DROB27 wrote:therealbig3 wrote:DROB27 wrote:
Who have they really played those two years?? Curry has came back to earth this team is clearly weaker then the last couple of years without KD..
Not the Spurs, because they couldn't help but choke the last couple of years.
Bitter Spurs fan is bitter.
And the Warriors are worse without KD compared to the last couple of years because they have worse depth...it's not really rocket science, they sacrificed depth to add a top-tier talent, and that top-tier talent is now injured, of course they're gonna be worse.
But they've also only had like 3 games without KD, I expect them to get a lot better the more they get used to it.
why would I be bitter , my team has been a contender for the last 19 years .. winning must be new to you guys
talk about a choke? Dubs blew a 3 -1 in the finals
LOL, I'm not a Warriors fan. But you're clearly bitter, because they surpassed your team (clearly) for the last 2 years now, and you've been doing nothing but looking up at them in the standings.
Warriors also came back from 3-1 down and beat the team that handed the Spurs their asses (OKC). I'd rather lose in the Finals than in the 2nd round.
I'm just tired of all the Spurs fans talking trash about the Warriors, and everyone talking about how the Spurs would beat them...Spurs have to prove they're even good enough to play them in the playoffs, because they've dropped the ball on that front for the last 2 years.
It's also ironic to question who the Warriors have beaten in the playoffs, when the Spurs of all teams were incredibly lucky in the years they won. They never beat a Lakers squad that was at their best, there were always injuries or in-fighting that allowed the Spurs to win. Not to mention players getting suspended in 2007, and Ibaka getting hurt in 2014. I'd take the 2016 Thunder over any of the teams the Spurs beat on the way to their titles.
