Political Roundtable Part XIII
Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33
Political Roundtable Part XIII
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 70,082
- And1: 22,489
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Political Roundtable Part XIII
This is the continuation of the Wizards Board Political Forum.
This forum is not for the faint of heart. We live in interesting and contentious times and this forum reflects that reality. Participants are very opinionated and some of these opinions may be shocking or upsetting to others. If you don't want to be confronted with opinions significantly contrary to your own, don't enter this thread.
The moderators will vigorously enforce the RealGM Terms of Service but we are not interested in limiting speech. So, no trolling, no name calling and no inciting.
This forum is not for the faint of heart. We live in interesting and contentious times and this forum reflects that reality. Participants are very opinionated and some of these opinions may be shocking or upsetting to others. If you don't want to be confronted with opinions significantly contrary to your own, don't enter this thread.
The moderators will vigorously enforce the RealGM Terms of Service but we are not interested in limiting speech. So, no trolling, no name calling and no inciting.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 70,082
- And1: 22,489
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
Kanyewest wrote:FYI, I just learned that China is phasing out steel and coal plants and they have agreed to a carbon tax (only a few states in the US). So they are doing more in terms of policy than the US.
Sent from my LG-D851 using RealGM mobile app
I'll believe it when I see it.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- Induveca
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,379
- And1: 724
- Joined: Dec 02, 2004
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
Kanyewest wrote:FYI, I just learned that China is phasing out steel and coal plants and they have agreed to a carbon tax (only a few states in the US). So they are doing more in terms of policy than the US.
Sent from my LG-D851 using RealGM mobile app
They're trying to stop using steel made from recycled scrap metal. Ironically a ton of that scrap metal is bought from US scrapyards.
Fascinating article on how Chinese businesses turn 1 pound of US scrap metals valued at 1 dollar into as much as 10 dollars per pound.
https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2013-08-29/to-a-chinese-scrap-metal-hunter-americas-trash-is-treasure
For instance hdmi cables have copper, but getting that copper means melting off the rubber (which they also recycle). But the ramifications of the chemicals used to separate all of the component materials weakens the quality, and the process itself causes pollution.
Note, they aren't ending scrap to steel due to pollution, but the questionable quality of recycled steel from scrap. The hundreds of other recyclables other than steel are still going strong.
Coal is a larger issue, the tens of thousands of factories using coal and ancient filtration systems is causing the vast majority of the pollution issues in China. The US had the same issues in the 40s and 50s when they were a manufacturing powerhouse. The pictures of Pittsburgh, Trenton and NYC in the 40s are similar to bad days in Beijing or Shenzhen today. And just like the US, they're now realizing the pollution makes them weak as a society, and in various marketplaces.
People tend to forget China is still very much a work in progress. And the agreement to pay a carbon tax? Carbon tax schemes are a whole other issue.....mostly used for blackmail and profit in governmental circles.
Just saying none of the things they announced are noble or evil, but required in their current environment of extreme pollution, and the eventual impact on their citizenry and competitive openings for opposition by foreign government and corporations.
Also, Kanye read about Pittsburgh and other US industrial cities choked by pollution in the 40s/50s. They announced much of the same, less coal more natural gas etc.....China is hardly trailblazing a path here.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 70,082
- And1: 22,489
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
Induveca wrote:They're trying to stop using steel made from recycled scrap metal. Ironically a ton of that scrap metal is bought from US scrapyards.
Fascinating article on how Chinese businesses turn 1 pound of US scrap metals valued at 1 dollar into as much as 10 dollars per pound.
https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2013-08-29/to-a-chinese-scrap-metal-hunter-americas-trash-is-treasure
For instance hdmi cables have copper, but getting that copper means melting off the rubber (which they also recycle). But the ramifications of the chemicals used to separate all of the component materials weakens the quality, and the process itself causes pollution.
Note, they aren't ending scrap to steel due to pollution, but the questionable quality of recycled steel from scrap. The hundreds of other recyclables other than steel are still going strong.
In the fire protection industry, Chinese manufactured pipe is notorious for corroding quickly.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,112
- And1: 4,965
- Joined: Jul 16, 2005
- Location: The Streets of DC
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- Induveca
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,379
- And1: 724
- Joined: Dec 02, 2004
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
This feels like a iOS vs Android Fanboy argument at times.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- sfam
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,462
- And1: 548
- Joined: Aug 03, 2007
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
nate wrote:Sorry sfam, you're the one that sounds a little unhinged here. The notion that Trump has a 40 year history of "assaulting women" is just outright slander. There is no question that Trump is a cad and has surely bedded a lot of women, perhaps when married, but that's a heck of a lot different than assault.
To say Trump HAS NOT sexually assaulted women, which prompted my response - in addition to dismissing Trump's own words where he says he does this without permission, where he says he walks in on women changing because he owns the pageant and all the rest, you have to dismiss all of these women who came forward. This list missed those that came after the middle of October, but I think you get the point. These are not new stories, never have been.
Spoiler:
Again, some people still believe Bill Cosby is without fault, so I don't doubt the power to suspend disbelief. But none of these people benefited from coming forward. Quite the opposite in fact- they were hounded by Trumps Trolls.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- FAH1223
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,287
- And1: 7,382
- Joined: Nov 01, 2005
- Location: Laurel, MD
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
Induveca wrote:Kanyewest wrote:FYI, I just learned that China is phasing out steel and coal plants and they have agreed to a carbon tax (only a few states in the US). So they are doing more in terms of policy than the US.
Sent from my LG-D851 using RealGM mobile app
They're trying to stop using steel made from recycled scrap metal. Ironically a ton of that scrap metal is bought from US scrapyards.
Fascinating article on how Chinese businesses turn 1 pound of US scrap metals valued at 1 dollar into as much as 10 dollars per pound.
https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2013-08-29/to-a-chinese-scrap-metal-hunter-americas-trash-is-treasure
For instance hdmi cables have copper, but getting that copper means melting off the rubber (which they also recycle). But the ramifications of the chemicals used to separate all of the component materials weakens the quality, and the process itself causes pollution.
Note, they aren't ending scrap to steel due to pollution, but the questionable quality of recycled steel from scrap. The hundreds of other recyclables other than steel are still going strong.
Coal is a larger issue, the tens of thousands of factories using coal and ancient filtration systems is causing the vast majority of the pollution issues in China. The US had the same issues in the 40s and 50s when they were a manufacturing powerhouse. The pictures of Pittsburgh, Trenton and NYC in the 40s are similar to bad days in Beijing or Shenzhen today. And just like the US, they're now realizing the pollution makes them weak as a society, and in various marketplaces.
People tend to forget China is still very much a work in progress. And the agreement to pay a carbon tax? Carbon tax schemes are a whole other issue.....mostly used for blackmail and profit in governmental circles.
Just saying none of the things they announced are noble or evil, but required in their current environment of extreme pollution, and the eventual impact on their citizenry and competitive openings for opposition by foreign government and corporations.
Also, Kanye read about Pittsburgh and other US industrial cities choked by pollution in the 40s/50s. They announced much of the same, less coal more natural gas etc.....China is hardly trailblazing a path here.
With their hundreds of billions in renewable energy investments
Plus building 3rd and 4th generation nuclear power plants
And policies aimed at reducing coal burning...
I think in 15 years you'll see China's smog cities dramatically cleaner

Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- Induveca
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,379
- And1: 724
- Joined: Dec 02, 2004
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
Agreed, 15-20 years. That's about how long it took Pittsburgh to get things under control.
My point was that them announcing they desired to clean up their horrible smog wasn't a noble cause, nor a novel idea as implied. All current and former Western European, US and Japanese manufacturing cities have been down the same path.
My point was that them announcing they desired to clean up their horrible smog wasn't a noble cause, nor a novel idea as implied. All current and former Western European, US and Japanese manufacturing cities have been down the same path.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,624
- And1: 1,672
- Joined: Mar 25, 2004
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
Question about infrastructure spending (a priority for the administration during the campaign).
The gas tax is supposed to be the source for construction and upkeep of roads, bridges, etc. However, it hasn't risen in roughly 25+ years (I think around 1990). With vastly improved fuel efficiency standards, all cars are getting the proverbial bang for the buck, and paying less for upkeep. As a result, the funding gap has been covered increasingly from the general tax revenue (i.e the income tax). What do you do? More and more people are not buying cars (the # of people applying for licenses has dramatically decreased in recent years), cars themselves are becoming vastly more fuel efficient, and some cars do not pay anything (pure electric cars).
Ideally, we'd switch over to a mileage-based system where the # of miles you drive equates to the tax owed. Its far fairer all around. The issue is privacy and how you handle it. Today's cars already have onboard computers to store odometer information. I know Oregon & California have piloted voluntary VMT options.
Raising the gas tax is political suicide it seems (aside from Senator Corker, don't think the GOP is too keen on it) but I think it needs to be done. The gas tax is the most equatable tax as it (in theory) is a user-fee such that only drivers pay for the construction and upkeep of roads. But, all taxpayers are forced to pay for it with the increasing gap.
Thoughts?
The gas tax is supposed to be the source for construction and upkeep of roads, bridges, etc. However, it hasn't risen in roughly 25+ years (I think around 1990). With vastly improved fuel efficiency standards, all cars are getting the proverbial bang for the buck, and paying less for upkeep. As a result, the funding gap has been covered increasingly from the general tax revenue (i.e the income tax). What do you do? More and more people are not buying cars (the # of people applying for licenses has dramatically decreased in recent years), cars themselves are becoming vastly more fuel efficient, and some cars do not pay anything (pure electric cars).
Ideally, we'd switch over to a mileage-based system where the # of miles you drive equates to the tax owed. Its far fairer all around. The issue is privacy and how you handle it. Today's cars already have onboard computers to store odometer information. I know Oregon & California have piloted voluntary VMT options.
Raising the gas tax is political suicide it seems (aside from Senator Corker, don't think the GOP is too keen on it) but I think it needs to be done. The gas tax is the most equatable tax as it (in theory) is a user-fee such that only drivers pay for the construction and upkeep of roads. But, all taxpayers are forced to pay for it with the increasing gap.
Thoughts?
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- pineappleheadindc
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 22,118
- And1: 3,479
- Joined: Dec 17, 2001
- Location: Cabin John, MD
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
mhd wrote:Question about infrastructure spending (a priority for the administration during the campaign).
The gas tax is supposed to be the source for construction and upkeep of roads, bridges, etc. However, it hasn't risen in roughly 25+ years (I think around 1990). With vastly improved fuel efficiency standards, all cars are getting the proverbial bang for the buck, and paying less for upkeep. As a result, the funding gap has been covered increasingly from the general tax revenue (i.e the income tax). What do you do? More and more people are not buying cars (the # of people applying for licenses has dramatically decreased in recent years), cars themselves are becoming vastly more fuel efficient, and some cars do not pay anything (pure electric cars).
Ideally, we'd switch over to a mileage-based system where the # of miles you drive equates to the tax owed. Its far fairer all around. The issue is privacy and how you handle it. Today's cars already have onboard computers to store odometer information. I know Oregon & California have piloted voluntary VMT options.
Raising the gas tax is political suicide it seems (aside from Senator Corker, don't think the GOP is too keen on it) but I think it needs to be done. The gas tax is the most equatable tax as it (in theory) is a user-fee such that only drivers pay for the construction and upkeep of roads. But, all taxpayers are forced to pay for it with the increasing gap.
Thoughts?
Yup, I find the gas tax to be the most fair tax around. IMO, if we need to raise it because of an infrastructure gap, so be it. It may also increase bus/train use, ride sharing, and reduce driving (pollution). These are okay outcomes IMO.
"Wheresoever you go, go with all your heart."
--Confucius
"Try not. Do or do not. There is no try"
- Yoda
--Confucius
"Try not. Do or do not. There is no try"
- Yoda
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- SUPERBALLMAN
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,546
- And1: 1,276
- Joined: Aug 08, 2006
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
DCZards wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/13/AR2009031303486.html
http://fortune.com/2017/01/20/barack-obama-donald-trump-country-moodys/
"I love it when a plan comes together" - Colonel John "Hannibal" Smith
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- SUPERBALLMAN
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,546
- And1: 1,276
- Joined: Aug 08, 2006
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
"I love it when a plan comes together" - Colonel John "Hannibal" Smith
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- SUPERBALLMAN
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,546
- And1: 1,276
- Joined: Aug 08, 2006
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
My personal experience is after putting a Make America Great Again sign in front of my home I had the sign and my mailbox smashed. I also received an anonymous letter delivered by mail which was filled with profanities calling me an A$$ Hole and rambled on about how Trump was as evil as satan.
"I love it when a plan comes together" - Colonel John "Hannibal" Smith
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,461
- And1: 20,138
- Joined: May 28, 2010
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
SUPERBALLMAN wrote:My personal experience is after putting a Make America Great Again sign in front of my home I had the sign and my mailbox smashed. I also received an anonymous letter delivered by mail which was filled with profanities calling me an A$$ Hole and rambled on about how Trump was as evil as satan.
Well, they do seem to have the moral high ground right now (Trump seeming to be the moral low ground). And they do seem to feel that the ends justifies the means.
And I think they are hurt and puzzled by the election - a rejections of sorts if you will. And rejection often causes surges of anger and aggression that we take out on those around us - you happen to be close by - I would just ignore it and become less of a target.
Guess you will have to become one of the silent majority.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,112
- And1: 4,965
- Joined: Jul 16, 2005
- Location: The Streets of DC
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
dckingsfan wrote:Well, they do seem to have the moral high ground right now (Trump seeming to be the moral low ground). And they do seem to feel that the ends justifies the means.
And I think they are hurt and puzzled by the election - a rejections of sorts if you will. And rejection often causes surges of anger and aggression that we take out on those around us - you happen to be close by - I would just ignore it and become less of a target.
Guess you will have to become one of the silent majority.
I'm curious. Who are referring to as the "silent majority"?
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 70,082
- And1: 22,489
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
sfam wrote:nate wrote:Sorry sfam, you're the one that sounds a little unhinged here. The notion that Trump has a 40 year history of "assaulting women" is just outright slander. There is no question that Trump is a cad and has surely bedded a lot of women, perhaps when married, but that's a heck of a lot different than assault.
To say Trump HAS NOT sexually assaulted women, which prompted my response - in addition to dismissing Trump's own words where he says he does this without permission, where he says he walks in on women changing because he owns the pageant and all the rest, you have to dismiss all of these women who came forward. This list missed those that came after the middle of October, but I think you get the point. These are not new stories, never have been.Spoiler:
Again, some people still believe Bill Cosby is without fault, so I don't doubt the power to suspend disbelief. But none of these people benefited from coming forward. Quite the opposite in fact- they were hounded by Trumps Trolls.
Trump has been a target for 40 years because he's rich and a known womanizer. The fact that some unsubstantiated allegations exist means nothing. And any 10-year-old allegation that came forward in the past year involving known Democrat operative attorneys like Gloria Allred are HIGHLY suspect.
Every one of those instances that could conceivably be characterized as "assault" have been vehemently denied by Trump and there is no proof of any of them whatsoever. Most are highly suspect because they occurred in public places but have no witnesses, or the allegations came forth many years later after Trump was on the verge of winning the presidency.
I'm not saying Trump is a saint. There is no doubt in my mind that he has spent much of his life objectifying women. I just don't think it's uniquely awful or even all that surprising. I'd say his behavior is roughly in line with about half of the rich and famous people in Hollywood and politics. When you are rich, powerful and reasonably good looking, you get used to many women throwing themselves at you and you eventually learn to treat all of them with much less respect. It's certainly not a good character trait, but it's not the same thing as assault.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 70,082
- And1: 22,489
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
SUPERBALLMAN wrote:My personal experience is after putting a Make America Great Again sign in front of my home I had the sign and my mailbox smashed. I also received an anonymous letter delivered by mail which was filled with profanities calling me an A$$ Hole and rambled on about how Trump was as evil as satan.
You got off easy. Since you had a Trump sign, you are basically a neo-Nazi; and as I understand it, it is now okay to assault a Nazi.
Indeed, we won't hear any stories about violent attacks and vandalism against Trump supporters in the news, even when the events are caught on video. But if a Muslim woman alleges that some guy told her to go back home, it'll make all the major newspapers.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,461
- And1: 20,138
- Joined: May 28, 2010
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
DCZards wrote:dckingsfan wrote:Well, they do seem to have the moral high ground right now (Trump seeming to be the moral low ground). And they do seem to feel that the ends justifies the means.
And I think they are hurt and puzzled by the election - a rejections of sorts if you will. And rejection often causes surges of anger and aggression that we take out on those around us - you happen to be close by - I would just ignore it and become less of a target.
Guess you will have to become one of the silent majority.
I'm curious. Who are referring to as the "silent majority"?
Zards - it is what Trump supporters think of themselves. I don't think they are a majority (which is what I think you are getting at) in any sense but they were undetected in the pools (well under represented). Super brings up an issue - they get told that they were evil for voting for Trump - so (often) they learn to be quiet.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- Kanyewest
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,343
- And1: 2,719
- Joined: Jul 05, 2004
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
Induveca wrote:Kanyewest wrote:FYI, I just learned that China is phasing out steel and coal plants and they have agreed to a carbon tax (only a few states in the US). So they are doing more in terms of policy than the US.
Sent from my LG-D851 using RealGM mobile app
They're trying to stop using steel made from recycled scrap metal. Ironically a ton of that scrap metal is bought from US scrapyards.
Fascinating article on how Chinese businesses turn 1 pound of US scrap metals valued at 1 dollar into as much as 10 dollars per pound.
https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2013-08-29/to-a-chinese-scrap-metal-hunter-americas-trash-is-treasure
For instance hdmi cables have copper, but getting that copper means melting off the rubber (which they also recycle). But the ramifications of the chemicals used to separate all of the component materials weakens the quality, and the process itself causes pollution.
Note, they aren't ending scrap to steel due to pollution, but the questionable quality of recycled steel from scrap. The hundreds of other recyclables other than steel are still going strong.
Coal is a larger issue, the tens of thousands of factories using coal and ancient filtration systems is causing the vast majority of the pollution issues in China. The US had the same issues in the 40s and 50s when they were a manufacturing powerhouse. The pictures of Pittsburgh, Trenton and NYC in the 40s are similar to bad days in Beijing or Shenzhen today. And just like the US, they're now realizing the pollution makes them weak as a society, and in various marketplaces.
People tend to forget China is still very much a work in progress. And the agreement to pay a carbon tax? Carbon tax schemes are a whole other issue.....mostly used for blackmail and profit in governmental circles.
Just saying none of the things they announced are noble or evil, but required in their current environment of extreme pollution, and the eventual impact on their citizenry and competitive openings for opposition by foreign government and corporations.
Also, Kanye read about Pittsburgh and other US industrial cities choked by pollution in the 40s/50s. They announced much of the same, less coal more natural gas etc.....China is hardly trailblazing a path here.
Interesting points. BTW, why do you conclude that a carbon tax is being used for blackmail by the government? How would you encourage businesses from lowering carbon emissions?