the fact is that he's defending, rebounding, posting up and now shooting the three-ball. And to me more valuable than biz as this team is currently constructed and based on where I think the league is headed.





Sent from my D6708 using RealGM mobile app

He posts up and shoots threes now?
BadMofoPimp wrote:Durant thinks Vooch is one of the Best Centers in the NBA. I will take his word over a couch-GM yelling at a TV.
User avatar
Def Swami
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 26,010
And1: 15,407
Joined: Aug 04, 2008
Location: Huevos Bancheros Brunch
Contact:
   

Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1114 » by Def Swami » Sun Jan 8, 2017 3:00 pm

The defense is still the thing that concerns me about this team. Vogel + elite rim protection + expected perimeter defense hasn't produced the results this team expected. We knew this team would be bad on offense. But missing their internal goal of top 5 defense is what really bugs me. AG at the 3 vs 4 is really not the overbearing issue on this team.
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,420
And1: 19,519
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1115 » by pepe1991 » Sun Jan 8, 2017 3:22 pm

j-ragg wrote:
Blue_and_Whte wrote:
MagicMatic wrote:
So essentially you are saying we HAVE to have an elite player, otherwise we subjected to playing in a system that isn't currently working in today's NBA.

If you rank the games best centers they are mostly on terrible teams.

Cousins- (19th)
Jordan- (17th)
KAT- (25th)
Drummond-(23rd)
Whiteside-(28th)
Gasol-(7th)
Gobert- (9th)
B.Lopez- (27th)



Some of these players have star players next to them like Gasol (Conley),Gobert (Hayward), and Jordan (Paul), but the majority are on terrible teams.

If you had to ask me whether I wanted to build a team around a inside game big man or not- I would definitely say no. People might consider Biz a back up, and Vuc significantly better, but I'd argue Biz is more suited to a team that obviously doesn't rely on an inside out game.


I'm in no way comparing Nik to any of those guys. But the fact is that he's defending, rebounding, posting up and now shooting the three-ball. And to me more valuable than biz as this team is currently constructed and based on where I think the league is headed.





Sent from my D6708 using RealGM mobile app

He posts up and shoots threes now?


Lol . This !!
Dude is everywhere but in post and took 29 threes.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
User avatar
j-ragg
RealGM
Posts: 18,332
And1: 11,680
Joined: Mar 31, 2005
Location: the don't re-sign Hedo bandwagon.
   

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1116 » by j-ragg » Sun Jan 8, 2017 3:50 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
j-ragg wrote:
Blue_and_Whte wrote:
I'm in no way comparing Nik to any of those guys. But the fact is that he's defending, rebounding, posting up and now shooting the three-ball. And to me more valuable than biz as this team is currently constructed and based on where I think the league is headed.





Sent from my D6708 using RealGM mobile app

He posts up and shoots threes now?


Lol . This !!
Dude is everywhere but in post and took 29 threes.

He's the best scorer on the team best scoring big in the league but whoops he scores worse than everyone on our team minus the 13th-15th guys. Just don't see why it's such a benefit with a scoring center when he shoots worse than our "pg who can't shoot".
BadMofoPimp wrote:Durant thinks Vooch is one of the Best Centers in the NBA. I will take his word over a couch-GM yelling at a TV.
User avatar
Blue_and_Whte
RealGM
Posts: 24,687
And1: 9,569
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
Location: Orlando, FL.
     

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1117 » by Blue_and_Whte » Sun Jan 8, 2017 3:54 pm

j-ragg wrote:
Blue_and_Whte wrote:
MagicMatic wrote:
So essentially you are saying we HAVE to have an elite player, otherwise we subjected to playing in a system that isn't currently working in today's NBA.

If you rank the games best centers they are mostly on terrible teams.

Cousins- (19th)
Jordan- (17th)
KAT- (25th)
Drummond-(23rd)
Whiteside-(28th)
Gasol-(7th)
Gobert- (9th)
B.Lopez- (27th)



Some of these players have star players next to them like Gasol (Conley),Gobert (Hayward), and Jordan (Paul), but the majority are on terrible teams.

If you had to ask me whether I wanted to build a team around a inside game big man or not- I would definitely say no. People might consider Biz a back up, and Vuc significantly better, but I'd argue Biz is more suited to a team that obviously doesn't rely on an inside out game.


I'm in no way comparing Nik to any of those guys. But the fact is that he's defending, rebounding, posting up and now shooting the three-ball. And to me more valuable than biz as this team is currently constructed and based on where I think the league is headed.





Sent from my D6708 using RealGM mobile app

He posts up and shoots threes now?

Are asking me if Vucevic posts up and shoot threes? And you think he's the best scoring big in the league? I had no idea you were blind. Please accept my condolences.

I never said Nik is the best scoring center in the league and I said he's one of the better scorers on this team although he needs to improve his percentages. You obviously have trouble with reading comprehension and understanding basketball.

Sent from my D6708 using RealGM mobile app
Faith, Family, & Orlando Magic
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,420
And1: 19,519
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1118 » by pepe1991 » Sun Jan 8, 2017 4:04 pm

Brook Lopez and Cousins indeed shoot 3s and post up.
Vučević takes : 22,1% shots from 0-3 feet range (what would you consider deep postups)
26,5% from 3-10 feet, what would you consider post up ,but it can also be close "mid range"
6% of Vučević total shots are 3 point shots

So, as you can see, over 40% of Vučević shots are long 2s . Shot that advanced stats view as worst shots you can take.

So saying that he plays in post and shoot 3s is myth because most of the time he just sleeps 15 feet from basket, waiting for another fadeaway jumper.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
User avatar
j-ragg
RealGM
Posts: 18,332
And1: 11,680
Joined: Mar 31, 2005
Location: the don't re-sign Hedo bandwagon.
   

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1119 » by j-ragg » Sun Jan 8, 2017 4:08 pm

Blue_and_Whte wrote:
j-ragg wrote:
Blue_and_Whte wrote:
I'm in no way comparing Nik to any of those guys. But the fact is that he's defending, rebounding, posting up and now shooting the three-ball. And to me more valuable than biz as this team is currently constructed and based on where I think the league is headed.





Sent from my D6708 using RealGM mobile app

He posts up and shoots threes now?

Are asking me if Vucevic posts up and shoot threes? And you think he's the best scoring big in the league? I had no idea you were blind. Please accept my condolences.
If you watch the sport called basketball and had the ability to comprehend youd see that Nik does post up and shoot threes as do guys like Embiid and Kat although at a higher level.

Sent from my D6708 using RealGM mobile app

You see what you want to see. Prime Shaq mixed in with Chamberlain with Dirk level perimeter skills. We see Nik Vucevic backup center on the Orlando Magic.
BadMofoPimp wrote:Durant thinks Vooch is one of the Best Centers in the NBA. I will take his word over a couch-GM yelling at a TV.
User avatar
Blue_and_Whte
RealGM
Posts: 24,687
And1: 9,569
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
Location: Orlando, FL.
     

Re: RE: Re: Official Speculation Thread 2016 Volume VII - Defense Wins Championships 

Post#1120 » by Blue_and_Whte » Sun Jan 8, 2017 4:11 pm

pepe1991 wrote:Brook Lopez and Cousins indeed shoot 3s and post up.
Vučević takes : 22,1% shots from 0-3 feet range (what would you consider deep postups)
26,5% from 3-10 feet, what would you consider post up ,but it can also be close "mid range"
6% of Vučević total shots are 3 point shots

So, as you can see, over 40% of Vučević shots are long 2s . Shot that advanced stats view as worst shots you can take.

So saying that he plays in post and shoot 3s is myth because most of the time he just sleeps 15 feet from basket, waiting for another fadeaway jumper.

I don't even know why I'm responding to the likes of you. But like I said. Vuc can post up and shoot threes and is currently defending very well. Again He's more valuable than biz as this team is currently constructed. Learn some reading comprehension before you try and debate me.

Sent from my D6708 using RealGM mobile app
Faith, Family, & Orlando Magic
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA

Return to Orlando Magic