Celts17Pride wrote:A whole lot of dumb going on in this thread right now. At first I thought I went into the Knicks forum.
Agreed, Thread went to the toilet as soon as every post i saw had MELO in it.
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts
Celts17Pride wrote:A whole lot of dumb going on in this thread right now. At first I thought I went into the Knicks forum.

Andrew McCeltic wrote:Marvel wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:
Why's he a scrub?
He can't get minutes over another scrub like Meeks. Even when Elfrid Payton was playing like crap he could still get minutes in the low 20s, Mario? Could only sniff the floor in garbage time.
Meeks is two years removed from good D and a great 3-point shooting season for the Lakers. Jaylen Brown hasn't been able to beat out Jonas Jerebko for minutes. You have to have a read on where a player is developmentally, and which of the difficulties he's having are likely to be ironed out by experience.
Patsfan1081 wrote: You also really need to go back and compare the two if you believe Mario makes Bradley at 21 look like a d leaguer. Not only was Avery a much better defender but he was a more effiecent shooter. I honestly don't know how you came up with this.
Captain_Caveman wrote:OFWGKTA wrote:CsBsSoxPhins wrote:I was about to bring this up, but was going to swing a little bigger: Whiteside going to us. I don't think we will have any interest in Vucevic at all.
With Vucevic it's possible to maintain max space this offseason, with Whiteside it is not
Whiteside >>> max cap space this summer.
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
Andrew McCeltic wrote:Iguodaladon wrote:Murta wrote:People emphasize his defense as an issue and it is to some degree, but what I find annoying about his games is he shies away from contact, both when it comes to setting proper screens and getting to the rim as opposed to settling for long distance shots. Not sure if that type of player would help IT.
One thing I love about Chandler is he's top 3 in the art of setting screens. But he'd also likely clog the paint for IT because he can't explode to the rim anymore.
I think Olynyk has cornered the market on feeble 7ft jump shooters
Look, again, I know we're worried about the cap - but getting Vucevic at a discount... He's 26 years old, if you accomodate your offensive system to him even a little bit, he can give you 18 points - maybe more - on +.500 shooting, and double-digit rebounds. Not a three-point shooter, doesn't draw fouls, and he's been considered weak defensively, but has improved this year under Vogel. He is, and has been, their best player for years.
Something like Bradley, Crowder, LAC 1st for Hezonja, Vucevic, ORL 17 unprotected? Hezonja's going to be a star, and they don't have patience to play him, he's finally getting minutes now because of injuries and making some big plays.
tlee324 wrote:Jusuf Nurkic, anyone?
GregB wrote:tlee324 wrote:Jusuf Nurkic, anyone?
Maybe for a crappy pick. His advanced stats are pretty bad and I don't think he really fits into our style of play. But we could use a big and he is on a cheap deal.

GregB wrote:tlee324 wrote:Jusuf Nurkic, anyone?
Maybe for a crappy pick. His advanced stats are pretty bad and I don't think he really fits into our style of play. But we could use a big and he is on a cheap deal.
BakersDozen wrote:So Stephen A says yesterday Melo would waive his ntc for three teams (Boston was one of the three teams) and now this morning Gorman says people in the Cs front office think he would fit Brads system....
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

BakersDozen wrote:So Stephen A says yesterday Melo would waive his ntc for three teams (Boston was one of the three teams) and now this morning Gorman says people in the Cs front office think he would fit Brads system....
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

London2Boston wrote:BakersDozen wrote:So Stephen A says yesterday Melo would waive his ntc for three teams (Boston was one of the three teams) and now this morning Gorman says people in the Cs front office think he would fit Brads system....
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
What? He doesn't fit the system at all. Dude is a black hole with no D. That said, if you aren't giving up any of the core or Nets picks and he's happy to accept his role, then I don't see why not..get I.T some help.

BakersDozen wrote:So Stephen A says yesterday Melo would waive his ntc for three teams (Boston was one of the three teams) and now this morning Gorman says people in the Cs front office think he would fit Brads system....
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

SmartWentCrazy wrote:BakersDozen wrote:So Stephen A says yesterday Melo would waive his ntc for three teams (Boston was one of the three teams) and now this morning Gorman says people in the Cs front office think he would fit Brads system....
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Then maybe we make the rumored Jae for Ibaka deal.

darrendaye wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:BakersDozen wrote:So Stephen A says yesterday Melo would waive his ntc for three teams (Boston was one of the three teams) and now this morning Gorman says people in the Cs front office think he would fit Brads system....
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Then maybe we make the rumored Jae for Ibaka deal.
I've got the bigger issue if that had to be the next shoe to drop. IMO, more likely Ibaka will be an albatross contract than someone who will be worth it.
SmartWentCrazy wrote:darrendaye wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Then maybe we make the rumored Jae for Ibaka deal.
I've got the bigger issue if that had to be the next shoe to drop. IMO, more likely Ibaka will be an albatross contract than someone who will be worth it.
I definitely agree and don't particularly love that deal (nor hate it, tbh). I just think that, if we trade for Melo, cap space no longer matters and the size of Ibakas next deal is irrelevant.

SmartWentCrazy wrote:darrendaye wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Then maybe we make the rumored Jae for Ibaka deal.
I've got the bigger issue if that had to be the next shoe to drop. IMO, more likely Ibaka will be an albatross contract than someone who will be worth it.
I definitely agree and don't particularly love that deal (nor hate it, tbh). I just think that, if we trade for Melo, cap space no longer matters and the size of Ibakas next deal is irrelevant.