Old Man Game wrote:You guys bringing up Russ' age relative to other players are missing the point. We're stuck in a sort of dead end cycle here, too good to improve through the draft, unable to attract free agents, unlikely to swing game changing trades. His age is immaterial to this assessment. The only things his age is relevant to is how many years of futility you are willing to endure before pulling the plug and how much you are going to get for him in return when you finally do.
Why are we too good to improve through the draft? We have a few movable assets and a pick that could combine to get us into the range where kawhi, giannis, George, hayward, Thompson, Adams, mccollum were picked. We have a pick that will be in the range or earlier than where Butler, Draymond, Gobert, Middleton, Jokic, Gasol, Teague, George Hill, Serge, Reggie, vucevic, ginobili, Parker were all picked. The notion that you can't get help unless you're picking in the top 5 is ridiculous. We're not getting cupcake/AD/LeBron but realistically only one team gets those guys and at best you're still at like a 25% shot of getting them.
Can we define futility? Because I wouldn't consider 7 games above .500 futility. We're on pace for 46 wins and the schedule actually eases up a bit. Futility would be what teams like minny, sac, Philly, and Orlando have been for the last 5 years. 3 of those teams dumped all their good players for youth. Philly did it unabashedly and they are still terrible and if Embiid continues down this road may not be better for another 3 years.