
Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,092
- And1: 2,001
- Joined: Nov 03, 2014
-
Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
Ugh. This makes me sad. 39 pts in a victory vs Spurs

Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,753
- And1: 22,818
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
-
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
You could sit and do this with every draft, wish we would have took Giannis.
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,931
- And1: 2,211
- Joined: Jan 17, 2015
-
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
Idk how much pt he would get. We have KCP he's been playing like a top 5-10 ish SG this year. I still love SJ tho
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
- A_dub06
- Starter
- Posts: 2,071
- And1: 967
- Joined: Dec 02, 2013
-
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
Calm down captain hindsight, nobody knew he would be this good.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
- TurboTitan
- Starter
- Posts: 2,188
- And1: 1,940
- Joined: Jul 12, 2013
- Location: Windsor, ON
-
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
Not even having a good year and he's a disgrace of a defender
“We don't see ourselves as All-Stars. We see ourselves as one unit. It's like five fingers on a hand. You can do more damage together as a fist than spread out flat.” ~SHEED
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,931
- And1: 2,211
- Joined: Jan 17, 2015
-
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
Mo-Town wrote:Not even having a good year and he's a disgrace of a defender
Idk man 20ppg for a 2nd year player is pretty good
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
- Izzite
- Senior
- Posts: 555
- And1: 327
- Joined: Apr 21, 2016
- Location: Beast Lansing
-
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
Nothing gets past you! 

Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
- Blkbrd671
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,862
- And1: 4,819
- Joined: Oct 05, 2010
- Location: Guam,USA
-
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
Ya hindsights 20/20 i am just glad that Booker was at least a finalist. meaning our FO at least had right idea. i legitametly think we could have run Booker as a PG and KCP which would make me need to change my panties
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,963
- And1: 2,829
- Joined: Jun 01, 2013
-
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
Blkbrd671 wrote:Ya hindsights 20/20 i am just glad that Booker was at least a finalist. meaning our FO at least had right idea. i legitametly think we could have run Booker as a PG and KCP which would make me need to change my panties
That and KCP can run the offense in a pinch if need be, not full-time, but he's usually been good for a lob or two to Dre, which a lot of our own PGs don't seem to get.
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,092
- And1: 2,001
- Joined: Nov 03, 2014
-
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
Lol that's me. Captain obvious/hindsight. Don't worry. I won't bring up Darko hahaha.
For the record, I still like Stanley and think he'll figure it out and be a starter eventually
For the record, I still like Stanley and think he'll figure it out and be a starter eventually
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,465
- And1: 2,323
- Joined: Apr 01, 2013
-
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
Maybe? MAYBE?!?!?
Of course we should have taken Devin Booker! He has an NBA skill.
Of course we should have taken Devin Booker! He has an NBA skill.
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,465
- And1: 2,323
- Joined: Apr 01, 2013
-
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
Blkbrd671 wrote:Ya hindsights 20/20 i am just glad that Booker was at least a finalist. meaning our FO at least had right idea. i legitametly think we could have run Booker as a PG and KCP which would make me need to change my panties
Almost having the right idea, and having the right idea is the difference between having Devin Booker and having Stanley Johnson wasting a roster spot.
Almost being right is the difference between drafting a hall of famer like Dwyane Wade, or blowing it on Darko Milicic.
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
- TurboTitan
- Starter
- Posts: 2,188
- And1: 1,940
- Joined: Jul 12, 2013
- Location: Windsor, ON
-
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
We should've taken Kawhi Leanord too
“We don't see ourselves as All-Stars. We see ourselves as one unit. It's like five fingers on a hand. You can do more damage together as a fist than spread out flat.” ~SHEED
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,362
- And1: 1,301
- Joined: Mar 15, 2014
-
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
If I could time travel and take a gun with me our starting lineup would be...
Giannis
PG13
Kawhi
Turner
Dre
I actually like Turner as a prospect more than Booker.
Imagine how hard it'd be to guard us with that lineup, lol!
Giannis
PG13
Kawhi
Turner
Dre
I actually like Turner as a prospect more than Booker.
Imagine how hard it'd be to guard us with that lineup, lol!
Kobe System wrote:I won't touch Drummond's contract. I'd rather have Deng and Mozgov's contract tbh.
Collymore wrote:Jay Tatum is a better prospect than Lebron James was at his age.

Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
- Blkbrd671
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,862
- And1: 4,819
- Joined: Oct 05, 2010
- Location: Guam,USA
-
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
ImHeisenberg wrote:Blkbrd671 wrote:Ya hindsights 20/20 i am just glad that Booker was at least a finalist. meaning our FO at least had right idea. i legitametly think we could have run Booker as a PG and KCP which would make me need to change my panties
Almost having the right idea, and having the right idea is the difference between having Devin Booker and having Stanley Johnson wasting a roster spot.
Almost being right is the difference between drafting a hall of famer like Dwyane Wade, or blowing it on Darko Milicic.
SJ just is more raw than everyone thought, doesn't mean he's still not going to be a great player. and defensively SJ seems to be showing what he did last year and his versatility still brings a lot of value to rotations.
Point is Booker should have been the pick, but not like SJ was a bad pick either
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,422
- And1: 769
- Joined: Apr 20, 2010
-
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
Shouldve taken Paul George also.
Detroit Sports Videos http://www.youtube.com/user/need4detroit
bkseven wrote:He's between average and above average.
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,960
- And1: 767
- Joined: Jan 26, 2014
- Location: downriver, MI
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
Lmao aaaand we have a darko reference.
Yeah, not gonna get into it in this thread. I still love stanimal's defensive potential, KCP's entrenchment as the starting SG, and even bullock's potential as the catch and shoot guy we so desperately need, assuming he can stay healthy.
Yeah, not gonna get into it in this thread. I still love stanimal's defensive potential, KCP's entrenchment as the starting SG, and even bullock's potential as the catch and shoot guy we so desperately need, assuming he can stay healthy.
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,960
- And1: 767
- Joined: Jan 26, 2014
- Location: downriver, MI
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
Lmao aaaand we have a darko reference.
Yeah, not gonna get into it in this thread. I still love stanimal's defensive potential, KCP's entrenchment as the starting SG, and even bullock's potential as the catch and shoot guy we so desperately need, assuming he can stay healthy.
Yeah, not gonna get into it in this thread. I still love stanimal's defensive potential, KCP's entrenchment as the starting SG, and even bullock's potential as the catch and shoot guy we so desperately need, assuming he can stay healthy.
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,519
- And1: 419
- Joined: Apr 06, 2012
-
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
We should have taken Carmelo Anthony!!
As a huge Stanley Johnson fan, I will say Booker can flat score. He's got range, touch, no conscience, and an array of shots/releases. That being said, I still believe Stanley Johnson will emerge. He's going through his deconstruction so that he can be built up. His toughness, size, strength, drive, work ethic, and competitiveness will not permit him to stay down.
So far this season has been an uphill climb out of the crapper, but he's putting in the work and finally starting to get the opportunities. SJ is on the way up as two way threat, but it's going to take time.
As a huge Stanley Johnson fan, I will say Booker can flat score. He's got range, touch, no conscience, and an array of shots/releases. That being said, I still believe Stanley Johnson will emerge. He's going through his deconstruction so that he can be built up. His toughness, size, strength, drive, work ethic, and competitiveness will not permit him to stay down.
So far this season has been an uphill climb out of the crapper, but he's putting in the work and finally starting to get the opportunities. SJ is on the way up as two way threat, but it's going to take time.
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
-
- Junior
- Posts: 450
- And1: 154
- Joined: Aug 09, 2012
Re: Maybe we shoulda took Booker lol
At time of the draft I was in favor of drafting Stanley. There was something about him, a certain pedigree. I also liked booker and would not have been disappointed with him.I must admit it has been frustrating watching Stanley most nights and I too wondered if drafting him was a mistake.NO it was a solid choice.stanley was raw with no specific offensive skill set. But the young man is a winner.Today he is learning the game the right way. He is improving his shooting and decision making. I believe his best position will be sg and in time he will become a good shooter. He needs reps in gym and to clean up his technique. Svg was right to break his game down to teach him to play the right way. In time I can see a pope Stanley backcourt,with Stanley being a knockdown shooter. That is if organization can be patient.