Would've loved to see Vogel have a chance to coach a point guard like him...but that's another topic

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow
SBM wrote:I don't think he will be here. He was an all-star and ATL moved on for a guy that now sits and watches Malcolm Delaney finish games. To me they did it because they didn't want to pay Teague. People look at things differently when its money time.
boomershadow wrote:SBM wrote:I don't think he will be here. He was an all-star and ATL moved on for a guy that now sits and watches Malcolm Delaney finish games. To me they did it because they didn't want to pay Teague. People look at things differently when its money time.
I can't imagine we would have ever traded for him if we didn't plan to resign him. I think it's only a matter of Teague choosing to stay rather than look at opportunities elsewhere.
One of the reasons Atlanta did the trade was to move beyond a logjam they had in the back court. We don't really have such problems. Joe Young isn't looking to need starter minutes or to move into a larger role to grow.
SBM wrote:Imo, the Hill/Teague swap was more about Hill and being 31 at seasons end wanting a new contract. Teague is younger, more durable and just as good or better. Look at Hill's efficiency as he plays more games its coming down and Teague is walking him down. I think they knew they didn't want Hill and are simply giving Teague a tryout because they don't know if they want him either. I really don't think they have or had definite intentions of re-signing Teague.