Mc-o wrote:in my opinion on paper it never made sense ! That's why so many people questioned it . He was hoping that people did things they never did before ! Ibaka be a 1st option, Ag at sf , Evan playmaker , ep a shooter , biz a starter . None of those things had happened before the trade happened and hasn't worked out now either . My point is that there was no reason to trade dipo yet especially for a player who isnt a difference maker. The team last year made a big jump and there was no reason not to think they would have improved this year. Continuity and chemistry is being over looked and also could have still traded dipo or Fournier or both and gotten a better return than ibakaLBPTarHeel27 wrote:Mc-o wrote:Biz is almost unplayable ! He isn't that great at defense , especially to make up for his offense . Biz has less value than Tobias because teams can get a back up center for about 10 million less per year . Tobias has a good contract and is a capable player . Also how would Tobias be blocking Ags development ? They could play together ! We actually had a better defense last year , we took a step back this year. Again I don't think dipo and Harris are stars but what we traded them for has made us worst and it's not hindsight 20/20 because at the time both trades were made a lot of people questioned the moves from the moment they happened
At the end of the day, this team would have failed either way. If we have stayed the course with Dipo and Harris...maybe we win 35 games again? Maybe? We see what is happening now.
Rob failed, either way. However, as a fan, I am happy that he at least took a swing and missed...rather than standing with something that clearly wasn't working. He put himself in that situation but I am OK with him trying to fix it...and again, the plan made sense on paper. It is not like the moves had no rhyme or reason behind them.
I think you are clinging to something that was never going to work. It's not hard to trend upward from 25 wins. It is sad that we view that as the good ol' days of this rebuild. That team was never going to accomplish anything but a first round exit, at their peak. I think there is something to be said for chemistry, for sure. It is a huge factor. But again...with all the chemistry in the world, that team was never going to work. I think the more prudent view, at this point, would be to look at what we have. Individually, we have a lot of good defensive talents. It clearly hasn't come together as a whole. Why not try and develop that chemistry? Target guys that can come in and score to help supplement the terrible offense while the team gets to know each other in their defensive rotations?
I am in no way saying I think it would work...but I do think that we need to realize that we will be building around Elf and AG with Biz fairly locked in as part of the near future. Unless something drastic changes, that is where we are. We failed in the beginning years of this rebuild, we are failing presently...we need to look ahead. So we are back to building around a core of guys that have no offense but do have some defensive potential. We need to make that work. I expect moves to reflect what I just said, going in to the trade deadline and in free agency.