Bergmaniac wrote:Kareem won in 1976 when his team was 6th in the West (out of 9 teams) and had a 40-42 record.
Different era, different league.
Moderators: Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285
Bergmaniac wrote:Kareem won in 1976 when his team was 6th in the West (out of 9 teams) and had a 40-42 record.
Bergmaniac wrote:Kareem won in 1976 when his team was 6th in the West (out of 9 teams) and had a 40-42 record.
Hero wrote:K_chile22 wrote:inquisitive wrote:OKC only 19 games away from 50 wins....might be a bad sign for Harden.
There's only 28 games left (time flies) . They'd have to go 19-9, which is unlikely, FiveThirtyEight has Rockets at 56 and Thunder at 47
That's way too big a gap for Westbrook to win MVP. At this point it seems fairly certain that OKC is gonna finish 6th/7th which won't cut it. If they go on a serious run then sure he can have MVP consideration but I really doubt it.
Harden's to lose.
K_chile22 wrote:My MVP rankings that don't matter but I feel like sharing:
1. Harden
2. Kawhi
3. Russ (mostly because 7th seed looking more and more likely)
4. KD
5(a). Steph
5(b). IT
Green89 wrote:Hero wrote:K_chile22 wrote:There's only 28 games left (time flies) . They'd have to go 19-9, which is unlikely, FiveThirtyEight has Rockets at 56 and Thunder at 47
That's way too big a gap for Westbrook to win MVP. At this point it seems fairly certain that OKC is gonna finish 6th/7th which won't cut it. If they go on a serious run then sure he can have MVP consideration but I really doubt it.
Harden's to lose.
7th seed and 11 turnovers last night in a loss. IMHO, an MVP candidate can't hurt your team that bad. 11 turnovers is backbreaking. I definitely think Harden's got the edge over Westbrook at this point.
Bergmaniac wrote:Green89 wrote:Hero wrote:
That's way too big a gap for Westbrook to win MVP. At this point it seems fairly certain that OKC is gonna finish 6th/7th which won't cut it. If they go on a serious run then sure he can have MVP consideration but I really doubt it.
Harden's to lose.
7th seed and 11 turnovers last night in a loss. IMHO, an MVP candidate can't hurt your team that bad. 11 turnovers is backbreaking. I definitely think Harden's got the edge over Westbrook at this point.
Harden has more turnovers per game this season. He also had a 12 turnovers game (which his team lost).
PeptoKlepto wrote:K_chile22 wrote:My MVP rankings that don't matter but I feel like sharing:
1. Harden
2. Kawhi
3. Russ (mostly because 7th seed looking more and more likely)
4. KD
5(a). Steph
5(b). IT
LeBron noticeably missing here.
Green89 wrote:Ouch, didn't know he had a 12 turnover game. Oh, my. They both will set a record for MVP having the most turnovers, whoever wins it. I think Harden and the 3 seed holds more weight over Russ at the 7th seed.
Per CBS sports, it's a 3 man race. Harden-Westbrook-Thomas.
http://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/nba-mvp-rankings-lebron-james-falls-isaiah-thomas-rises-as-race-tightens/
K_chile22 wrote:PeptoKlepto wrote:K_chile22 wrote:My MVP rankings that don't matter but I feel like sharing:
1. Harden
2. Kawhi
3. Russ (mostly because 7th seed looking more and more likely)
4. KD
5(a). Steph
5(b). IT
LeBron noticeably missing here.
He doesn't have the counting stats other guys have, is probably coasting a little, and his team is under performing. Not much of a case besides being the best player in the world when he wants to be, and that's not what the award is about
Exodus wrote:I think Kyrie Irving in the best player on the team to be honest
DROB27 wrote:Kawhi needs to be in everyone's top three guy is carrying scrubs out there , only the stats nerds who don't actually watch the games would disagree
fromthetop321 wrote:Lebron is averaging 26 8 9 and leading the best team in the east. Anyone leaving him off your top 3 list shouldn't be taken seriously.
K_chile22 wrote:fromthetop321 wrote:Lebron is averaging 26 8 9 and leading the best team in the east. Anyone leaving him off your top 3 list shouldn't be taken seriously.
And Kawhi is averaging a more efficient, 25.6 5.9 3.4 while playing elite defense on a 60+ win team where he's the only all All-star (and don't say LMA. He's hasn't been good.)
Harden is averaging a more efficient 29 11 8 on a team with a better record and zero all stars
Westbrook has the whole triple double thing I don't really care for, but since we are using counting stats, 30-10-10 on a weird fitting roster winning more games than they should based on talent level
Maaaaybe Westbrook is the only one you could make an argument over because the record is so much better, but at the same time the Cavs are worse than we thought they'd be this year. That's typically bad for MVP votes.
LookToShoot wrote:Melo is the only player that makes the Rockets watchable for the basketball purists. Otherwise it would just be three point shots and pick n roll.
RCM88x wrote:K_chile22 wrote:fromthetop321 wrote:Lebron is averaging 26 8 9 and leading the best team in the east. Anyone leaving him off your top 3 list shouldn't be taken seriously.
And Kawhi is averaging a more efficient, 25.6 5.9 3.4 while playing elite defense on a 60+ win team where he's the only all All-star (and don't say LMA. He's hasn't been good.)
Harden is averaging a more efficient 29 11 8 on a team with a better record and zero all stars
Westbrook has the whole triple double thing I don't really care for, but since we are using counting stats, 30-10-10 on a weird fitting roster winning more games than they should based on talent level
Maaaaybe Westbrook is the only one you could make an argument over because the record is so much better, but at the same time the Cavs are worse than we thought they'd be this year. That's typically bad for MVP votes.
"More efficient"
Lebron: 53/38/69, 58eFG%, 61%ts, 2.1 assist:turnover (+11.9 on/off)
Kawhi: 49/39/90, 54eFG%, 62%ts, 1.62 assist:turnover (+0.3 on/off)
Harden: 44/35/85, 52eFG%, 61%ts, 1.92 assist:turnover (+3.2 on/off)
Westbrook: 42/34/83, 47eFG%, 54%ts, 1.85 assist:turnover (+16.0 on/off)
There is literally no way possible that you can say that Kawhi or Harden are "more efficient" than LeBron.
K_chile22 wrote:Boosting players for having a bad bench or bringing them down for having a good one is not how on/off is supposed to work. It's a data point, not the end all be all.
RCM88x wrote:K_chile22 wrote:fromthetop321 wrote:Lebron is averaging 26 8 9 and leading the best team in the east. Anyone leaving him off your top 3 list shouldn't be taken seriously.
And Kawhi is averaging a more efficient, 25.6 5.9 3.4 while playing elite defense on a 60+ win team where he's the only all All-star (and don't say LMA. He's hasn't been good.)
Harden is averaging a more efficient 29 11 8 on a team with a better record and zero all stars
Westbrook has the whole triple double thing I don't really care for, but since we are using counting stats, 30-10-10 on a weird fitting roster winning more games than they should based on talent level
Maaaaybe Westbrook is the only one you could make an argument over because the record is so much better, but at the same time the Cavs are worse than we thought they'd be this year. That's typically bad for MVP votes.
"More efficient"
Lebron: 53/38/69, 58eFG%, 61%ts, 2.1 assist:turnover (+11.9 on/off)
Kawhi: 49/39/90, 54eFG%, 62%ts, 1.62 assist:turnover (+0.3 on/off)
Harden: 44/35/85, 52eFG%, 61%ts, 1.92 assist:turnover (+3.2 on/off)
Westbrook: 42/34/83, 47eFG%, 54%ts, 1.85 assist:turnover (+16.0 on/off)
There is literally no way possible that you can say that Kawhi or Harden are "more efficient" than LeBron.