ImageImageImage

The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0)

Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob

Crossy2008
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,772
And1: 1,163
Joined: Dec 21, 2008
   

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#201 » by Crossy2008 » Sun Jan 29, 2017 3:52 pm

Rozier has been impressive from time to time this season, but I would be OK trading him, and having Jackson take over his role. I really like Jackson's game. He plays much more under control than Rozier.
Darth Celtic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 38,946
And1: 17,506
Joined: Jun 26, 2003
Location: Big 3 will crush the east!
     

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#202 » by Darth Celtic » Sun Jan 29, 2017 4:15 pm

exactly, no young player with injury concerns will turn down 4 years 90 million to take 1 year and 5.8 just so you can be unrestricted. That's just dumb, and of course I know that. The problem was it seems everyone is talking about next year. Point is, if the sixers want him next year, they have him. He'd have to wait till 2018 offseason to leave and take a ton of cash less.
MrDollarBills = MrWelchesBets
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#203 » by SmartWentCrazy » Sun Jan 29, 2017 4:20 pm

sully00 wrote:No he is right he doesn't have to sign any deal and just take his QO like Monroe did. Read what he actually wrote.

Now I am not completely up to speed on the CBA changes and part of that is some of it isn't known yet but what is Noel's QO going to be?
It was scheduled to be 5.8 mil, the CBA talks about a 45% increase in rookie scale but that is over 3 years, but I also saw something that said Noel's QO was going to be 13 mil. Tough to just sit on a 5.8 mil when teams are throwing 15-20 mil a season at you but a lot easier to sit on 13 mil.


My assumption is that the QO will not go up this offseason. I know the cap hold changes will not begin until the 2018 offseason, so I cannot imagine the QO not moving in lock-step with this.
Smog
Senior
Posts: 706
And1: 801
Joined: Aug 19, 2010

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#204 » by Smog » Sun Jan 29, 2017 5:08 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Smog wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:A) Sigh. You're now shifting the goal posts. You are arguing a player "not remotely" worth 20M a year would turn down a clear overpay (by your earlier definition) "in his last shot at a big contract" because he wants a situation where he'd get more than the theoretical 30 MPG I carved out in my hypothetical situation. So Hill is going to accept much less money, for 3-6 more minutes a night on a worse team (Philly, Brooklyn, Minnesota, Milwaukee, Sacramento, Utah, Indiana, Chicago, Orlando or New Orleans, from your earlier list)? So much for "his last shot at a big contract", I guess. Or trying to win a title.

This is tiring. You're speaking out of both sides of your mouth.

B) here's another relevant quote I said a few posts earlier:



I don't care about George Hill nor where he would go nor how much he's worth. I'm not going to continue to argue about him because that's nitpicking on an item that ignores what I was saying. My point was that I'd rather have max cap space as an asset than Nic Vucevic.

C) Nerlens Noel isn't turning down a 4 year 100mm deal to sign a 1 year ~7mm deal because of playing time concerns. Don't be dense. No one with his injury history would. An ACL tear has already cost him millions of dollars at this point-- he won't take that risk again.

He's also made it abundantly clear that all he cares about is money, which is why he wanted minutes, right back to his original twitter antics when he changed his avatar to indicate as such.


Now you're being obtuse just for the sake of it. In your hypothetical world, we're offering $20 million to Hill to be at most a backup, while perhaps a dozen point-guard needy teams with cap space will all offer less for a starting job? You think the Celtics, who not only don't need a point guard but have a brewing roster problem at the position given this year's draft class, would be the only team to throw stupid money at him? Remember that Mike Conley signed the biggest deal in history last year.

As for Noel, this is a guy who publicly blasted the team on numerous occasions for not finding a way to set him free, and called the logjam "silly." If you think that both Noel and Philly want to continue this relationship for multiple years at max money, I don't know what to tell you. And again, even if Philly somehow values him that much, that would mean they're certainly not attaching a lottery pick to him just to get Avery Bradley, since that's what this was originally about.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,894
And1: 71,031
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#205 » by Celts17Pride » Sun Jan 29, 2017 5:19 pm

Homerclease wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:FWIW (which is probably very little)

The supposed "Kings Insider" in RealGM says the Celtics are trying to find a trade for Marcus Smart.

Doesn't make sense to me, Smart is fine right where he is as a 6th man and running the second unit. Need to put a better scoring option next to him next season (an improved Jaylen Brown or our Brk pick). They should move Bradley now when his value is at its peak

This info could and probably is total crap. Just pointing it out
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#206 » by sully00 » Sun Jan 29, 2017 5:35 pm

Banks2Pierce wrote:
Edug27 wrote: But to me, a defensive big man is a big man who is.. um.. a pretty good defensive player. Amir is not.


Amir is a good defensive player. Stats(adjusted and non-adjusted), eye test, Brad, whatever. It's kind of a blatant truth. He's long, smart, quick enough, and has underrated strength. Can't rebound, but is good in spite of it. Pretty much the case with all of our bigs.


The other issue is that role guys like Amir and Al play in the defense doesn't necessarily reflect in their personal stats. Both players cover up IT's significant drawbacks defensively. I don't mean this as a slight but no matter how hard IT tries it is somewhat like playing against a little kid he can't really stop guys from doing what they want to do without help and because of what he means to the offense he can't pick up fouls.

The defense funnels penetration to Amir and Horford the other has to rotate and that leaves us exposed on the glass. I do think these two guys sacrifice a lot to make others effective. That said Amir is playing in cement right now he is better on defense than offense but it is painful to watch. That said plugging in some other guy doesn't necessarily mean it is going to make things better because that guy may not be willing and or able to do what Amir does even if he does have ankles that work.
greenpierce
Pro Prospect
Posts: 843
And1: 148
Joined: May 02, 2001
Location: Los Angeles
     

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#207 » by greenpierce » Sun Jan 29, 2017 6:39 pm

If we were to help Melo to Clips how about something like this:

To Boston: Reddick, Pierce, O'Quinn, Hernangomez

To NY: Bradley, Crawford, Zeller

To Clips: Anthony, J. Young

http://basketball.realgm.com/tradechecker/saved_trade/6805608
User avatar
GoCeltics123
RealGM
Posts: 17,503
And1: 33,510
Joined: May 05, 2015
         

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#208 » by GoCeltics123 » Sun Jan 29, 2017 6:46 pm

greenpierce wrote:If we were to help Melo to Clips how about something like this:

To Boston: Reddick, Pierce, O'Quinn, Hernangomez

To NY: Bradley, Crawford, Zeller

To Clips: Anthony, J. Young

http://basketball.realgm.com/tradechecker/saved_trade/6805608

NO. AB is too valuable even though I kinda like Redick and O'Quinn/Hernangomez
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#209 » by SmartWentCrazy » Sun Jan 29, 2017 7:05 pm

greenpierce wrote:If we were to help Melo to Clips how about something like this:

To Boston: Reddick, Pierce, O'Quinn, Hernangomez

To NY: Bradley, Crawford, Zeller

To Clips: Anthony, J. Young

http://basketball.realgm.com/tradechecker/saved_trade/6805608


If we were willing to deal AB in a deal for Melo, I'm imagining we'd probably just keep Melo. I think we'd much prefer him to Reddick and Pierce.

For reference, I also don't think we'd trade AB for Melo or this return. Especially because Reddick is an FA and going to get paid this offseason.
User avatar
GoCeltics123
RealGM
Posts: 17,503
And1: 33,510
Joined: May 05, 2015
         

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#210 » by GoCeltics123 » Sun Jan 29, 2017 7:17 pm

I will say this: if Ainge is trading Smart, his recent outbursts are probably a big reason why
User avatar
Green89
RealGM
Posts: 28,419
And1: 27,984
Joined: Apr 01, 2013

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#211 » by Green89 » Sun Jan 29, 2017 7:24 pm

GoCeltics123 wrote:I will say this: if Ainge is trading Smart, his recent outbursts are probably a big reason why


I didn't like how Smart acted last night. He needed a while to calm down. His outbursts have to be monitored because just a few days after the other issue, he had to be helped to simmer down by teammates last night.
Smeff10
Junior
Posts: 353
And1: 287
Joined: Jun 29, 2016
     

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#212 » by Smeff10 » Sun Jan 29, 2017 7:33 pm

if boogie is for sure staying in sac, would they entertain a trade for caulk-stein? I don't watch a lot of sac basketball but he seems like a good compliment. Rozier and non brk 1st?
Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 42,206
And1: 25,986
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#213 » by Curmudgeon » Sun Jan 29, 2017 7:33 pm

We absolutely would NOT prefer Melo at nearly 30M a year to Reddick and Pierce. Melo totally clogs the Celtics' cap.
And the Knicks won't take Crawford. Their refusal to take him is why they are looking for a third team in the first place.

There is no way any 3-team LA, NY Boston deal works financially without Crawford, unless the Clips are willing to give up Doc's kid and virtually their entire bench. And if I were Ainge, my up front price for not hanging up the phone would be an unprotected first rounder from the Knicks.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West
"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells
"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
gocelts
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,089
And1: 1,966
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Location: Illadelphia

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#214 » by gocelts » Sun Jan 29, 2017 8:43 pm

This is interesting. Danny was a knack for "winning" trades and the Knicks are in a bind here with limited options. I seriously doubt we land a star, but Rozier or anyone of value won't be involved.....a plater of Zeller Young or Mickey may get us a decent serviceable player or a pick.
~gocelts
Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,597
And1: 8,077
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#215 » by Celtics_Champs » Sun Jan 29, 2017 9:53 pm

GoCeltics123 wrote:I will say this: if Ainge is trading Smart, his recent outbursts are probably a big reason why


Boy is he tough to root for. I like the guy but the way he acts on the court is exactly the type of player I see myself disliking with a passion if he were on a rival team.

I wouldn't mind seeing him traded but hopefully they can get to a point where they sell high.
CelticFaninLBC
RealGM
Posts: 10,166
And1: 3,258
Joined: Aug 16, 2004

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#216 » by CelticFaninLBC » Sun Jan 29, 2017 10:15 pm

So Smart for Noel?
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#217 » by Andrew McCeltic » Sun Jan 29, 2017 10:17 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
greenpierce wrote:If we were to help Melo to Clips how about something like this:

To Boston: Reddick, Pierce, O'Quinn, Hernangomez

To NY: Bradley, Crawford, Zeller

To Clips: Anthony, J. Young

http://basketball.realgm.com/tradechecker/saved_trade/6805608


If we were willing to deal AB in a deal for Melo, I'm imagining we'd probably just keep Melo. I think we'd much prefer him to Reddick and Pierce.

For reference, I also don't think we'd trade AB for Melo or this return. Especially because Reddick is an FA and going to get paid this offseason.


Young, Bradley, Zeller for Reddick, Pierce, O'Quinn, Hernangomez? Pass. Add in unprotected Knicks pick this year and it's a maybe.
FlatearthZorro
RealGM
Posts: 20,599
And1: 12,343
Joined: Feb 12, 2010
Location: Somewhere in Boston
     

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#218 » by FlatearthZorro » Sun Jan 29, 2017 11:16 pm

CelticFaninLBC wrote:So Smart for Noel?


Bogut is still the best option out there, if we can make it happen somehow.

We don't need Noel- we're either gonna have to pay him or let him go at the end of the season. Not only that but Zizic is coming next season for sure.
Good assessment:

PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
User avatar
Avalanche
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,522
And1: 1,498
Joined: May 21, 2007
Location: Australia
Contact:
     

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#219 » by Avalanche » Sun Jan 29, 2017 11:28 pm

Having to pay Noel, if he is a real defensive anchor and a big future part of our front court isn't actually a bad thing

I'm not moving Smart though
Image
User avatar
Froob
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 43,339
And1: 61,672
Joined: Nov 04, 2010
Location: ▼VII▲VIII
         

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#220 » by Froob » Sun Jan 29, 2017 11:39 pm

Chris Mannix brought up a good point that you can't invest big money in IT, Bradley, and Smart. IT and Bradley are probably 100+ mill players and Smart could be looking at between 60-80. Somebody has to go, who will it be?
Image

Tommy Heinsohn wrote:The game is not over until they look you in the face and start crying.


RIP The_Hater

Return to Boston Celtics