Political Roundtable Part XIII
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- Kanyewest
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,495
- And1: 2,783
- Joined: Jul 05, 2004
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
Trump should stop quoting the fake media
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/320316-trump-clarifies-remarks-on-nonexistent-sweden-incident-i-got-it
Sent from my LG-D851 using RealGM mobile app
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/320316-trump-clarifies-remarks-on-nonexistent-sweden-incident-i-got-it
Sent from my LG-D851 using RealGM mobile app
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- gtn130
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,512
- And1: 2,740
- Joined: Mar 18, 2009
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII

Unfettered assault on privacy here. Cannot fathom having to hand over my device pin and account passwords in order to re-enter the US.
Trump supporters are cool with this because they think they will never be targeted. Laughably short-sighted.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- Induveca
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,379
- And1: 724
- Joined: Dec 02, 2004
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
Kanyewest wrote:Induveca wrote:Kanyewest wrote:FYI, I just learned that China is phasing out steel and coal plants and they have agreed to a carbon tax (only a few states in the US). So they are doing more in terms of policy than the US.
Sent from my LG-D851 using RealGM mobile app
They're trying to stop using steel made from recycled scrap metal. Ironically a ton of that scrap metal is bought from US scrapyards.
Fascinating article on how Chinese businesses turn 1 pound of US scrap metals valued at 1 dollar into as much as 10 dollars per pound.
https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2013-08-29/to-a-chinese-scrap-metal-hunter-americas-trash-is-treasure
For instance hdmi cables have copper, but getting that copper means melting off the rubber (which they also recycle). But the ramifications of the chemicals used to separate all of the component materials weakens the quality, and the process itself causes pollution.
Note, they aren't ending scrap to steel due to pollution, but the questionable quality of recycled steel from scrap. The hundreds of other recyclables other than steel are still going strong.
Coal is a larger issue, the tens of thousands of factories using coal and ancient filtration systems is causing the vast majority of the pollution issues in China. The US had the same issues in the 40s and 50s when they were a manufacturing powerhouse. The pictures of Pittsburgh, Trenton and NYC in the 40s are similar to bad days in Beijing or Shenzhen today. And just like the US, they're now realizing the pollution makes them weak as a society, and in various marketplaces.
People tend to forget China is still very much a work in progress. And the agreement to pay a carbon tax? Carbon tax schemes are a whole other issue.....mostly used for blackmail and profit in governmental circles.
Just saying none of the things they announced are noble or evil, but required in their current environment of extreme pollution, and the eventual impact on their citizenry and competitive openings for opposition by foreign government and corporations.
Also, Kanye read about Pittsburgh and other US industrial cities choked by pollution in the 40s/50s. They announced much of the same, less coal more natural gas etc.....China is hardly trailblazing a path here.
Interesting points. BTW, why do you conclude that a carbon tax is being used for blackmail by the government? How would you encourage businesses from lowering carbon emissions?
The top 20 Fortune 500 Chinese companies (around 90 or so of them) are 100% state owned, the rest the state controls (don't forget they are quasi-communist). Nearly all of them are bank or energy producing companies. China's goal for decades has been to enrich the country via industrial means.
In a government well known for currency manipulation, how can a carbon tax administered by government owned utilities, supplied by government owned mining, then billed to government owned/financed manufacturing be taken seriously?
They'll reduce emissions, for their own health.....much like the US and EU did in the mid 1900s. No other reason, their corporate culture is hyper-competitive.
They'll participate in multi-national carbon tax/global warming talks, play nice and bide their time. They'll be the last to "implement" after production and energy costs have increased everywhere but China.
Then? More creative accounting in the interesting stew of communism where China 100% owns their largest companies, and owns a substantial piece of ALL public companies.
Anyone who expects them to take a financial hit for the environment, and distribute a revenue-neutral tax back to its people is being quite naive. Good bargaining chip though.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
-
DCZards
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,158
- And1: 5,007
- Joined: Jul 16, 2005
- Location: The Streets of DC
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
Kanyewest wrote:Trump should stop quoting the fake media
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/320316-trump-clarifies-remarks-on-nonexistent-sweden-incident-i-got-it
Sent from my LG-D851 using RealGM mobile app
Well, I'm sure one of the Trump's supporters on this board will tell us why it was "pure genius" on his part to use Fox's fake story.
It's about time #45 hired some fact-checkers...isn't it? This is Sweden incident stuff is even stupider (and more dangerous) than that nonsense Trump said about having "the biggest electoral college win since Ronald Reagan."
But, then again, I guess with Trump and his administration we're going to have to get used to living in a world of "alternative facts."
This is just another example of why we absolutely MUST have a media that questions what this guy says and does.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- Kanyewest
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,495
- And1: 2,783
- Joined: Jul 05, 2004
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
CPAC cancels Milo as Speaker. http://m.sfgate.com/entertainment/the-wrap/article/CPAC-Cancels-Milo-Yiannopoulos-as-Speaker-Over-10945829.php
Sent from my LG-D851 using RealGM mobile app
Sent from my LG-D851 using RealGM mobile app
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- sfam
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,462
- And1: 548
- Joined: Aug 03, 2007
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
Lets give the guy credit, it looks like Trump picked a reasonable National Security Advisor.
Even his critics who hate Trump love the pick:
I was fully prepared for Bolton, but am happily surprised I was wrong. Yes, there is like full military folk everywhere in the Trump presidency, but I think Trump, who goes by image first (flag officers connote power), will find that the military is a pretty process oriented place. I doubt the team Trump has assembled will go for quick, ill-thought out ideas. They may actually put a check on his worse tendencies.
Even his critics who hate Trump love the pick:
I was fully prepared for Bolton, but am happily surprised I was wrong. Yes, there is like full military folk everywhere in the Trump presidency, but I think Trump, who goes by image first (flag officers connote power), will find that the military is a pretty process oriented place. I doubt the team Trump has assembled will go for quick, ill-thought out ideas. They may actually put a check on his worse tendencies.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- sfam
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,462
- And1: 548
- Joined: Aug 03, 2007
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
SUPERBALLMAN wrote:My personal experience is after putting a Make America Great Again sign in front of my home I had the sign and my mailbox smashed. I also received an anonymous letter delivered by mail which was filled with profanities calling me an A$$ Hole and rambled on about how Trump was as evil as satan.
This is pretty horrible. Sorry about that. Violence is almost never a good idea, especially for things like this. Really hope you don't get any more stalking behavior like the letters.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- sfam
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,462
- And1: 548
- Joined: Aug 03, 2007
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
nate33 wrote:sfam wrote:nate wrote:Sorry sfam, you're the one that sounds a little unhinged here. The notion that Trump has a 40 year history of "assaulting women" is just outright slander. There is no question that Trump is a cad and has surely bedded a lot of women, perhaps when married, but that's a heck of a lot different than assault.
To say Trump HAS NOT sexually assaulted women, which prompted my response - in addition to dismissing Trump's own words where he says he does this without permission, where he says he walks in on women changing because he owns the pageant and all the rest, you have to dismiss all of these women who came forward. This list missed those that came after the middle of October, but I think you get the point. These are not new stories, never have been.Spoiler:
Again, some people still believe Bill Cosby is without fault, so I don't doubt the power to suspend disbelief. But none of these people benefited from coming forward. Quite the opposite in fact- they were hounded by Trumps Trolls.
Trump has been a target for 40 years because he's rich and a known womanizer. The fact that some unsubstantiated allegations exist means nothing. And any 10-year-old allegation that came forward in the past year involving known Democrat operative attorneys like Gloria Allred are HIGHLY suspect.
Every one of those instances that could conceivably be characterized as "assault" have been vehemently denied by Trump and there is no proof of any of them whatsoever. Most are highly suspect because they occurred in public places but have no witnesses, or the allegations came forth many years later after Trump was on the verge of winning the presidency.
I'm not saying Trump is a saint. There is no doubt in my mind that he has spent much of his life objectifying women. I just don't think it's uniquely awful or even all that surprising. I'd say his behavior is roughly in line with about half of the rich and famous people in Hollywood and politics. When you are rich, powerful and reasonably good looking, you get used to many women throwing themselves at you and you eventually learn to treat all of them with much less respect. It's certainly not a good character trait, but it's not the same thing as assault.
Like I said, suspension of disbelief is always possible, even when the man states the words as plainly as day.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- sfam
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,462
- And1: 548
- Joined: Aug 03, 2007
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
nate33 wrote:SUPERBALLMAN wrote:My personal experience is after putting a Make America Great Again sign in front of my home I had the sign and my mailbox smashed. I also received an anonymous letter delivered by mail which was filled with profanities calling me an A$$ Hole and rambled on about how Trump was as evil as satan.
You got off easy. Since you had a Trump sign, you are basically a neo-Nazi; and as I understand it, it is now okay to assault a Nazi.
Indeed, we won't hear any stories about violent attacks and vandalism against Trump supporters in the news, even when the events are caught on video. But if a Muslim woman alleges that some guy told her to go back home, it'll make all the major newspapers.
If its not clear (I'm guessing it is), if you ask me, there are very very few times violence ever actually succeeds, and is almost always a bad idea. Like literally, if your outcome is to change a policy, remove a dictator, or discredit a President, just simply by the numbers, you are far less likely to succeed as a movement by resorting to violence. I really hope the movements involved with this - the ones that will drive long term engagement - learn and understand this.
As instability in a society increases, the norms holding the society together come under stress. Violence becomes more normal. When the country is rich in violence already, as we are with thousands upon thousands of random gun deaths a year, the propensity for violent response increases with the chance in instability.
Instability can be measured in changes in tone through news analytics. I tend to use the GDELT Project for that. If you're a data scientist, this is one of the largest open data sets in the world. It has an event dataset of violent events and protests, and a taxonomy set of hundreds of items that articles are tracked to. You can literally track changes in tone over time, and create word clouds for the most influential people driving the instability.
As an aside, it probably won't shock you to find out that Trump is dead center of the influence for instability, in both news and in social media monitoring.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
-
payitforward
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,807
- And1: 9,196
- Joined: May 02, 2012
- Location: On the Atlantic
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
SUPERBALLMAN wrote:
Oh no... now that's asking too much! I mean...
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- gtn130
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,512
- And1: 2,740
- Joined: Mar 18, 2009
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
gtn130 wrote:
Unfettered assault on privacy here. Cannot fathom having to hand over my device pin and account passwords in order to re-enter the US.
Trump supporters are cool with this because they think they will never be targeted. Laughably short-sighted.
So are Trump acolytes on board with this or nah?
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
-
nuposse04
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,310
- And1: 2,468
- Joined: Jul 20, 2004
- Location: on a rock
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
Kanyewest wrote:CPAC cancels Milo as Speaker. http://m.sfgate.com/entertainment/the-wrap/article/CPAC-Cancels-Milo-Yiannopoulos-as-Speaker-Over-10945829.php
Sent from my LG-D851 using RealGM mobile app
That video of him on twitter was fairly vile. Dude actually tried to justify pedophilia.
It'll be interesting to see if he remains the poster boy for the alt right. Dude is a scum bag, through and through.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
-
dckingsfan
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,094
- And1: 20,559
- Joined: May 28, 2010
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
sfam wrote:nate33 wrote:SUPERBALLMAN wrote:My personal experience is after putting a Make America Great Again sign in front of my home I had the sign and my mailbox smashed. I also received an anonymous letter delivered by mail which was filled with profanities calling me an A$$ Hole and rambled on about how Trump was as evil as satan.
You got off easy. Since you had a Trump sign, you are basically a neo-Nazi; and as I understand it, it is now okay to assault a Nazi.
Indeed, we won't hear any stories about violent attacks and vandalism against Trump supporters in the news, even when the events are caught on video. But if a Muslim woman alleges that some guy told her to go back home, it'll make all the major newspapers.
If its not clear (I'm guessing it is), if you ask me, there are very very few times violence ever actually succeeds, and is almost always a bad idea. Like literally, if your outcome is to change a policy, remove a dictator, or discredit a President, just simply by the numbers, you are far less likely to succeed as a movement by resorting to violence. I really hope the movements involved with this - the ones that will drive long term engagement - learn and understand this.
Cosign!!
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- gtn130
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,512
- And1: 2,740
- Joined: Mar 18, 2009
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
Oh, look, Trump supporters shouting down Dexter Fowler for having an opinion. I thought only the smug coastal elites who live in a bubble do that
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- TGW
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,388
- And1: 6,792
- Joined: Oct 22, 2010
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
Kanyewest wrote:CPAC cancels Milo as Speaker. http://m.sfgate.com/entertainment/the-wrap/article/CPAC-Cancels-Milo-Yiannopoulos-as-Speaker-Over-10945829.php
Sent from my LG-D851 using RealGM mobile app
Milo is apparently not just a racist idiot, but also a member of NAMBLA.
Freakin weirdo.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
-
dckingsfan
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,094
- And1: 20,559
- Joined: May 28, 2010
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
gtn130 wrote:
Oh, look, Trump supporters shouting down Dexter Fowler for having an opinion. I thought only the smug coastal elites who live in a bubble do that
It's like Kaepernick kneeling anyone athletes should be allowed to have their opinions. Fowler's comments were not inflammatory - the comments back, not so much.
It is one of the biggest concerns I have with this country right now - is the lack of free speech.
We should consider this when we have the dialog in this thread - so much of the country never gets to have these kind of dialogs.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
-
payitforward
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,807
- And1: 9,196
- Joined: May 02, 2012
- Location: On the Atlantic
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
nate33 wrote:sfam wrote:nate wrote:Sorry sfam, you're the one that sounds a little unhinged here. The notion that Trump has a 40 year history of "assaulting women" is just outright slander. There is no question that Trump is a cad and has surely bedded a lot of women, perhaps when married, but that's a heck of a lot different than assault.
To say Trump HAS NOT sexually assaulted women, which prompted my response - in addition to dismissing Trump's own words where he says he does this without permission, where he says he walks in on women changing because he owns the pageant and all the rest, you have to dismiss all of these women who came forward. This list missed those that came after the middle of October, but I think you get the point. These are not new stories, never have been.Spoiler:
Again, some people still believe Bill Cosby is without fault, so I don't doubt the power to suspend disbelief. But none of these people benefited from coming forward. Quite the opposite in fact- they were hounded by Trumps Trolls.
Trump has been a target for 40 years because he's rich and a known womanizer. The fact that some unsubstantiated allegations exist means nothing. And any 10-year-old allegation that came forward in the past year involving known Democrat operative attorneys like Gloria Allred are HIGHLY suspect.
Every one of those instances that could conceivably be characterized as "assault" have been vehemently denied by Trump and there is no proof of any of them whatsoever. Most are highly suspect because they occurred in public places but have no witnesses, or the allegations came forth many years later after Trump was on the verge of winning the presidency.
I'm not saying Trump is a saint. There is no doubt in my mind that he has spent much of his life objectifying women. I just don't think it's uniquely awful or even all that surprising. I'd say his behavior is roughly in line with about half of the rich and famous people in Hollywood and politics. When you are rich, powerful and reasonably good looking, you get used to many women throwing themselves at you and you eventually learn to treat all of them with much less respect. It's certainly not a good character trait, but it's not the same thing as assault.
So... here's what you said, nate:
1. "The fact that some unsubstantiated allegations exist means nothing." -- "Some," nate? Haven't there been quite a large number of them? Hasn't he in fact stated explicitly that he engages in this activity repeatedly? So... how does that combination "mean nothing" pray tell?
2. "any 10-year-old allegation that came forward in the past year involving known Democrat operative attorneys like Gloria Allred are HIGHLY suspect." I.e. they're suspect in that they come from a political enemy -- at least that's what I take you to mean. Then again, we wouldn't expect to see them coming from his political allies, would we? Are allegations of corruption against the Clintons also "HIGHLY suspect" if they come from political enemies of the Clintons? In short, don't negative allegations often (maybe usually) come from an enemy rather than a friend? Does that mean they are "suspect" by definition?
Should they be cast aside, or should the issues be investigated? Lets say corruption in the case of the Clintons & sexual assault in the case of Trump? Both? Neither? Only investigate the Clintons? Only Trump?
3. "Every one of those instances that could conceivably be characterized as "assault" have been vehemently denied by Trump and there is no proof of any of them whatsoever." If denied, then eo ipso false? If denied, then eo ipso not worth investigating? Oh, and isn't admitting & bragging about it a kind of "proof?" If not of any particular one of these instances "vehemently denied by Trump" then a fortiori of others? No? He's lying, & the women are too?
4. "I'd say his behavior is roughly in line with about half of the rich and famous people in Hollywood and politics." Forgive me for asking, nate, but how the hell would you know, if you don't mind explaining...?
5. "When you are rich, powerful and reasonably good looking, you get used to many women throwing themselves at you and you eventually learn to treat all of them with much less respect. It's certainly not a good character trait, but it's not the same thing as assault."
Tell me this: where did anyone suggest that what you describe would be the same thing as assault? But, once again, in this thread not for the faint of heart, how the hell would you know whether that's true? & how would you know whether/& how often women have been "throwing themselves at" Donald Trump? How the hell would you know what Donald Trump eventually learned about how "to treat all of them?"
In fact, you don't know any of this stuff, do you nate? In fact, you just made it all up. It's a common debating technique -- to shift the ground of what's being discussed. In this case, you confected a little tale that turns Donald Trump's admitted -- hell, self-proclaimed! -- pattern of putting his hands on women's privates into the unfortunate result of "women throwing themselves at" him.
Good job, nate: you just made them, the women, responsible for Trump's self-proclaimed groping. You might want to ask yourself whether you really want to do that. Whether you want to sink to that in order to defend this guy.
5. "Most are highly suspect because they occurred in public places but have no witnesses, or the allegations came forth many years later after Trump was on the verge of winning the presidency." But, neither of those facts mean a thing. The first is false as a generalization; many occurred in not at all public places.
The 2d, that women made the allegations public when doing so could harm the person who assaulted them, doesn't make them suspect either. Do you think it's easy for a woman to come out and say "that 'rich & powerful' (to use your designation) man assaulted me?" Or do you think it might be a difficult thing to do? Seems to me that when you feel maybe you can actually get back at the perpetrator might be the time you screw up your courage. Would that be hard for you to understand?
None of the above proves that Donald Trump did or didn't do anything, of course. And "where there's smoke there's fire" is neither legally significant nor always true.
Hence, if you like, you can continue to dismiss all this & blame women for how Donald Trump brags that he treats them. But, in that case, it might be sensible to avoid trying to take the higher moral ground anywhere else in this thread. The moral grime with which you'll have covered yourself doesn't come off that easily.
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
-
payitforward
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,807
- And1: 9,196
- Joined: May 02, 2012
- Location: On the Atlantic
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
SUPERBALLMAN wrote:My personal experience is after putting a Make America Great Again sign in front of my home I had the sign and my mailbox smashed. I also received an anonymous letter delivered by mail which was filled with profanities calling me an A$$ Hole and rambled on about how Trump was as evil as satan.
Oh he's much worse than Satan... Hell, even Putin is worse than Satan....
No, really, what I meant to write was this -- did the dork who wrote the letter include a return address? If so, you can write him back. You know... be loving, peaceful, prove how wrong he is. Oh, and make him pay to fix the mailbox! No... you described "an anonymous letter." Too bad.
I'm no Trump fan, but I hope you responded by putting up an even bigger sign!
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
-
payitforward
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,807
- And1: 9,196
- Joined: May 02, 2012
- Location: On the Atlantic
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
nate33 wrote:SUPERBALLMAN wrote:My personal experience is after putting a Make America Great Again sign in front of my home I had the sign and my mailbox smashed. I also received an anonymous letter delivered by mail which was filled with profanities calling me an A$$ Hole and rambled on about how Trump was as evil as satan.
You got off easy. Since you had a Trump sign, you are basically a neo-Nazi; and as I understand it, it is now okay to assault a Nazi.
Indeed, we won't hear any stories about violent attacks and vandalism against Trump supporters in the news, even when the events are caught on video. But if a Muslim woman alleges that some guy told her to go back home, it'll make all the major newspapers.
More standard debating technique, right?
SBM describes a pretty nasty experience, & you reply by recontextualizing it to make it a) even worse, b) indicative of other, even more worse stuff, & c) evidence that the mainstream media favor any random Muslim over folks who have suffered "violent attacks and vandalism" b/c they are Trump supporters.
What's especially great is that to get all that rhetorical benefit no more was required save to reframe SBM's personal account of a personal event that involved him & 1 other person.
It's a great way to incite people against a whole group, let me tell you. Right out of the totalitarian playbook!
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
- SUPERBALLMAN
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,653
- And1: 1,336
- Joined: Aug 08, 2006
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XIII
payitforward wrote:SUPERBALLMAN wrote:My personal experience is after putting a Make America Great Again sign in front of my home I had the sign and my mailbox smashed. I also received an anonymous letter delivered by mail which was filled with profanities calling me an A$$ Hole and rambled on about how Trump was as evil as satan.
Oh he's much worse than Satan... Hell, even Putin is worse than Satan....
No, really, what I meant to write was this -- did the dork who wrote the letter include a return address? If so, you can write him back. You know... be loving, peaceful, prove how wrong he is. Oh, and make him pay to fix the mailbox! No... you described "an anonymous letter." Too bad.
I'm no Trump fan, but I hope you responded by putting up an even bigger sign!
Thanks, no it had no return address, and the letter itself gave me the impression it was written by someone with mental problems, very rambling, lots of profanity and references to God and the bible. I was actually worried something bad might happen.
But I think the letter, mailbox and sign were done by different people. I also had some trash thrown, and the occasional person yell F you as they drove by. I did tape the sign and put it back up btw.
"I love it when a plan comes together" - Colonel John "Hannibal" Smith










