Dweeb wrote:He's cheeks. Awful FG percentage. They need Avery back right away
Whatever nerd
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
Dweeb wrote:He's cheeks. Awful FG percentage. They need Avery back right away
Froob wrote:Friends is like Kyle Lowry, everyone says it's amazing but you sit down and watch it and you're just like meh...
GuyClinch wrote: Regulation is mostly to blame - also excessive medical costs.
BannerStatus wrote:Parliament10 wrote:Marcus Smart, while not a baby, is still only 22.
As I have said many times, he Backs up 3 positions on Offense.
And 5 positions on Defense.
He's the Kind of 6th-Man that you want, on a team that will Contend.
And Contending, doesn't just happen overnight.
Even Michael Jordan didn't win his first Championship, until he was 28 yrs old.
Completely agree with this. The question to me though, is how much are you willing to pay for that? In this current NBA environment, I think someone will pony-up big $$$ for him with a commitment to let him start. I don't think Danny can (or would want to ) compete with a huge offer.
He's the classic "I love him at ___ $ price, I hate him at ___ $ price.
R9ndo wrote:I think he can be a great 6th man with the ability to start some games.
He almost kind of reminds me of smaller version of Ron Artest but Marcus is a better passer.
Celts17Pride wrote:I personally think he is a perfect sell high player now that he is playing reasonably well. Just can't see giving him $15 million per year
CrowderKeg wrote:Of course it would be nice if we had our defensive and offensive closer all in one package (Kawhi, Butler, etc.) but we got the next best thing in Smart/IT. Whatever Smart brings by way of offense is gravy. That rebound/jump ball to seal it! What a bulldog.
KumaJG wrote:Smart is the Reggie Evans of pg. Nice to have
Gomes3PC wrote:KumaJG wrote:Smart is the Reggie Evans of pg. Nice to have
I'd call him more of a Tony Allen piece. At $4-5M per year (I guess $7-9M in today's dollars) he's a really nice contributor. But just due to his age and where he was drafted, he'll probably make 50% more than that. At this stage, due to the complete lack of development of a jumper or finishing ability at the rim, I just can't see how you pay him an 8-figure salary.
The good news is there's still ~2.5 years before Ainge has to make that decision.
Gomes3PC wrote:At this stage, due to the complete lack of development of a jumper or finishing ability at the rim, I just can't see how you pay him an 8-figure salary.
The good news is there's still ~2.5 years before Ainge has to make that decision.
GreenBloodedC wrote:
You see this? He's a winner. And that's the only thing that matters.
CsBsSoxPhins wrote:Smart is such an interesting player; just on this page of this thread, I have seen him compared to Reggie Evans, Ron Artest, and Tony Allen... and I understand each one of them.
He's one of a kind and I hate the idea of losing a player that offers so many game winning players. It's frustrating he can't shoot but the more he turns into a distributor, the less painful it is when he shoots a lower percentage than you'd like. He's also a great complement to IT and Bradley. I want him and players with his tenacity around.