ImageImageImageImageImage

Game 64: Los Angeles Lakers (19-44) @ Dallas Mavericks (26-36) - 8:30 PM ET

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

User avatar
iamworthy
RealGM
Posts: 20,137
And1: 8,916
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Ring City!!!
   

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles Lakers (19-44) @ Dallas Mavericks (26-36) - 8:30 PM ET 

Post#41 » by iamworthy » Wed Mar 8, 2017 3:55 am

Read on Twitter
Image
User avatar
TylersLakers
RealGM
Posts: 10,961
And1: 2,867
Joined: Jan 20, 2006
Location: Winnipeg Canada
     

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles Lakers (19-44) @ Dallas Mavericks (26-36) - 8:30 PM ET 

Post#42 » by TylersLakers » Wed Mar 8, 2017 4:04 am

Probably the best offensive game from the young core. Clarkson, Randle, Russell, Nance, Ingram. Outside of Nance and Clarkson, probably one of the worst defensive games from that group as well.
Image
Landsberger
General Manager
Posts: 9,146
And1: 2,001
Joined: Jul 04, 2016
 

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles Lakers (19-44) @ Dallas Mavericks (26-36) - 8:30 PM ET 

Post#43 » by Landsberger » Wed Mar 8, 2017 4:08 am

TylersLakers wrote:Probably the best offensive game from the young core. Clarkson, Randle, Russell, Nance, Ingram. Outside of Nance and Clarkson, probably one of the worst defensive games from that group as well.


Those 2 played just "bad" defense. :lol:

The late 4th offense was against tackling dummy defense by Dallas. Not sure that should count. :lol:
danfantastk32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,993
And1: 1,958
Joined: Dec 20, 2015
     

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles Lakers (19-44) @ Dallas Mavericks (26-36) - 8:30 PM ET 

Post#44 » by danfantastk32 » Wed Mar 8, 2017 4:24 am

Landsberger wrote:
TylersLakers wrote:Probably the best offensive game from the young core. Clarkson, Randle, Russell, Nance, Ingram. Outside of Nance and Clarkson, probably one of the worst defensive games from that group as well.


Those 2 played just "bad" defense. :lol:

The late 4th offense was against tackling dummy defense by Dallas. Not sure that should count. :lol:


Yeah...I had a long last couple days. Sorta nodded off late-3rd. Missed most of the 4th. I see we cut it down to 11-12 points. Sounds like they had their deep-bench in. Couldn't say for sure, though. =0)

Grats to Dirk on the 30k
Grats to Randle on the tripple-dub.
User avatar
TylersLakers
RealGM
Posts: 10,961
And1: 2,867
Joined: Jan 20, 2006
Location: Winnipeg Canada
     

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles Lakers (19-44) @ Dallas Mavericks (26-36) - 8:30 PM ET 

Post#45 » by TylersLakers » Wed Mar 8, 2017 4:25 am

I also think Corey Brewer will have a significant role off the bench next season. If Deng wants to play at all next season, he better bring it.
Image
danfantastk32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,993
And1: 1,958
Joined: Dec 20, 2015
     

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles Lakers (19-44) @ Dallas Mavericks (26-36) - 8:30 PM ET 

Post#46 » by danfantastk32 » Wed Mar 8, 2017 4:25 am

Just need Phoenix to win it. It'll be a great night
User avatar
KobeBryant24
Veteran
Posts: 2,514
And1: 2,167
Joined: Aug 06, 2014
Location: Savannah, GA
     

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles Lakers (19-44) @ Dallas Mavericks (26-36) - 8:30 PM ET 

Post#47 » by KobeBryant24 » Wed Mar 8, 2017 5:38 am

:cry: We are so trash
User avatar
Danny Darko
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 18,606
And1: 5,968
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
         

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles Lakers (19-44) @ Dallas Mavericks (26-36) - 8:30 PM ET 

Post#48 » by Danny Darko » Wed Mar 8, 2017 7:50 am

KobeBryant24 wrote::cry: We are so keeping our pick


fixed :D
Image
NoseBleedLakers
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,484
And1: 343
Joined: Jan 29, 2011
Location: 1 hour North of Staples
     

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles Lakers (19-44) @ Dallas Mavericks (26-36) - 8:30 PM ET 

Post#49 » by NoseBleedLakers » Wed Mar 8, 2017 9:23 am

There's just not enough words to describe how pathetic and unwatchable this team is. These losers literally make basketball look like rocket science lol.

3 years, 11 months, 6 days. That's how long it has been since the last time this crap franchise last beat the Mavs. That's 14 straight losses. **** impressive :rofl: :rofl:

Most importantly though is that the Laker tank continues to improve the chances of their consolation prize of a lottery pick in June. Well played loss tonight. :clap:
User avatar
tugs
RealGM
Posts: 16,878
And1: 2,994
Joined: Jul 22, 2010

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles Lakers (19-44) @ Dallas Mavericks (26-36) - 8:30 PM ET 

Post#50 » by tugs » Wed Mar 8, 2017 12:21 pm

Basing on this game, I really don't think Russell and Clarkson can coexist as long as Russ is PG and JC is the designated scorer. I like any combo of JC-Nwaba/Ennis and DLo-Nwaba/Ennis.

I like Nwaba-DLo starting and Ennis-JC.
danfantastk32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,993
And1: 1,958
Joined: Dec 20, 2015
     

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles Lakers (19-44) @ Dallas Mavericks (26-36) - 8:30 PM ET 

Post#51 » by danfantastk32 » Thu Mar 9, 2017 5:54 am

tugs wrote:Basing on this game, I really don't think Russell and Clarkson can coexist as long as Russ is PG and JC is the designated scorer. I like any combo of JC-Nwaba/Ennis and DLo-Nwaba/Ennis.

I like Nwaba-DLo starting and Ennis-JC.


If we do end up keeping our pick, and get a new PG.....I would not be surprised if Russell get's moved. I think he's the guy you can get the most value for. I think he's decent, but he's prob never going to be a top-8 pg in the league. If half this new class lives up to expectations, he may never crack top 10. So what do you have, realistically?

Especially if he thinks he's worth more, and want's some fat contract. You really gonna dump $18-22 mil on some middle-pack PG? Still a chance to grow...but if we do get that pick, I wouldn't be surprised to hear D'angelo is being shopped around.
LakersSoul
Head Coach
Posts: 7,100
And1: 4,967
Joined: Jul 03, 2016

Re: Game 64: Los Angeles Lakers (19-44) @ Dallas Mavericks (26-36) - 8:30 PM ET 

Post#52 » by LakersSoul » Thu Mar 9, 2017 11:48 am

mcscotty wrote:The Mavs have done a better job than us at piecing together young talent and they haven't even missed the playoffs.


Too bad we couldnt land Barnes instead of Deng. That would have been a huge upgrade and he is only 24. He could have been a key member of the building program...

Dallas has had a good year signing Barnes, Curry, then trading for Noel. Barnes and Noel will be the cornerstone after Dirk retires. They will not miss a beat. Damn it Jim!!

Not Yo Ham Lakers!

The Don and The King!

Return to Los Angeles Lakers