ImageImageImageImageImage

Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42)

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

danfantastk32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,993
And1: 1,958
Joined: Dec 20, 2015
     

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#121 » by danfantastk32 » Sat Mar 4, 2017 6:28 am

Good game for that 2nd unit. After that showboat dunk, we brought some life, and cut that deficit a ton. Bench still has some fight. Good for them.

Just go look at the +- tonight. Pretty much tells the story of who came to play. When your 19-42....you can take nights off, apparently.
mambo
Sophomore
Posts: 120
And1: 25
Joined: Jan 02, 2016
 

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#122 » by mambo » Sat Mar 4, 2017 6:50 am

Mark MEdina:

"David Nwaba said he'll be back w/ D-Fenders tomorrow & then back with the Lakers on Sunday"

MONSTER
User avatar
BEazy
RealGM
Posts: 10,101
And1: 2,497
Joined: Aug 06, 2010
     

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#123 » by BEazy » Sat Mar 4, 2017 7:08 am

Glad I spent my time at the gym than watch this game lol
Image

Long Live The Black Mamba. Kobe Bean Bryant Laker For Life. 8/24
NoseBleedLakers
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,484
And1: 343
Joined: Jan 29, 2011
Location: 1 hour North of Staples
     

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#124 » by NoseBleedLakers » Sat Mar 4, 2017 10:02 am

Ain't no better feeling being a Laker fan than falling asleep before tip-off in what ends up being another blowout loss anyways lmfao.

Big shout out to the Celtics, Sixers, Magic, Suns, and Mavs for all winning tonight and allowing these losers to grab sole possession of last place in the West and second-worst overall. That Laker tank still well on its way to making its rounds to the lottery. #TankCity
Spens1
RealGM
Posts: 13,865
And1: 3,879
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
     

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#125 » by Spens1 » Sat Mar 4, 2017 11:11 am

This one hurts. To lose to the damn celitcs by 20. where is their pride for the jersey ffs.
cashflo
Senior
Posts: 713
And1: 131
Joined: Jun 24, 2008

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#126 » by cashflo » Sat Mar 4, 2017 12:57 pm

Nwaba
Ballerhogger
RealGM
Posts: 47,741
And1: 17,306
Joined: Jul 06, 2014
       

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#127 » by Ballerhogger » Sat Mar 4, 2017 1:05 pm

Spens1 wrote:This one hurts. To lose to the damn celitcs by 20. where is their pride for the jersey ffs.

Getting closer to the fire sale point.
Ballerhogger
RealGM
Posts: 47,741
And1: 17,306
Joined: Jul 06, 2014
       

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#128 » by Ballerhogger » Sat Mar 4, 2017 1:06 pm

Can we just black purple alt unfiorms and the white ones, for the rest of the year?
User avatar
iamworthy
RealGM
Posts: 20,137
And1: 8,916
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Ring City!!!
   

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#129 » by iamworthy » Sat Mar 4, 2017 3:26 pm

Ingram 0-2 for the entire game???? Really...... Kid should be putting up at least 15 shots a game.
Image
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,799
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#130 » by Slava » Sat Mar 4, 2017 3:31 pm

Nick young is like herpes, no one wants it.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
Michael Lucky
RealGM
Posts: 15,140
And1: 6,789
Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#131 » by Michael Lucky » Sat Mar 4, 2017 4:16 pm

iamworthy wrote:Ingram 0-2 for the entire game???? Really...... Kid should be putting up at least 15 shots a game.

Yeah I don't understand it either. He wasn't drafted to ball watch.
Landsberger
General Manager
Posts: 9,146
And1: 2,001
Joined: Jul 04, 2016
 

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#132 » by Landsberger » Sat Mar 4, 2017 4:48 pm

Michael Lucky wrote:
iamworthy wrote:Ingram 0-2 for the entire game???? Really...... Kid should be putting up at least 15 shots a game.

Yeah I don't understand it either. He wasn't drafted to ball watch.


He was out of the flow when he was in there. He was also in constant foul trouble. That said he passed out of shooting situations several times in the first quarter that I saw as well.
User avatar
iamworthy
RealGM
Posts: 20,137
And1: 8,916
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Ring City!!!
   

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#133 » by iamworthy » Sat Mar 4, 2017 5:26 pm

Ingram's offensive troubles are as puzzling as if we got lonzo ball here next year and he did the same thing.
Image
DS17
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,563
And1: 1,399
Joined: Mar 08, 2015
 

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#134 » by DS17 » Sat Mar 4, 2017 7:42 pm

:(
SlimShady83
RealGM
Posts: 14,565
And1: 4,406
Joined: Jun 19, 2012

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#135 » by SlimShady83 » Sat Mar 4, 2017 11:04 pm

Y'all willing to give your fav Dlo a year and Randle a year as well. So stop bagging on Ingram. It's only been just over a half a season for him. Heck some of you have such a hard on for DLO and still giving him up slack.

Give Ingram some time. FFS
My Go Team
Magic, Jordan, Pippen, Duncan, Shaq

My Counter
Stockton, Kobe, Bird, Rodman, Dirk

Today's Team
Luka, SGA, Tatum, Giannis, Wemby
User avatar
TylersLakers
RealGM
Posts: 10,961
And1: 2,867
Joined: Jan 20, 2006
Location: Winnipeg Canada
     

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#136 » by TylersLakers » Sat Mar 4, 2017 11:05 pm

iamworthy wrote:Ingram's offensive troubles are as puzzling as if we got lonzo ball here next year and he did the same thing.


I just think of what we're running and I don't think he's comfortable with it but he's playing the good soldier role because that's what kind of guy he is. I honestly think you have to use him as a Kobe type player. Ball on the wing, dribble the crap out of the ball, pick and roll with him as the ball handler, etc. And, we just can't play like that.
Image
Spens1
RealGM
Posts: 13,865
And1: 3,879
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
     

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#137 » by Spens1 » Sun Mar 5, 2017 12:29 am

iamworthy wrote:Ingram's offensive troubles are as puzzling as if we got lonzo ball here next year and he did the same thing.


To be fair if Lonzo struggled offensively I wouldn't be that surprised. His shot is U.G.L.Y

I honestly hope we get #1 and get Fultz, he seems like the franchise P.G out of the top 2.
Princeinrevolt
Rookie
Posts: 1,220
And1: 529
Joined: May 05, 2015
       

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#138 » by Princeinrevolt » Sun Mar 5, 2017 1:58 am

skullz wrote:Y'all willing to give your fav Dlo a year and Randle a year as well. So stop bagging on Ingram. It's only been just over a half a season for him. Heck some of you have such a hard on for DLO and still giving him up slack.

Give Ingram some time. FFS

DLO gets the most hate out of any player man, what are you talking about. And the thing is Russell doesn't deserve a lot of the hate he gets, Ingram kind of does tbh. Even though not a lot of people hate on Ingram anyways. But Ingram has always been a project, so we shouldn't hate on him, if he just had a reliable shot, he would be a really good player this year. But unfortunately he doesn't. There is a stats that shows Ingram is one of the best in the NBA in driving after closeouts but he doesn't use it often because defenders lay off him a lot for his terrible shooting. The reason he had such an amazing game against the Spurs is because they like to closeout on everyone, so Ingram attacked all those closeouts, and had an extremely efficient night. Ingram should try to gain some weight in the summer (Not too much to prevent injury), and work on his shooting 24/7. He could be a good player by next season!!
danfantastk32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,993
And1: 1,958
Joined: Dec 20, 2015
     

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#139 » by danfantastk32 » Sun Mar 5, 2017 11:03 am

skullz wrote:Y'all willing to give your fav Dlo a year and Randle a year as well. So stop bagging on Ingram. It's only been just over a half a season for him. Heck some of you have such a hard on for DLO and still giving him up slack.

Give Ingram some time. FFS


I think that all 3 players should be given 3 years before the "book is written". But that doesn't mean that Ingram hasn't been absolutely horrible this year. If you go look at the PER this season, Ingram is 337 of 346 players in the NBA.

PER is not the be-all-end-all...but it's a decent statistic showing your overall value. Don't believe me?? Go look up the top 30..and your gonna essentially see the all-star roster. Couple exceptions....but you'll get the point.

So 9th worst in the entire NBA?? Hell there's at least 50 drafted behind him just this year. Have even half of those gotten a sliver of the chance this guy has got? It's worrisome.

Frankly it's all of them! We were a 17 win team last year. Lots of rookies......Kobe's farewell.....last year was the "lowest of the low" right? So how come with Randle, Russell, Clarkson, Nance, all a year older....and this super-stud #2 pick rookie we're only like 4-5 wins better? It's been a disappointing year for the whole team.
User avatar
iamworthy
RealGM
Posts: 20,137
And1: 8,916
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Ring City!!!
   

Re: Game 62: They who must not be named (39-22) @ Los Angeles Lakers (19-42) 

Post#140 » by iamworthy » Sun Mar 5, 2017 6:20 pm

TylersLakers wrote:
iamworthy wrote:Ingram's offensive troubles are as puzzling as if we got lonzo ball here next year and he did the same thing.


I just think of what we're running and I don't think he's comfortable with it but he's playing the good soldier role because that's what kind of guy he is. I honestly think you have to use him as a Kobe type player. Ball on the wing, dribble the crap out of the ball, pick and roll with him as the ball handler, etc. And, we just can't play like that.


Luke needs to figure out the best way to use him then because Ingram is far better offensively then what he's showing. His offensive production at duke is very real.
Image

Return to Los Angeles Lakers