ImageImageImageImageImage

Political Roundtable Part XII

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,166
And1: 5,011
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#621 » by DCZards » Sun Jan 29, 2017 6:25 pm

Induveca wrote:
DCZards wrote:I guess Trump has decided that we don't need the support of the banned countries in helping to wipe out Isis in those countries, as Trump has promised to do. Not a good idea to alienate, which this ban certainly does, those leaders and countries we need to fight Isis.


What leaders? With the exception of Iran every single one of the countries are currently engaged in civil wars, each seemingly justified by extreme/moderate interpretations of the Koran.


It sounds like the US has something in common with these banned countries: Bad leadership and internal strife. :)
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,405
And1: 6,803
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#622 » by TGW » Sun Jan 29, 2017 6:42 pm

verbal8 wrote:Does he remember this?

Read on Twitter


It's sad that someone as level-headed as Pence has to lower himself to trumps level of stupidity.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
JWizmentality
RealGM
Posts: 14,101
And1: 5,122
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Cosmic Totality
   

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#623 » by JWizmentality » Sun Jan 29, 2017 7:02 pm

TGW wrote:
verbal8 wrote:Does he remember this?

Read on Twitter


It's sad that someone as level-headed as Pence has to lower himself to trumps level of stupidity.


If you watch some of Conway's interviews, you can spot the little moments when a piece of her soul dies. :lol:
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,633
And1: 8,865
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#624 » by AFM » Sun Jan 29, 2017 7:14 pm

JWizmentality wrote:
TGW wrote:
verbal8 wrote:Does he remember this?

Read on Twitter


It's sad that someone as level-headed as Pence has to lower himself to trumps level of stupidity.


If you watch some of Conway's interviews, you can spot the little moments when a piece of her soul dies. :lol:


I bet she polishes off a fifth of whiskey each night.
ozthegap
Senior
Posts: 671
And1: 159
Joined: Jul 01, 2015
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#625 » by ozthegap » Sun Jan 29, 2017 7:22 pm

#calexit gaining steam
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,465
And1: 11,667
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#626 » by Wizardspride » Sun Jan 29, 2017 7:39 pm

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/mccain-bannons-spot-on-nsc-a-radical-departure/ar-AAmnmX7?li=BBnbcA1&ocid=edgsp

McCain: Bannon's spot on NSC a 'radical departure'


Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) on Sunday said he is concerned with President Donald Trump's recent memorandum that reorganizes the National Security Council (NSC).

"I am worried about the National Security Council," McCain told CBS's "Face the Nation."

Trump on Saturday signed a memorandum that restructured the NSC, adding White House chief strategist Stephen Bannon to "the principals committee," and removing the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the director of national intelligence.

According to the memorandum, the director of national intelligence and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff "shall attend where issues pertaining to their responsibilities and expertise are to be discussed."

McCain, who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee, called Bannon's placement on the NSC a "radical departure from any national security council in history."

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,828
And1: 7,961
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#627 » by montestewart » Sun Jan 29, 2017 7:47 pm

A lot of Trump supporters seem to persistently and enthusiastically characterize Trump's crazy tweets and other communications as "trolling" to drive his opponents batty while rousing his supporters. I can easily believe that, and it's sometimes amusing. Unfortunately, I can't really tell if the series of rapidly issued orders are not more trolling. It seems as if the amount of planning that went into it was on par with EG deciding Andrew Nicholson was a good use of resources. They promised they'd do it, and they're doing it. What more is there to talk about, or think about?

Leadership by trolling. Not sure how that's going to turn out.
User avatar
pineappleheadindc
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,118
And1: 3,479
Joined: Dec 17, 2001
Location: Cabin John, MD
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#628 » by pineappleheadindc » Sun Jan 29, 2017 7:58 pm

montestewart wrote:A lot of Trump supporters seem to persistently and enthusiastically characterize Trump's crazy tweets and other communications as "trolling" to drive his opponents batty while rousing his supporters. I can easily believe that, and it's sometimes amusing. Unfortunately, I can't really tell if the series of rapidly issued orders are not more trolling. It seems as if the amount of planning that went into it was on par with EG deciding Andrew Nicholson was a good use of resources. They promised they'd do it, and they're doing it. What more is there to talk about, or think about?

Leadership by trolling. Not sure how that's going to turn out.



Moreover, aren't the citizens that are being trolled still Americans? What kind of American President is not concerned with a large swath of Americans and, instead, is happy "trolling" them? Is that what a President does?
"Wheresoever you go, go with all your heart."
--Confucius

"Try not. Do or do not. There is no try"
- Yoda
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,465
And1: 11,667
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#629 » by Wizardspride » Sun Jan 29, 2017 8:08 pm

Read on Twitter



Read on Twitter

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
User avatar
Doug_Blew
Junior
Posts: 442
And1: 378
Joined: Jul 19, 2003
Location: West Side

Re: RE: Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#630 » by Doug_Blew » Sun Jan 29, 2017 8:39 pm

nate33 wrote:
I_Like_Dirt wrote:
nate33 wrote:The biggest benefit is that the average illegal immigrant costs society thousands of dollars in welfare and other benefits while contributing very little to the tax base:


Undocumented immigrants do not qualify for welfare, food stamps, Medicaid, and most other public benefits. Most of these programs require proof of legal immigration status and under the 1996 welfare law, even legal immigrants cannot receive these benefits until they have been in the United States for more than five years.

http://money.cnn.com/2014/11/20/news/economy/immigration-myths/

How is the average illegal immigrant collecting welfare and other benefits if they need to to show proof of legal status?
User avatar
Doug_Blew
Junior
Posts: 442
And1: 378
Joined: Jul 19, 2003
Location: West Side

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#631 » by Doug_Blew » Sun Jan 29, 2017 8:47 pm

NatP4 wrote:
closg00 wrote:The Trump alternative fact of the day: His ban is working out nicely"


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app


Right after you referred to the new executive order as a "Muslim ban" just a couple posts up.

:roll:


Did you also roll your eyes when Trump wanted a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on.”? Or when he asked Giuliani how he could legally implement a Muslim ban?
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,166
And1: 5,011
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#632 » by DCZards » Sun Jan 29, 2017 9:13 pm

pineappleheadindc wrote:
montestewart wrote:A lot of Trump supporters seem to persistently and enthusiastically characterize Trump's crazy tweets and other communications as "trolling" to drive his opponents batty while rousing his supporters. I can easily believe that, and it's sometimes amusing. Unfortunately, I can't really tell if the series of rapidly issued orders are not more trolling. It seems as if the amount of planning that went into it was on par with EG deciding Andrew Nicholson was a good use of resources. They promised they'd do it, and they're doing it. What more is there to talk about, or think about?

Leadership by trolling. Not sure how that's going to turn out.



Moreover, aren't the citizens that are being trolled still Americans? What kind of American President is not concerned with a large swath of Americans and, instead, is happy "trolling" them? Is that what a President does?


That's what so scary. We now have a president who openly treats many of the people that he's sworn to serve as if they were his enemies.
popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,867
And1: 405
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#633 » by popper » Sun Jan 29, 2017 9:21 pm

Wizardspride wrote:
Read on Twitter



Read on Twitter


Yeah, I don't see how this makes any sense at all.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,602
And1: 23,070
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: RE: Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#634 » by nate33 » Sun Jan 29, 2017 9:38 pm

Doug_Blew wrote:
nate33 wrote:
I_Like_Dirt wrote:


Undocumented immigrants do not qualify for welfare, food stamps, Medicaid, and most other public benefits. Most of these programs require proof of legal immigration status and under the 1996 welfare law, even legal immigrants cannot receive these benefits until they have been in the United States for more than five years.

http://money.cnn.com/2014/11/20/news/economy/immigration-myths/

How is the average illegal immigrant collecting welfare and other benefits if they need to to show proof of legal status?

'That myth debunking article is false.

The Two-Variables Method. The far right column in Table 1 reports welfare use for illegal immigrant households using only the two migration variables discussed in the methodology section of this report. Although there is an undercount of illegal immigrants using this method, the table shows that there is simply no question that households headed by illegal immigrants access a good deal of welfare. In fact, illegal immigrants' use of some programs is quite high. For example, using just the two migration variables, 30 percent of households headed by illegal immigrants are on food stamps and 56 percent have at least one person on Medicaid. Any suggestion that there are no welfare costs associated with illegal immigrants is incorrect. The SIPP shows that households headed by individuals with a very high probability of being in the country illegally make significant use of food programs and Medicaid

Image


http://cis.org/Welfare-Use-Legal-Illegal-Immigrant-Households

As I understand it, illegal immigrants have difficultly getting direct cash assistance, but they have limited eligibility for food stamps, and medicaid. Furthermore, their children are benefiting from the education infrastructure built here by U.S. taxpayers. There's also road and utility infrastructure expenses.

This is not 1890. You can't be very productive with just a strong back and a good work ethic. And there is a massive social safety net providing huge benefits to people. Our immigration policy should reflect this reality.

Basically, it's only those with a college degree who are paying their own way. People with no degree are almost always a burden to society. This is not their fault. Not everyone is blessed with the necessary IQ and reasoning skills to make it through college and get employed in a productive field. I've got no problems with society trying to help out those that need an extra hand. But we don't need to import even more people that are almost certain to be a burden on society. That's insanity.
User avatar
Doug_Blew
Junior
Posts: 442
And1: 378
Joined: Jul 19, 2003
Location: West Side

Re: RE: Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#635 » by Doug_Blew » Sun Jan 29, 2017 10:06 pm

Doug_Blew wrote:
nate33 wrote:
Image


http://cis.org/Welfare-Use-Legal-Illegal-Immigrant-Households

As I understand it, illegal immigrants have difficultly getting direct cash assistance, but they have limited eligibility for food stamps, and medicaid. Furthermore, their children are benefiting from the education infrastructure built here by U.S. taxpayers. There's also road and utility infrastructure expenses.

This is not 1890. You can't be very productive with just a strong back and a good work ethic. And there is a massive social safety net providing huge benefits to people. Our immigration policy should reflect this reality.

Basically, it's only those with a college degree who are paying their own way. People with no degree are almost always a burden to society. This is not their fault. Not everyone is blessed with the necessary IQ and reasoning skills to make it through college and get employed in a productive field. I've got no problems with society trying to help out those that need an extra hand. But we don't need to import even more people that are almost certain to be a burden on society. That's insanity.


Thanks for the link Nate. It looks like the majority of the illegals get their benefits from their US Born children.

From the link...
Finally, it must be remembered that illegal immigrant households without children accessing these programs comprise only 14 percent of all illegal households receiving welfare benefits. Most of those are through fraud, living with a green card holder or a pregnant woman.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,856
And1: 9,233
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#636 » by payitforward » Mon Jan 30, 2017 12:55 am

payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,856
And1: 9,233
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: RE: Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#637 » by payitforward » Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:04 am

Doug_Blew wrote:
Doug_Blew wrote:
nate33 wrote:
Image


http://cis.org/Welfare-Use-Legal-Illegal-Immigrant-Households

As I understand it, illegal immigrants have difficultly getting direct cash assistance, but they have limited eligibility for food stamps, and medicaid. Furthermore, their children are benefiting from the education infrastructure built here by U.S. taxpayers. There's also road and utility infrastructure expenses.

This is not 1890. You can't be very productive with just a strong back and a good work ethic. And there is a massive social safety net providing huge benefits to people. Our immigration policy should reflect this reality.

Basically, it's only those with a college degree who are paying their own way. People with no degree are almost always a burden to society. This is not their fault. Not everyone is blessed with the necessary IQ and reasoning skills to make it through college and get employed in a productive field. I've got no problems with society trying to help out those that need an extra hand. But we don't need to import even more people that are almost certain to be a burden on society. That's insanity.


Thanks for the link Nate. It looks like the majority of the illegals get their benefits from their US Born children.

From the link...
Finally, it must be remembered that illegal immigrant households without children accessing these programs comprise only 14 percent of all illegal households receiving welfare benefits. Most of those are through fraud, living with a green card holder or a pregnant woman.

Basically, the table Nate pasted in doesn't show what he'd like it to show & doesn't hold water anyway.

As to:
"This is not 1890. You can't be very productive with just a strong back and a good work ethic. And there is a massive social safety net providing huge benefits to people. Our immigration policy should reflect this reality."

Nice! I think it was just demonstrated that illegal immigrants do not get much benefit from the "massive social safety net." Moreover, you certainly can be productive with a strong back and a good work ethic. There is *a lot* of work that needs doing and requires just those characteristics. Hence an immigration policy along the lines nate would like would reflect not reality but nate's really mind-blowing set of prejudices!

"Not everyone is blessed with the necessary IQ and reasoning skills to make it through college and get employed in a productive field." This is what might look like an ordinary statement but is really ugly. The disaffected white workers whose cause nate seems to feel aligned with & whose resentment gave us the current jackass Presidnyet, wouldn't like to be described as lacking "necessary IQ and reasoning skills."

TBH, tho I don't question your IQ, nate, I don't think your reasoning skills amount to much. I.e. other than as a simple tool employed to justify a broad, uncriticized range of prejudices reflecting no reality w/ which I am acquainted.
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,166
And1: 5,011
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: RE: Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#638 » by DCZards » Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:46 am

payitforward wrote:"Not everyone is blessed with the necessary IQ and reasoning skills to make it through college and get employed in a productive field." This is what might look like an ordinary statement but is really ugly. The disaffected white workers whose cause nate seems to feel aligned with & whose resentment gave us the current jackass Presidnyet, wouldn't like to be described as lacking "necessary IQ and reasoning skills."


I do think it's reasonable to question the "reasoning skills" of anyone who would vote for a bigot, bully and liar like Trump.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,602
And1: 23,070
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: RE: Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#639 » by nate33 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 3:01 am

payitforward wrote:
"Not everyone is blessed with the necessary IQ and reasoning skills to make it through college and get employed in a productive field." This is what might look like an ordinary statement but is really ugly. The disaffected white workers whose cause nate seems to feel aligned with & whose resentment gave us the current jackass Presidnyet, wouldn't like to be described as lacking "necessary IQ and reasoning skills."


Youf interpretation is completely off. Indeed, I would actually concur with the statement that many of Trump's supporters also lack the high IQ necessary to be knowledge workers capable of giving back more in taxes than they costs in benefits and infrastructure expenditures. I think Trump's economic plan of trade protectionism and immigration restriction will help improve their condition so that they get closer to parity on the taxes/benefits scale, but many would still be a net negative. I think his plan will improve the lot of many Clinton voters as well.

Any society will have a portion of its people unable to "pull their own weight". This is a given. It is the responsibility of society to give them a hand when necessary. It is not the responsibility of society to go around looking for more people who can't pull their own weight and invite them here. Immigration should be designed to admit only (or at least mostly) those who are likely to pay more in taxes than they cost in services. I fail to see why this is so difficult for you to comprehend.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,602
And1: 23,070
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: RE: Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#640 » by nate33 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 3:04 am

DCZards wrote:
payitforward wrote:"Not everyone is blessed with the necessary IQ and reasoning skills to make it through college and get employed in a productive field." This is what might look like an ordinary statement but is really ugly. The disaffected white workers whose cause nate seems to feel aligned with & whose resentment gave us the current jackass Presidnyet, wouldn't like to be described as lacking "necessary IQ and reasoning skills."


I do think it's reasonable to question the "reasoning skills" of anyone who would vote for a bigot, bully and liar like Trump.

Yup. That's going to work real well for your side politically. "Everyone who disagrees with me is an idiot... or a bigot... or Hitler". :lol:

Return to Washington Wizards