Twenty Seconds Of The Insane Defense Tucker Puts On Players

Risk101 · Post #1 » by **Risk101** » Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:12 pm

How much money is PJ going to command in free agency?!

https://streamable.com/jvjtn

Kurtz · Post #2 » by **Kurtz** » Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:17 pm

We can't let this man leave.

Drop Shot · Post #3 » by **Drop Shot** » Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:17 pm

Matty · Post #4 » by **Matty** » Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:17 pm

Now compare that with Demar's effort in that same sequence. Gets trapped on screens almost all the time.

Post #5 » by **Duffman100** » Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:52 pm

Matty wrote:Now compare that with Demar's effort in that same sequence. Gets trapped on screens almost all the time.

Hater.

C_Money · Post #6 » by **C_Money** » Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:56 pm

What are the odds of re-signing all 3 of Lowry, Ibaka and Tucker?

vaff87 · Post #7 » by **vaff87** » Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:57 pm

Duffman100 wrote:
Matty wrote:Now compare that with Demar's effort in that same sequence. Gets trapped on screens almost all the time.

Hater.

Not to mention DeMar has to expend much more energy on offense than Tucker, and plays 10-12 more minutes a game.

Jonn · Post #8 » by **Jonn** » Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:58 pm

Risk101 wrote:How much money is PJ going to command in free agency?!

https://streamable.com/jvjtn

Completely suffocated George. He's tenacious as hell. It's a mindset of trying to make the other guy as miserable as possible. It's such a rare skill in today's league. He's definitely going to get paid especially if we make a deep run.

Risk101 · Post #9 » by **Risk101** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:02 am

C_Money wrote:What are the odds of re-signing all 3 of Lowry, Ibaka and Tucker?

Trading away JV and Carroll would improve those odds.

Post #10 » by **JaysRule15** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:05 am

Would have to move CoJo, Carroll and likely JV if we want to keep Ibaka, Lowry and Tucker. Patterson would also be tough to re-sign unless he's willing to take a discount.

TackyRapsFan · Post #11 » by **TackyRapsFan** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:06 am

Most of that is just effort. It's rare to see a man so tenacious on defense.

He is an absolute must keep. I want to keep him, Kyle, pat and serge lol

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Mack11 · Post #12 » by **Mack11** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:09 am

Matty · Post #13 » by **Matty** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:18 am

vaff87 wrote:
Duffman100 wrote:
Matty wrote:Now compare that with Demar's effort in that same sequence. Gets trapped on screens almost all the time.

Hater.

Not to mention DeMar has to expend much more energy on offense than Tucker, and plays 10-12 more minutes a game.

PG, Kawhi, or Butler (similar positional players) don't seem to have problems getting stuck on screens continuously. They're also expected to play loads of minutes and produce lots of points. Why are you apologising for DeMar's weaknesses? why don't you just call it for what it is instead of playing the victim card every time reasonable posters like me or Boogie points it out.

Bankai · Post #14 » by **Bankai** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:25 am

Would MLSE be willing to even resign Lowry, Ibaka, Tucker, and Patterson unless this was a Championship season? I doubt it.

Mister Ze · Post #15 » by **Mister Ze** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:26 am

Gonna be almost impossible to move Demarre.

LiSTWithLani · Post #16 » by **LiSTWithLani** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:29 am

Matty wrote:
vaff87 wrote:
Duffman100 wrote:
Hater.

Not to mention DeMar has to expend much more energy on offense than Tucker, and plays 10-12 more minutes a game.

PG, Kawhi, or Butler (similar positional players) don't seem to have problems getting stuck on screens continuously. They're also expected to play loads of minutes and produce lots of points. Why are you apologising for DeMar's weaknesses? why don't you just call it for what it is instead of playing the victim card every time reasonable posters like me or Boogie points it out.

Absolutely agree!

Defense is heavily based on effort. Yes, physical measurements and a basketball IQ factor in.

Not putting in 100% effort on every play should result in your bum being seated here:

Raptors_Dynasty · Post #17 » by **Raptors_Dynasty** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:32 am

Mack11 wrote:

JusReign the goat

Post #18 » by **Double Helix** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:35 am

1) Fronts him just enough to dissuade the pass knowing how hard the over the top pass would be to make.

2) Sees the play develop and cuts right through economically knowing that the screener would have to move substantially to clip him.

3) Catches back up, spins off a screen narrowly avoiding it.

4) Crowds George with that trademark slow, intimidating step by step approach to him while in his stance.

6) Somehow is still able to move his feet well enough to back pedal against an athlete of Paul George's caliber and avoids a foul.
7) Still puts forth an impressive shot contest despite all the back pedaling.

That's just awesome. You can literally sense Paul George's frustration with him as the play develops. Like a fly he can't shake.

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

visionquest · Post #19 » by **visionquest** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:45 am

Couldnt stop laughing watching Tucker's old school D.

His defensive instincts are sublime.

VinBaker6 · Post #20 » by **VinBaker6** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:46 am

Matty wrote:
vaff87 wrote:
Duffman100 wrote:
Hater.

Not to mention DeMar has to expend much more energy on offense than Tucker, and plays 10-12 more minutes a game.

PG, Kawhi, or Butler (similar positional players) don't seem to have problems getting stuck on screens continuously. They're also expected to play loads of minutes and produce lots of points. Why are you apologising for DeMar's weaknesses? why don't you just call it for what it is instead of playing the victim card every time reasonable posters like me or Boogie points it out.

How's Ross doing in Orlando? Haven't checked on him in a while.