State of the Board (Brewers/Cubs Issues)

brewcityboii · Post #21 » by **brewcityboii** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:39 pm

mattbulls wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

The Brewers may have a better record but they aren't the better team, but I will admit they have the pieces to be really really good in the future.

Good Thing Ned Yost is losing games on purpose so the Cubs will still win the division.

Interseting. What is the cubs Record against Plus .500 teams and what is the brewers record.

Where do the cubs/brewers rank in runs scored and runs against.
Where do the cubs/brewers rank in Team pitching.

Traditionally all those #'s added up usually will let you know the better team. So go look and than make statements.

SportsWorld · Post #22 » by **SportsWorld** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:41 pm

Alright brewcity move along. This is exactly why GYBE made this topic.

mattbulls · Post #23 » by **mattbulls** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:46 pm

brewcityboii wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Interseting. What is the cubs Record against Plus .500 teams and what is the brewers record.

Where do the cubs/brewers rank in runs scored and runs against.
Where do the cubs/brewers rank in Team pitching.

Traditionally all those #'s added up usually will let you know the better team. So go look and than make statements.

What's the head to head record?

brewcityboii · Post #24 » by **brewcityboii** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:51 pm

SportsWorld wrote:Alright brewcity move along. This is exactly why GYBE made this topic.

So as soon as I prove my point I am considered being a troll or something. All we were doing here was having a civil talk about the race and about our teams. And it is a problem to you because why???

I was under the impression that he made the topic to see if people had a problem with brewer fans on cubs boards and vica versa.

So please enlighten me.

brewcityboii · Post #25 » by **brewcityboii** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:53 pm

What's the head to head record?

5-7 not to big of a difference there boss

2poor · Post #26 » by **2poor** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:54 pm

Kind of funny that he'd say that though.

Yeah, the Brewers have scored more runs (446 v. 421), but go ahead and look at the other stats.

Cubs have allowed less runs (379 v. 405). Difference of 26 runs, which kind of negates the fact that the Brewers have scored more runs.

Team batting, Cubs: .270, Brewers .265

Team pitching, Cubs ERA: 3.89, Milwaukee: 4.10. Cubs have the second-lowest BAA, Brewers are 6th.

Brewers have committed more errors (66 v. 52)

I could really go on and on. They mentioned this on ESPN so you picked a bad time to contend that the numbers were in the Brewers favor whatsoever. Look at the stats yourself, they tell an entirely different story.

mattbulls · Post #27 » by **mattbulls** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:55 pm

Neither is 3.5 games.

Oh and don't throw out sarcastic nick-names like "boss" if we are having a civil conversation.

brewcityboii · Post #28 » by **brewcityboii** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:55 pm

Please send me a link to where you found the team pitching stat cause the one on mlb.com is different.

2poor · Post #29 » by **2poor** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:57 pm

brewcityboii wrote:Please send me a link to where you found the team pitching stat cause the one on mlb.com is different.

click

SportsWorld · Post #30 » by **SportsWorld** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:58 pm

Cubs Hit List:
Milwaukee (7), Washington(6), Chicago White Sox (5), Atlanta, (4), Pittsburgh (4), Houston (4), Colorado (3), St. Louis (3), San Diego (3), Cincinnati (2), Seattle (2), Philadelphia, New York Mets, Los Angeles Dodgers, Texas, San Francisco

brewcityboii · Post #31 » by **brewcityboii** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:59 pm

But I am off to the Game now so you all have a good nite and have fun against the most overpaid pitcher in the NL

2poor · Post #32 » by **2poor** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:00 pm

Post #33 » by **GYBE** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:32 pm

See, this isn't that bad. As long as the back-and-forth is about the teams and players instead of personal insults, we're all cool.

Ayt · Post #34 » by **Ayt** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:36 pm

I like this page to look at standings and what teams "should" have in terms of wins and losses. Its as tight as a virgin in the NL central right now.

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/stati ... ndings.php

Ruben Douglas · Post #35 » by **Ruben Douglas** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:24 pm

I think the banter is good and fun. I've lived in Milwaukee my whole life and am a fan of both teams...it was easy when they were in different leagues. Obviously when it comes down to it I'm cheering for the Cubs but it's fun to post on both boards.
As a big Milwaukee Bucks fan I see the same posters over there that also post on the Brewers board.
I just want to warn everyone that at times these same posters may tend to take things more personal than the average poster. There isn't anything necessarily wrong with that but it can/might turn a little ugly at times.

WEFFPIM · Post #36 » by **WEFFPIM** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:57 am

Can't we all just get along?

Post #37 » by **Wade-A-Holic** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:13 am

willeatfire4playoffsinmil wrote:Can't we all just get along?

Are you really asking "Sewers" and "Scrubs" fans to get along right now? Good luck.

Howling Mad · Post #38 » by **Howling Mad** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:15 am

Ayt wrote:I like this page to look at standings and what teams "should" have in terms of wins and losses. Its as tight as a virgin in the NL central right now.

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/stati ... ndings.php

State of the Board (Brewers/Cubs Issues)

Should I be removing reported posts?