could you have gottan Boogie and Burler

bleedblue3303 · Post #1 » by **bleedblue3303** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 6:06 pm

Just wondering was discussing last night. Do you think you had the assets to get Boogie and Butler? Did Angie value the Bk picks to highly should the move have been to go after Boogie Cousins withe this years BK first and Butler with next years.

Just curious to see what you all thought.

jmr07019 · Post #2 » by **jmr07019** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 6:07 pm

yes we had the assets and yes we should have gotten both of those guys to go with IT, Horford and Crowder. That's my opinion, most of the board however is happy we didn't get cousins.

_UnderScore · Post #3 » by **_UnderScore** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 6:13 pm

Maybe. Maybe not. Was it worth it to mortgage our future to try and go all in and win now? Ainge didn't seem to think so, and he is better at his job than I am.

DarkAzcura · Post #4 » by **DarkAzcura** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 6:14 pm

Doesn't seem like it if the King's are as high on Hield as people have been reporting.

The Bulls have been asking for the moon, and any deal with them seems to start with Brown and/or BKN17. To match Sac's perceived value of Hield and NOP's pick, the Celtics would need to also use Brown and/or BKN17. Pretty hard to get both if you need the same assets to get both.

Homerclease · Post #5 » by **Homerclease** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 6:15 pm

Hard to turn down Burler, I hear he's pretty strong

truth18 · Post #6 » by **truth18** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 6:15 pm

Gottan? Burler?

Take a **** second to read the forum and see that we already have a Cousins thread.

CeltsfanSinceBirth · Post #7 » by **CeltsfanSinceBirth** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 6:17 pm

Homerclease wrote:Hard to turn down Burler, I hear he's pretty strong

I would have traded the next 20 years of 1st round picks for Burler. There is no easier path to a championship than by having uniforms that don't have lumps or loose threads. Burler solves those problems.

Banks2Pierce · Post #8 » by **Banks2Pierce** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 6:19 pm

jmr07019 wrote:yes we had the assets and yes we should have gotten both of those guys to go with IT, Horford and Crowder. That's my opinion, most of the board however is happy we didn't get cousins.

I'm not fully sure of this. What do you think the price for Cousins for us would have been?

truth18 · Post #9 » by **truth18** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 6:21 pm

CeltsfanSinceBirth wrote:
Homerclease wrote:Hard to turn down Burler, I hear he's pretty strong

I would have traded the next 20 years of 1st round picks for Burler. There is no easier path to a championship than by having uniforms that don't have lumps or loose threads. Burler solves those problems.

Burler?

Burler?

Burler?

BigTrade92 · Post #10 » by **BigTrade92** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 6:36 pm

Jackie Burler is a stud.

Post #11 » by **Darth Celtic** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 6:44 pm

who the **** is burler?

Post #12 » by **canman1971** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 7:01 pm

Guys we have a trade rumors thread. Also, when a trade happen, as in the Cousins' case, there is a thread for that. Try reading through them. I bet you will get your answer.