pepe1991 wrote:SOUL wrote:Darth Magic wrote:The AG and Elf experiment will take us nowhere. I'm not extending either and would look to trade them both. Its so sad that there is no one on this roster who looks like they even have the potential to be a star
We've looked better with them running and involved in the offense then any point during the Vucevic/Fournier experiment as our top scorers.
There is no way Fournier is a top player on this team this season, I'm sorry. Not even in the world of alternative facts.
I'm not sure what are you trying to argue tho.
Evan is best offensive player for a Magic by literally all criterion.
He is leader in PPG , his potential assists are high, him, despite having down year, still has highest TS% among starters.
You could argue that he can't be first offensive option and that argument nobody ever will try to fight againt, but he still is head and shoulders better offensive player than Payton and Gordon .
What metrics do you use when you say " we looked better with them running and involved in the offense then any point during Vučevic/Fournier experiment" ? You use post allstar numbers to praise Payton ( especially ones when Vučević was out) and in same time we will just ignore that in that period STILL lead team in points ( 18 ppg ) on 46% FG and 40% for 3 ?There is no way Fournier is a top player on this team this season, I'm sorry. Not even in the world of alternative facts.
So who is? Elfrid Payton, 12 ppg ,5,9 apg player who makes lot of defensive mistakes, who had best month of basketball in January, where "his" team lost 12 of 16 games? With below average efficiency and putrid 3 point shooting.
Or it's clear that by efficiency, and raw PPG leader of this team is 17 ppg , 3,2 rpg, 3,2 apg player who at least is league average at efficiency and who , unlike Payton, could at least be starter or 6th man on some contending team.
That's actually all highly disputable. The goal should be for the offense to score at an efficient rate. Any player's specific metrics don't necessarily reflect the team's metrics while said player is on the floor. The team has a higher ORtg when Payton is on the floor than when Fournier is on the floor. The team is actually worse when Fournier is on the floor than when he isn't, due to the significant decline in defense. His counting stats are relatively impressive on this roster because he accumulates the largest share of the minutes. Everyone looks better when they are afforded the playing time to let their per game averages more accurately reflect their per 36 minutes.
It's fairly obvious that coaches like Fournier a lot. He has been given more freedom on the floor than any other player on the roster under both Vogel and Skiles, but that doesn't necessarily mean he has been the most productive player on the team. I'm fairly certain that Fournier could be a much more efficient player in another situation that could create more set shots for him, but we are paying him an awful lot of money to be more than that. At best, I suspect he will be a floor spacer on a good team that can mask his defensive deficiencies by utilizing him in favorable situations. Those types of players don't get paid anywhere near 17 million per year though.
I know that the modern NBA analytics trend is in love with TS%, but the team metrics over the last couple years have pretty clearly established that we have a few other pieces on the roster that are far more conducive to our winning games.