ImageImageImage

Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice!

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts

skywalker33
Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 14,105
And1: 5,458
Joined: Jun 02, 2014
       

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1481 » by skywalker33 » Sat Jan 21, 2017 9:37 pm

Homerclease wrote:
skywalker33 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:And it our situation that equals pennies. But please sky walker, tell us how Gallo is worth 2 Brooklyn picks again.


Hey Homer, show me ONE post that I made saying Gallo is worth those 2 Brooklyn picks, put up or shut up !


All last season you were saying this right up until Gallo got hurt again


Then SHOW ME !! I've never said Gallo is worth two BKN picks...take you time to find it and proved the link please !! Not even sure I said he'd be worth one of those picks......

Trying to make me look like an idiot is just making you look like one...unless you can prove me wrong.
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose


Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
User avatar
Parliament10
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 52,586
And1: 61,999
Joined: Jul 24, 2009
       

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1482 » by Parliament10 » Sat Jan 21, 2017 9:40 pm

skywalker33 wrote:
Curmudgeon wrote:
Homerclease wrote:They could get Nurkic for pennies at this point, don't see how it's robbing anyone to pay Paul for that price.


If you thought Sullinger was fat and out of shape, wait till you see Nurkic. There's a reason why the Nuggets are dumping him, and it has nothing to do with the fact that he can't play with Jokic. Good players can almost always play with good players..


You are SOOO wrong again !! Nurkic dropped 35lbs this off-season, going from 280lbs to 245lbs working with our trainer. The reason has nothing to do with him not being able to play with Jokic or not being a good player, it's because Nurkic is playing BEHIND Jokic and he wants more minutes, believes he should be a starter. He's a very good player with room to get better, he easily has double-double potential as he demonstrated early in the season when he was starting. He does need to work on h is game a bit, has a tendency to rush things which has led to some turnovers.

What do you think you guys would want for Jusuf Nurkic?
"You have to put the work in.
Nothing is given."

~ Jayson Tatum
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,866
And1: 70,968
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1483 » by Celts17Pride » Sat Jan 21, 2017 9:41 pm

Andrew McCeltic wrote:
grindtime22 wrote:
Patsfan1081 wrote: You also really need to go back and compare the two if you believe Mario makes Bradley at 21 look like a d leaguer. Not only was Avery a much better defender but he was a more effiecent shooter. I honestly don't know how you came up with this.


Yeah it is crazy talk. Bradley wasn't just a rotation player for us, he was enormous for our team that 2nd year in the league. He was a huge reason the Celtics turned that season around after the all star break. He was making people cry on the defensive end. He took over as a starter and Ray Allen didn't get his job back.

Once he took over as a starter, he put in 12 points a game on 50/47/80 shooting while playing probably the best defense of his career.


Incredibly defined role on a good team, and Doc was patient bringing him along on offense, when he was missing shots, telling him eventually he'd start making them like he did in practice. His defense got him on the court, and that's where he was ahead of Hezonja. That hot streak of shooting didn't last, and he didn't really get back to a level of consistent offensive excellence until this year. Always been streaky.

Put Hezonja on that Celtics team, young Bradley on this year's Magic, you could get very different outcomes. I'm talking about raw ability, not situational performance.

Give it up. Quit while you are way, way, way behind
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1484 » by Andrew McCeltic » Sat Jan 21, 2017 9:49 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:
Andrew McCeltic wrote:
grindtime22 wrote:
Yeah it is crazy talk. Bradley wasn't just a rotation player for us, he was enormous for our team that 2nd year in the league. He was a huge reason the Celtics turned that season around after the all star break. He was making people cry on the defensive end. He took over as a starter and Ray Allen didn't get his job back.

Once he took over as a starter, he put in 12 points a game on 50/47/80 shooting while playing probably the best defense of his career.


Incredibly defined role on a good team, and Doc was patient bringing him along on offense, when he was missing shots, telling him eventually he'd start making them like he did in practice. His defense got him on the court, and that's where he was ahead of Hezonja. That hot streak of shooting didn't last, and he didn't really get back to a level of consistent offensive excellence until this year. Always been streaky.

Put Hezonja on that Celtics team, young Bradley on this year's Magic, you could get very different outcomes. I'm talking about raw ability, not situational performance.

Give it up. Quit while you are way, way, way behind


Look, time will tell. I'm betting Hezonja's averaging 15 points a game within two years, minimum, and getting them in ways Bradley can't. Never had that level of confidence with Mclemore or Waiters. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. If you want to keep heckling, knock yourself out.
NYKHardKnock
Head Coach
Posts: 7,141
And1: 4,950
Joined: Mar 11, 2014

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1485 » by NYKHardKnock » Sat Jan 21, 2017 10:03 pm

Carmelo at PF has a huge advantage on defenders and would work well in your system. Besides the Nets pick shoot an offer. OR if you want to involve the pick we can do Carmelo + 2017 NYK 1st + for 2017 NETS +

Knicks wound loose a massive amount of games and will end up top 8 guaranteed
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,866
And1: 70,968
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1486 » by Celts17Pride » Sat Jan 21, 2017 10:04 pm

Kristaps6_NYK wrote:Carmelo at PF has a huge advantage on defenders and would work well in your system. Besides the Nets pick shoot an offer. OR if you want to involve the pick we can do Carmelo + 2017 NYK 1st + for 2017 NETS +

Knicks wound loose a massive amount of games and will end up top 8 guaranteed

Most Celtics would offer is Amir, Zeller, Rozier and the Celtics 2018 first rounder. I'm sure the Celtics would through in James Young as well.
jfs1000d
RealGM
Posts: 28,099
And1: 14,947
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1487 » by jfs1000d » Sat Jan 21, 2017 10:12 pm

I think Melo would fit in nice at PF. He could score inside and stretch the defense.

I think Anthony would fit great. My only issue is he is 32 on big money and we can't empty the holster on him. The window is short with him.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
NYKHardKnock
Head Coach
Posts: 7,141
And1: 4,950
Joined: Mar 11, 2014

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1488 » by NYKHardKnock » Sat Jan 21, 2017 10:15 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:
Kristaps6_NYK wrote:Carmelo at PF has a huge advantage on defenders and would work well in your system. Besides the Nets pick shoot an offer. OR if you want to involve the pick we can do Carmelo + 2017 NYK 1st + for 2017 NETS +

Knicks wound loose a massive amount of games and will end up top 8 guaranteed

Most Celtics would offer is Amir, Zeller, Rozier and the Celtics 2018 first rounder. I'm sure the Celtics would through in James Young as well.
To be honest, at this point I'll take any first round pick because trading Melo would benefit the Knicks by rebuilding. But as a Knicks fan we also look to get a pretty good return especially attaching our first. Believe me I know an offer of Melo + for NETS 1st would be absolutely putrid, that's why attaching our first and more might be fair
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,866
And1: 70,968
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1489 » by Celts17Pride » Sat Jan 21, 2017 10:17 pm

Kristaps6_NYK wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:
Kristaps6_NYK wrote:Carmelo at PF has a huge advantage on defenders and would work well in your system. Besides the Nets pick shoot an offer. OR if you want to involve the pick we can do Carmelo + 2017 NYK 1st + for 2017 NETS +

Knicks wound loose a massive amount of games and will end up top 8 guaranteed

Most Celtics would offer is Amir, Zeller, Rozier and the Celtics 2018 first rounder. I'm sure the Celtics would through in James Young as well.
To be honest, at this point I'll take any first round pick because trading Melo would benefit the Knicks by rebuilding. But as a Knicks fan we also look to get a pretty good return especially attaching our first. Believe me I know an offer of Melo + for NETS 1st would be absolutely putrid, that's why attaching our first and more might be fair

Celtics won't trade any Nets picks for Melo. Total non starter.
NYKHardKnock
Head Coach
Posts: 7,141
And1: 4,950
Joined: Mar 11, 2014

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1490 » by NYKHardKnock » Sat Jan 21, 2017 10:22 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:
Kristaps6_NYK wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:Most Celtics would offer is Amir, Zeller, Rozier and the Celtics 2018 first rounder. I'm sure the Celtics would through in James Young as well.
To be honest, at this point I'll take any first round pick because trading Melo would benefit the Knicks by rebuilding. But as a Knicks fan we also look to get a pretty good return especially attaching our first. Believe me I know an offer of Melo + for NETS 1st would be absolutely putrid, that's why attaching our first and more might be fair

Celtics won't trade any Nets picks for Melo. Total non starter.
I know that that's why I offer the 2017 Knicks pick and also a 2018 or 19 top 8 protected.

I understand it's not appealing, so I would try and make it as appealing before moving off to a different route with the Celtics in terms of trade package. Although I do think it's fair including two Knicks picks
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,866
And1: 70,968
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1491 » by Celts17Pride » Sat Jan 21, 2017 10:25 pm

Kristaps6_NYK wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:
Kristaps6_NYK wrote:To be honest, at this point I'll take any first round pick because trading Melo would benefit the Knicks by rebuilding. But as a Knicks fan we also look to get a pretty good return especially attaching our first. Believe me I know an offer of Melo + for NETS 1st would be absolutely putrid, that's why attaching our first and more might be fair

Celtics won't trade any Nets picks for Melo. Total non starter.
I know that that's why I offer the 2017 Knicks pick and also a 2018 or 19 top 8 protected.

I understand it's not appealing, so I would try and make it as appealing before moving off to a different route with the Celtics in terms of trade package. Although I do think it's fair including two Knicks picks

Again the Celtics are not trading Nets picks for Melo no matter what the Knicks offer
NYKHardKnock
Head Coach
Posts: 7,141
And1: 4,950
Joined: Mar 11, 2014

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1492 » by NYKHardKnock » Sat Jan 21, 2017 10:28 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:
Kristaps6_NYK wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:Celtics won't trade any Nets picks for Melo. Total non starter.
I know that that's why I offer the 2017 Knicks pick and also a 2018 or 19 top 8 protected.

I understand it's not appealing, so I would try and make it as appealing before moving off to a different route with the Celtics in terms of trade package. Although I do think it's fair including two Knicks picks

Again the Celtics are not trading Nets picks for Melo no matter what the Knicks offer
LOL damn you guys, I don't blame you honestly. Now the real question is if you get the 1st pick do you choose Fultz or JJ? since you got IT
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,866
And1: 70,968
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1493 » by Celts17Pride » Sat Jan 21, 2017 10:31 pm

Kristaps6_NYK wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:
Kristaps6_NYK wrote:I know that that's why I offer the 2017 Knicks pick and also a 2018 or 19 top 8 protected.

I understand it's not appealing, so I would try and make it as appealing before moving off to a different route with the Celtics in terms of trade package. Although I do think it's fair including two Knicks picks

Again the Celtics are not trading Nets picks for Melo no matter what the Knicks offer
LOL damn you guys, I don't blame you honestly. Now the real question is if you get the 1st pick do you choose Fultz or JJ? since you got IT

I think Ainge would take Fultz or Ball
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,190
And1: 15,057
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1494 » by 165bows » Sat Jan 21, 2017 10:34 pm

Captain_Caveman wrote:
Homerclease wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:Trading for Melo is like going all-in without going in at all.

Trading for Nutkic is like robbing Peter, Fred, Larry and Jose to pay Paul.

They could get Nurkic for pennies at this point, don't see how it's robbing anyone to pay Paul for that price.


I'm talking about even playing him. He would improve our rebounding at the expense of everything else. The guy is a fat slob and he sucks.

Heh, that's the non-PC version of where I'm at lol. Without a mega-leap he's JJ Hickson, and Sac owes a lotto pick to Chicago that they traded for that guy a million years ago.
GreenFor3
Pro Prospect
Posts: 764
And1: 388
Joined: Dec 06, 2013
   

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1495 » by GreenFor3 » Sat Jan 21, 2017 10:58 pm

165bows wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
Homerclease wrote:They could get Nurkic for pennies at this point, don't see how it's robbing anyone to pay Paul for that price.


I'm talking about even playing him. He would improve our rebounding at the expense of everything else. The guy is a fat slob and he sucks.

Heh, that's the non-PC version of where I'm at lol. Without a mega-leap he's JJ Hickson, and Sac owes a lotto pick to Chicago that they traded for that guy a million years ago.

They still owe that pick? Damn. And now those swaps with Philly are probably going to screw them too. You think people would learn after the Nets swaps have screwed them a few times.
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1496 » by Captain_Caveman » Sun Jan 22, 2017 12:42 am

Kristaps6_NYK wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:
Kristaps6_NYK wrote:Carmelo at PF has a huge advantage on defenders and would work well in your system. Besides the Nets pick shoot an offer. OR if you want to involve the pick we can do Carmelo + 2017 NYK 1st + for 2017 NETS +

Knicks wound loose a massive amount of games and will end up top 8 guaranteed

Most Celtics would offer is Amir, Zeller, Rozier and the Celtics 2018 first rounder. I'm sure the Celtics would through in James Young as well.
To be honest, at this point I'll take any first round pick because trading Melo would benefit the Knicks by rebuilding. But as a Knicks fan we also look to get a pretty good return especially attaching our first. Believe me I know an offer of Melo + for NETS 1st would be absolutely putrid, that's why attaching our first and more might be fair


Hear you on the rest, but I look at it like this... there is a 0% chance of the Knicks getting one of those Nets picks in a trade that doesn't involve Porzingis. Given that there is a nearly 0% chance of a Porzingis trade happening right now, you might as might put that idea to bed.
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1497 » by Captain_Caveman » Sun Jan 22, 2017 12:44 am

Kristaps6_NYK wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:
Kristaps6_NYK wrote:I know that that's why I offer the 2017 Knicks pick and also a 2018 or 19 top 8 protected.

I understand it's not appealing, so I would try and make it as appealing before moving off to a different route with the Celtics in terms of trade package. Although I do think it's fair including two Knicks picks

Again the Celtics are not trading Nets picks for Melo no matter what the Knicks offer
LOL damn you guys, I don't blame you honestly. Now the real question is if you get the 1st pick do you choose Fultz or JJ? since you got IT


Today, I say Fultz > Ball > Smith > Jackson > Ntilikina.
chrisab123
RealGM
Posts: 15,216
And1: 10,627
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
         

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1498 » by chrisab123 » Sun Jan 22, 2017 2:31 am

So...this is the team that the Celtics will be taking to the playoffs...very flawed
User avatar
BleedGreen1989
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,023
And1: 3,904
Joined: May 18, 2013

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1499 » by BleedGreen1989 » Sun Jan 22, 2017 3:10 am

I know the horse is dead, but I'm gonna keep hitting him.

Andrew Bogut makes a ton of sense for this team, all things considered.
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,628
And1: 13,578
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1500 » by brackdan70 » Sun Jan 22, 2017 3:40 am

BleedGreen1989 wrote:I know the horse is dead, but I'm gonna keep hitting him.

Andrew Bogut makes a ton of sense for this team, all things considered.


I don't disagree but I am afraid Bogut may be that dead horse. worth a shot if it doesn't cost more than the Minny 2nd.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey

Return to Boston Celtics