HotelVitale wrote:hookshot199 wrote: It's not a balanced roster. They'll have three guards, one unproven small forward, and an aging center who shouldn't play center, and no power forward. And they'll have to make a decision on how much to pay Smart - $10 mil? $15 mil? The Celtics have the opposite problem of the Sixers. They don't have enough players to fill out their roster and signing both Bradley and Thomas will push them right up to their cap ceiling. We have too many players - counting future picks - and no problem payroll-wise for the next two to three years.
I'm losing your pt here! We started this by pointing out that the Sixers will soon be in the spot the Celtics are at now--not enough roster spots for their draft picks--so I'm not sure how or why you came to the opposite point.
The current Celts had to dump a promising prospect and draft a weak stash player, so their problem now is too many players.Flashing forward a year or two, the Celtics will have their current solid core and will have other players too--they'll probably re-sign some of their current vets with Bird rights, they'll have another 3-4 guys on rookie deals (2 1st rd picks this year and next), etc. Their roster won't be empty, it just could be expensive depending on what they do. But that's an accounting issue rather than a talent one--they already have a strong core of vets and will have some great chances (this year's FA and two years of top-5 drafts) to find another great player or two. (Also, the cap projections are about $102m for 2017-18 and $108m for 2018-2019, so you're right about two years from now. That makes the Celt situation even less of a problem).
Also, I'm a longtime Noel guy but
I think you're tripping a little if you think that swapping him for J Brown--while also taking away like $12m of this summer's cap space for Noel's cap hold--would be a brilliant move for their long term success. Noel aint Rudy Gobert and their best chance of becoming a real contender comes from this summer's cap space.
<<They also have a bunch of possible roster spots next year--if they want to develop young guys they can get rid of bench pieces like Jerebko or Gerald Green or Olynyk. I wish they were more screwed, though, they're the only team that I'm actively rooting against right now (even though I ironically like their key players--IT, Crowder, Bradley, Horford, Johnson)).>>
I see where we got off track. I've written before that Ainge is not a good drafter. Then again, he's been handicapped by not having many top-10 picks. He had to let Sullinger and Hunter walk. James Young will probably be next. Smart is a good player but limited because he can't shoot. Olynyk gives some quality minutes but he'll never be a starter and Ainge have to offer him a payday sooner or later. Rosier was picked 16 in the middle of the pack like TLC. Post Rondo, Avery Bradley is his one big hit.
My main point, I guess, is that I don't think most Celtics prospects on the parent club, based in part on playing time, have limited upside. It's just an opinion. Keeping them on the roster instead of bringing over Zizic or Yabusele seems to me to be a lateral move.
So responding to your main point: In 2018, when the Celtics must re-up Thomas and Bradley (I assume they will), they will have tied up more than 45% of their cap space in three guards including this year's pick. Counting Smart, who they'll have to make an offer to, the total will go up to slightly more than 50% just counting his qualifying offer. Four players.
Add Horford, Crowder and Brown and the total is around 90%. That's seven players.
Without a backup center or power forward.
Under the new economics, a player like Amir Johnson will command $15 mil, I would think. That would put them right at the cap. Eight players.
We're not in the same situation because we will have all of roster spots filled and will be slightly under the cap even if we sign Noel to $20 mil.
Just my quick arithmetic.
Bottom line: With the exception of Bradley and excluding Smart (because he was a six pick), they haven't developed any of their picks which puts them more at the mercy of the market.