PG: Oklahoma City Thunder (89) - Dallas Mavericks (104)

Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

Player(s) of the Game

Steven Adams | 19 PTS (8-10 FG) 5 REB
5
50%
Russell Westbrook | 29 PTS (8-24 FG) 5 AST
0
No votes
Enes Kanter | 16 PTS (7-14 FG) 10 REB
5
50%
 
Total votes: 10

User avatar
Thabo Sefolosha
Thunder Forum The Opening Tip
Posts: 3,426
And1: 6,662
Joined: Oct 29, 2013
 

PG: Oklahoma City Thunder (89) - Dallas Mavericks (104) 

Post#1 » by Thabo Sefolosha » Mon Mar 6, 2017 3:57 am

Image OKLAHOMA CITY THUNDER   at   DALLAS MAVERICKS Image
Imagehttp://www.espn.com/nba/game?gameId=400900327

Image


Image
User avatar
Osirus89
Starter
Posts: 2,148
And1: 2,017
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
   

Re: PG: Oklahoma City Thunder (89) - Dallas Mavericks (104) 

Post#2 » by Osirus89 » Mon Mar 6, 2017 4:05 am

Good news: They said Russ actually has 14 technicals so he won't be suspended.
Bad news: It won't matter whether he plays or not, the team is playing like trash.
Don't know if I want to watch anymore games until Victor returns. Just awful...

Oh and Norris Cole effin sucks. Send his azz back to China.
Thundershock88
Starter
Posts: 2,301
And1: 2,234
Joined: Jul 08, 2015

Re: PG: Oklahoma City Thunder (89) - Dallas Mavericks (104) 

Post#3 » by Thundershock88 » Mon Mar 6, 2017 4:07 am

Whole team is Garbagio. Not looking forward to this next stretch.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: PG: Oklahoma City Thunder (89) - Dallas Mavericks (104) 

Post#4 » by bondom34 » Mon Mar 6, 2017 4:11 am

Image
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,340
And1: 19,166
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: PG: Oklahoma City Thunder (89) - Dallas Mavericks (104) 

Post#5 » by ThunderBolt » Mon Mar 6, 2017 4:22 am

Not voting. We don't have the time or assets to build around Russ. I've been on the fence about it all season. It's official.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: PG: Oklahoma City Thunder (89) - Dallas Mavericks (104) 

Post#6 » by spearsy23 » Mon Mar 6, 2017 4:28 am

Knrstz wrote:Not voting. We don't have the time or assets to build around Russ. I've been on the fence about it all season. It's official.

On the flip side, if this keeps happening then maybe we'll put everybody on the block so we can build an actual team. We have like 6 guys playing that you hope develop into something, most teams don't have that many on their roster. At least those pieces are movable, trade them all and get vets that maybe aren't great players but are at least ready to play. There's no harm in mortgaging the future when there is no future.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: PG: Oklahoma City Thunder (89) - Dallas Mavericks (104) 

Post#7 » by bondom34 » Mon Mar 6, 2017 4:31 am

Oh and there's time. Not even getting into it now, but I enjoy a team that can consistently win games. I'd rather be a Grizz fan the last 5 years than a Bucks fan.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
InTheSabonus
Pro Prospect
Posts: 762
And1: 548
Joined: Dec 20, 2016
 

Re: PG: Oklahoma City Thunder (89) - Dallas Mavericks (104) 

Post#8 » by InTheSabonus » Mon Mar 6, 2017 4:56 am

spearsy23 wrote:
Knrstz wrote:Not voting. We don't have the time or assets to build around Russ. I've been on the fence about it all season. It's official.

On the flip side, if this keeps happening then maybe we'll put everybody on the block so we can build an actual team. We have like 6 guys playing that you hope develop into something, most teams don't have that many on their roster. At least those pieces are movable, trade them all and get vets that maybe aren't great players but are at least ready to play. There's no harm in mortgaging the future when there is no future.


Something that pisses me off is that we have so many roster spots spent on either similar players that contribute nothing offensively, or contribute nothing at all.

It's arguably redundant to have both Roberson and Grant on a roster. But Roberson, Grant and Huestis?

Singler and Semaj contribute nothing on either end. And giving Singler a 5 year deal...

Collison is a roster spot used on a guy for his veteran leadership. I get that. Don't mind using one roster spot on him. But it's when you combine it with the five roster spots spent on Roberson, Grant, Huestis, Semaj and Singler...How many roster spots are we going to use on guys that contribute nothing offensively, or nothing at all? Why is it so many? Why can't we use roster spots on guys that can reliably help Russ?
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: PG: Oklahoma City Thunder (89) - Dallas Mavericks (104) 

Post#9 » by bondom34 » Mon Mar 6, 2017 4:57 am

InTheSabonus wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:
Knrstz wrote:Not voting. We don't have the time or assets to build around Russ. I've been on the fence about it all season. It's official.

On the flip side, if this keeps happening then maybe we'll put everybody on the block so we can build an actual team. We have like 6 guys playing that you hope develop into something, most teams don't have that many on their roster. At least those pieces are movable, trade them all and get vets that maybe aren't great players but are at least ready to play. There's no harm in mortgaging the future when there is no future.


Something that pisses me off is that we have so many roster spots spent on either similar players that contribute nothing offensively, or contribute nothing at all.

It's arguably redundant to have both Roberson and Grant on a roster. But Roberson, Grant and Huestis?

Singler and Semaj contribute nothing on either end. And giving Singler a 5 year deal...

Collison is a roster spot used on a guy for his veteran leadership. I get that. Don't mind using one roster spot on him. But it's when you combine it with the five roster spots spent on Roberson, Grant, Huestis, Semaj and Singler...How many roster spots are we going to use on guys that contribute nothing offensively, or nothing at all? Why is it so many? Why can't we use roster spots on guys that can reliably help Russ?

I want to say something positive tonight before I go to bed.

Your username is possibly my favorite on RealGM.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
oken
Pro Prospect
Posts: 826
And1: 429
Joined: Jun 24, 2016
 

Re: PG: Oklahoma City Thunder (89) - Dallas Mavericks (104) 

Post#10 » by oken » Mon Mar 6, 2017 6:26 am

As a guy noted in the main game thread, what this team seriously lacks is toughness which has vaporized from the team the moment Adams decided to slow down a bit. Maybe he has some kind of injury that he does not want to aggravate idk but the lack of toughness and defensive leadership will kill them. That's why I still don't understand why Presti traded Ersan who ticks all the boxes for OKC's obivous needs atm. He was the leader in taking charges and I don't remember any more player (maybe Perk) that sets more screens all throughout the game. He even had a decent 3-pt shooting. Why Presti, why?
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: PG: Oklahoma City Thunder (89) - Dallas Mavericks (104) 

Post#11 » by Pillendreher » Mon Mar 6, 2017 9:43 am

Just embarassing.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
oken
Pro Prospect
Posts: 826
And1: 429
Joined: Jun 24, 2016
 

Re: PG: Oklahoma City Thunder (89) - Dallas Mavericks (104) 

Post#12 » by oken » Mon Mar 6, 2017 4:25 pm

On the other news:
- Jazz barely won against Boogie-less Sacramento (they also seem to be slumping)
- Miami continues to roll over east side after an embarrassing loss to Orlando (D-Wait hit 40% 3-pt and.. 20% 2-pts)
- Pels won against LA Lamers and it seems the sickness of Asik was not Gentrynitis but rather Gastrogentrytis. He caught some bacteria during his Mexico visit! I wonder if it was tacos..
http://www.sbnation.com/nba/2017/3/1/14783870/ty-lawson-has-gastroenteritis-asked-instagram-for-a-bomb-taco-spot

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder