Edual wrote:JF5 wrote:cedric76 wrote:People need to stop with that pf bs. He is best at sf.
Sent from my SM-A310F using
RealGM mobile app
But how so?
He's not a good enough dribbler, and honestly I can't see his handles improving much more than this.
He's a VERY poor shooter for the position as he's shooting 29 Percent from 3 which is putrid for a perimeter player, and his overall scoring relies on his shooting because he can barely get to the rim if at all if it isn't a cross-match up.
His percentages from different ranges.
0-5 ft: 67.8 Percent
5-9 ft: 26.8 Percent
10-14 ft: 40.0 Percent
15-19 ft: 31.4 Percent
20-24 ft: 27.7 Percent
25-29 ft: 32.1 Percent
http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/203932/shooting/Those aren't shooting numbers that even scream starter for even a below average Small Forward. He needs to move back to the 4...
Compared to I guess someone like Wilson Chandler the #'s are not that far off, ehh maybe thats why chandler is not a starter, I mean I know Gordon is a bad shooter but he seems to be very good at defending the #3... good enough where his defense outweighs his offence. If you put him at the #4 he likely will just suck on both ends.
Draymond Greens Numbers are horrible, but he makes up for it on D
Wilson Chandler's shooting isn't that bad compared to AG's:
0-5 ft: 61.3 Percent
5-9 ft: 40.7 Percent
10-14 ft: 36.0 Percent
15-19 ft: 43.3 Percent
20-24 ft: 28.8 Percent
25-29 ft: 39.1 Percent
His shooting to me is average... Plus, I agree to disagree with you on Gordon being able to consistently defend the 3. He's wildly inconsistent. Some nights he'll drape the opposing Forward and other nights he'll get burned/and be out of position.
Plus Draymond Green is the guy I was AG to model his game after. Except I don't think he has the ability to anchor a defense the way Green can. He'd be better off if he just focused on his all-around abilities rather than trying to be the player that HE THINKS he can be offensively.