fatlever wrote:http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/18327785/muggsy-bogues-tracy-mcgrady-first-candidates-basketball-hall-fame
Muggsy is up for the HOF. Is he deserving? Should the HOF be only about stats/wins? Or is there a place for the pioneers and "freaks" of the league that did the impossible?
I talked with @BaselineBuzz on Twitter about this today. He believes that Muggsy could be a first ballot HoFer. And while I got his point, what I wonder about then is where's the cut-off point. Is it the fact that he is THE shortest? Spud Webb was a couple of inches taller, just as good and also has a famous win in the dunk contest to his name. That's gimmicky enough for him to be considered as well, right?
Truth be told, I wouldn't have even ever thought that he is a possible candidate and ultimately I don't think he should be in the HoF as it is presently constituted. He wasn't even close to being an All-Star level player. I'm not sure how I'd feel about someone like that making it.
However, to return to something Simmons wrote in his book, I would agree with him having a place there if the HoF was just completely revamped and there were categories for pioneers, the greatest role players, the guys who are unique and noteworthy for some particular factoid, etc. Because Muggsy of course does have a footnote in the story of the NBA's history. I can't take anything away from that and the fact that what he did on the court was amazing.