AFM wrote:Interesting perspective from the WSJ
By suppressing debate about Islam, nationalism and terror, the left set the stage for today’s backlash.
Politicians across the West are saying the same thing in what is shaping up to be the widest rollback of the freedom of movement in decades.
It’s not just right-wing nationalists like Marine Le Pen in France or Hungary’s Viktor Orbán. Centrists get it, too. Some, like Angela Merkel, are still-reluctant restrictionists. Others, like Theresa May, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte and French presidential aspirant François Fillon, are more forthright. All have wised up to the popular demand for drastically lower immigration rates.
The irony is that freedom of movement is unraveling because liberals won central debates—about Islamism, social cohesion and nationalism. Rather than give any ground, they accused opponents of being phobic and reactionary. Now liberals are reaping the rewards of those underhanded victories.
Liberals refused to acknowledge the link between Islamist ideology and terrorism. For eight years under President Obama, the U.S. government refused even to say “Islamism,” claiming ludicrously that U.S. service members were going to war against “violent extremism.” Voters could read and hear about jihadists offering up their actions to Allah before opening automatic fire on shoppers and blasphemous cartoonists.
The left also largely “won” the debate over Muslim integration. For too many liberals, every Islamist atrocity was cause to fret about an “Islamophobic” backlash. When a jihadist would go boom somewhere, pre-emptive hashtags expressing solidarity with threatened Muslims were never far behind.
But liberals don’t bother nearly as much about the pathologies in Muslim communities, and in Islamic civilization itself, that were producing so much carnage. Some would sooner abandon their own feminist and gay-rights orthodoxies than criticize what imams in Paris and London suburbs were telling their congregations.
liberal writers sneered at the Somali-born human-rights activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali as an “Enlightenment fundamentalist.” Brandeis disinvited her to speak on campus in 2014. The Southern Poverty Law Center last year branded her an “extremist,” along with the counterterror campaigner Maajid Nawaz.
Liberals thus empowered the most illiberal elements of Muslim communities while marginalizing reformers. Is it any wonder that many voters came to see Muslims as sources of danger and social incohesion?
Liberals, finally, “won” the debate over nationalism. In Europe especially and the U.S. to a lesser extent, they treated nationalism and the West’s Judeo-Christian heritage as relics of a dark past. For European Union leaders, the ideal political community was an ever-expanding set of legal procedures, commercial links and politically correct norms. Citizens could fill in the blanks with whatever cultural content they preferred—preferably “Europe” itself.
Judging by their breathless editorials and social-media outbursts, leading liberals still blame this reversal in political fortunes on a paroxysm of collective fear and hatred, the forces they’ve always sought to banish. Yet the main culprits for the popular revolt against liberalism are liberals themselves.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/how-liberals-killed-the-freedom-of-movement-1485464612
Here's the problem though and the left lose a huge opportunity in 2008-2009.
The anxiety citizens around the industrial world fear is justified. About jobs, wages, opportunity. But the issue isn't only with illegal immigration.
The issue is the whole neoliberal economic set up. The bankers got the profits from the bailouts the central banks did. Not the people. The people are paying for the corporate welfare that's been put in place. The people are getting ripped off... and especially in the US where our health system bankrupts families.
The anxiety people are feeling isn't left or right. The issue is that anxiety is built up into wedge issues of racism, abortion, etc.
Yes, parts of the Muslim world have issues with terrorism. But why are the places where these terrorist outfits not suffering from the ban? Who finances the extremist groups in Syria? Countries in the Gulf region i.e. Saudi and Qatar who primed the pump. Governments in the West no matter who is in control are blind to this reality and will not call out these countries or put in the sanctions they put on Iran on these nations.
Where have most of the ISIS fighters come from? Tunisia right now.
The guys who did 9/11 could come into the USA right now based on Trump's executive action.
