MathiasPW wrote:Not completely sure in regards to stats, but I think Len/Williams is a better duo complementing each other than Chandler/Williams or Chandler/Len.
Williams substitutes Chandler rebounding fairly well and provides value in the offensive end, while Len is a better rim protector than Chandler. We could use Len/Williams in more different scenarios within a game that any of the other combos.
I agree that in terms of what they bring to the table on the court, Len/Williams is better. If you factor in leadership, Chandler/Williams might come out on top. And if we did draft a center, then that pushes me entirely towards Chandler/Williams.
I think we can get a second or two for Len's RFA rights... I've expressed this before: if Len does not receive a hefty offer, we'd be in a position to match his contract without much difficulty. An RFA bidder, knowing this, might offer us a second or two in order to get us to hand Alex over. If Alex did receive a substantial offer, then we'd have to choose between Alex and Tyson - again, the central issue for me at that point becomes whether we just drafted a center.
When looking at C prospects, IMO, the most important factor is physical tools, and the second most important is mental makeup. Robert Williams nearly matches Hassan Whiteside's height and wingspan, jumps higher, but isn't an **** like Hassan, is a better passer, and is possibly still growing. So, yeah, I'm really hyped on him. For me, this draft is all about the 1 and 5 spots. I'm lower on Ball and Smith than many, but higher on Ntilikina than most. I'm also sensitive to the notion that if we draft a guard, ideally, they guard would be able to guard both 1s and 2s. Fultz and Ntilikina fit that profile. Ball and Smith do not. Plus, with Ball or Smith, we'd be forced to move Bledsoe pretty much immediately, whereas Ntilikina can be developed more slowly.