ImageImageImageImage

Game 51: Indiana Pacers (25-22) @ Orlando Magic (19-31) - 7:00 PM ET

Moderators: ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass

Pacers_Freak
Veteran
Posts: 2,967
And1: 2,817
Joined: Oct 06, 2016
   

Re: Game 51: Indiana Pacers (25-22) @ Orlando Magic (19-31) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#261 » by Pacers_Freak » Thu Feb 2, 2017 2:14 pm

Blue_and_Whte wrote:
Pacers_Freak wrote:
Blue_and_Whte wrote:Please lose. For the love of god lose.


Depending on which Pacer team shows up we may make it really hard for you to lose. We have been more consistent as of late, but the road still remains a mystery with this team. Our schedule is about to get really tough so we really need games like tonight. Hope we can accommodate in your tanking venture! :-D

You were spot on with this. PG had one of the worst games ive seen him play and your leading scorer was CJ Miles with 16. Too close for me.


Lol. Unfortunately I know this team all too well. We are especially a mess on the road. It is baffling. Brooklyn on Friday will be another adventure for us. The one positive is our defense has gotten much better in the last month and allowed us to win games like last night.

My unsolicited opinion on the Magic. You guys kind of remind me of the Pacers of the Dunleavy/Murphy days. Just bad enough to not make the playoffs and not bad enough for a great pick. I really hope that things get rolling for you. Vuc is a nice piece and if you can get a couple more to go around him you will have a chance. I'm pulling for that to happen big time. I am a huge Frank fan. Was at the last Pacer/Magic game in Indy and when they showed him he got a standing ovation. Best of luck to the Magic moving forward!
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,041
And1: 19,036
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Game 51: Indiana Pacers (25-22) @ Orlando Magic (19-31) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#262 » by pepe1991 » Thu Feb 2, 2017 2:52 pm

tiderulz wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:
SOUL wrote:
Which is still more than what the rest of our team shows on a daily basis. EP is getting to the point where he's becoming dependable most games and aggressive for the majority of it. Vucevic has been stepping it up on defense and doing things that affect the game when his shot isn't on. Most people are not declaring these guys as stars or superstars, but at the very least it's nice to have a few players that are impacting the game more often than not even if it is in losses.

I know you have some weird thing against them because they hang their head every 20 games or get frustrated, but that's something that you have to deal with since they're actually the ones playing the game and going through the battles with their team. I think if it was a huge issue you'd see more people complaining about that instead of a 2 second shot of them on the bench with their head in the towels.

Anyway, accumulating good players isn't the problem. We need to keep good/solid players here, but we also need a star. We have very few "solid" and no star as of yet. AG is probably the closest thing talent wise but he's still a bit away on the offensive end if he's to ever get there.

Instead of putting our players in a position to succeed, we've been a franchise of putting players in abnormal/off roles in hopes that they will improve in that area at the expense of team cohesion and wins. But then we do nothing with that in the future and abandon the experiment, which probably means we just should have played them in their preferred/best position/role in the first place and just increase their usage.

What we need to do after this season is (besides hopefully drafting a star) is really decide where the team intends to go as a franchise and have complete faith in the process with those players. No more short leashes on the higher talent but younger players, no more veteran player monopoly on minutes with complete disregard to how they're playing, no more selling us an entirely different product before the season and then doing something else during the season. At the very least we need some clarity on what the hell we're doing.



Last couple of years Magic are heaven for "proven vets" where they get lot of money, or they simply go here to get healthy, pump some stats and get better deal here, or somwhere else ,because Magic are one few teams where they will actually get any playing time ( in expense of young player :banghead: )

So Afflalo, Nelson ,Big Baby where here 3 years ago. Afflalo had his career highs in FGA here,at least team got something for him in return.
Nelson also had his FGA career high in that few years of overplaying him on tanking team.
Davis , naturally, also had career high in FGA here. And it was crazy, dude was shooting 14 FGA per game :crazy: .

Let's move on.
Jason Smith, in PER 36, had career high in FGA last year. Naturally when you have Harris, NIcholson and Gordon at PF you give 30 years old one year deal player most shots per possesion in his career.
Jennings didn't shoot that much, but even when he did, he couldn't make them. Still got around 18 mpg based on name alue alone ( 36% FG ).
Frye was awful here, great with Cavs, team got nothing for him.
Ilyasova is averaging Ibakas numbers with 76ers, team got rid of him.


This year: Jeff Green, $15M for this year, 9 ppg, 23 mpg, over 8 FGA, 39% FG, 29% for 3. Nobody had more opportunities to prove that he has some value than him. And he failed. However, Vogel still gives mu 25-30 min every night to the point where he was STARTING SHOOTING GUARD last week.

CJ Watson ( not just this year ) ,i having worst year(s) of his career with Magic. Career lows in TS% , FG% effective FG%, 3 point percentage. He is probably done with NBA after his deal is up. Yet, it won't stop Vogel from playing him.
Meeks would be good trade, if team was good, but because team is not good he was just another 30 years old shooter that didn't have healthy season in over 2 years.

So it's not hard to figure out, Magic every year sign vets because they want to compete ,vets take lot of playing time from young players, and because team does such a poor job at menaging vets they tend to run wild and overshadow young players to the point where they push young players into role players- type role. And if vets show some value, they are traded ( for nothing ) or leave for better deals. And if they suck, they still leave .

You need to have vets but Magic don't have vets, they have mercenaries that use them to get themselfs better contracts. Good vets help young players become better, mercenaries , powered with awful coaches ( both, Vogel and Skiles ) take control over a team and lead them into- Orlando Kings directionless- direction. 4 years of tanking and Magic have 0 players younger than 21, 2 players younger than 22 and bunch of vets that talk how " team needs to play hard" and in same time guys like Augustin and Green play with below zero effort defense and just kill ball movment ,call isolation for themselfs and jack shots.


Ryan Anderson, Courtney Lee, Tobias Harris, Mo Harkless, Kyle OQuinn, Elfrid Payton, Aaron Gordon, Victor Oladipo. Lets not act like the team hasnt played young players.



How much team valued them? Harkless for top 50 procected second round pick in 2020. Harris for nothing, Quinn for nothing, rushed Anderson out of here because he was too old for rebuild? Dude was 24 years old ,and than they got Big Baby at age of 28 and game him 30 mpg. Oladipo and Sabonis traded for rental of player that nobody knows real age,who declined 3 years ago on defense.
Do they really value Aaron that high? IF they do ,why they refuse to play him at his natural position and why they made a run for Ibaka who plays his position. Aaron Gordon last year played 23,9 mpg in expense of Jason Smith. Let's not forget that. He plays just 27 mpg now, out of position, in expense of Jeff Green.

SO yea, only player that actually got unlimited number of time to suck and play through his mistakes is Payton. And after almost 3 years he still doesn't look like long term future at PG. Oladipo at least, from his second year was productive. Ofc that team got rid fo him "because he is not star" ,replaced with Ibaka who is now being shopped around and on his position they payed Evan who is also not star but also can't defend his position Yeey. :banghead:
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
User avatar
tiderulz
RealGM
Posts: 36,918
And1: 14,847
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
Location: Atlanta
 

Re: Game 51: Indiana Pacers (25-22) @ Orlando Magic (19-31) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#263 » by tiderulz » Thu Feb 2, 2017 2:55 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
tiderulz wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:

Last couple of years Magic are heaven for "proven vets" where they get lot of money, or they simply go here to get healthy, pump some stats and get better deal here, or somwhere else ,because Magic are one few teams where they will actually get any playing time ( in expense of young player :banghead: )

So Afflalo, Nelson ,Big Baby where here 3 years ago. Afflalo had his career highs in FGA here,at least team got something for him in return.
Nelson also had his FGA career high in that few years of overplaying him on tanking team.
Davis , naturally, also had career high in FGA here. And it was crazy, dude was shooting 14 FGA per game :crazy: .

Let's move on.
Jason Smith, in PER 36, had career high in FGA last year. Naturally when you have Harris, NIcholson and Gordon at PF you give 30 years old one year deal player most shots per possesion in his career.
Jennings didn't shoot that much, but even when he did, he couldn't make them. Still got around 18 mpg based on name alue alone ( 36% FG ).
Frye was awful here, great with Cavs, team got nothing for him.
Ilyasova is averaging Ibakas numbers with 76ers, team got rid of him.


This year: Jeff Green, $15M for this year, 9 ppg, 23 mpg, over 8 FGA, 39% FG, 29% for 3. Nobody had more opportunities to prove that he has some value than him. And he failed. However, Vogel still gives mu 25-30 min every night to the point where he was STARTING SHOOTING GUARD last week.

CJ Watson ( not just this year ) ,i having worst year(s) of his career with Magic. Career lows in TS% , FG% effective FG%, 3 point percentage. He is probably done with NBA after his deal is up. Yet, it won't stop Vogel from playing him.
Meeks would be good trade, if team was good, but because team is not good he was just another 30 years old shooter that didn't have healthy season in over 2 years.

So it's not hard to figure out, Magic every year sign vets because they want to compete ,vets take lot of playing time from young players, and because team does such a poor job at menaging vets they tend to run wild and overshadow young players to the point where they push young players into role players- type role. And if vets show some value, they are traded ( for nothing ) or leave for better deals. And if they suck, they still leave .

You need to have vets but Magic don't have vets, they have mercenaries that use them to get themselfs better contracts. Good vets help young players become better, mercenaries , powered with awful coaches ( both, Vogel and Skiles ) take control over a team and lead them into- Orlando Kings directionless- direction. 4 years of tanking and Magic have 0 players younger than 21, 2 players younger than 22 and bunch of vets that talk how " team needs to play hard" and in same time guys like Augustin and Green play with below zero effort defense and just kill ball movment ,call isolation for themselfs and jack shots.


Ryan Anderson, Courtney Lee, Tobias Harris, Mo Harkless, Kyle OQuinn, Elfrid Payton, Aaron Gordon, Victor Oladipo. Lets not act like the team hasnt played young players.



How much team valued them? Harkless for top 50 procected second round pick in 2020. Harris for nothing, Quinn for nothing, rushed Anderson out of here because he was too old for rebuild? Dude was 24 years old ,and than they got Big Baby at age of 28 and game him 30 mpg. Oladipo and Sabonis traded for rental of player that nobody knows real age,who declined 3 years ago on defense.
Do they really value Aaron that high? IF they do ,why they refuse to play him at his natural position and why they made a run for Ibaka who plays his position. Aaron Gordon last year played 23,9 mpg in expense of Jason Smith. Let's not forget that. He plays just 27 mpg now, out of position, in expense of Jeff Green.

SO yea, only player that actually got unlimited number of time to suck and play through his mistakes is Payton. And after almost 3 years he still doesn't look like long term future at PG. Oladipo at least, from his second year was productive. Ofc that team got rid fo him "because he is not star" ,replaced with Evan who is not star but also can't defend his position Yeey. :banghead:


you are changing your argument. I thought your argument was the organization doesnt play young players.

if you are now saying they dont value them, that is a completely different argument and one that i can agree with.

Why do they refuse to play AG at PF? because they brought in a top level PF and AG kept getting hurt and didnt and hasnt shown enough that he should be a PF starter over Ibaka. AG maybe has shown to be a 6th man, but hasnt shown to be a star that many people want him to be.
User avatar
KingRobb02
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,464
And1: 917
Joined: Aug 07, 2007
         

Re: Game 51: Indiana Pacers (25-22) @ Orlando Magic (19-31) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#264 » by KingRobb02 » Thu Feb 2, 2017 3:01 pm

purpleswordfish wrote:
Xatticus wrote:
neuraldarwinism wrote:reporter, "aaron has only been the roll man 7 times on the year, how can that happen with someone with his athleticism?" vogel, "he plays the 3". *sycophantic magic commentators cheer in support


That's a dumbfounding response. Adherence to rigid and outdated positional definitions and roles is absurd in the modern NBA. If it's effective, you use it. Total basketball.


You're absolutely right. The other day, I saw OKC occasionally running a pick and roll set with Westbrook handling the ball and Oladipo setting the pick. It sounds bizarre - and it is - but, it caught the defense off guard and led to open looks.

To say a small forward can't be the roll man, especially one that can play the four position, is just lazy in today's NBA.

The Jameer/Vince ball action was lethal for us back in the day. This isn't a novel concept.
User avatar
Blue_and_Whte
RealGM
Posts: 24,651
And1: 9,548
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
Location: Orlando, FL.
     

Re: Game 51: Indiana Pacers (25-22) @ Orlando Magic (19-31) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#265 » by Blue_and_Whte » Thu Feb 2, 2017 4:11 pm

Pacers_Freak wrote:
Blue_and_Whte wrote:
Pacers_Freak wrote:
Depending on which Pacer team shows up we may make it really hard for you to lose. We have been more consistent as of late, but the road still remains a mystery with this team. Our schedule is about to get really tough so we really need games like tonight. Hope we can accommodate in your tanking venture! :-D

You were spot on with this. PG had one of the worst games ive seen him play and your leading scorer was CJ Miles with 16. Too close for me.


Lol. Unfortunately I know this team all too well. We are especially a mess on the road. It is baffling. Brooklyn on Friday will be another adventure for us. The one positive is our defense has gotten much better in the last month and allowed us to win games like last night.

My unsolicited opinion on the Magic. You guys kind of remind me of the Pacers of the Dunleavy/Murphy days. Just bad enough to not make the playoffs and not bad enough for a great pick. I really hope that things get rolling for you. Vuc is a nice piece and if you can get a couple more to go around him you will have a chance. I'm pulling for that to happen big time. I am a huge Frank fan. Was at the last Pacer/Magic game in Indy and when they showed him he got a standing ovation. Best of luck to the Magic moving forward!

Well the hope is that the FO and Frank understand that the PO's are not a good option for us right now. As you know being a treadmill team is the worst position a team can be in and, imo, going for an 8th seeded playoff berth just to get swept accomplishes that. I'm pulling for them to start moving towards player development. Good luck to you guys as well.
Faith, Family, & Orlando Magic
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
PennytoShaq
Magic Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 7,381
And1: 5,218
Joined: Jan 24, 2016
 

Re: Game 51: Indiana Pacers (25-22) @ Orlando Magic (19-31) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#266 » by PennytoShaq » Thu Feb 2, 2017 6:23 pm

purpleswordfish wrote:
Xatticus wrote:
neuraldarwinism wrote:reporter, "aaron has only been the roll man 7 times on the year, how can that happen with someone with his athleticism?" vogel, "he plays the 3". *sycophantic magic commentators cheer in support


That's a dumbfounding response. Adherence to rigid and outdated positional definitions and roles is absurd in the modern NBA. If it's effective, you use it. Total basketball.


You're absolutely right. The other day, I saw OKC occasionally running a pick and roll set with Westbrook handling the ball and Oladipo setting the pick. It sounds bizarre - and it is - but, it caught the defense off guard and led to open looks.

To say a small forward can't be the roll man, especially one that can play the four position, is just lazy in today's NBA.


You mean you read the Zach Lowe article in which it was highlighted that OKC does this maybe 1-2 times a game, and if they did it more it would be ineffective?

I agree that Gordon should be the roll man a little more more often. But I think Frank does as well. He just is being real. SFs are not commonly roll men in the NBA. It makes no real sense from a schematic standpoint. It's too easy to clog the paint on and basically is more of a gimmick look than something you can put in the offense on the regular. Which is just like the OKC 1-2 PnR.

Gordon back at the 4 and this opens up if we have a legit wing out there.
User avatar
OrlandO
RealGM
Posts: 21,634
And1: 16,421
Joined: May 27, 2009

Re: Game 51: Indiana Pacers (25-22) @ Orlando Magic (19-31) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#267 » by OrlandO » Thu Feb 2, 2017 6:54 pm

PennytoShaq wrote:
purpleswordfish wrote:
Xatticus wrote:
That's a dumbfounding response. Adherence to rigid and outdated positional definitions and roles is absurd in the modern NBA. If it's effective, you use it. Total basketball.


You're absolutely right. The other day, I saw OKC occasionally running a pick and roll set with Westbrook handling the ball and Oladipo setting the pick. It sounds bizarre - and it is - but, it caught the defense off guard and led to open looks.

To say a small forward can't be the roll man, especially one that can play the four position, is just lazy in today's NBA.


You mean you read the Zach Lowe article in which it was highlighted that OKC does this maybe 1-2 times a game, and if they did it more it would be ineffective?

I agree that Gordon should be the roll man a little more more often. But I think Frank does as well. He just is being real. SFs are not commonly roll men in the NBA. It makes no real sense from a schematic standpoint. It's too easy to clog the paint on and basically is more of a gimmick look than something you can put in the offense on the regular. Which is just like the OKC 1-2 PnR.

Gordon back at the 4 and this opens up if we have a legit wing out there.

If Vogel thought that he would play AG at the 4 during some stretches. He doesn't.
Mc-o
Analyst
Posts: 3,007
And1: 1,518
Joined: Nov 20, 2015

Re: Game 51: Indiana Pacers (25-22) @ Orlando Magic (19-31) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#268 » by Mc-o » Thu Feb 2, 2017 6:59 pm

OrlandO wrote:
PennytoShaq wrote:
purpleswordfish wrote:
You're absolutely right. The other day, I saw OKC occasionally running a pick and roll set with Westbrook handling the ball and Oladipo setting the pick. It sounds bizarre - and it is - but, it caught the defense off guard and led to open looks.

To say a small forward can't be the roll man, especially one that can play the four position, is just lazy in today's NBA.


You mean you read the Zach Lowe article in which it was highlighted that OKC does this maybe 1-2 times a game, and if they did it more it would be ineffective?

I agree that Gordon should be the roll man a little more more often. But I think Frank does as well. He just is being real. SFs are not commonly roll men in the NBA. It makes no real sense from a schematic standpoint. It's too easy to clog the paint on and basically is more of a gimmick look than something you can put in the offense on the regular. Which is just like the OKC 1-2 PnR.

Gordon back at the 4 and this opens up if we have a legit wing out there.

If Vogel thought that he would play AG at the 4 during some stretches. He doesn't.

This !!!!!! The fact that AG has played very little at the 4 is the most concerning thing for me ! Has even played a total of 20 minutes all season at the 4 ?!?
PennytoShaq
Magic Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 7,381
And1: 5,218
Joined: Jan 24, 2016
 

Re: Game 51: Indiana Pacers (25-22) @ Orlando Magic (19-31) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#269 » by PennytoShaq » Thu Feb 2, 2017 7:58 pm

OrlandO wrote:
PennytoShaq wrote:
purpleswordfish wrote:
You're absolutely right. The other day, I saw OKC occasionally running a pick and roll set with Westbrook handling the ball and Oladipo setting the pick. It sounds bizarre - and it is - but, it caught the defense off guard and led to open looks.

To say a small forward can't be the roll man, especially one that can play the four position, is just lazy in today's NBA.


You mean you read the Zach Lowe article in which it was highlighted that OKC does this maybe 1-2 times a game, and if they did it more it would be ineffective?

I agree that Gordon should be the roll man a little more more often. But I think Frank does as well. He just is being real. SFs are not commonly roll men in the NBA. It makes no real sense from a schematic standpoint. It's too easy to clog the paint on and basically is more of a gimmick look than something you can put in the offense on the regular. Which is just like the OKC 1-2 PnR.

Gordon back at the 4 and this opens up if we have a legit wing out there.

If Vogel thought that he would play AG at the 4 during some stretches. He doesn't.


He does think it because he said it last night.

He also said at the beginning of the year that they were committed to developing AG at the SF. So until we move Ibaka I doubt it happens that often.
User avatar
OrlandO
RealGM
Posts: 21,634
And1: 16,421
Joined: May 27, 2009

Re: RE: Re: Game 51: Indiana Pacers (25-22) @ Orlando Magic (19-31) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#270 » by OrlandO » Thu Feb 2, 2017 8:36 pm

PennytoShaq wrote:
OrlandO wrote:
PennytoShaq wrote:
You mean you read the Zach Lowe article in which it was highlighted that OKC does this maybe 1-2 times a game, and if they did it more it would be ineffective?

I agree that Gordon should be the roll man a little more more often. But I think Frank does as well. He just is being real. SFs are not commonly roll men in the NBA. It makes no real sense from a schematic standpoint. It's too easy to clog the paint on and basically is more of a gimmick look than something you can put in the offense on the regular. Which is just like the OKC 1-2 PnR.

Gordon back at the 4 and this opens up if we have a legit wing out there.

If Vogel thought that he would play AG at the 4 during some stretches. He doesn't.


He does think it because he said it last night.

He also said at the beginning of the year that they were committed to developing AG at the SF. So until we move Ibaka I doubt it happens that often.


Developing at 3 is not a good excuse to never play him at the 4 in a season where winning had such a high priority. Meanwhile Henny is still hyping AG's position-less versatility......

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
PennytoShaq
Magic Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 7,381
And1: 5,218
Joined: Jan 24, 2016
 

Re: RE: Re: Game 51: Indiana Pacers (25-22) @ Orlando Magic (19-31) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#271 » by PennytoShaq » Fri Feb 3, 2017 12:56 am

OrlandO wrote:
PennytoShaq wrote:
OrlandO wrote:If Vogel thought that he would play AG at the 4 during some stretches. He doesn't.


He does think it because he said it last night.

He also said at the beginning of the year that they were committed to developing AG at the SF. So until we move Ibaka I doubt it happens that often.


Developing at 3 is not a good excuse to never play him at the 4 in a season where winning had such a high priority. Meanwhile Henny is still hyping AG's position-less versatility......

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk


Its not an excuse, its just the reality of the situation.He is a starter and so is ibaka, so many times they are on the floor together. They also are still watching his minutes. Trying to keep him at around 30 a game or so. Most likely to monitor that foot and make sure it is never an issue again.

The minutes are simply not there often enough until we move Ibaka.
User avatar
OrlandO
RealGM
Posts: 21,634
And1: 16,421
Joined: May 27, 2009

Re: RE: Re: Game 51: Indiana Pacers (25-22) @ Orlando Magic (19-31) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#272 » by OrlandO » Fri Feb 3, 2017 1:10 am

PennytoShaq wrote:
OrlandO wrote:
PennytoShaq wrote:
He does think it because he said it last night.

He also said at the beginning of the year that they were committed to developing AG at the SF. So until we move Ibaka I doubt it happens that often.


Developing at 3 is not a good excuse to never play him at the 4 in a season where winning had such a high priority. Meanwhile Henny is still hyping AG's position-less versatility......

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk


Its not an excuse, its just the reality of the situation.He is a starter and so is ibaka, so many times they are on the floor together. They also are still watching his minutes. Trying to keep him at around 30 a game or so. Most likely to monitor that foot and make sure it is never an issue again.

The minutes are simply not there often enough until we move Ibaka.

AG has played over 370 minutes with Green or Rudez at PF... the opportunities have been there. We don't even see it when a big is injured. It's an excuse.
PennytoShaq
Magic Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 7,381
And1: 5,218
Joined: Jan 24, 2016
 

Re: RE: Re: Game 51: Indiana Pacers (25-22) @ Orlando Magic (19-31) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#273 » by PennytoShaq » Fri Feb 3, 2017 1:23 am

OrlandO wrote:
PennytoShaq wrote:
OrlandO wrote:
Developing at 3 is not a good excuse to never play him at the 4 in a season where winning had such a high priority. Meanwhile Henny is still hyping AG's position-less versatility......

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk


Its not an excuse, its just the reality of the situation.He is a starter and so is ibaka, so many times they are on the floor together. They also are still watching his minutes. Trying to keep him at around 30 a game or so. Most likely to monitor that foot and make sure it is never an issue again.

The minutes are simply not there often enough until we move Ibaka.

AG has played over 370 minutes with Green or Rudez at PF... the opportunities have been there. We don't even see it when a big is injured. It's an excuse.


Again, they were clearly committed to playing him full time at the 3. It's not an excuse, it is exactly what they said they would do.

You really want Rudez guarding the SF? I mean, that makes no sense at all.

Orlando has done this with other rookies. And if it fails, they move them back.
OrlandoDream
General Manager
Posts: 8,021
And1: 6,242
Joined: Jul 05, 2013
Location: Altamonte Springs Fl
 

Re: Game 51: Indiana Pacers (25-22) @ Orlando Magic (19-31) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#274 » by OrlandoDream » Fri Feb 3, 2017 1:24 am

OrlandO wrote:
PennytoShaq wrote:
purpleswordfish wrote:
You're absolutely right. The other day, I saw OKC occasionally running a pick and roll set with Westbrook handling the ball and Oladipo setting the pick. It sounds bizarre - and it is - but, it caught the defense off guard and led to open looks.

To say a small forward can't be the roll man, especially one that can play the four position, is just lazy in today's NBA.


You mean you read the Zach Lowe article in which it was highlighted that OKC does this maybe 1-2 times a game, and if they did it more it would be ineffective?

I agree that Gordon should be the roll man a little more more often. But I think Frank does as well. He just is being real. SFs are not commonly roll men in the NBA. It makes no real sense from a schematic standpoint. It's too easy to clog the paint on and basically is more of a gimmick look than something you can put in the offense on the regular. Which is just like the OKC 1-2 PnR.

Gordon back at the 4 and this opens up if we have a legit wing out there.

If Vogel thought that he would play AG at the 4 during some stretches. He doesn't.

We are one trade away from making this AGs career move. If anything, he is a good defensive 3 but we need offense in that 3 and he just doesnt have the handles to be a full-time 3...yet. His position is best suited at that 4 spot. I cant wait until Ibaka is traded so we get to see a couple games preview of AG full-time next year.
User avatar
OrlandO
RealGM
Posts: 21,634
And1: 16,421
Joined: May 27, 2009

Re: RE: Re: Game 51: Indiana Pacers (25-22) @ Orlando Magic (19-31) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#275 » by OrlandO » Fri Feb 3, 2017 2:03 am

PennytoShaq wrote:
OrlandO wrote:
PennytoShaq wrote:
Its not an excuse, its just the reality of the situation.He is a starter and so is ibaka, so many times they are on the floor together. They also are still watching his minutes. Trying to keep him at around 30 a game or so. Most likely to monitor that foot and make sure it is never an issue again.

The minutes are simply not there often enough until we move Ibaka.

AG has played over 370 minutes with Green or Rudez at PF... the opportunities have been there. We don't even see it when a big is injured. It's an excuse.


Again, they were clearly committed to playing him full time at the 3. It's not an excuse, it is exactly what they said they would do.

Vogel also said they would play through AG like Paul George. What's your point? Again, the opportunities were there to play him at the 4. We needed him there at times. And winning was the top priority this season. Not playing him at all at the 4 because we're developing him at the 3 is just a crappy excuse for mismanagement.
PennytoShaq
Magic Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 7,381
And1: 5,218
Joined: Jan 24, 2016
 

Re: RE: Re: Game 51: Indiana Pacers (25-22) @ Orlando Magic (19-31) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#276 » by PennytoShaq » Fri Feb 3, 2017 5:30 pm

OrlandO wrote:
PennytoShaq wrote:
OrlandO wrote:AG has played over 370 minutes with Green or Rudez at PF... the opportunities have been there. We don't even see it when a big is injured. It's an excuse.


Again, they were clearly committed to playing him full time at the 3. It's not an excuse, it is exactly what they said they would do.

Vogel also said they would play through AG like Paul George. What's your point? Again, the opportunities were there to play him at the 4. We needed him there at times. And winning was the top priority this season. Not playing him at all at the 4 because we're developing him at the 3 is just a crappy excuse for mismanagement.


The point is that the Magic wanted him at the 3 this season and dedicated his minutes there. They also stated as such. That is all I am saying. And honestly, I think that long term it was not a bad decision. He has defended the wing quite well. It's not like we move him to PF and suddenly we are a playoff team.
User avatar
OrlandO
RealGM
Posts: 21,634
And1: 16,421
Joined: May 27, 2009

Re: RE: Re: Game 51: Indiana Pacers (25-22) @ Orlando Magic (19-31) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#277 » by OrlandO » Fri Feb 3, 2017 6:28 pm

PennytoShaq wrote:
OrlandO wrote:
PennytoShaq wrote:
Again, they were clearly committed to playing him full time at the 3. It's not an excuse, it is exactly what they said they would do.

Vogel also said they would play through AG like Paul George. What's your point? Again, the opportunities were there to play him at the 4. We needed him there at times. And winning was the top priority this season. Not playing him at all at the 4 because we're developing him at the 3 is just a crappy excuse for mismanagement.


The point is that the Magic wanted him at the 3 this season and dedicated his minutes there. They also stated as such. That is all I am saying. And honestly, I think that long term it was not a bad decision. He has defended the wing quite well. It's not like we move him to PF and suddenly we are a playoff team.

Questionable coaching decisions can easily add up and make a team look worse than they should be. Maybe now it doesn't matter, but it could have mattered earlier in the year when Vogel was pleading for more effort and we were getting crushed on the boards. I don't think playing him at PF a little would be bad for his development at SF. I would argue it's better for his development as it's almost a requirement for a starter to be able to play two positions these days. Question is, what position will they put him in next season when Ibaka is not here? Despite giving him all minutes at SF it still does not seem like they've committed to him at either position.
PennytoShaq
Magic Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 7,381
And1: 5,218
Joined: Jan 24, 2016
 

Re: RE: Re: Game 51: Indiana Pacers (25-22) @ Orlando Magic (19-31) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#278 » by PennytoShaq » Fri Feb 3, 2017 8:04 pm

OrlandO wrote:
PennytoShaq wrote:
OrlandO wrote:Vogel also said they would play through AG like Paul George. What's your point? Again, the opportunities were there to play him at the 4. We needed him there at times. And winning was the top priority this season. Not playing him at all at the 4 because we're developing him at the 3 is just a crappy excuse for mismanagement.


The point is that the Magic wanted him at the 3 this season and dedicated his minutes there. They also stated as such. That is all I am saying. And honestly, I think that long term it was not a bad decision. He has defended the wing quite well. It's not like we move him to PF and suddenly we are a playoff team.

Questionable coaching decisions can easily add up and make a team look worse than they should be. Maybe now it doesn't matter, but it could have mattered earlier in the year when Vogel was pleading for more effort and we were getting crushed on the boards. I don't think playing him at PF a little would be bad for his development at SF. I would argue it's better for his development as it's almost a requirement for a starter to be able to play two positions these days. Question is, what position will they put him in next season when Ibaka is not here? Despite giving him all minutes at SF it still does not seem like they've committed to him at either position.


I agree. If you read my old posts I have always been an advocate of going small and playing him at the 4. I think the main issue is that we have no elite scorer. So the logic was to develop him at SF and get him used to guarding wings since we don't have a good SF anyway. Based on everything Rob and Vogel have said, I think they wanted to go all in with him at the 3. Additionally, I believe he wanted to play the position. I think it is good that we gave him a shot there. He can't say we held him back since he wanted to play the position and has stated that more than once.

IMO he will go back to PF when Ibaka is gone.

Return to Orlando Magic