randomhero423 wrote:reyes deserved to start. defintely. so did wright. (although m-cab is much better). beltran didn't.
here's hanley's #'s.
Batting 1st: .361 8 HR 19 RBI 17 2b, 5 3b. .433 OBP 205 at bats.
Batting 3rd: .297 6 HR, 18 RBI, 8 2b, 0 3b. .331 OBP 165 at bats.
So it is evident he's asked for more of a power swing when he's 3rd and not first. Reyes plays his role, and so does Hanley. Which makes both uncomparable stats wise.
And Hanley is overlooked by Met fans for two reasons. One he's in FL and no publicity. Two he's terrible vs us.
His career vs the NYM: .214 avg, 4 HR, 9 rbi, 30 SO, 14 R, 133 atbats.
You're the first person here to actually come up with some data and information to base your opinion on. I like that. But I disagree....just because they don't have identical roles doesn't mean you can't say one is better than the other. A batter is a batter....whatever your role is, you have to produce. And they both have great production.
The only thing I can admit to is...since their stats are SO CLOSE, it's hard to say one is better than the other. But my purpose is not to make everyone believe that Hanley>Reyes....it's the fact that Hanley is SO under the radar (wasn't even IN the All-Star game) that bothers me.
I'm not trying to say Furcal is better than Reyes...that's not an argument....if you really think I'm crazy for saying Hanley is better than Reyes than you're either biased or don't know baseball because it is certainly arguable. Not fact, but arguable.