2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
Moderators: bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
- ken6199
- Forum Mod - Rockets

- Posts: 13,438
- And1: 18,745
- Joined: Jan 05, 2015
- Location: Bill O'Brien is GOAT
-
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
Cavs now with a league 5th best SRS, 2nd below Raptors in the East.
RealGM loves you, Melissa.
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
-
therealbig3
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,625
- And1: 16,150
- Joined: Jul 31, 2010
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
Triples333 wrote:MisterHibachi wrote:Triples333 wrote:Yes, disregard the substance and focus on us laughing at you. Probably for the best.
Like your rebuttal that since Harden had no expectations on him pre-season he should be given a boost? Or pretending that Houston is higher in the ranking despite having more losses? Or pretending that Harden means more to his team when the numbers disprove it?
Yes man, a team projected as a 42 win 8 seed at best on pace for 58+ wins is significant. To not acknowledge that is just sad.
Maybe this just means that Harden's supporting cast was underrated? Because they play better without him than the Cavs do without LeBron.
LeBron has meant more to his team than Harden has to his. That's just a fact. Pretty sure that's the definition of MVP.
Whatever the projection was, Houston's supporting cast has played better without Harden than people thought. Harden should get credit for this?
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
- Young_Star11
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 22,282
- And1: 1,767
- Joined: Oct 28, 2005
- Location: RealGM
-
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
LeBron is the best player in the world, no one is doubting that.
If the season finishes today, Harden should win MVP by a conclusive-enough margin.
If the season finishes today, Harden should win MVP by a conclusive-enough margin.
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
-
HurricaneKid
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,093
- And1: 5,052
- Joined: Jul 13, 2010
- Location: Sconnie Nation
-
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
Harden has had 9 straight games with at least 6 TOs. I believe that's a record.
He was still pretty great today but its an ongoing issue.
He was still pretty great today but its an ongoing issue.
fishnc wrote:If I had a gun with two bullets and I was in a room with Hitler, Bin Laden, and LeBron, I would shoot LeBron twice.
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
- BallerTalk
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,712
- And1: 6,816
- Joined: Jul 01, 2013
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
therealbig3 wrote:Maybe this just means that Harden's supporting cast was underrated? Because they play better without him than the Cavs do without LeBron.
LeBron has meant more to his team than Harden has to his. That's just a fact. Pretty sure that's the definition of MVP.
No that's not a fact, that is merely your interpretation of a flawed statistic.
This thread has been thoroughly entertaining if for no other reason than watching opposing fans so doggedly determined to demonstrate how superior the Rockets' supporting cast is.
Who knew Houston had the secret superteam of the West?
You checkin' for the sound of the beast
I'm the hound, I'ma creep, I get down, I'ma eat
I'ma keep somethin' to lay a naysayer to sleep
-
I'm the hound, I'ma creep, I get down, I'ma eat
I'ma keep somethin' to lay a naysayer to sleep
-
Re: RE: Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
- K_chile22
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,754
- And1: 8,645
- Joined: Jul 15, 2015
-
Re: RE: Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
HurricaneKid wrote:Harden has had 9 straight games with at least 6 TOs. I believe that's a record.
He was still pretty great today but its an ongoing issue.
Lower TO% than Nash in 11 of his 18 seasons. It really isn't much of a problem. There are a few bone head ones but for the most part the TO totals for him, and Westbrook, are a product of usage, pace, and ball handling responsibilities.
Turnovers also context-less. I can think of 3 today just off the top of my head that weren't his fault
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
- RSP83
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,247
- And1: 4,269
- Joined: Sep 14, 2010
-
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
James Harden is basically Mike D'antoni's Steve Nash 2.0. Like Nash, he deservingly in the top 2-3 in the MVP race this year. But I have a feeling he's going to disappoint in the Playoff.
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
- RSP83
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,247
- And1: 4,269
- Joined: Sep 14, 2010
-
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
red96 wrote:Let me guess.Rastas wrote:Prediction for seasons end -
Player A = 27/8/9 with 64 wins - no1 seed
Player B = 28/8/12 with 56 wins - no 3 or 4 seed
Player C = 31/10/10 with 46 wins - no 7 seed
Who wins it - I got A
A)KD
B)Harden
C)Westbrook
What do I win?!?!
Presti was a badass drafter. Didn't they get drafted by OKC after 3 consecutive year?
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
- lars_rosenberg
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,267
- And1: 3,776
- Joined: Aug 15, 2014
-
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
Player A (KD) is averaging less than 5 assists. If he had 8 as in the prediction posted above he would be in the running with Harden and Westbrook... But he isn't.
It's still an impressive season for him: a forward rebounding as a center and dishing assists almost like a PG with elite scoring efficiency. In a normal season he would be MVP, but this time something unbelievable is happening.
It's still an impressive season for him: a forward rebounding as a center and dishing assists almost like a PG with elite scoring efficiency. In a normal season he would be MVP, but this time something unbelievable is happening.
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
-
Rastas
- Starter
- Posts: 2,488
- And1: 1,195
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
Wake up people - Player A is not KD
He is KD's worst nightmare
He is KD's worst nightmare
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
-
Rastas
- Starter
- Posts: 2,488
- And1: 1,195
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
I'm thinking some people only watch players from the worsten conference .
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
-
Rastas
- Starter
- Posts: 2,488
- And1: 1,195
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
Here's a clue - player A is a 4 time MVP and the reigning finals MVP!
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
-
Tritodian
- Junior
- Posts: 368
- And1: 464
- Joined: Mar 29, 2016
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
OKC is on pace to win 45-46 games. That's just not good enough. And if Westbrook is really having a historically great offensive season as some people suggest, why isn't he making his team much better than it is now? Don't tell me the supporting cast of Steven Adams, Oladipo, Roberson, and Enes Kanter, combined with historically-great-triple-double-averaging Westbrook is not good enough to get you at least 50 wins. That's nonsense.
Lebron in his early Cleveland days had much worse players around him and still won 60+ games. 14-15 Harden shared most of his playing time with the likes of Ariza, Motiejunas, Beverley, Terry, and Corey Brewer and still won 56 games.
If Westbrook is truly having one of the best offensive seasons that deserve MVP, his team should have much better record than 45-46 wins. Plain and simple.
Lebron in his early Cleveland days had much worse players around him and still won 60+ games. 14-15 Harden shared most of his playing time with the likes of Ariza, Motiejunas, Beverley, Terry, and Corey Brewer and still won 56 games.
If Westbrook is truly having one of the best offensive seasons that deserve MVP, his team should have much better record than 45-46 wins. Plain and simple.
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
- bondom34
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 66,716
- And1: 50,290
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
Tritodian wrote:OKC is on pace to win 45-46 games. That's just not good enough. And if Westbrook is really having a historically great offensive season as some people suggest, why isn't he making his team much better than it is now? Don't tell me the supporting cast of Steven Adams, Oladipo, Roberson, and Enes Kanter, combined with historically-great-triple-double-averaging Westbrook is not good enough to get you at least 50 wins. That's nonsense.
Lebron in his early Cleveland days had much worse players around him and still won 60+ games. 14-15 Harden shared most of his playing time with the likes of Ariza, Motiejunas, Beverley, Terry, and Corey Brewer and still won 56 games.
If Westbrook is truly having one of the best offensive seasons that deserve MVP, his team should have much better record than 45-46 wins. Plain and simple.
Oladipo's missed 8 games, or 20 percent of the season. And without him OKC's offense is Sixers level bad. Houston's on the other hand still runs as middle of the pack when Harden sits out.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
- Lauri_Legend
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,017
- And1: 1,667
- Joined: Dec 13, 2010
-
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
There are only two names we can really choose from this season, maybe three: Russell Westbrook, James Harden, and Lebron James.
No one can the Warriors can win it. The last two MVPs are on the same team. How can somebody be the "most valuable player" when they're playing next to a "most valuable player". Makes no sense.
No one can the Warriors can win it. The last two MVPs are on the same team. How can somebody be the "most valuable player" when they're playing next to a "most valuable player". Makes no sense.
Admin of DieHardChicagoBullsFans: https://www.facebook.com/DieHardChicagoBullsFans
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
-
Shock Defeat
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,783
- And1: 18,937
- Joined: Aug 30, 2012
-
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
Stop mentioning KD or Curry. Both of them are DISQUALIFIED from winning MVP this year. That's just how it is, the voters won't vote for them.
Unless the media HATES Harden, there's no way he loses the MVP to Westbrook or LeBron. LeBron has a much better supporting cast than Harden and has worse stats. Plus people are tired of giving Bron the MVP.
Unless the media HATES Harden, there's no way he loses the MVP to Westbrook or LeBron. LeBron has a much better supporting cast than Harden and has worse stats. Plus people are tired of giving Bron the MVP.
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
- TheSuzerain
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,415
- And1: 11,414
- Joined: Mar 29, 2012
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
I think it's Harden by a considerable amount at the moment. He checks every box.
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
-
Screwston
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,069
- And1: 643
- Joined: Mar 10, 2014
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
Harden is responsible for 57 of the Rockets points per game this season, which is an Nba record (set in 1972, 56 points)
Pls tell us hows LeBron the Mvp
Pls tell us hows LeBron the Mvp
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
-
Gil
- Starter
- Posts: 2,379
- And1: 1,283
- Joined: Feb 15, 2012
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
Still can't believe LeBron is getting nominated in here. He's literally playing with 2 other All-NBA caliber players & 20 PPG scorers.
Is he the best player in the League? Yes.
Is he the MVP of the League? Hell no.
Is he the best player in the League? Yes.
Is he the MVP of the League? Hell no.
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
- bmurph128
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,880
- And1: 3,871
- Joined: May 28, 2015
-
Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread
BBall Loyalty wrote:If you put LeBron on the Rockets instead of Harden I actually doubt they'd be this good.
They'd be better. Much better.
With LeBron, they'd be title contenders. They would probably beat the Warriors.
Beverly/Ariza/LeBron....the defensive ability there....my God...









