ImageImageImageImage

The Trade Thread II

Moderators: Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird

jjohns828
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,579
And1: 587
Joined: Jul 11, 2012
   

Re: The Trade Thread II 

Post#441 » by jjohns828 » Wed Feb 8, 2017 11:13 am

ballislife wrote:Raptor fan coming in peace... I just want to know what you guys are thinking about Serge Ibaka? Is he looked at as a part of the future? Or are you guys actually looking to deal him for future spots?

Personally, as a Raptors fan, he's exactly what we need and Masai Ujiri has shown significant interest in him in the past. Ibaka is definitely a good core piece on a lot of teams, but I don't see any fit in the NBA better than with the Raptors.

If the Raps gave Joseph + Ross, would you guys do it? We MIGHT be willing to give one of our 2 first round picks (TOR/LAC).


Personally, I'd rather have the cap space from letting Ibaka walk. I'm not a fan of Ross, after a good start to the season he's come back down to earth to being the disappoint player he's been for the rest of his career, and with Payton and Augustin both on the roster already I don't see much need for Joseph and would give him a negative value for the Magic.
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,567
And1: 8,516
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: The Trade Thread II 

Post#442 » by Skybox » Wed Feb 8, 2017 12:07 pm

Skin wrote:
tiderulz wrote:
nymets1 wrote:The Magic are reportedly shopping Nikola Vucevic, Jeff Green and Serge Ibaka.
According to sources of Steve Kyler of Basketball Insiders, the Magic may be valuing these pieces a little bit too high, which is why a deal has yet to go down for the Orlando franchise. They are, however, trying to land a major piece and have been linked to guys like Goran Dragic and Jimmy Butler. It doesn't seem likely that they'll be able to get either of those guys with what they have to offer, but trading away Vuc and Ibaka in order to give more minutes to Aaron Gordon at the four seems to be the theme here. Feb 7 - 4:51 PM
Source: Basketball Insiders

http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nba/1862/nikola-vucevic


trading away Vuc, a center, does zero for giving more time for AG at the 4

How about if it moved Ibaka to the 5 and then opened up min for Gordon at the 4? :wink:


Conventional wisdom says Ibaka can't play center...I assume we'd sorely miss Vuc's rebounds...could AG grab more? could Ibaka adapt? The more I think I know, the less I know with this personnel. Right now I'm wondering if Ibaka is the only one worth keeping and ship out the rest. Nobody getting to the rim and the line to an absurd degree...can't blame our bigs for that. Can't shoot + Can't get to line = Hopeless.
drpepper10
Sophomore
Posts: 104
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 01, 2015

Re: The Trade Thread II 

Post#443 » by drpepper10 » Wed Feb 8, 2017 12:40 pm

is there Trade talks have involved RJax/Stanley/Bullock and Ibaka/Hezonja/Elfrid ? between the detroit pistons and the magic
OrlandoDream
General Manager
Posts: 8,091
And1: 6,274
Joined: Jul 05, 2013
Location: Altamonte Springs Fl
 

Re: The Trade Thread II 

Post#444 » by OrlandoDream » Wed Feb 8, 2017 1:19 pm

drpepper10 wrote:is there Trade talks have involved RJax/Stanley/Bullock and Ibaka/Hezonja/Elfrid ? between the detroit pistons and the magic

Stan is not known for shaking up the roster that much this late in the season. I doubt that's true
User avatar
j-ragg
RealGM
Posts: 18,332
And1: 11,680
Joined: Mar 31, 2005
Location: the don't re-sign Hedo bandwagon.
   

Re: The Trade Thread II 

Post#445 » by j-ragg » Wed Feb 8, 2017 1:28 pm

Skybox wrote:
Skin wrote:
tiderulz wrote:
trading away Vuc, a center, does zero for giving more time for AG at the 4

How about if it moved Ibaka to the 5 and then opened up min for Gordon at the 4? :wink:


Conventional wisdom says Ibaka can't play center...I assume we'd sorely miss Vuc's rebounds...could AG grab more? could Ibaka adapt? The more I think I know, the less I know with this personnel. Right now I'm wondering if Ibaka is the only one worth keeping and ship out the rest. Nobody getting to the rim and the line to an absurd degree...can't blame our bigs for that. Can't shoot + Can't get to line = Hopeless.

Ibaka is hardly the solution though. Not lately at least. Guy has played with almost no effort over the past month. And no one gets to the line including him.
BadMofoPimp wrote:Durant thinks Vooch is one of the Best Centers in the NBA. I will take his word over a couch-GM yelling at a TV.
T-Cat
Starter
Posts: 2,375
And1: 542
Joined: May 04, 2004

Re: The Trade Thread II 

Post#446 » by T-Cat » Wed Feb 8, 2017 1:38 pm

I just heard on ESPN that the Suns and Kings are interested in a Cousins trade!

Alex Len, Tucker and multiple picks!

Could we want Cousins or involve him in a 3 way trade like Boston or Minnesota?
User avatar
LBPTarHeel27
RealGM
Posts: 11,833
And1: 1,512
Joined: Jul 10, 2004
Location: Right behind you
   

Re: The Trade Thread II 

Post#447 » by LBPTarHeel27 » Wed Feb 8, 2017 1:46 pm

MagicMatic wrote:
LBPTarHeel27 wrote:
tiderulz wrote:
If Minny has all this talent, why are they losing more than we are?

just seems this is the Orlando way. Like a player for a year, like them more then 2nd year, then tear them down and want them traded the 3rd year.


Are you trying to say that we actually are in a comparable spot to Minny?

I'd get your argument about this "Orlando way" if anyone we had traded had actually turned out to be a stud. None of them have been any better after leaving here.



It's not like AG and EP are buried on the bench. They play significant minutes, against even terrible teams, and still aren't 'wow-ing' anyone. We don't have the luxury of having these young players earn their minutes behind better, more established players.

The difference between us and Minnesota is that their players actually meet or exceed fan's expectations on the court. Is it right to feel that way? Maybe not, but it's true.


This.

Also, like I have said. We have no clue who our best player is. It is very clear that "their guy" is Towns. Wiggins is the #2. LaVine is the #3. Having those distinct roles allows everything to fall in to place. It allows the role players to play their roles and not be forced to perform tasks that take away from what they do best.
Image
User avatar
Blue_and_Whte
RealGM
Posts: 24,678
And1: 9,568
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
Location: Orlando, FL.
     

Re: The Trade Thread II 

Post#448 » by Blue_and_Whte » Wed Feb 8, 2017 1:46 pm

The Real Dalic wrote:
Blue_and_Whte wrote:
The Real Dalic wrote:I agree with the part about their not being many options to pass to, but I don't think that that should be up to Evan on who gets the ball or not. If he has a chance to give AG or Elf an open chance at a 3, Evan has to make that pass and trust his teammates to either take and make the shot, or make the right play, whether that be a pass or drive.
Well using that logic shouldn't his teammates trust him to make the right play? So if you have a situation where you've got Jodie Meeks and Payton open on the perimeter with 3 seconds left who should Evan pass to? Wouldn't the right play be to pass the ball out to Meeks on the perimeter if he's open? Would that be fair to Payton in that scenario? If the scenario described happened, and he end up passing to Payton instead of Meeks people would STILL get on Evan for passing to wrong guy. I feel like its a lose lose for him.

He shouldn't be expected to pass to Payton out of sympathy if there are better options available. Obviously if Payton or AG are his choices then he should hit them but only secondary to trying to get his own shot because imo, he's the best option at that point and he absolutely should look to score first. Hes not without his faults especially when he tries to force the issue but I feel like he's doing what he's told to do and I feel like he finds those guys if they're open.

With 3 seconds left I wouldn't even be opposed to seeing Evan take it to the hole himself. But I do obviously agree that in that exact scenario that Meeks is the one you go to. I like Evan and I'm not saying he doesn't pass it, I'm just saying he can't choose to not pass it to AG or Elf if they're open just because they're not the best shooters.
Well I personally don't think he freezes them out on purpose. The reality is that they aren't good shooters and I don't know if they'll ever be so its a tough position to be in.
Faith, Family, & Orlando Magic
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
IllMagic04
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,836
And1: 1,875
Joined: Jul 06, 2012
Location: Baltimore MD
     

Re: The Trade Thread II 

Post#449 » by IllMagic04 » Wed Feb 8, 2017 1:47 pm

Xatticus wrote:
ballislife wrote:Raptor fan coming in peace... I just want to know what you guys are thinking about Serge Ibaka? Is he looked at as a part of the future? Or are you guys actually looking to deal him for future spots?

Personally, as a Raptors fan, he's exactly what we need and Masai Ujiri has shown significant interest in him in the past. Ibaka is definitely a good core piece on a lot of teams, but I don't see any fit in the NBA better than with the Raptors.

If the Raps gave Joseph + Ross, would you guys do it? We MIGHT be willing to give one of our 2 first round picks (TOR/LAC).


A lot of Raptors fans stop by to express their interest in Ibaka. Everyone pitches an offer similar to this. Ross isn't terrible value for his contract, but I'd rather have the cap space this summer. Joseph isn't worth his contract and I'd want something in return just to take it from you.

I'd imagine some around here would take that offer over nothing, but I wouldn't. I'd let Ibaka walk before I'd accept that offer.


Really? If they include the pick Id be all over the deal. Cap space for what? Its not much in the FA market this summer. If the Raps offered that we better take it. Id pass on Joseph but the pick+ Ross gets it done for me.
The Real Dalic
RealGM
Posts: 17,740
And1: 7,630
Joined: Nov 22, 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
         

Re: The Trade Thread II 

Post#450 » by The Real Dalic » Wed Feb 8, 2017 1:48 pm

Blue_and_Whte wrote:
The Real Dalic wrote:
Blue_and_Whte wrote:Well using that logic shouldn't his teammates trust him to make the right play? So if you have a situation where you've got Jodie Meeks and Payton open on the perimeter with 3 seconds left who should Evan pass to? Wouldn't the right play be to pass the ball out to Meeks on the perimeter if he's open? Would that be fair to Payton in that scenario? If the scenario described happened, and he end up passing to Payton instead of Meeks people would STILL get on Evan for passing to wrong guy. I feel like its a lose lose for him.

He shouldn't be expected to pass to Payton out of sympathy if there are better options available. Obviously if Payton or AG are his choices then he should hit them but only secondary to trying to get his own shot because imo, he's the best option at that point and he absolutely should look to score first. Hes not without his faults especially when he tries to force the issue but I feel like he's doing what he's told to do and I feel like he finds those guys if they're open.

With 3 seconds left I wouldn't even be opposed to seeing Evan take it to the hole himself. But I do obviously agree that in that exact scenario that Meeks is the one you go to. I like Evan and I'm not saying he doesn't pass it, I'm just saying he can't choose to not pass it to AG or Elf if they're open just because they're not the best shooters.
Well I personally don't think he freezes them out on purpose. The reality is that they aren't good shooters and I don't know if they'll ever be so its a tough position to be in.

I don't think so either. I was just arguing that if we were to find out that he did that, that wouldn't be fair to his teammates.
God. Family. Country. Basketball.
User avatar
LBPTarHeel27
RealGM
Posts: 11,833
And1: 1,512
Joined: Jul 10, 2004
Location: Right behind you
   

Re: The Trade Thread II 

Post#451 » by LBPTarHeel27 » Wed Feb 8, 2017 2:09 pm

Xatticus wrote:
LBPTarHeel27 wrote:
tiderulz wrote:
If Minny has all this talent, why are they losing more than we are?

just seems this is the Orlando way. Like a player for a year, like them more then 2nd year, then tear them down and want them traded the 3rd year.


Are you trying to say that we actually are in a comparable spot to Minny?

I'd get your argument about this "Orlando way" if anyone we had traded had actually turned out to be a stud. None of them have been any better after leaving here.


I tend to think the Minnesota core is really overrated, though It's certainly better than ours. Once you get past all the hype and volume, Wiggins hasn't done anything special. He is still struggling defensively, which is troubling considering that what made him the top pick was his athleticism and defensive upside. Right now, he is just another Rudy Gay that hasn't yet been outed as such. If I were running Minnesota, I'd come up with some weak excuse to make him available with the hopes that it could net me a haul from some desperate franchise (like Orlando).



It's a great thing that Towns is the stud there and not Wiggins. The fact that they have Towns allow them to sleep easy at night and allow Wiggins to develop at whatever pace he needs to. The same for the rest of the squad. I do think that trading him, if they think he is stalling, is not a bad idea. They could definitely get a nice package for him...especially from a team like us.

Coming back to the conversation about our own players, the problem is that we keep overpaying them for stats they are pillaging here. I really don't care what the market was for Fournier, he was dramatically overpaid. If you look at the assets that Ainge has accumulated, the common trait among all of them was their high productivity relative to their contracts.

There is an economic theory that holds that the more information you have, the better equipped you are to make a decision. Hennigan has repeatedly let assets walk into restricted free agency before making a decision on them. This is a problem. This is why we overpaid Harris and Fournier. You have to make your decisions on players before you lose leverage. Once a player reaches restricted free agency armed with the pillaged stats you let them accrue, you only have the options of overpaying them or letting them walk. You can extend players a year before they actually reach restricted free agency. If the two sides are far apart, you ship that asset out while you still have some leverage.

Harris and Fournier on their rookie-scale contracts are useful pieces. Once they are earning 17 mil per season, they are a problem. The forum simply reflects this.


I get what you are saying here and the theme is accurate...but not the details.

Ainge signed Horford on a contract that arguably exceeds his value on the court. However, the fact that they have a guy like Thomas as "their guy" allows Horford to properly fall in to his role. Horford is no longer worth 26 million, IMO...but it works because of the overall roster make up. You talk about these assets that Ainge has accumulated but in reality, Horford's situation is the only one that applies to this conversation. The other guys were either brought in before the cap exploded or they are home grown with a low level of potential. If Avery Bradley is still the same player in 2 years...would you feel the same way about Ainge if he paid Bradley near 20 million? That will likely be the case, whether it is Boston or someone else.

You look at what we did with Biz....17 Million. Sounds like a ton for a guy that is completely one dimensional. However, if the Rockets give him that contract...there is a case to be made that he could be at the head of the class in the DPOY conversation. When you put him on a great offensive team, the fact that he is one dimensional no longer matters...it actually compliments the roster.

As for Harris/Fournier/Dipo...

First off, we didn't really let Fournier hit the market. We technically extended him...didn't let him sign an offer sheet anywhere. Exactly what you are asking Henny to do. Then you have Dipo...who we were not going to keep because we decided on keeping Fournier. When I spoke with Henny at the Luncheon, he was certain that Fournier would have gotten a huge offer sheet in RFA...so it is hard to say that we overpaid him. When it comes to Fournier...we did exactly what you are talking about doing.

Then as far as Tobias goes...17 million is an overpay? I am by no means a fan of his...I actually think he is nothing more than a decent role player...but in today's NBA, him at 17 million is a very fair deal. Especially when you consider that it is a declining contract that will be 14.8 mill in the final year. Where is the overpay?
Image
User avatar
tiderulz
RealGM
Posts: 36,944
And1: 14,872
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
Location: Atlanta
 

Re: The Trade Thread II 

Post#452 » by tiderulz » Wed Feb 8, 2017 2:16 pm

LBPTarHeel27 wrote:As for Harris/Fournier/Dipo...

First off, we didn't let Fournier hit the market. We extended him. Exactly what you are asking Henny to do. Then you have Dipo...who we were not going to keep because we decided on keeping Fournier. When I spoke with Henny at the Luncheon, he was certain that Fournier would have gotten a huge offer sheet in RFA...so it is hard to say that we overpaid him. When it comes to Fournier...we did exactly what you are talking about doing.


thought for sure that Fournier hit the market. He rejected the initial extension while under contract, season ended and Evan was able to sign with other teams, but re-signed with us.
User avatar
LBPTarHeel27
RealGM
Posts: 11,833
And1: 1,512
Joined: Jul 10, 2004
Location: Right behind you
   

Re: The Trade Thread II 

Post#453 » by LBPTarHeel27 » Wed Feb 8, 2017 2:18 pm

tiderulz wrote:
LBPTarHeel27 wrote:As for Harris/Fournier/Dipo...

First off, we didn't let Fournier hit the market. We extended him. Exactly what you are asking Henny to do. Then you have Dipo...who we were not going to keep because we decided on keeping Fournier. When I spoke with Henny at the Luncheon, he was certain that Fournier would have gotten a huge offer sheet in RFA...so it is hard to say that we overpaid him. When it comes to Fournier...we did exactly what you are talking about doing.


thought for sure that Fournier hit the market. He rejected the initial extension while under contract, season ended and Evan was able to sign with other teams, but re-signed with us.


You're right...I googled it to check myself before the post but didn't look at the date. He "extended" but technically it was in FA.

http://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/report-evan-fournier-agrees-to-5-year-85m-extension-with-magic/
Image
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,567
And1: 8,516
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: The Trade Thread II 

Post#454 » by Skybox » Wed Feb 8, 2017 2:53 pm

For the record... Cousins isn't available and if he becomes available, I want nothing to do with his show. That's not surface level "he's a bad guy" stuff. His skills don't translate to wins in todays NBA. If, somehow, he ends up with a strong veteran team (rich get richer) and shows the unexpected maturity to defer money and authority to do so...he could be a great story. But for a weak, young, non-contending team...it would be a mess...again. He's a fantastic individual talent.
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,357
And1: 19,451
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: The Trade Thread II 

Post#455 » by pepe1991 » Wed Feb 8, 2017 2:53 pm

tiderulz wrote:
LBPTarHeel27 wrote:As for Harris/Fournier/Dipo...

First off, we didn't let Fournier hit the market. We extended him. Exactly what you are asking Henny to do. Then you have Dipo...who we were not going to keep because we decided on keeping Fournier. When I spoke with Henny at the Luncheon, he was certain that Fournier would have gotten a huge offer sheet in RFA...so it is hard to say that we overpaid him. When it comes to Fournier...we did exactly what you are talking about doing.


thought for sure that Fournier hit the market. He rejected the initial extension while under contract, season ended and Evan was able to sign with other teams, but re-signed with us.


First offer was $12M per year i belive?
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
User avatar
Blue_and_Whte
RealGM
Posts: 24,678
And1: 9,568
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
Location: Orlando, FL.
     

The Trade Thread II 

Post#456 » by Blue_and_Whte » Wed Feb 8, 2017 3:25 pm

I'm pretty surprised nothing has happened yet tbh. I expected the FO to make some panic trades about now.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Faith, Family, & Orlando Magic
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
User avatar
Xatticus
Head Coach
Posts: 6,795
And1: 8,287
Joined: Feb 18, 2016
Location: the land of the blind
         

Re: The Trade Thread II 

Post#457 » by Xatticus » Wed Feb 8, 2017 3:32 pm

LBPTarHeel27 wrote:I get what you are saying here and the theme is accurate...but not the details.

Ainge signed Horford on a contract that arguably exceeds his value on the court. However, the fact that they have a guy like Thomas as "their guy" allows Horford to properly fall in to his role. Horford is no longer worth 26 million, IMO...but it works because of the overall roster make up. You talk about these assets that Ainge has accumulated but in reality, Horford's situation is the only one that applies to this conversation. The other guys were either brought in before the cap exploded or they are home grown with a low level of potential. If Avery Bradley is still the same player in 2 years...would you feel the same way about Ainge if he paid Bradley near 20 million? That will likely be the case, whether it is Boston or someone else.

You look at what we did with Biz....17 Million. Sounds like a ton for a guy that is completely one dimensional. However, if the Rockets give him that contract...there is a case to be made that he could be at the head of the class in the DPOY conversation. When you put him on a great offensive team, the fact that he is one dimensional no longer matters...it actually compliments the roster.

As for Harris/Fournier/Dipo...

First off, we didn't really let Fournier hit the market. We technically extended him...didn't let him sign an offer sheet anywhere. Exactly what you are asking Henny to do. Then you have Dipo...who we were not going to keep because we decided on keeping Fournier. When I spoke with Henny at the Luncheon, he was certain that Fournier would have gotten a huge offer sheet in RFA...so it is hard to say that we overpaid him. When it comes to Fournier...we did exactly what you are talking about doing.

Then as far as Tobias goes...17 million is an overpay? I am by no means a fan of his...I actually think he is nothing more than a decent role player...but in today's NBA, him at 17 million is a very fair deal. Especially when you consider that it is a declining contract that will be 14.8 mill in the final year. Where is the overpay?


Horford is the exception to what I stated (assuming Horford isn't actually worth more than a max contract), but if you look at the totality of their roster, Ainge has acquired bargain after bargain. Crowder, Thomas, and Bradley were all bargains. This is true even under the economics of the NBA before the cap "exploded."

1st year salary of contract as a percentage of the team's salary cap when the contract was signed:

Isaiah Thomas: 11.5%
Avery Bradley: 11.4%
Jae Crowder: 8.6%


Tobias Harris: 22.9%
Evan Fournier: 18.1%
Bizmack Biyombo: 18.1%


Bradley in two years on a 20M per year deal would be 18.5% of their cap. No. I wouldn't feel the same about his value then as I do now. It might make sense for them to give him that much, but probably not.

The increase in salary cap in conjunction with a weak free agent pool led to some massive overpays. This certainly doesn't make these contracts any more palatable in the long-term. We are relying on the cap continuing to climb just to find some scrap of rationale to justify them.

There is no hypothetical scenario that makes Biyombo look appealing at 18% of the salary cap. It is a massive overpay for a player that has no chance of providing the utility to justify the expenditure. There might be some marginal importance in roster composition, but it is negligible next to the productivity of the player.

What other teams are willing to pay is irrelevant. The Magic have a finite amount of resources at their disposal. The only important factors are the totality of a player's contributions on the court and how much of those limited resources that player takes up. The value of any player is inversely related to what they are earning. Fournier on a rookie-scale deal is a far more valuable player than he is on his current contract.

Just for clarification, I wasn't advocating that Fournier was extended at all. I was advocating that the decision between Fournier and Oladipo should've been made before Fournier hit restricted free agency. Fournier wasn't extended ahead of time. He reached his agreement on the eve of restricted free agency. The Magic had exhausted any leverage they had in that situation before finally reaching that agreement. Because they failed to address the issue before the eve of his restricted free agency, the Magic really only had one choice between Fournier and Oladipo. Choosing Oladipo in this hypothetical means they let Fournier walk for nothing, or they give Fournier his contract and find a way to dump it before extending Oladipo. The decision makes itself at that point, because Fournier's trade value had already plunged.
"Xatticus has always been, in my humble opinion best poster here. Should write articles or something."
-pepe1991
User avatar
Nemesis21
RealGM
Posts: 39,229
And1: 6,615
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Free Nemesis21
         

Re: The Trade Thread II 

Post#458 » by Nemesis21 » Wed Feb 8, 2017 3:39 pm

Blue_and_Whte wrote:I'm pretty surprised nothing has happened yet tbh. I expected the FO to make some panic trades about now.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app



Well that's good then, isn't it? We don't need panic trades, we aren't making the playoffs. However, I'm not against trades, as long as they aren't panic trades with the thought of making the playoffs.
OrlandoNed
Head Coach
Posts: 6,740
And1: 4,878
Joined: Jul 31, 2013
 

Re: The Trade Thread II 

Post#459 » by OrlandoNed » Wed Feb 8, 2017 3:49 pm

Nemesis21 wrote:
Blue_and_Whte wrote:I'm pretty surprised nothing has happened yet tbh. I expected the FO to make some panic trades about now.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app



Well that's good then, isn't it? We don't need panic trades, we aren't making the playoffs. However, I'm not against trades, as long as they aren't panic trades with the thought of making the playoffs.

Well it's good if you're okay with Hennigan staying on board as GM. I'm not, so to me we are in trouble regardless if the team makes moves with the short term or long term in mind. If we make long term moves that would lead me to believe that Hennigan is fairly confident that he would not be fired in the offseason.
User avatar
Nemesis21
RealGM
Posts: 39,229
And1: 6,615
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Free Nemesis21
         

Re: The Trade Thread II 

Post#460 » by Nemesis21 » Wed Feb 8, 2017 4:21 pm

OrlandoNed wrote:
Nemesis21 wrote:
Blue_and_Whte wrote:I'm pretty surprised nothing has happened yet tbh. I expected the FO to make some panic trades about now.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app



Well that's good then, isn't it? We don't need panic trades, we aren't making the playoffs. However, I'm not against trades, as long as they aren't panic trades with the thought of making the playoffs.

Well it's good if you're okay with Hennigan staying on board as GM. I'm not, so to me we are in trouble regardless if the team makes moves with the short term or long term in mind. If we make long term moves that would lead me to believe that Hennigan is fairly confident that he would not be fired in the offseason.


It is well known, that I want Rob to stay.

Return to Orlando Magic