2016-17 Rookie Watch thread

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Who will make the All Rookie 1st Team?

Brogdon
100
19%
Brown
25
5%
Chriss
43
8%
Embiid
94
18%
Ferrell
5
1%
WILLY Hernangomez
36
7%
Hield
64
12%
Ingram
14
3%
Murray
39
7%
Saric
106
20%
 
Total votes: 526

skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: RE: Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#781 » by skones » Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:03 pm

Jon1798 wrote:
skones wrote:
Jon1798 wrote:
He's averaging over 16 points per 36 through his first two months of NBA basketball. He's now starting and won rookie of the month in December, for a team that is one game out of the playoffs after starting 0-8 from decimated injuries.

In all seriousness, when was the last time you watched him play if at all?

After starting 0-8? You act as if they've climbed out of some hole. They're one game out of the playoffs at 9 games under .500 right now. Acting as if their playoff eligibility somehow strengthens your argument doesn't really fly.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using RealGM mobile app


0-8 is not a hole?

He said Buddy is on a crappy team. The Pelicans have been a .500 team after that 0-8 start when about 7 people were missing games. I think that's worth mentioning no? It's an average team, not a crappy team. My post was a response to his.


Not when you're using the playoff picture relevance to bolster your argument at 9 games under .500 as if they've somehow climbed out of it, no.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#782 » by skones » Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:16 pm

XtotheDeezy wrote:
skones wrote:Also, Malcolm Brogdon just keeps doing his thing with a 17 point, 6 rebound, 6 assist performance on 5/11 from the field, 3/5 from 3, and only 1 to.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using RealGM mobile app


He's looking like a Top 5 rookie from that draft class.


He's pretty easily been the best player drafted from his class this season. It'll be interesting to see how he progresses vs those who are substantially younger. As it stands, it looks as if Milwaukee has found their version of George Hill in the 2nd round.
User avatar
Lauri_Legend
Analyst
Posts: 3,017
And1: 1,667
Joined: Dec 13, 2010
 

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#783 » by Lauri_Legend » Wed Jan 11, 2017 6:58 pm

Denzel Valentine last night with 19pts on 5-11 3s playing meaningful minutes for the first time.
Admin of DieHardChicagoBullsFans: https://www.facebook.com/DieHardChicagoBullsFans
User avatar
XtotheDeezy
Veteran
Posts: 2,711
And1: 1,791
Joined: Apr 14, 2010
 

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#784 » by XtotheDeezy » Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:00 pm

skones wrote:
XtotheDeezy wrote:
skones wrote:Also, Malcolm Brogdon just keeps doing his thing with a 17 point, 6 rebound, 6 assist performance on 5/11 from the field, 3/5 from 3, and only 1 to.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using RealGM mobile app


He's looking like a Top 5 rookie from that draft class.


He's pretty easily been the best player drafted from his class this season. It'll be interesting to see how he progresses vs those who are substantially younger. As it stands, it looks as if Milwaukee has found their version of George Hill in the 2nd round.


You're right. In terms of moving forward, I would still rather have Simmons or Ingram, but yeah he's #3.
Jon1798
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,736
And1: 2,632
Joined: Feb 15, 2005

Re: RE: Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#785 » by Jon1798 » Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:27 pm

skones wrote:
Jon1798 wrote:
skones wrote:After starting 0-8? You act as if they've climbed out of some hole. They're one game out of the playoffs at 9 games under .500 right now. Acting as if their playoff eligibility somehow strengthens your argument doesn't really fly.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using RealGM mobile app


0-8 is not a hole?

He said Buddy is on a crappy team. The Pelicans have been a .500 team after that 0-8 start when about 7 people were missing games. I think that's worth mentioning no? It's an average team, not a crappy team. My post was a response to his.


Not when you're using the playoff picture relevance to bolster your argument at 9 games under .500 as if they've somehow climbed out of it, no.


Actually, I argued that Buddy Hield is not somehow a lesser player because of the Pelicans performance. Are you arguing otherwise or just arguing to argue?
"This post wants out of New Orleans" - Woj
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: RE: Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#786 » by skones » Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:05 pm

Jon1798 wrote:
skones wrote:
Jon1798 wrote:
0-8 is not a hole?

He said Buddy is on a crappy team. The Pelicans have been a .500 team after that 0-8 start when about 7 people were missing games. I think that's worth mentioning no? It's an average team, not a crappy team. My post was a response to his.


Not when you're using the playoff picture relevance to bolster your argument at 9 games under .500 as if they've somehow climbed out of it, no.


Actually, I argued that Buddy Hield is not somehow a lesser player because of the Pelicans performance. Are you arguing otherwise or just arguing to argue?


Is he a lesser player? No. But he's certainly getting ample opportunity to play through mistakes on NOLA where there are quite a few teams where he may not. Your attempt to boost Hield up "as a starter on a team one game out of the playoffs" is just as bad of a point as the initial poster who made the "crappy team comment."
Jon1798
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,736
And1: 2,632
Joined: Feb 15, 2005

Re: RE: Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#787 » by Jon1798 » Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:25 pm

skones wrote:
Jon1798 wrote:
skones wrote:
Not when you're using the playoff picture relevance to bolster your argument at 9 games under .500 as if they've somehow climbed out of it, no.


Actually, I argued that Buddy Hield is not somehow a lesser player because of the Pelicans performance. Are you arguing otherwise or just arguing to argue?


Is he a lesser player? No. But he's certainly getting ample opportunity to play through mistakes on NOLA where there are quite a few teams where he may not. Your attempt to boost Hield up "as a starter on a team one game out of the playoffs" is just as bad of a point as the initial poster who made the "crappy team comment."


Riiiight. So to recap, your opinion is Hield is extra benefitting because he is on a team that it's not important what happens. And the fact that they are playing for a playoff spot is not an important part of that discussion. Interesting.

The Pels have Jrue Holiday, Tyreke Evans, E-Twaun Moore, Langston Galloway and Tim Frazier all fighting and sharing minutes at the guard spots right now. Buddy has had as much competition as anyone.

Since December 1st, his per 36 numbers have been 17.1 points, 43% FG, 50% 3PT% (on about 7 shots per 36) , 93% FT, 4.95 rebounds, 2.5 assists.

The fact that he is starting is important because he is going up against NBA starters. The fact that they are fighting for a playoff spot is important for the exact reason you have tried to down play how good he has been. There are more reasons than any team in the league for Alvin to try and save his job and to play a veteran over a rookie. But Buddy has been the second best player on this team. He has played like the second best rookie in the league.
"This post wants out of New Orleans" - Woj
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#788 » by skones » Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:38 pm

You're flat out not making any sense. I'm downplaying your "playoff team" argument to put Hield on a pedestal because nobody gives a rat's ass if youre a playoff team at 8 or 9 games below .500. You might as well not be, because you're not a very good team. Period.

So saying things like, "He's doing it on a team in playoff contention!" doesn't go very far when you put it into context of their ACTUAL record standing. They're not in playoff contention because they're an average to solid team. They're in playoff contention because the rest of the West from 8-15 is so damn awful. It's bogus to lambaste someone for calling your team crappy and then combat it with a heavily skewed in your favor "playoff contention" argument when in any other season, your "playoff contention team" is in the thick of the lottery.
User avatar
JohnWillow
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,619
And1: 5,714
Joined: Jun 27, 2015
Location: Erik Karlsson to SJ? Slap me silly Dougy!!!
       

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#789 » by JohnWillow » Thu Jan 12, 2017 6:23 am

Another international player for Spurs, really good shooter, great vision, pretty good rim protector. Good job R.C. Buford again.



Celtics fan. :crazy:
We also face the Kings twice in the near future. I think it's time Yabu pays back some of that free money he's been given his entire career and bounces Fox for a nice 2 week ankle sprain.
brutalitops
Head Coach
Posts: 6,383
And1: 8,163
Joined: Feb 20, 2014
Location: Perth, Australia
     

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#790 » by brutalitops » Thu Jan 12, 2017 2:24 pm

While Dunn has been pretty trash he's starting to get confidence, Still probably a career back-up PG/

Defensively he's good, He gets some huge blocks, has some nice moves with the ball, His inability to space the floor really could open up the game for him
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,497
And1: 11,521
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#791 » by Turk Nowitzki » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:46 pm

Tom349 wrote:Caris Levert is looking good for Brooklyn. His playmaking in particular is impressive.

That was a great pick by the Nets. The injury factor, while a clear risk, allowed them to get a lotto talent at pick #20.
LibertyPrime
Starter
Posts: 2,314
And1: 1,972
Joined: Dec 08, 2013
 

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#792 » by LibertyPrime » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:49 pm

brutalitops wrote:While Dunn has been pretty trash he's starting to get confidence, Still probably a career back-up PG/

Defensively he's good, He gets some huge blocks, has some nice moves with the ball, His inability to space the floor really could open up the game for him


I keep hoping he'll have more of a Gary Payton arc, where everything clicks after the first year. He has shone real flashes defensively, but his job right now is to quarterback one of the worst second units in the NBA. He does seem to have some synergy with Zach Lavine when they play together.
"The last domino falls here!"
islanders11040
Head Coach
Posts: 7,418
And1: 6,978
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
Location: New York
       

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#793 » by islanders11040 » Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:18 pm

From the last week or so (7 game stretch, avg 17mins/g):









Good 3 pt shooter. Good at cutting to the basket. Good effort at all times. Always moving. There is something there.
dautjazz
RealGM
Posts: 15,278
And1: 10,044
Joined: Aug 01, 2001
Location: Miami, FL
 

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#794 » by dautjazz » Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:30 pm

islanders11040 wrote:From the last week or so (7 game stretch, avg 17mins/g):









Good 3 pt shooter. Good at cutting to the basket. Good effort at all times. Always moving. There is something there.


He's looks wasted in every screenshot of those youtube videos lol. Does he have a naturally wasted look?
NickAnderson wrote:
How old are you, just curious.

by gomeziee on 21 Jul 2013 00:53

im 20, and i did grow up watching MJ play in the 90's.
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 42,269
And1: 20,742
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#795 » by AussieBuck » Sat Jan 14, 2017 12:06 am

He's just ugly.
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.


GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#796 » by skones » Sat Jan 14, 2017 3:27 am

Brogdon with another good outing. Pretty ridiculous he's as well rounded and poised as he is in year one. It feels like there are no real weaknesses in his game. 13 points, 6 rebounds 5 assists 2 steals 1 TO 3/6 from the field. Dellys back and is now coming off the bench, looks like he may have taken the starting job for good.
dorkestra
RealGM
Posts: 10,387
And1: 12,675
Joined: Mar 03, 2013

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#797 » by dorkestra » Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:27 pm

I think Brogdon fits well for the Bucks and he should be able to hold down PG of the future for them. Now all they need is a defensive minded center.
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,697
And1: 67,361
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#798 » by Duke4life831 » Sat Jan 14, 2017 11:15 pm

Looks like Brandon Ingram is slowly starting to get a little more comfortable out there. His January shooting numbers are looking really good, starting to just play with a little more confidence out there. You can see some of his moves has the potential to be unguardable.
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 18,656
And1: 20,248
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#799 » by MrBigShot » Sun Jan 15, 2017 12:28 am

If you're reading this take a second and look at Embiid's twitter picture LOL

The guy can flat out ball and his sense of humor is gold.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
User avatar
Kabookalu
RealGM
Posts: 63,103
And1: 70,115
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
Location: Long Beach, California

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#800 » by Kabookalu » Sun Jan 15, 2017 7:18 am

The rookie watch threads are a lot less hostile when there's no studs in the class.
Read on Twitter

Return to The General Board