
Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
Moderator: THE J0KER
Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Cold Hard Gameday Facts
- Posts: 15,607
- And1: 8,991
- Joined: Jun 15, 2008
- Location: France
-
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 10,390
- And1: 4,124
- Joined: Oct 28, 2015
- Location: Cheyenne, WY
-
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
Probably no Jokic - does not look good for the Nuggets. Biggest question in my mind is who is going to stop Bradley & Thomas? Harris can do a good job on one of them, but Nelson? I don't think so. It's not his forte.
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 220
- And1: 255
- Joined: Feb 20, 2017
-
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
How about protecting that 4th quarter lead for a change? Let's go Nugs!
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 220
- And1: 255
- Joined: Feb 20, 2017
-
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
Plumlee may not be producing as much as Nurkic, but he has really helped our cause tonight.
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 220
- And1: 255
- Joined: Feb 20, 2017
-
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
Nugs are dodging a lot of bullets out there. Too many open looks for Boston.
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 220
- And1: 255
- Joined: Feb 20, 2017
-
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
This one's in the bag! First time i've seen Hibbert in action and actually score in a Nugs uniform.
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,920
- And1: 25,281
- Joined: Jun 27, 2014
-
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
Oof. Nice win guys. Jokic is a machine. You got a cornerstone there.
See you next season. (Or, in the Finals.)
See you next season. (Or, in the Finals.)
Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,444
- And1: 642
- Joined: Dec 28, 2004
-
Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
Boston missed a bunch of shots but we played good D and physical down the stretch. Why can't these guys produce this effort more consistently
P.S. Does Malone get any calls? Seems like he can't work the refs for anything
P.S. Does Malone get any calls? Seems like he can't work the refs for anything
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
- bwgood77
- Global Mod
- Posts: 97,960
- And1: 60,907
- Joined: Feb 06, 2009
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
-
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
What a game. Jokic was crazy good again. Gallinari, Chandler, Murray, Barton and Plumlee all solid as well.
When asked how Fascism starts, Bertrand Russell once said:
"First, they fascinate the fools. Then, they muzzle the intelligent."
"First, they fascinate the fools. Then, they muzzle the intelligent."
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
- Posts: 14,089
- And1: 5,449
- Joined: Jun 02, 2014
-
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
SMTBSI wrote:Oof. Nice win guys. Jokic is a machine. You got a cornerstone there.
See you next season. (Or, in the Finals.)
Well, THAT was FUN
Next season it is cuz we both know this is the last game vs. the C's this year. Good luck for the rest of the season.
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose
Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Senior
- Posts: 749
- And1: 440
- Joined: Nov 14, 2009
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
SMTBSI wrote:Oof. Nice win guys. Jokic is a machine. You got a cornerstone there.
See you next season. (Or, in the Finals.)
We appreciate you coming around but it also makes me remember, where are all those celtics fans who were around here talking about how much we were over-valuing Nurkic?
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 10,390
- And1: 4,124
- Joined: Oct 28, 2015
- Location: Cheyenne, WY
-
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
SoCalNuggsFan wrote:SMTBSI wrote:Oof. Nice win guys. Jokic is a machine. You got a cornerstone there.
See you next season. (Or, in the Finals.)
We appreciate you coming around but it also makes me remember, where are all those celtics fans who were around here talking about how much we were over-valuing Nurkic?
That's not a nice thing to say; true, but sounds like a "sore winner". (In RealGM terms, it's close to trolling/baiting.) Let's play nice with others please.
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Junior
- Posts: 452
- And1: 169
- Joined: Jan 02, 2017
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
I am amazed at production Celtics are able to get out of their roster, I wish Nuggets were half as successful.
Boston should have traded for Nurk for sure he is exactly what they need. It would have been a huge upgrade for them.
Boston should have traded for Nurk for sure he is exactly what they need. It would have been a huge upgrade for them.
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,041
- And1: 12,852
- Joined: Jul 15, 2013
- Location: Ogden, UT
-
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
Super impressed with Jokic. I knew he was a stud, but the ball handling and passing is really nice. hope you guys can continue to build a nice team.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,041
- And1: 12,852
- Joined: Jul 15, 2013
- Location: Ogden, UT
-
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
Acountant_Z wrote:I am amazed at production Celtics are able to get out of their roster, I wish Nuggets were half as successful.
Boston should have traded for Nurk for sure he is exactly what they need. It would have been a huge upgrade for them.
I was surprised the Cs didn't. I know they have Zizic coming over and you don't want too many guys with names that end with a c, but sure could have used Nurkic and it appears we could have put forth a competitive offer. Also he would not have crushed the free agent dream cap space wise. Oh well.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 10,390
- And1: 4,124
- Joined: Oct 28, 2015
- Location: Cheyenne, WY
-
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
brackdan70 wrote:Acountant_Z wrote:I am amazed at production Celtics are able to get out of their roster, I wish Nuggets were half as successful.
Boston should have traded for Nurk for sure he is exactly what they need. It would have been a huge upgrade for them.
I was surprised the Cs didn't. I know they have Zizic coming over and you don't want too many guys with names that end with a c, but sure could have used Nurkic and it appears we could have put forth a competitive offer. Also he would not have crushed the free agent dream cap space wise. Oh well.
Totally agree with you, but Nuggets' posters have been told in no uncertain terms by enough Boston fans that we are idiots for think Nurkic has any real value and that (slight exaggeration coming) Zizic will be the greatest center in the history of basketball.


brackdan70 wrote:Super impressed with Jokic. I knew he was a stud, but the ball handling and passing is really nice. hope you guys can continue to build a nice team.
I agree with Acountant_Z that I look for the Nuggets to be half as successful in building, as the Celtics have been.
What Acountant_Z didn't say is that I'm also looking forward to seeing the Nuggets kick the Celtics right out of a championship series.

Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 131
- And1: 60
- Joined: Mar 11, 2017
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
I was very impressed with your victory last night. I don't understand why Murray isn't starting though. I had him as the 2nd best player in last year's draft. When he gets erratic minutes you get erratic production. He's still very young and the future is bright for him. He and Jokic are two outstanding building blocks. It looks like Plumlee has been a nice addition. Too bad you couldn't work things out with Nurkic but at least now you have a guy who knows his place, plays hard, and is seemingly more team oriented. If you play like you did last night you will be a very tough out in the playoffs.
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
- Galloisdaman
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,674
- And1: 2,171
- Joined: Mar 17, 2011
Re: Game 65: Boston Celtics (41-24) @ Denver Nuggets (29-35) - 9:00 PM ET
I want this team to make the playoffs. They are really coming around.
Jucic is waking up the NBA
Gallo is quietly having a strong season where he is becoming even more efficient. His shooting keeps rising.
Chandler despite possibly saying some dumb stuff is playing very well also.
Muarry is going to be very good.
Harris plays both ends of the court.
Bring on the Warriors!!!
Jucic is waking up the NBA
Gallo is quietly having a strong season where he is becoming even more efficient. His shooting keeps rising.
Chandler despite possibly saying some dumb stuff is playing very well also.
Muarry is going to be very good.
Harris plays both ends of the court.
Bring on the Warriors!!!
My eyes glaze over when reading alternative stat (not advanced stat) narratives that go many paragraphs long. If you can not make your point in 2 paragraphs it may not be a great point. 
