ImageImageImage

Is SVG realizing KCP is our best option??

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

In SVG We Trust
Starter
Posts: 2,016
And1: 1,399
Joined: Mar 14, 2016
   

Re: RE: Re: Is SVG realizing KCP is our best option?? 

Post#61 » by In SVG We Trust » Sun Feb 26, 2017 1:18 pm

Pharaoh wrote:
In SVG We Trust wrote:Again, you only can win nowadays with a good defensive C. Every offensive mind oriented big man is struggling to translate his game into wins. That's the game right now, and we're playing an old and inefficient basketball.


That's the original post Matt.

If you wanna jump in, hitch your wagon to this guy go hard mate

I stated it's incorrect, named 5 bigs to boot

Throw in the fact he's been trying to flame me for months...


Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app

I don't know

Why you can't

Understand basketball

But it's pretty clear

You're almost always wrong

And you never get tired

To lose arguing

With every guy here
hadzi dogg
Senior
Posts: 508
And1: 32
Joined: Feb 21, 2011

Re: RE: Re: Is SVG realizing KCP is our best option?? 

Post#62 » by hadzi dogg » Sun Feb 26, 2017 10:58 pm

Pharaoh wrote:
In SVG We Trust wrote:Again, you only can win nowadays with a good defensive C. Every offensive mind oriented big man is struggling to translate his game into wins. That's the game right now, and we're playing an old and inefficient basketball.


That's the original post Matt.

If you wanna jump in, hitch your wagon to this guy go hard mate

I stated it's incorrect, named 5 bigs to boot

Throw in the fact he's been trying to flame me for months...


Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app


Horford and Millsap isn't a good argument because they are both plus defensive players. Blake Griffin is an elite offensive talent and he isn't the Center, Deandre Jordan is and he is a defensive player of the year candidate.

You're argument is pretty dumb honestly. He is saying offensive oriented big man as: If your center is a plus on offense but a minus on defense it is tough to win. Your argument to that is naming a bunch of big men that have offensive skill on teams with great defensive bigs.

Obviously if your big man has offensive skills your team can do good but there needs to be an emphasis on the defensive end from that position.
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Is SVG realizing KCP is our best option?? 

Post#63 » by Pharaoh » Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:46 am

hadzi dogg wrote:
Pharaoh wrote:
In SVG We Trust wrote:Again, you only can win nowadays with a good defensive C. Every offensive mind oriented big man is struggling to translate his game into wins. That's the game right now, and we're playing an old and inefficient basketball.


That's the original post Matt.

If you wanna jump in, hitch your wagon to this guy go hard mate

I stated it's incorrect, named 5 bigs to boot

Throw in the fact he's been trying to flame me for months...


Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app


Horford and Millsap isn't a good argument because they are both plus defensive players. Blake Griffin is an elite offensive talent and he isn't the Center, Deandre Jordan is and he is a defensive player of the year candidate.

You're argument is pretty dumb honestly. [b]He is saying offensive oriented big man as: If your center is a plus on offense but a minus on defense it is tough to win. [b]Your argument to that is naming a bunch of big men that have offensive skill on teams with great defensive bigs.

Obviously if your big man has offensive skills your team can do good but there needs to be an emphasis on the defensive end from that position.


To the bold - that's not what he said
Maybe he should have worded his post differently?

JV is not a defensive C - he's vital to the Raps winning games

LMA is not a defensive C - he's vital to SA winning games

Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Is SVG realizing KCP is our best option?? 

Post#64 » by Pharaoh » Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:56 am

In SVG We Trust wrote:
Pharaoh wrote:
In SVG We Trust wrote:Again, you only can win nowadays with a good defensive C. Every offensive mind oriented big man is struggling to translate his game into wins. That's the game right now, and we're playing an old and inefficient basketball.


That's the original post Matt.

If you wanna jump in, hitch your wagon to this guy go hard mate

I stated it's incorrect, named 5 bigs to boot

Throw in the fact he's been trying to flame me for months...


Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app

I don't know

Why you can't

Understand basketball

But it's pretty clear

You're almost always wrong

And you never get tired

To lose arguing

With every guy here

Yeah man just like that time when I said Rubio was what we needed and a lot of people said "No way!"

Fast forward 2 weeks and now it's like "yeah man Rubio is like Ish but a little better so it makes perfect sense"

I've seen, played in and coached more games than you've had hot dinners my man!

I've been posting online about basketball for 15 years - I've been wrong many times and don't mind admitting it...unlike some!

When you make blanket statements that are obviously incorrect you should be called on them.

If you meant your big man has to be a defensive C then you should have said that - although that's incorrect too cause JV & LMA prove that.

Fact is the C position is a dying spot - not because there are no defensive Cs or good offensive Cs though

The traditional C is a dead weight because very few can read the floor and make plays!

The stretch 4 is becoming the playmaking 4 & you're seeing it happen at the 5 as well - NBA defenses are too good and coaches have learnt that having playmakers at as many positions as possible is the way to go.

Kinda a European thing so one would think you'd get that better than most

Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 48,956
And1: 12,461
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: Is SVG realizing KCP is our best option?? 

Post#65 » by BadMofoPimp » Mon Feb 27, 2017 6:09 pm

Snakebites wrote:KCP is still wildly inconsistent though.

Its easy to forget but for every game like last night there's at least one where he's an absolute brick layer. Hoping he gets more consistent soon.


Reminds me of Westbrook/Harden about 4 years ago. They were exactly like that.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: Is SVG realizing KCP is our best option?? 

Post#66 » by Blkbrd671 » Tue Feb 28, 2017 2:31 am

BadMofoPimp wrote:
Snakebites wrote:KCP is still wildly inconsistent though.

Its easy to forget but for every game like last night there's at least one where he's an absolute brick layer. Hoping he gets more consistent soon.


Reminds me of Westbrook/Harden about 4 years ago. They were exactly like that.


i believe stats indicate that the more usage KCP gets, the better player he becomes in terms of filling up the stat sheet. Unforunately i believe his defensive stats suffer though. Finding balance obviously is part of development
sc8581
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,876
And1: 766
Joined: Jul 22, 2013

Re: Is SVG realizing KCP is our best option?? 

Post#67 » by sc8581 » Tue Feb 28, 2017 4:10 pm

Blkbrd671 wrote:
BadMofoPimp wrote:
Snakebites wrote:KCP is still wildly inconsistent though.

Its easy to forget but for every game like last night there's at least one where he's an absolute brick layer. Hoping he gets more consistent soon.


Reminds me of Westbrook/Harden about 4 years ago. They were exactly like that.


i believe stats indicate that the more usage KCP gets, the better player he becomes in terms of filling up the stat sheet. Unforunately i believe his defensive stats suffer though. Finding balance obviously is part of development


His defensive stats also suffer from having to defend the opposing teams best perimeter scorer and not having a rim protector behind him. So basically Reggie and Dre hurt him on both ends.
In SVG We Trust
Starter
Posts: 2,016
And1: 1,399
Joined: Mar 14, 2016
   

Re: Is SVG realizing KCP is our best option?? 

Post#68 » by In SVG We Trust » Tue Feb 28, 2017 4:23 pm

KCP defensive stats being in Utah would be impressive.
coordinator0
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,311
And1: 1,383
Joined: Nov 11, 2008

Re: Is SVG realizing KCP is our best option?? 

Post#69 » by coordinator0 » Tue Feb 28, 2017 5:33 pm

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter
El Chivo
Starter
Posts: 2,317
And1: 978
Joined: Jun 19, 2015
Location: Roma
       

Re: Is SVG realizing KCP is our best option?? 

Post#70 » by El Chivo » Tue Feb 28, 2017 5:42 pm

KCP and Harris should share at least 30 shots per night
You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.
duncansmithnba
Ballboy
Posts: 30
And1: 64
Joined: Feb 03, 2017
         

Re: Is SVG realizing KCP is our best option?? 

Post#71 » by duncansmithnba » Tue Feb 28, 2017 7:56 pm

El Chivo wrote:KCP and Harris should share at least 30 shots per night


Basically, this.
DBC10
General Manager
Posts: 9,963
And1: 2,829
Joined: Jun 01, 2013
 

Re: Is SVG realizing KCP is our best option?? 

Post#72 » by DBC10 » Tue Feb 28, 2017 8:50 pm

The bulk of the offense should run primarily through Tobias and KCP with Ish being the guy that sets these guys up and facilitate.

Which I agree with.
vic
Veteran
Posts: 2,619
And1: 1,101
Joined: Dec 27, 2012

Re: Is SVG realizing KCP is our best option?? 

Post#73 » by vic » Tue Feb 28, 2017 8:54 pm

Which is why he does better without RJ. RJ is the new Josh Smith. Ego inflated athleticism dependent chucker addition by subtraction.
You need 2-way wings, 2-way shooting bigs, and you can't allow low iq players on the court. Assist/turnover ratio is crucial. Shooting point guards are icing on the cake IF they are plus defenders.
Weaver & Casey, govern yourselves accordingly!
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 50,927
And1: 18,063
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: Is SVG realizing KCP is our best option?? 

Post#74 » by Snakebites » Thu Mar 2, 2017 3:29 pm

So yeah.

Last night's game is a pretty good illustration of why KCP really can't be our "best option", not if we're going to be any good.

Games like this aren't a majority, but they're frequent enough that he really can't be our best scorer.

I'm definitely open to seeing how things go with him as a bigger part of the offense (we frankly don't have much to lose in that regard), but yeah, if he's our best option, we're in trouble.
Billl
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,218
And1: 3,352
Joined: Sep 06, 2013

Re: Is SVG realizing KCP is our best option?? 

Post#75 » by Billl » Thu Mar 2, 2017 5:40 pm

Not often? He's missed double digits 16 times this season already. I like him as a second or 3rd option, but he's streaky. If his outside shot isn't falling, he doesn't really have anything else where can consistently get points. His handle is much improved, but he's not one of those guys that has a natural feel for taking it in the lane and forcing the action.
User avatar
ComboGuardCity
RealGM
Posts: 25,969
And1: 4,896
Joined: Jul 10, 2010

Re: Is SVG realizing KCP is our best option?? 

Post#76 » by ComboGuardCity » Thu Mar 2, 2017 5:42 pm

Stan is giving KCP too many minutes. He needs to scale back or he's gonna burn him out.
need4detroit
Analyst
Posts: 3,422
And1: 769
Joined: Apr 20, 2010
       

Re: Is SVG realizing KCP is our best option?? 

Post#77 » by need4detroit » Thu Mar 2, 2017 10:58 pm

ComboGuardCity wrote:Stan is giving KCP too many minutes. He needs to scale back or he's gonna burn him out.

Too many minutes with Reggie Jakcson will turn any shooting guard insane.
Detroit Sports Videos http://www.youtube.com/user/need4detroit
bkseven wrote:He's between average and above average.
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: Is SVG realizing KCP is our best option?? 

Post#78 » by Pharaoh » Fri Mar 3, 2017 12:28 am

I wonder how many of those poor offensive games are a result of not getting the ball in good positions early to get him going?

It's not as simple as "he had a poor game offensively & shot like crap"

You gotta look at the quality of shots he's getting in the offense, especially at the beginning of games

Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app

Return to Detroit Pistons