GlenRiceARoni wrote:dmutombo321 wrote:Its almost a case study in the psychology of irrational optimism to see how some folks can delude themselves into talking this up as if it was somehow a good deal. Yes, Plumlee is a better fit than either Hibbert or Hawes, but his pricetag far exceeds his value and there's a reason his is universally regarded as one of the 10 worst contracts in the NBA.
Cho has mastered the blueprint for casual fan appeasement; assemble a capped out .500ish squad just competitive enough to scrap for an ephemeral playoff cameo each year while lacking the talent to win a series nor the draft positioning or cap flexibility to meaningfully upgrade the roster enough to ever compete with the big boys
When his tenure as Charlotte's GM concludes, Cho's How-To book will be able to write itself:
'First Round Fodder
...A Manifesto for Mediocrity'
It has good alliteration and Al Jefferson can author the foreword
Completely disagree on the .500 team for obvious reasons.
Absolutely no reason this squad cant win ~50 games if healthy.
22-16 with zeller
1-11 without zeller
We are WELL over .500 with zeller and that was with hibbert completely screwing us.
We won 48 games last year and tied for 3rd place.
People talk about this "treadmill" but its all straight BS. Most championship teams were made by forming a good team and continuing to add pieces not by tanking.
A lot of these "young cores" everyone raves about top out at 30-40 wins. Then you have to pay them huge money before you know if they are good enough to justify it....
You have a user name that harken's back to the original Hornet's Golden age.
Where would you rank this year's team relative to the Rice/Mason/Divac core or the Mashburn/Baron/Wesley group?
I found those Hornets teams compelling because you knew they always had a chance to make deep playoff runs each year and the rosters were capable of beating any team in the league on a given night. If it werent for the Rice team running into the brick wall that was Jordan's Bulls in the second roundd of the playoffs (who they actually beat once in the regular season during their 72-10 year) or the Mashburn team falling in the conference semi finals after a commanding 3-2 leading, it wouldnt have been out of the question for either of those teams to have advanced and had a legit chance at winning the East.
That's something that would be unfathomable to imagine for this present Hornets team.
There's no question these hornets are fairly competitive, well coached, want to win and capable of playing some good ball. However, barring another trade, even if Zeller gets healthy and they regain form to slide into a 6-8 seed, I dont see any way in hell they defeat a Cleveland, Toronto or Boston in a 7 game series.
That leaves them with another first round exit, another draft pick in the 20ish range, no meaningful cap room aside from the MLE which wont be sufficient to sign a true difference maker. Which brings them to next year where they'll again be poised for another season of .500ish 40-some-odd-win basketball, only to rinse and repeat as their core grows older.