Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice!

reload141 · Post #321 » by **reload141** » Sun Jan 8, 2017 10:02 pm

Curmudgeon wrote:As I've said before, the price for Nurkic will include taking one of Denver's veterans in the deal. They'be been trying to trade Faried for over a year now, and Chandler is also rumored to be on the block. I'm guessing that taking on long-term money will be a deal breaker for Ainge.

Chandler off the bench though :droop:

Curmudgeon · Post #322 » by **Curmudgeon** » Sun Jan 8, 2017 10:20 pm

reload141 wrote:
Curmudgeon wrote:As I've said before, the price for Nurkic will include taking one of Denver's veterans in the deal. They'be been trying to trade Faried for over a year now, and Chandler is also rumored to be on the block. I'm guessing that taking on long-term money will be a deal breaker for Ainge.

Chandler off the bench though

Faried could be a useful player too-- he rebounds. But there goes the cap space to sign a max free agent in July. If Ainge didn't care about cap space, he could go a log way towards solving the Celtics' rebounding problems by acquiring Tyson Chandler.

It looks to me as though Bogut is the most likely acquisition. There are too many suitors for Millsap, which will drive up the price.

Post #323 » by **Darth Celtic** » Sun Jan 8, 2017 10:44 pm

skywalker33 wrote:
Darth Celtic wrote:
bs_and_cs wrote:Is Nurkic really available? What do you think his price would be? I hope we are working Denver.

They probably want a lot. I'd offer like james young, jordon mikey, and the clippers 1st round pick, wolves 2017 2nd round pick.

Doubt that would get you more than an earful of laughter.

then keep him and pay him, or lose him for nothing. Celtics won't give up anything other than late 1sts for him.

CelticFaninLBC · Post #324 » by **CelticFaninLBC** » Sun Jan 8, 2017 10:53 pm

165bows wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
Curmudgeon wrote:
If Ainge has pictures of Mark Cuban sleeping with someone other than Cuban's wife, that might work.

Rozier is a big overpay for half a season of Bogut, who misses half his games to begin with.

Dude is also averaging 3ppg and 27% FTs.

He and Rondo are currently engaged in a furious battle for the worst offensive stat line of all time. Bogut is currently leading in the innovative "fewer FGs than TOs/game" metric.

Rondo is putting up a really tough fight but Bogut's combo of shockingly low volume and efficiency, combined with astronomical turnover rate, will be tough to beat.

Guess these guys missed the memo about offensive explosions league-wide.

Verdict: Zeller + clips and cavs seconds for Bogut = we'll think about it.

Bogut's rebounding % is right there with Whiteside and Tyson Chandler. Don't need much offense from the center position, if they add Butler. Also, moving Rozier, who has done very little so far, gives them some extra cap space this summer.

Avalanche · Post #325 » by **Avalanche** » Sun Jan 8, 2017 11:00 pm

Surely if we had a Griffin or Hayward ready to sign on the dotted line unloading Faried or Chandler (or someone else) wouldn't be too hard in the offseason?

I'd take Nurkic with either if it was cheap

Friggin hate Bogut

FlatearthZorro · Post #326 » by **FlatearthZorro** » Sun Jan 8, 2017 11:03 pm

Avalanche wrote:Surely if we had a Griffin or Hayward ready to sign on the dotted line unloading Faried or Chandler (or someone else) wouldn't be too hard in the offseason?

I'd take Nurkic with either if it was cheap

Friggin hate Bogut

I wouldn't take Nurkic anyways. Zizic is coming next season.

Bogut makes too much sense.

Curmudgeon · Post #327 » by **Curmudgeon** » Sun Jan 8, 2017 11:05 pm

Right now the teams shopping players are asking too much. Ainge is taking calls on the Brooklyn pick and he's probably asking too much as well. But that's the top pick in the draft of the decade. He ought to be asking too much.

MaxwellSmart · Post #328 » by **MaxwellSmart** » Sun Jan 8, 2017 11:30 pm

If Zeller is sick---why is he on the bench with the team--?
shouldn't he be home resting.?...Looks like he's just waiting for Jan.14th.

$8Million Salary match.

Marvel · Post #329 » by **Marvel** » Sun Jan 8, 2017 11:32 pm

Boston34Bg wrote:
Avalanche wrote:Surely if we had a Griffin or Hayward ready to sign on the dotted line unloading Faried or Chandler (or someone else) wouldn't be too hard in the offseason?

I'd take Nurkic with either if it was cheap

Friggin hate Bogut

I wouldn't take Nurkic anyways. Zizic is coming next season.

Bogut makes too much sense.

I want to see what we have in Zizic too. A 2nd rounder and Zeller for Bogut. Never know when the next injury is for Bogut.

Avalanche · Post #330 » by **Avalanche** » Sun Jan 8, 2017 11:41 pm

Marvel wrote:
Boston34Bg wrote:
Avalanche wrote:Surely if we had a Griffin or Hayward ready to sign on the dotted line unloading Faried or Chandler (or someone else) wouldn't be too hard in the offseason?

I'd take Nurkic with either if it was cheap

Friggin hate Bogut

I wouldn't take Nurkic anyways. Zizic is coming next season.

Bogut makes too much sense.

I want to see what we have in Zizic too. A 2nd rounder and Zeller for Bogut. Never know when the next injury is for Bogut.

I'm super high on Zizic tbh, I think he's going to be a real impact player here

but is Nurk/Zizic at C next season really too much considering the main FA targets are a wing and a PF?

I just hate Bogut's attitude, coupled with his injury history and now non-existent offensive game, I'd really prefer someone else

I can see the positives, but would prefer to look elsewhere

Franc · Post #331 » by **Franc** » Sun Jan 8, 2017 11:41 pm

Marvel wrote:
Boston34Bg wrote:
Avalanche wrote:Surely if we had a Griffin or Hayward ready to sign on the dotted line unloading Faried or Chandler (or someone else) wouldn't be too hard in the offseason?

I'd take Nurkic with either if it was cheap

Friggin hate Bogut

I wouldn't take Nurkic anyways. Zizic is coming next season.

Bogut makes too much sense.

I want to see what we have in Zizic too. A 2nd rounder and Zeller for Bogut. Never know when the next injury is for Bogut.[/quote

Injury is a thing , you never know when will it happen for any other player also, not only Bogut.

31to6 · Post #332 » by **31to6** » Mon Jan 9, 2017 12:10 am

Avalanche wrote:Surely if we had a Griffin or Hayward ready to sign on the dotted line unloading Faried or Chandler (or someone else) wouldn't be too hard in the offseason?

Can I just give an 'amen' to that? I've been trying to make that point to no avail.

Did the Warriors have max room when they met with Durant? No.

Durant, LeBron, Aldridge, Carmelo, Wade -- they've all met (and several signed) with teams that didn't have space for the contracts that they gave them at the time of their meeting.

I don't know why so many get so hung up on this. You have to have a path to the max, sure, but you can trade a contract such as Tyson Chandler's -- easily. Even if in the worst case scenario we took on someone who put us over the max and they got injured or declined rapidly, we're loaded with a bunch of late firsts to pay a team to take a year of a guy if we had to dump someone.

Marvel · Post #333 » by **Marvel** » Mon Jan 9, 2017 12:20 am

Franc wrote:
Marvel wrote:
Boston34Bg wrote:
I wouldn't take Nurkic anyways. Zizic is coming next season.

Bogut makes too much sense.

I want to see what we have in Zizic too. A 2nd rounder and Zeller for Bogut. Never know when the next injury is for Bogut.[/quote

Injury is a thing , you never know when will it happen for any other player also, not only Bogut.

Yeah lol, just like shooting 3s is a thing but for some players it's more of a sure thing that they go in. Just like Bogut, he's more likely to get injured than any other NBA player today.

Franc · Post #334 » by **Franc** » Mon Jan 9, 2017 12:36 am

Marvel wrote:
Franc wrote:
Marvel wrote:

I want to see what we have in Zizic too. A 2nd rounder and Zeller for Bogut. Never know when the next injury is for Bogut.[/quote

Injury is a thing , you never know when will it happen for any other player also, not only Bogut.

Yeah lol, just like shooting 3s is a thing but for some players it's more of a sure thing that they go in. Just like Bogut, he's more likely to get injured than any other NBA player today.

AMEN!

Captain_Caveman · Post #335 » by **Captain_Caveman** » Mon Jan 9, 2017 2:33 am

skywalker33 wrote:
Darth Celtic wrote:
bs_and_cs wrote:Is Nurkic really available? What do you think his price would be? I hope we are working Denver.

They probably want a lot. I'd offer like james young, jordon mikey, and the clippers 1st round pick, wolves 2017 2nd round pick.

Doubt that would get you more than an earful of laughter.

No, you talking mess about a 14-23 team is what's funny.

Take it.

Take it.

skywalker33 · Post #336 » by **skywalker33** » Mon Jan 9, 2017 2:53 am

Darth Celtic wrote:
skywalker33 wrote:
Darth Celtic wrote:
They probably want a lot. I'd offer like james young, jordon mikey, and the clippers 1st round pick, wolves 2017 2nd round pick.

Doubt that would get you more than an earful of laughter.

then keep him and pay him, or lose him for nothing. Celtics won't give up anything other than late 1sts for him.

BOS isn't the only destination...the NBA is a bit bigger :roll:

youngthegiant · Post #337 » by **youngthegiant** » Mon Jan 9, 2017 2:55 am

How about a bigger deal involving Gallinari + Nurkic???

Post #338 » by **Darth Celtic** » Mon Jan 9, 2017 3:30 am

skywalker33 wrote:
Darth Celtic wrote:
skywalker33 wrote:
Doubt that would get you more than an earful of laughter.

then keep him and pay him, or lose him for nothing. Celtics won't give up anything other than late 1sts for him.

BOS isn't the only destination...the NBA is a bit bigger

And this is a Boston forum. I think you might be lost. The nuggets forum is elsewhere. I didn't say I expected the nuggets to accept the trade. If I said the nuggets would accept, or would be fair if, or won't get better than, I can see you fan boys coming over and stalking our trade thread. But I didn't. So back to your board or make some other fans trade thread unreadable. We don't need your opinions.

reload141 · Post #339 » by **reload141** » Mon Jan 9, 2017 3:38 am

youngthegiant wrote:How about a bigger deal involving Gallinari + Nurkic???

What would you want?

Chuck-Cheese · Post #340 » by **Chuck-Cheese** » Mon Jan 9, 2017 4:02 am

skywalker33 wrote:
Darth Celtic wrote:
skywalker33 wrote:
Doubt that would get you more than an earful of laughter.

then keep him and pay him, or lose him for nothing. Celtics won't give up anything other than late 1sts for him.

BOS isn't the only destination...the NBA is a bit bigger

it's funny how you regularly rip Celtic fans on the nuggets board for the way they value their own players and yet you seem to spend a great deal of time trying to rile up celts fans on their own board. don't you have anything better to do?