
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Q0i_AamBCu8
Moderator: TyCobb
High 5 wrote:Braves get pretty good turnouts all things considered. Turner Field is a bitch to get to and decent tickets aren't exactly cheap. And the thing with Atlanta, so much of the population isn't even from Georgia. But I bet the Braves are one of the best when it comes to tv ratings.
But regardless, I was talking about how the Mets suck at baseball.
mets87 wrote:yes, as opposed to playing in atlanta where all 50 fans that go to the games would appreciate him more
2poor wrote:Cubs TV Ratings > *
Cubs Attendance > *
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
HMFFL wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Attendance:
2001: Mets ranked 15th (Atlanta 12th)
2002: Mets ranked 7th (Atlanta 13th)
2003: Mets ranked 16th (Atlanta 10th)
2004: Mets ranked 17th (Atlanta 16th)
2005: Mets ranked 8th (Atlanta 15th)
2006: Mets ranked 3rd (Atlanta 14th)
2007: Mets rank 3rd (Atlanta 15th)
As you can see Atlanta is rather consistent and the Mets must win for the fans to come out. Also if you take into consideration population and the rail system it's not even worth debating why the Mets would have more fans. Putting the poor location of Turner Field to the side, the amount of transplants Atlanta has is outrageous.
cmaff051 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Ummn.. the Braves have been winning for the last 15 years and they still draw middle of the road crowds. Imagine if they started losing?
When the Mets win, they fill up their stadium and rank Top 5 in attendance. When they lose, they are a middle of the pack team attendance wise.
When the Braves win, they bring middle of the pack crowds. When they lose, I doubt they'd be in the Top 20.
Return to The General MLB Board